Don't accept the premise of this. During the cold War, being a communist was sufficient to refuse an alien's entrance. To actively work for communism was sufficient to get you banned or imprisoned. freedom of speech isn't a right for invaders to attack us citizens, destroy property or deny free movement of non protesters. Our rights aren't a suicide pact.
The guy's point though - they had the choice of all the much easier target protestors, but why did they pick this particular protestor with such an "interesting" background?
Perhaps because his previous associations make him a perfect example of why we have the right to eject foreign actors? He's a great precedent. And the evidence is strong that he actually works for a foreign government.
Assange is not a comparable case. He wasn't here and if there is a comparison, it's the Pentagon papers.
One of the reasons Julian Assange got released was the lack of clarity as to whether the First Amendment does or does not apply to a non-US-citizen.
This Mahmoud guy seems an unlikely pick for a test case - seems he could have been or still is working for the British. It's certainly not what it seems, just a regular troublemaker being kicked out of US.
Okay, is it just me? This article presupposes that UK and the US are allies in what is going on. I think that's the first erroneous assumption, imo. Though I should clarify. The guy worked as a contractor for MI6. Yes, CIA and MI6 are allies. But that does not mean the USA and the UK are allies. These are deep state guys, imo, and the Trump ICE people have honed in on this guy. Of course there's a reason though we don't know what it is. But I think premise two in this guy's article is the most plausible: "2) He was never pro-Palestinian but was infiltrating the protest movement for the British government"
The guys argument that it's #3 seems like straight up trying to sell us a BS narrative: "3) He was not very political but was moved recently to activism by the genocide in Gaza
Of these, option 3) seems to me the most plausible, though all are certainly possible."
I'm not buying that. At all. Seems to me the best interests of America are served by rounding up and dealing with ALL of the deep state assets in all of their various cubby holes: academia, USAID, military, SES, etc, etc.
If this is a chess move to start the reveal that the UK is NOT our friend, that would not surprise me at all. Just as Zelenskyy going running to his UK puppetmasters when he pisses off President Trump shows that the UK is not our friend. (Not the British people, of course. I'm talking about the people controlling the UK and torturing their own people.)
This explains why there's the story that ICE released all the previously caught people from the first round. Remember they said that the first round was "the most violent".
I now wonder how many of those "violent" ones were assets that got scooped up. Can't just release the assets without drawing attention so release them all at least gives them some obscurity.
This guy is a radical. He is a leader. And you remove leaders above all else. What is so hard to figure out?
This article splits hairs a lot, yet never mentions if this guy is Shia or Sunni. The Sunni, which make up about 80% of Islam, are usually the ones that are fervently against the existence of other beliefs. Isn't that the buried lead? I guess I am splitting hairs... And the author is not that talented.
It is obvious he was arrested, so why waste time on agonizing and splitting hairs over the motives of this dude, and the motives of law enforcement? And wondering what sect they are in? Birds of a feather flock together, leading the predominate extremists to control the Muslims hive. Simple as that...
This Khalil is a leader, and is just like Islamic radicals everywhere, are contradictory and duplicit, for sake of confusion it causes, to further Islamic aims. Cut the head off the snake is always sound logic. Deport him after the usual cursory legal things our Constitution requires. And never come back Jack.
Bottom line, Islam is always on the march, and where opportunity exists, it will spread like an invasive infestation, and the Christians, being tolerant souls, will allow this scurge to flourish in their backyards.
Isn't it a beautiful thing to be able to spread their ideology on college campuses, and have this virus spread by our very own American brainwashed youth far and wide across America. And what should we expect from our friggin education "system". We need to cut the head off the snakes. All of them, Marxists included. That might decimate the education system for awhile. KEK
same as Khashogi and that Russian guy the media got butthurt about
anytime the media makes a big deal, assume it's a spy
Don't accept the premise of this. During the cold War, being a communist was sufficient to refuse an alien's entrance. To actively work for communism was sufficient to get you banned or imprisoned. freedom of speech isn't a right for invaders to attack us citizens, destroy property or deny free movement of non protesters. Our rights aren't a suicide pact.
Not disagreeing with you at all
The guy's point though - they had the choice of all the much easier target protestors, but why did they pick this particular protestor with such an "interesting" background?
Simple. He is a radical islamic leader in a sheep's disguise. Let get rid of the one's stirring the pot.
Perhaps because his previous associations make him a perfect example of why we have the right to eject foreign actors? He's a great precedent. And the evidence is strong that he actually works for a foreign government.
Assange is not a comparable case. He wasn't here and if there is a comparison, it's the Pentagon papers.
Yet the (communists) still took over.
One of the reasons Julian Assange got released was the lack of clarity as to whether the First Amendment does or does not apply to a non-US-citizen.
This Mahmoud guy seems an unlikely pick for a test case - seems he could have been or still is working for the British. It's certainly not what it seems, just a regular troublemaker being kicked out of US.
Now we have Mi-6 agent provocateurs to deal with, as if the FBI and CIA don’t have enough here already.
Why was a British Intelligence Asset, recruited to foment violence in his home country, permitted to come here?
Okay, is it just me? This article presupposes that UK and the US are allies in what is going on. I think that's the first erroneous assumption, imo. Though I should clarify. The guy worked as a contractor for MI6. Yes, CIA and MI6 are allies. But that does not mean the USA and the UK are allies. These are deep state guys, imo, and the Trump ICE people have honed in on this guy. Of course there's a reason though we don't know what it is. But I think premise two in this guy's article is the most plausible: "2) He was never pro-Palestinian but was infiltrating the protest movement for the British government"
The guys argument that it's #3 seems like straight up trying to sell us a BS narrative: "3) He was not very political but was moved recently to activism by the genocide in Gaza
Of these, option 3) seems to me the most plausible, though all are certainly possible."
I'm not buying that. At all. Seems to me the best interests of America are served by rounding up and dealing with ALL of the deep state assets in all of their various cubby holes: academia, USAID, military, SES, etc, etc.
If this is a chess move to start the reveal that the UK is NOT our friend, that would not surprise me at all. Just as Zelenskyy going running to his UK puppetmasters when he pisses off President Trump shows that the UK is not our friend. (Not the British people, of course. I'm talking about the people controlling the UK and torturing their own people.)
This explains why there's the story that ICE released all the previously caught people from the first round. Remember they said that the first round was "the most violent".
I now wonder how many of those "violent" ones were assets that got scooped up. Can't just release the assets without drawing attention so release them all at least gives them some obscurity.
This guy is a radical. He is a leader. And you remove leaders above all else. What is so hard to figure out?
This article splits hairs a lot, yet never mentions if this guy is Shia or Sunni. The Sunni, which make up about 80% of Islam, are usually the ones that are fervently against the existence of other beliefs. Isn't that the buried lead? I guess I am splitting hairs... And the author is not that talented.
It is obvious he was arrested, so why waste time on agonizing and splitting hairs over the motives of this dude, and the motives of law enforcement? And wondering what sect they are in? Birds of a feather flock together, leading the predominate extremists to control the Muslims hive. Simple as that...
This Khalil is a leader, and is just like Islamic radicals everywhere, are contradictory and duplicit, for sake of confusion it causes, to further Islamic aims. Cut the head off the snake is always sound logic. Deport him after the usual cursory legal things our Constitution requires. And never come back Jack.
Bottom line, Islam is always on the march, and where opportunity exists, it will spread like an invasive infestation, and the Christians, being tolerant souls, will allow this scurge to flourish in their backyards.
Isn't it a beautiful thing to be able to spread their ideology on college campuses, and have this virus spread by our very own American brainwashed youth far and wide across America. And what should we expect from our friggin education "system". We need to cut the head off the snakes. All of them, Marxists included. That might decimate the education system for awhile. KEK
Ah, I suspected there was something important about this guy when Trump said he was "the first arrest"
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AdzA1lJd/guardian--trump-calls-arrest-of-/c/
brit spy huh.