The surveys they received asked several questions including whether the researchers had received funding from China, and if their university had recognised only two sexes - male and female.
I guess we're still funding plenty of research in Australian universities, just not the universities that support the trooning. It's a start, but what else are we continuing to fund? So many millions of our tax dollars thrown all over the world.
The concept is not entirely corrupt. If the research is serving the interests or aims of the American government, then its legitimate for the US govt to fund that research. But NOT if it doesn't benefit American, the objectives and interests of the American people.
Or if it violates the American mandate. Which you know a lot of the research is going to be doing.
Well, research (clinical, academic, etc) isn't just a matter of manufacturing. It's also usually free market. Someone has to want to do the research, particularly if its innovative areas.
Sometimes, it's just that people in X country are specializing in Y type of research.
To inspire or motivate people to do certain types of research, you normally would use grants of some form or description. Think Fauci and NHS.
Also, a LOT of American research organs (i.e. corporations, academic institutions like universities) have been corrupted.
Then again, if your objective is to fund anti-human (aka globalist) research, or to bankrupt the country you are supposed to be working for, then obviously funding overseas research can be corrupted to achieve those goals.
Anyway, the administration put a survey to the recipients, and used that to distinguish between what it considers legit researchers and bad, or bogus, researchers.
Anyway, I think its likely to just be a step in the process. Like reestablishing the manufacturing sector in the US, Maga Administration is going to want to re-establish or reignite American research operations.
Last week after it was revealed the universities had been asked to justify their funding, the National Tertiary Education Union called on the government to "guarantee Australian researchers would be protected".
"The federal government must push back on the Trump administration's blatant foreign interference in our independent research in the strongest possible terms," NTEU president Alison Barnes said.
Bloody hell. How brain dead can you get?
The US government was funding various forms of research, which is a legitimate use of funds if the research directly benefits or serves the aims of the American government, to serve the American people.
But there's no way one can call a decision to NOT fund certain types of research as "interference in our independent research". If it's independent, then you don't need someone else's funding.
But you just know that the research that was being funded wasn't serving the American people. Probably doing research on how a mob of kangaroos respond to gender reassignment surgery, or such stupid stuff.
They are panicking and having emergency meetings on how to respond to Trump 45~47. I know how they better respond. Ok, thank you to all the Americans who have supported us. Maybe in the future, we can return the favors to you.
It's necessary. It's absolutely necessary for him to cut off the money flow. I just sincerely hope that he's able to do enough and his term so that we can get lasting change.
So Trump’s defunding of AUSTRALIAN universities is viewed as interference in their research? Not as long as we are funding you it isn’t. Simple, DJT endedvthe funding, so no more “interference”, you can do as you please with your “research”.
"The federal government must push back on the Trump administration's blatant foreign interference in our independent research in the strongest possible terms," NTEU president Alison Barnes said.
I guess we're still funding plenty of research in Australian universities, just not the universities that support the trooning. It's a start, but what else are we continuing to fund? So many millions of our tax dollars thrown all over the world.
When Trump paused USAID for 3 months, all kinds of junk rises to the surface
The concept is not entirely corrupt. If the research is serving the interests or aims of the American government, then its legitimate for the US govt to fund that research. But NOT if it doesn't benefit American, the objectives and interests of the American people.
Or if it violates the American mandate. Which you know a lot of the research is going to be doing.
So why can't we do that right here? Employing Americans and spending the money locally?
Well, research (clinical, academic, etc) isn't just a matter of manufacturing. It's also usually free market. Someone has to want to do the research, particularly if its innovative areas.
Sometimes, it's just that people in X country are specializing in Y type of research.
To inspire or motivate people to do certain types of research, you normally would use grants of some form or description. Think Fauci and NHS.
Also, a LOT of American research organs (i.e. corporations, academic institutions like universities) have been corrupted.
Then again, if your objective is to fund anti-human (aka globalist) research, or to bankrupt the country you are supposed to be working for, then obviously funding overseas research can be corrupted to achieve those goals.
Anyway, the administration put a survey to the recipients, and used that to distinguish between what it considers legit researchers and bad, or bogus, researchers.
Anyway, I think its likely to just be a step in the process. Like reestablishing the manufacturing sector in the US, Maga Administration is going to want to re-establish or reignite American research operations.
Bloody hell. How brain dead can you get?
The US government was funding various forms of research, which is a legitimate use of funds if the research directly benefits or serves the aims of the American government, to serve the American people.
But there's no way one can call a decision to NOT fund certain types of research as "interference in our independent research". If it's independent, then you don't need someone else's funding.
But you just know that the research that was being funded wasn't serving the American people. Probably doing research on how a mob of kangaroos respond to gender reassignment surgery, or such stupid stuff.
How can she even put “interfering in our independent research’ in the same sentence? They’re about as independent as lice.
☝️. This!
That's some real money.
Cancel everything, see who squeals.
THEN decide if it's worth it.
I thought I knew all about the fuckery, but then even more surfaces that surprises me.
Cut?! ELIMINATE!!
They are panicking and having emergency meetings on how to respond to Trump 45~47. I know how they better respond. Ok, thank you to all the Americans who have supported us. Maybe in the future, we can return the favors to you.
I know we are the funding money machine for the whole world. It is so unfortunately that we have to see through the auditing process from Dodge.
It's necessary. It's absolutely necessary for him to cut off the money flow. I just sincerely hope that he's able to do enough and his term so that we can get lasting change.
So Trump’s defunding of AUSTRALIAN universities is viewed as interference in their research? Not as long as we are funding you it isn’t. Simple, DJT endedvthe funding, so no more “interference”, you can do as you please with your “research”.
Libtards will scream.
We just have too much money. We need to give it all away to fund "cross functional genitalia for trans-universe nationals at Area 51."
"Are We Funding the Whole World?!?"
Yes. Ever since the end of WWII.
u/#wtf