I. Historical Background
The Khazars were a Turkic people whose ruling class converted to Judaism in the 8th–9th century—not out of spiritual conviction, but as a geopolitical maneuver to stay neutral between the Christian and Islamic empires.
After the collapse of their empire, many are believed to have migrated west into Eastern Europe, blending with local Jewish communities, forming a distinct elite with a Jewish identity but secular ambitions.
II. Religion as a Shield, Not a Compass
This group did not descend from the ancient tribes of Israel, nor did they carry the spiritual foundations of Torah-based Judaism.
Jewish identity became a protective cloak:
Used to deflect criticism (e.g., labeling dissent as “antisemitic”).
Used to claim victimhood or moral legitimacy when pursuing political, financial, or global agendas.
True Judaism—based on humility, justice, and covenant—is often in direct opposition to the actions and ethics of these elites.
III. Secular Operation of Power
The Khazarian-descended or ideologically aligned elite operate as a network of secular, globalist actors:
Finance: Central banks, IMF, BIS, major private banks.
Media: Control over mainstream news, entertainment, and publishing.
Politics: Influence over national governments, think tanks, and lobby groups.
NGOs & Foundations: Used to steer public policy and reshape society from the top down.
Their actions are guided by:
Strategic interest, not faith.
Material control, not moral leadership.
Preservation of power, not public good.
IV. Key Characteristics of the Network
Tightly coordinated: Interconnected through bloodlines, intermarriage, foundations, and secret societies.
Global in scope: Not loyal to any one country—loyal to a transnational system of control.
Ideologically deceptive: Presents itself as humanitarian, inclusive, or “chosen,” while acting through manipulation, exploitation, and coercion.
V. Distinction That Matters
This isn’t about “the Jews.” It’s about a secular elite that uses Jewish identity as a tool, and does not represent the values or lineage of spiritual Israel or observant Judaism.
The danger lies in:
Conflating this group with all Jews (which is false and dangerous).
Ignoring their true motives by focusing only on surface identities.
tl;dr - The Biblical Edomite synagogue of Satan mentioned in Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 where Jesus Christ speaks of Jews that are masquerading as Jews but aren't really Jews:
Revelation 2:9 - I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 3:9 - I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars—I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
BIBLICAL
WE ARE LIVING IN BIBLICAL TIMES
IT'S GOING TO BE BIBLICAL
None of this accounts for the Talmud. Its evil.
The Talmud has nothing to do with the Bible. It came from Babylon while the Jews were exiled there from the Holy Land. Like where it is from--Babylon---it's origin is the pits of hell!
kind of, the modern days jews are a result of the some of the tribe of judah taking with them the ways of babylon when they where freed from babylonian captivity, those ways including ritual mixing and a meterlinial blood line which is diametrically opposed to the biblical Hebrews who opposed mixing of all kinds and where patrilineal
There are two talmuds, Babylonian and pre Babylonian. Together, they span something like 900 years. The talmuds are a collection of old wives tales, recipes, stories, scientific commentary that has, in at least some cases, been debunked, AND theological writings that are contradictory. Talmudic Jews do not follow the whole talmud but instead tend to focus on and study selected portions. Those portions,I believe, vary to some degree from sect to sect. The tendency of some to single certain verses out and apply them to an entire group of religiously observant people seems to me to be beneath the dignity of the GAW crowd who sometimes go so far as to snear at those who don't think critically for themselves. It is helpful to note that Jews can be a very intellectual bunch, analyzing issues down to the very smallest of details and unnecessarily so at times in my opinion. One passage I came across actually says that although"thus and such" is permissible, anyone who does it is wrong and should be beaten. Why bother?... But some do. I am of the mindset that Orthodox Judaism is plagued by the same phenomenon of sin that Christian denominations are plagued by whereby some evil individuals seek positions of power within a religious structure in order to take advantage of the vulnerable. This does not make all Orthodox Jews evil. I was once Catholic. That didn't make me what many in the priestly echelon were nor does it make all priests evil. The evangelical church has had similar issues.
Beat me to it!
The problem with that is that the English translations do not capture the REAL meaning of what Jesus was saying.
He was specifically talking to and about the "Judeans" (ALL people living in the Roman province of Judea during his lifetime were "Judeans"), who were PRETENDING to be Israelites, but were not.
They were CLAIMING to be children of Abraham, by which they meant children of God.
But Jesus knew that was a lie, which is why he called them out.
"Jew" is a word that came LONG AFTER Christ's time on Earth.
He was talking about fake Israelites (who are not jews at all), which makes the entire thing confusing.
The Israelites and Judahites (a part of the Israelite family) had mostly all been deported to Assyria and Babylon before Christ's time.
While they were gone, the Edomites moved into the former Kingdom of Judah, which became Judea, a Roman province once Rome conquered the area.
By Jesus' time, it was called Judea, and it was a "diverse" population, with mostly Edomites (i.e. modern day jews) and also some true Israelites/Judahites, and others, as well.
The people who were of the synagogue of Satan were the Edomites, the ancestors of modern day "jews." They were name-stealers and pretending to be "God's Chosen," but were in fact decendents of Esau/Edom, who God hated.
But they were pretending to be "of Abraham," and therefore Israelites.
But they were not.
They used their "Tradition of the Elders" religious ideas to try and destroy a true understanding of the Old Testament. This was early Judaism, NOT Christianity. These ideas later became the Talmud.
They were pretenders and deceivers.
THAT is why Jesus hated them.
They exist now just as they did then.
I have another comment in this thread that illustrates the distinction you made in a fun way, remaining biblically accurate for those that have a hard time following the Bible and bloodlines.
Maybe you've seen it. Maybe you haven't. If you have, watch it again. Great comment, fren.
After Cyrus of Persia conquered Babylon, Jews were allowed back to to Israel, some stayed and some went back. My background are the ones that stayed.
So are you saying St John was prophesizing in this part of Revelation? I ask this because this post says the Khazars became Jewish in the 8th century
Revelations is a prophetic book. I have often thought that the Khazerians were a part of those that John was speaking about
Makes sense to me & even if it corelates to a church or group back then, I find that God often speaks in triplicate. With one phrase can make 3 different prophecies spanning very different times. Makes a lot of sense. I just wanted clarity on that, Thank You fren !
You are most welcome.
I have had the exact same thought about the khazerians.