You can't simulate launch acceleration without a centrifuge (not involved) and you can't simulate weightlessness without a big airplane doing a porpoise dive (and only for 10s of seconds), having no view of Earth from above the atmosphere.
But, I will agree that "they" might not have known the difference anyway. Nevertheless, the view would have been impossible to fake.
Now when you are 100 km above the Earth. Special effects depend on the audience viewer having a fixed point of view.
This was the 11th manned flight. You are talking like it was all for the first time. And you have no idea how to create the image of a planet at that altitude of view. Special effects are engineered; they are not invoked by magic. It just kills me that people who don't know what they are talking about can confidently use the word "obviously."
What kind of "bimbo" is it who thinks it was fake, when it was real?
It is historic language usage that "man" is both a gender and non-gender. In the abstract, it has no gender, as with "mankind." It comports with the German use of "man" as "one." To refer to the gendered individual in German, one uses "mann." The formation of English from Archaic French and Anglo-Saxon involved the complete drop of gendered nouns.
And, besides, we have no verb such as "womanned." I thought the age of Woke was over with.
This is not the thinking even of a high school graduate. The capsule landed. No big deal. Someone, Bezos, it doesn't matter, unlatched the hatch. This was not on video. The women were supposed to wait for the photo op. Someone inside jumped the gun and opened the door. Bezos stops the miscue, closes the hatch, and they wait for the timed photo op to go through the motions of hatch opening for the sake of the photo op.
Pressurized doors open inwards all the time. That is how airliner doors work, because the interior pressure keeps the door shut. It is only after the door has moved inward that the hinge articulation allows it to be opened outward. (It is an extremely clever articulation, and I marvel at it every time I see it.)
No scorch marks from re-entry because there was no re-entry as from orbit. They went up and down at low velocity. Apparently no one understands that this was NOT an orbital flight and at the peak altitude, the velocity was ZERO.
All the people opining "this looked fake," have no idea what aerospace reality is.
The gaffe - Footage of the capsule shows the door opening to the inside.
The girls opened the door from the inside.
Also the capsule was reeeeealy clean.
Yes, it opens to the inside so it can't blow out or be opened in a low pressure environment.
Yes, they were instructed to wait but being dumb bitches, they didn't.
What did you expect it to look like?
They might just be dumb bitches, but part of me thinks if this was real they saw something they didn’t expect to see.
Freaked out, they didn’t follow protocol.
You're not making any sense.
You can't simulate launch acceleration without a centrifuge (not involved) and you can't simulate weightlessness without a big airplane doing a porpoise dive (and only for 10s of seconds), having no view of Earth from above the atmosphere.
But, I will agree that "they" might not have known the difference anyway. Nevertheless, the view would have been impossible to fake.
Now when you are 100 km above the Earth. Special effects depend on the audience viewer having a fixed point of view.
This was the 11th manned flight. You are talking like it was all for the first time. And you have no idea how to create the image of a planet at that altitude of view. Special effects are engineered; they are not invoked by magic. It just kills me that people who don't know what they are talking about can confidently use the word "obviously."
What kind of "bimbo" is it who thinks it was fake, when it was real?
It is historic language usage that "man" is both a gender and non-gender. In the abstract, it has no gender, as with "mankind." It comports with the German use of "man" as "one." To refer to the gendered individual in German, one uses "mann." The formation of English from Archaic French and Anglo-Saxon involved the complete drop of gendered nouns.
And, besides, we have no verb such as "womanned." I thought the age of Woke was over with.
Never been to one. Spent my time designing launch vehicles, and viewing the real things at the U. S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
Tim Isreal Pool . Yea, ok. Fake as unicorn poop.
Ridiculous
Looks like "Plan 9 From Outer Space" now has competition for the worst sci-fi movie ever.
This is not the thinking even of a high school graduate. The capsule landed. No big deal. Someone, Bezos, it doesn't matter, unlatched the hatch. This was not on video. The women were supposed to wait for the photo op. Someone inside jumped the gun and opened the door. Bezos stops the miscue, closes the hatch, and they wait for the timed photo op to go through the motions of hatch opening for the sake of the photo op.
Pressurized doors open inwards all the time. That is how airliner doors work, because the interior pressure keeps the door shut. It is only after the door has moved inward that the hinge articulation allows it to be opened outward. (It is an extremely clever articulation, and I marvel at it every time I see it.)
No scorch marks from re-entry because there was no re-entry as from orbit. They went up and down at low velocity. Apparently no one understands that this was NOT an orbital flight and at the peak altitude, the velocity was ZERO.
All the people opining "this looked fake," have no idea what aerospace reality is.
Lol that looks like 60's space capsule from a shitty SciFi flick.
Disclosures incoming?