President Trump Provides Update on Epstein File Release (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
President Trump addressed the anticipated release of the Epstein documents, emphasizing his commitment to transparency while facing skepticism from conservatives regarding the Attorney General's effectiveness. Tensions are rising within the Republican base...
He got the JFK, RFK, and MLK(apparently it confirmed MLK is a degenerate) out to the public. Kash has only been in the fbi for like 30days, and Pam is only slightly longer. I'm only going to get restless if we don't get Epstien by November. There are elements in the Admin actively trying to prevent or disobey the orders. We have to root that out first, and it's deeply entrenched. I'm not worried, the time to worry is by the midterms if there's no progress
Kash has been voted on February 20th, so that makes it 63 days. That's not the problem.
The problem was him running his mouth about releasing the files on day 1 and all we got is crickets. No arrests at all except a couple of Tesla vandals.
These are the problems that people are starting to have.
I agree with the day one stuff, but I have a feeling, he's learning who the entrenched enemies are in the beginning. Just remember us in the Q movement are basically okay with dismantling the FBI peior to Trump winning. They put mom's and dad's on terror watch lists for speaking at school board meetings. That's just one item. All I'm saying is hey he didn't deliver on day one but I'm super glad I know the fbi isn't trying to actively FUCK the Trump administration like it did in term 1. So I feel like we will get some big wins. I'm still all for dismantling the FBI.
The only hopium I have heard on these delays is that they are preparing actual prosecutions and don't want to go public until the most wealthy criminals capable of fleeing justice and living in Argentina forever have already been raided.
I did hear speculation that the timing will likely coincide with elections for political reasons. "Vote for Blue No Matter Who They Touch!" could be the new party slogan.
Some celebrities definitely fled the US around that time.
There are two good reasons to not release the Epstein files, there are ongoing Grand Jury investigations, or releasing them would undermine planned prosecutions. It’s not hard to imagine a judge ruling that any material released prior to trial is prejudicial and inadmissible.
What doesn’t make sense is why the President, DOJ, and FBI don’t just admit that if it’s the case.
What planned prosecutions?
That’s part of my point, we don’t know if there are any planned prosecutions, but don’t you hope there are? What good does it do to release the files if no one is brought to justice?
What we should really be saying is we want the people on Epstein’s “client list” and his accomplices brought to justice. Releasing the files without prosecutions would actually be a travesty of justice for the original reasons I cited, the released files would likely be inadmissible in court.
There's no "client list."
That's something newspapers made up.
Maxwell was found guilty in 2021.
There's zero indication of other ongoing cases
Moves and countermoves. The people becoming aware is their greatest fear. - Q
Could be that even acknowledging it would lead to damage being done. Instead they get the enemy to expend their ammunition and then punish mistakes.
Mebbe because they'd like the grand jury members to survive their service?
Yeah a lot of my friends think Trump serves Israel and it’s hard to refute.
Two more weeks
There is a huge pile of documents spanning numerous cases that can, and need to be shown to the public. And, all I see are excuses, or just flat out ignoring questions from the public- what I see is deliberate DoJ obfuscation regarding many cases, not transparency.
A). Tell the public about the cocaine found in the Whitehouse.
-What is the exact quantity of cocaine found in the so-called "baggie?"
-What is it's street value? What is its purity? Was any fentanyl mixed with it?
-Has the perpetrator who brought the "baggie" been identified? Are charges pending against anyone involved (the dope dealer, etc.) with the "baggie?" Has anyone been fired, or arrested for the security failure? Has the "baggie" been linked to foreign, or domestic persons?
Is that too much to ask, dear Pamela? What's the excuse going to be for keeping all of that information hidden from the public?
..:Ok, next. How about the FBI documents regarding the murder of Seth Rich?
B). Let's start with an easy question. Why was the FBI even tasked to investigate an alleged "street mugging" to begin with? That is not normal jurisdiction for the FBI. So, tell us little bit about why the FIB got involved in the first place.
-Could ask lots of questions about this case, obviously....
C). Benghazi? Think the public forgot about that one? Think again. Where is the formal apology from the govt. to YouTuber who was falsely accused (framed) for allegedly inciting a riot, resulting in fatalities? That happened over a decade ago. When does the public get to see the truth about that grotesque fiasco?
If dear Pamela cannot deliver transparency regarding the Epstein case then, maybe she can prove her trustworthiness by providing long hidden information to the public regarding numerous other cases.
The public is long tired of the lies. Dear Pam needs to prove herself, and do it fast, or else we will obliterate our so-called "republican" congressional weaklings during mid-term elections to force election losses. Electoral decimation is a perfectly valid form of punishment, and corrective action to replace the losers who are continuing to allow the DoJ to hide the truth from the public. We ain't playing the stall game again.
So he says we now have all of the JFK files with full transparency aka no redactions. Is that online somewhere? And I'm surprised no bombshell reports have come out exposing the network of people who were behind it.
my fellow americans, the files are on my desk
I suppose one reason why they haven't released those documents, or done this or that: when Trump, Patel or anyone else who now got in were talking about doing something they didn't yet have inside information. Because they were not inside. Then they got in and got it. That may have changed things. Like those Epstein files are maybe a lot more messy and much larger than they assumed, and will need to be looked at, thoroughly, before they release anything. They may have found out things they didn't expect. Or they may have found that they can't even yet find everything because the previous administration had "lost", "misplaced", etc some parts of the whole, and they are now trying to find the missing pieces, and find if they have only been hidden in some way, or possibly even destroyed, before they do anything.
I mean, it's not likely the previous administration left everything in nice organized piles for the new administration so it would be as easy as possible for them to start working with all that information etc, considering they are not exactly best of friends with each other.
"I don't know." What do you mean you don't know what the status is regarding the Epstein files?