The aluminum is in the form of an oxide, accompanied by barium and strontium oxides in a nanoparticulate form. The reason for this is that nanododecahedrons of aluminum oxide has one of the most reflective and highest surface area. They Pay pilots who are owner operators thirty five cents a mile to spray under the umbrella of operation solar shield. The planes are retrofitted for free with tanks and emitters that are an engineered hydrospikes design.
Eventually these particulates rain down because they are cloud level. There is so much being sprayed that natural absorption cycles cause it to be taken in to the plant life, Which is what initially caused the yellowing and dead zones in the pacific northwest forests, Which is what initiated the study that I read most of this information from. The people did testify under oath in court that this is all factual information, and the people had p. H. D's.
And it all came to nothing. You need to stop reacting to intentions as though they were deeds. (Other articles on MIT Technology Review.) How they really do things is to talk a good show, get some money, not run far, get thrown down the memory hole, and...talk a good show etc. (rinse and repeat).
Alright, but the intent is there and documented, and I've watched first hand them filling the skies above my head with something that doesn't dissolve; it lingers for the whole day and no doubt lands on the ground. What do you think it is?
The point about “who are the actual, explicit companies doing this” is a good point. They’re going to have a technical term they call it by, that won’t be “chemtrails”. “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection”, maybe?
I did some quick searches. Found a few research program names, but no incorporated company publicly saying “it’s totally us doing this.”
Back when it first dropped that chemtrails were back on the menu here several months back (direct comment from cats, iirc), I think someone did find a few names. We should definitely have a list of explicit operators if so.
Intent is not a deed. And you have no basis for thinking that a major geo-engineering project is under way. People have been talking about and studying and designing solar power satellites for the past 50 years. Nothing has happened. It far easier to build nuclear power stations on the ground. A profusion of intent means absolutely nothing in the world of deeds. So, you can't make the illogical jump from intent to deed, when deeds require more than intent.
What you see are persistent contrails from commercial aircraft, consisting of ice crystals from frozen water vapor. In other words, high-altitude clouds. And they persist as long as high-altitude clouds. Eventually, they evaporate into the air, like high-altitude clouds. Completely unconnected from any geoengineering plot.
I live in the approach-departure corridor to a major international airport. I have seen these all the time for the past 40 years. They are a form of cloud. And if you are suspicious of clouds, I can guarantee you would not enjoy the Pacific Northwest.
I live in the approach-departure corridor to a major international airport. I have seen these all the time for the past 40 years. They are a form of cloud.
40 years ago, I’d watch the planes fly over, and see the contrails. They were short, and they disappeared quickly.
10ish years ago I started seeing long, persistent “contrails” that would spread out and change into large cloud formations over time, in a much dryer region than the Pacific Northwest.
Something changed.
At the same time, the “rich psychopath” class, such as Billy and whatnot, were talking about deliberate geoengineering at conceptual levels to combat muh climate change. They never said specific companies they were funding that I heard, but observed visuals changed.
Do I know these things are correlated, or what they mean? No, but you’ve brought up a valid point at the very least.
“Name names.” is not an unfair demand. Observation alone is insufficient to draw conclusions from.
They're loosely admitting it in this https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/24/us-scientists-launch-worlds-biggest-solar-geoengineering-study you know how they do things... run it covertly for a few decades then tell us they just started it later
I had this copypasta in my notes:
The aluminum is in the form of an oxide, accompanied by barium and strontium oxides in a nanoparticulate form. The reason for this is that nanododecahedrons of aluminum oxide has one of the most reflective and highest surface area. They Pay pilots who are owner operators thirty five cents a mile to spray under the umbrella of operation solar shield. The planes are retrofitted for free with tanks and emitters that are an engineered hydrospikes design.
Eventually these particulates rain down because they are cloud level. There is so much being sprayed that natural absorption cycles cause it to be taken in to the plant life, Which is what initially caused the yellowing and dead zones in the pacific northwest forests, Which is what initiated the study that I read most of this information from. The people did testify under oath in court that this is all factual information, and the people had p. H. D's.
And it all came to nothing. You need to stop reacting to intentions as though they were deeds. (Other articles on MIT Technology Review.) How they really do things is to talk a good show, get some money, not run far, get thrown down the memory hole, and...talk a good show etc. (rinse and repeat).
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/high-profile-geoengineering-experiment-shuts-down/
Alright, but the intent is there and documented, and I've watched first hand them filling the skies above my head with something that doesn't dissolve; it lingers for the whole day and no doubt lands on the ground. What do you think it is?
The point about “who are the actual, explicit companies doing this” is a good point. They’re going to have a technical term they call it by, that won’t be “chemtrails”. “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection”, maybe?
I did some quick searches. Found a few research program names, but no incorporated company publicly saying “it’s totally us doing this.”
Back when it first dropped that chemtrails were back on the menu here several months back (direct comment from cats, iirc), I think someone did find a few names. We should definitely have a list of explicit operators if so.
there's also this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9kdDkYfaNMQ
Seems like you’re arguing with Douglas Murray. Let it go man, his mind’s already made up.
“People are spraying something in the air and it’s probably not for nefarious purposes, and even if it is it probably won’t work.”
Trust the science, bro. Trust the experts 😉👍
Intent is not a deed. And you have no basis for thinking that a major geo-engineering project is under way. People have been talking about and studying and designing solar power satellites for the past 50 years. Nothing has happened. It far easier to build nuclear power stations on the ground. A profusion of intent means absolutely nothing in the world of deeds. So, you can't make the illogical jump from intent to deed, when deeds require more than intent.
What you see are persistent contrails from commercial aircraft, consisting of ice crystals from frozen water vapor. In other words, high-altitude clouds. And they persist as long as high-altitude clouds. Eventually, they evaporate into the air, like high-altitude clouds. Completely unconnected from any geoengineering plot.
I live in the approach-departure corridor to a major international airport. I have seen these all the time for the past 40 years. They are a form of cloud. And if you are suspicious of clouds, I can guarantee you would not enjoy the Pacific Northwest.
40 years ago, I’d watch the planes fly over, and see the contrails. They were short, and they disappeared quickly.
10ish years ago I started seeing long, persistent “contrails” that would spread out and change into large cloud formations over time, in a much dryer region than the Pacific Northwest.
Something changed.
At the same time, the “rich psychopath” class, such as Billy and whatnot, were talking about deliberate geoengineering at conceptual levels to combat muh climate change. They never said specific companies they were funding that I heard, but observed visuals changed.
Do I know these things are correlated, or what they mean? No, but you’ve brought up a valid point at the very least.
“Name names.” is not an unfair demand. Observation alone is insufficient to draw conclusions from.