🚨Trump TS - It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤜 FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! 🤛
Trump's TS post - https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114729009239087163
On qagg - https://qagg.news/?read=TT27932
Regime Change - https://qagg.news/?read=1558
u/#q1558
Notice "Regime change" in both the TS post and the Q post. Big "R" Little "c". There is no reason for it to be that way except it's the same as the Q post.
I mean grammatically it makes absolute sense for it to be that way. You don't capitalize every first letter of a word in quotations, and Regime change isn't a title of s book or operation which would deem each word be capitalized. I'd say it'd be more interesting if both the post and Truth were capitalized.
Grammatically it makes sense in the Q post. It is NOT proper grammar in the TS post. That was my point. There is no reason for it to be "R" "c" in the TS post except that it is the exact same as in the Q post..
Oh gotcha, thanks for the explanation. I see what you're getting at now
Guess optics no longer matter.
We got a schedule to keep, don't ya know.
This is my thinking, like everyone’s saying “regime change” like it’s some horrible thing, but have they seen the current regime in Iran?? Pretty horrible already! Not much downside to try for someone new, only up from here.
The fall of insane Muslims running countries would be such a blessing for the world. I hope it happens.
By the people of Iran
That was my thought as well. At least it's right up front, not 50 years later after a FOIA.
Technically, Q is a regime change. A TRUE regime change (hopefully). Most of them are more like "regime change lite," where you get a new Cabal front man v. an old Cabal front man (at most they are warring Cabal factions)..
The main difference to the above is that Persians are not Arabs. The mistake the Shah made the last time was suspending democratic opposition and and centralized authority under the monarchy and persecuting the opposition. The Ayatollah used this to their advantage and was very effective in their propaganda. They would have to be careful again or it can repeat. Perhaps there is a deal to made which could carve out part of the country with port access/acces to resources, etc. and they can coexist side by side but that is messy as well.
Let's not forget the part where the US toppled a democratically elected Iranian gov and installed a king.
That is reserved for us, they are a long way away to getting that degree of liberalism.