Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

335
🚨Breaking! The Supreme Court has ruled favorably towards the Trump administration They rule that nationwide universal injunctions by district judges exceed their authority granted by Congress (twitter.com) 🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
posted 359 days ago by Joys1Daughter 359 days ago by Joys1Daughter +335 / -0
46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 36 ▼
– bubble_bursts 36 points 359 days ago +36 / -0

You mean Trump is not creating the constitutional crisis and instead its the leftist Judges? My my, color me surprised.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0
▲ 27 ▼
– Bedminster 27 points 359 days ago +27 / -0

This is a huge win. Now, let's see about the whole birth right citizenship bullshit! MAGA!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 14 points 359 days ago +14 / -0

Amen!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 359 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Bedminster 1 point 358 days ago +1 / -0

We know damn well one of these leftist judges will absolutely try.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– PhDinNY 23 points 359 days ago +23 / -0

What is pretty disappointing is that you only have to have a basic knowledge of the U.S. Constitution to know this, and what is really disgusting is that three of the justices didn't agree!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 19 points 359 days ago +19 / -0

They have their own agenda's... 🤬

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Jtkirk5598 6 points 359 days ago +6 / -0

Three of the justices cannot be trusted to even tie their own shoelaces. I'm not surprised!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– LongTimeListener2 10 points 359 days ago +10 / -0

Amy Coney Barret wrote the majority opinion and in it destroys DEI hire Jackson.

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,” she began. “We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary,” she added.

” Justice Jackson skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring legalese. “

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Notimportant81 6 points 359 days ago +6 / -0

She said that? Wow. Truly a rhetorical take down of Jackson's intellect.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jtkirk5598 1 point 358 days ago +1 / -0

I am still in awe that she skewered her like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Rootcause 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

How many of them were autopenned?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jtkirk5598 1 point 358 days ago +1 / -0

Probably all of them 😂

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

It's a short, simple document. Only a crook would get it wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– BurnerAcct42069 17 points 359 days ago +17 / -0

It literally says in article III of the constitution that only SCOTUS has jurisdiction to rule against the federal government at all

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– usernametaken4 15 points 359 days ago +15 / -0

It's about effing time. Seriously. I can't believe these stupid judges have gotten away with it for so long. Even POTUS acted like they could use their "power" to supercede his. I know he did it just for this ruling, but it was so annoying. Now we can put those mosquitoes back into their box and not hear their names anymore. So over it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 359 days ago +2 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 13 points 359 days ago +13 / -0

Cool.

Now deport.

Deport, deport, deport.

I voted for tens of millions of deportations.

DEPORT!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 359 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– ArmyLady 13 points 359 days ago +13 / -0

win against the Lilliputian attacks from justices HA!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 11 points 359 days ago +11 / -0

Take that you corrupt POS!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 359 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– SOGWAP 9 points 359 days ago +9 / -0

How does a judge NOT KNOW THE LIMITS OF HIS AUTHORITY? THEY SHOULD BE FIRED FOR INCOMPETENCE.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 8 points 359 days ago +8 / -0

And INDICTED.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Jtkirk5598 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

These people were installed as political operatives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Fineiwillbite 1 point 359 days ago +1 / -0

Because judges literally go on precedent. The first district based- nationwide injunctions actually started during the Obama era. The GOP and Dems been sharing playbooks since Andrew Jackson. Dirty politics ain’t anything new. We are all fucked. Y'all just don’t see it yet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– RadiantPatriot 7 points 359 days ago +7 / -0

Thanks be to God!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– PopTartGun 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

Injunction (Judicial Order) ≠ Law

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CaptainChrisPBacon 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

Once again, the SCOTUS has ruled that Trump 45~47 is well within his authority and is constitutionally correct in using his authority. And that the rogue Judges are unconstitutional.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BigDaddy1reboot 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

What happens next to all these injunctions? Are they now null and void? Or does each one need to sent back to the lower court to be adjudicated.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MisprisionIsEvil 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

Everyone knew this. They just didn't care.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 5 points 359 days ago +5 / -0

https://nitter.poast.org/theMRC/status/1938600801301151963

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CaptainChrisPBacon 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

A Judge has just ruled that he is filing an injunction on the SCOTUS. /s

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

They would if they thought it would work Captain! 😸

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

TY dear fren... 🥂

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– trumpThrice 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

Well duuuuuuuuh

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ffairchild 4 points 359 days ago +4 / -0

That's what I was Thinking! Seems like if we fix the lower court system SCOTUS won't have much to do!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– moscowjade 3 points 358 days ago +3 / -0

Hawaiian Judge orders Supreme Court to reverse its decision.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Malachi3vs16 2 points 359 days ago +2 / -0

ia ruling in a positive direction!

There might be some more aspects of limiting universal injunctions to be decided, , so far so good.

“The court did not decide whether the district courts’ injunctions should be narrower for the states challenging the executive order, and instead left it to the “lower courts [to] determine whether a narrower injunction is appropriate.”

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/supreme-court-sides-with-trump-administration-on-nationwide-injunctions-in-birthright-citizenship-case/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 3 points 358 days ago +3 / -0

Thanks Malachi!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Honor+Duty 2 points 359 days ago +2 / -0

I wonder if they need to go into hiding now! Better have some bodyguards. The lunatic MKs will be after them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldgal_frdup 1 point 359 days ago +1 / -0

Their session typically ends at the end of June/beginning of July. That's why they always save the sticky ones for the end of their session. I'm sure they have good protection after how the leftists acted after the Roe v. Wade decision. It's sad that a portion of our society is so violently sick. Pray for the justices.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 359 days ago +8 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy