Let me understand this. If your child is vaccinated against whooping cough, but the Smiths children are not AND the Smiths children get whooping cough, how does that affect your children? Isn’t the whole point of vaccines to keep vaccinated children from getting it? And if so, then the decision should rest ultimately with the parent as the consequences only affect them.
Ok, I don't care for the fake numbers, no matter how disparate. OP claims it is 80% for vax, to 20% against. I bet the ratio is different, but that's beside the point. Even if it was 99% for, it still would not make any difference, because it is not a popular vote thing.
The point is: One has the right to refuse medical treatment under the Nuremberg code. This is to stop bad actors from using humans as guinea pigs - something Joseph Mendele was into, allegedly experimenting on Jewish prisoners. That means something.
There will always be people who don't want to partake in the 'experiment'. What are you gunna do about it? Force people to take a 'medicine' against their will? Oh wait, they tried that already [see above, oh and many politicians were preddy good at forcing people to take the Covid jabs - even as they claim it wasn't so, now].
Just for the record, when it comes to medication, It's not about what 'the majority' want. It's what the individual wants. Go ahead and stop the refusers from attending the schools, or public spaces - there will be still some people who will just find another way, rather than submit to the silliness.
He is a vaccine salesman and not a doctor. Two contradictory positions, but one he keeps pretending holds no sway over his shitty advice and recommendations.
A 'school vax requirement' is as retarded as a soda consumption mandate and a lot more deadly. Schools as it is are barely capable of teaching, why would you ever heed medical demands from purple haired and pierced weirdos that dont even know if they are a man or a woman?
Doesn't the vax protect against whatever disease it's supposed to protect from?
The debate for requirements should fall apart when the second question is answered. If you are for it, do it. If not, don't. Anything more is about power and control, not self-determination and health.
It's not the vax that curbed the diseases, it was hygiene. They need to curb all of the vaccines until they are properly safety tested and proven safe.
Let me understand this. If your child is vaccinated against whooping cough, but the Smiths children are not AND the Smiths children get whooping cough, how does that affect your children? Isn’t the whole point of vaccines to keep vaccinated children from getting it? And if so, then the decision should rest ultimately with the parent as the consequences only affect them.
There's the rub. They pretend the vax works then admit it doesn't by saying those who don't get it endanger those who did.
It's the risk of the Emperors new clothes......
Oh stop it! Its not nice to be rational and use reasonable thinking.
/sarc
Ok, I don't care for the fake numbers, no matter how disparate. OP claims it is 80% for vax, to 20% against. I bet the ratio is different, but that's beside the point. Even if it was 99% for, it still would not make any difference, because it is not a popular vote thing.
The point is: One has the right to refuse medical treatment under the Nuremberg code. This is to stop bad actors from using humans as guinea pigs - something Joseph Mendele was into, allegedly experimenting on Jewish prisoners. That means something.
There will always be people who don't want to partake in the 'experiment'. What are you gunna do about it? Force people to take a 'medicine' against their will? Oh wait, they tried that already [see above, oh and many politicians were preddy good at forcing people to take the Covid jabs - even as they claim it wasn't so, now].
Just for the record, when it comes to medication, It's not about what 'the majority' want. It's what the individual wants. Go ahead and stop the refusers from attending the schools, or public spaces - there will be still some people who will just find another way, rather than submit to the silliness.
How enfuriating for the majority.
He is a vaccine salesman and not a doctor. Two contradictory positions, but one he keeps pretending holds no sway over his shitty advice and recommendations.
A 'school vax requirement' is as retarded as a soda consumption mandate and a lot more deadly. Schools as it is are barely capable of teaching, why would you ever heed medical demands from purple haired and pierced weirdos that dont even know if they are a man or a woman?
Well, why would the 80% care? Isn't a vaccine supposed to prevent your getting the disease if you encounter it?
This OP used to be the surgeon general.
Again, who cares if anyone else gets vaccinated?
Doesn't the vax protect against whatever disease it's supposed to protect from?
The debate for requirements should fall apart when the second question is answered. If you are for it, do it. If not, don't. Anything more is about power and control, not self-determination and health.
What is this liberal dribble doing on here? What clueless fucktard
Once the majority of the public is convinced of a lie, it becomes even more difficult than convincing an individual they have been lied to.
Another reason why mine are homeschooled.
Liar ,, wish I could read comments ,, no way 80 percent of people back this poison.
That man was the surgeon general of these United States. The more effective RFK Jr is the more firm the narrative becomes.
Is the cure worse than the disease?
It's not the vax that curbed the diseases, it was hygiene. They need to curb all of the vaccines until they are properly safety tested and proven safe.