JohnTitor has now edited and completely changed all his delusional comments in this post a few hours ago. He edited out all the crazy parts after being called out.
He did heavily imply that Trump will die and then "come back". He talked about Trump getting the Vax being the cause. And said this will be "biblical" implying a resurrection event.
He also edited out where he went full retard and said "Trump knows that I know this".
So JT edited all his comments then completely changed his story now to 'Trump will fake his death". Which doesnt explain all the rambling about Trump being vaxxed or it being "biblical".
The dude thinks Trump is actually monitoring and communicating with him which is somewhere south of the borderline of Sanityville.
Yeah, responding to any of those points are up to him, I’m not his defense attorney and he’s his own person. magavoices’ comments are just wildly wrong, and he did the same misrepresentative trash to me a few days ago.
His original comment can be viewed below (older revisions are at the bottom). I can understand the whole Jesus comparison thing. He definitely implied that Trump would die because of the vax he got, then return in 3 days. To me that meant Lazarus/biblical, and not Jesus. But either way its retarded.
There are several fair criticisms later on. I don’t believe I indicated any position toward his actual comments. My issue was with assigning words to the position then strawmanning that, very loudly, in particular from someone who has done that repeatedly to multiple users.
Q originally released on 4chan. Then 8chan. Eventually we found ourselves at Voat. In these places, you needed to be prepared to vigorously defend good ideas, let alone bad ones.
Q actually asked us to move to Voat. That place was a shithole -- the entire community was mostly rejected by former Voat users and we were continually hazed just for trying to use a little corner of their forum for ourselves.
I don't think any veteran of Q has such delicate sensibilities that they believe I've crossed a line of being too harsh.
The picture JohnTutor17 was painting was that Trump was dead (Trump's passing) and going to "come back" in 3 days. Whatever harshness you detected on my part was on a proper scale to the ridiculousness of the claim -- which I perceived as blastphemy.
I'm not alone. Prior to responding to his post, he was already ratioed. Even the mods mocked JohnTutor17 by calling out his ridiculous prediction of a flood / tidal wave with a pinned thread.
He had the opportunity to defend his comments and win people over to his point of view. He chose, instead, to revise the craziness out of his comments. Either way, that's the way the forum should work -- refine good ideas and weed out bad ones.
It's wrong to put words into someone's mouth and THEN proceed to attack or criticize or blame them for those words.
One wonders what Mr. Titor meant. His words certainly implied either a sort of Christ-like return or a faked Christ-like return. But he didn't state that outright, so there is some ambiguity to his comments. The correct approach is to request clarification. After that, you can critique or discuss based on accuracy of communication.
"Form, message, communication" is a signoff line I've had on my personal email form for more than two decades.
When a message is expressed in a form that fits it perfectly and properly, communication can be accomplished. But sometimes it's important and necessary to check, verify that you've understood the right message from the form that you encounter.
I suppose everyone thinks it's a coincidence that I'm mentioned what I did in the above linked post yesterday, and then that very night Papi ALSO posts about his passing???
Did you guys learn the comms or nah?
Coincidencefag much?
The future has a way of proving the past.
Youre right he doesnt say the death/resurrection words. After his ridiculous failed flooding prediction, seems hes going with slightly vague posts that leave just enough wiggle room to backpedal if needed.
What he originally said here (or on his "Trump will return in 3 days" post) doesnt imply faking death. Faking death isnt biblical whatsoever, and what relevance does him receiving the jab have if hes just faking and re-appearing in 3 days? I actaully asked him that twice and he wont answer. I assume answering them wouldnt leave enough wiggle to backpedal out of.
His now deleted statement about 'Trump knows that I know' certainly needs no further clarification. Thats just crazy talk.
I seem to recall serialbrain2 talking about Q team communicating with him too. Right about that time I knew he was losing the plot. Or as some other anon called it..."his head was so far up his own ass he actually started turning inside-out".
JohnTitor has now edited and completely changed all his delusional comments in this post a few hours ago. He edited out all the crazy parts after being called out.
He did heavily imply that Trump will die and then "come back". He talked about Trump getting the Vax being the cause. And said this will be "biblical" implying a resurrection event.
He also edited out where he went full retard and said "Trump knows that I know this".
So JT edited all his comments then completely changed his story now to 'Trump will fake his death". Which doesnt explain all the rambling about Trump being vaxxed or it being "biblical".
The dude thinks Trump is actually monitoring and communicating with him which is somewhere south of the borderline of Sanityville.
Yeah, responding to any of those points are up to him, I’m not his defense attorney and he’s his own person. magavoices’ comments are just wildly wrong, and he did the same misrepresentative trash to me a few days ago.
His original comment can be viewed below (older revisions are at the bottom). I can understand the whole Jesus comparison thing. He definitely implied that Trump would die because of the vax he got, then return in 3 days. To me that meant Lazarus/biblical, and not Jesus. But either way its retarded.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ba3msClt/x/c/4eVJXhytTYU
There are several fair criticisms later on. I don’t believe I indicated any position toward his actual comments. My issue was with assigning words to the position then strawmanning that, very loudly, in particular from someone who has done that repeatedly to multiple users.
Fair enough
Q originally released on 4chan. Then 8chan. Eventually we found ourselves at Voat. In these places, you needed to be prepared to vigorously defend good ideas, let alone bad ones.
Q actually asked us to move to Voat. That place was a shithole -- the entire community was mostly rejected by former Voat users and we were continually hazed just for trying to use a little corner of their forum for ourselves.
I don't think any veteran of Q has such delicate sensibilities that they believe I've crossed a line of being too harsh.
The picture JohnTutor17 was painting was that Trump was dead (Trump's passing) and going to "come back" in 3 days. Whatever harshness you detected on my part was on a proper scale to the ridiculousness of the claim -- which I perceived as blastphemy.
I'm not alone. Prior to responding to his post, he was already ratioed. Even the mods mocked JohnTutor17 by calling out his ridiculous prediction of a flood / tidal wave with a pinned thread.
He had the opportunity to defend his comments and win people over to his point of view. He chose, instead, to revise the craziness out of his comments. Either way, that's the way the forum should work -- refine good ideas and weed out bad ones.
It's wrong to put words into someone's mouth and THEN proceed to attack or criticize or blame them for those words.
One wonders what Mr. Titor meant. His words certainly implied either a sort of Christ-like return or a faked Christ-like return. But he didn't state that outright, so there is some ambiguity to his comments. The correct approach is to request clarification. After that, you can critique or discuss based on accuracy of communication.
"Form, message, communication" is a signoff line I've had on my personal email form for more than two decades.
When a message is expressed in a form that fits it perfectly and properly, communication can be accomplished. But sometimes it's important and necessary to check, verify that you've understood the right message from the form that you encounter.
u/AllMostThere
His original comment can be viewed here. Some very clever anon showed me the "revisions" link...Thank you to that clever anon btw.
Youre right he doesnt say the death/resurrection words. After his ridiculous failed flooding prediction, seems hes going with slightly vague posts that leave just enough wiggle room to backpedal if needed.
What he originally said here (or on his "Trump will return in 3 days" post) doesnt imply faking death. Faking death isnt biblical whatsoever, and what relevance does him receiving the jab have if hes just faking and re-appearing in 3 days? I actaully asked him that twice and he wont answer. I assume answering them wouldnt leave enough wiggle to backpedal out of.
His now deleted statement about 'Trump knows that I know' certainly needs no further clarification. Thats just crazy talk.
I seem to recall serialbrain2 talking about Q team communicating with him too. Right about that time I knew he was losing the plot. Or as some other anon called it..."his head was so far up his own ass he actually started turning inside-out".
Thought of serialbrain2 as well.