Grok says:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly list "treason" as a distinct offense but addresses equivalent acts under Article 94 (Mutiny or Sedition), which includes actions like creating revolt or violence against lawful civil authority with intent to overthrow it. The penalty for such acts can include death or other punishments as a court-martial may direct (10 U.S.C. § 894). However, the UCMJ applies to members of the armed forces, and whether it extends to a sitting or former president is unclear, as the president, while Commander-in-Chief, is a civilian official not typically subject to military law.law.cornell.edu
For civilians, including a president, treason is defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2381, which mirrors the U.S. Constitution (Article III, Section 3). It involves levying war against the United States or adhering to enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Penalties include death, imprisonment for not less than five years, a fine of at least $10,000, and ineligibility to hold any U.S. office.law.cornell.edu
Military Tribunal Requirement: Treason by a civilian, including a president, is typically prosecuted in federal civilian courts, not military tribunals. The Supreme Court in Ex parte Milligan (1866) ruled that military tribunals cannot try civilians where civil courts are functioning. Military tribunals are generally reserved for enemy combatants or during wartime when civilian courts are unavailable. There’s no legal requirement for a president accused of treason to face a military tribunal; prosecution would likely occur in federal court unless extraordinary circumstances (e.g., a collapsed government) apply.law.stackexchange.comen.wikipedia.orglawsuitlegal.com
Some X posts claim a president, as Commander-in-Chief, could be subject to the UCMJ and military tribunals for treason or sedition, but these lack legal grounding, as the president’s civilian status typically places them under civilian jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The penalty for treason under civilian law (applicable to a president) includes death or imprisonment, with prosecution in federal courts, not military tribunals, unless civilian courts are non-functional. Always consult a qualified legal expert for specific cases, as this is a complex area.
Military assets were used against an American citizen who was the incoming president during the transition period with the help of foreign governments for the benefit of foreign interests. That is treason and should be dealt with accordingly followed by an outlaw of the party for a 25 year period at the federal level given their inability to self govern.
Bondi has the referral, that means nothing will happen. This is to get everyone off epstein. If they had stuff they would just act on it, not announce it to everyone
"GEN. FLYNN STATES THAT MILITARY TRIBUNALS SHOULD BE EXPLORED"
I think they should be mandatory.
The only way is the military
https://qalerts.app/?n=26
He probably said that because he's not a legal expert. He figures let someone else make that decision.
Trump should institute a Federal Lottery to buy a chance to be a member of the firing squads that should arise from these trials.
It might just go a long way to retire our National Debt.
Pay per view would take care of the rest
Great point! That would brings Billions!
100k per American would do it
Kek! Great idea fren!
Grok says: The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly list "treason" as a distinct offense but addresses equivalent acts under Article 94 (Mutiny or Sedition), which includes actions like creating revolt or violence against lawful civil authority with intent to overthrow it. The penalty for such acts can include death or other punishments as a court-martial may direct (10 U.S.C. § 894). However, the UCMJ applies to members of the armed forces, and whether it extends to a sitting or former president is unclear, as the president, while Commander-in-Chief, is a civilian official not typically subject to military law.law.cornell.edu
For civilians, including a president, treason is defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2381, which mirrors the U.S. Constitution (Article III, Section 3). It involves levying war against the United States or adhering to enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Penalties include death, imprisonment for not less than five years, a fine of at least $10,000, and ineligibility to hold any U.S. office.law.cornell.edu
Military Tribunal Requirement: Treason by a civilian, including a president, is typically prosecuted in federal civilian courts, not military tribunals. The Supreme Court in Ex parte Milligan (1866) ruled that military tribunals cannot try civilians where civil courts are functioning. Military tribunals are generally reserved for enemy combatants or during wartime when civilian courts are unavailable. There’s no legal requirement for a president accused of treason to face a military tribunal; prosecution would likely occur in federal court unless extraordinary circumstances (e.g., a collapsed government) apply.law.stackexchange.comen.wikipedia.orglawsuitlegal.com
Some X posts claim a president, as Commander-in-Chief, could be subject to the UCMJ and military tribunals for treason or sedition, but these lack legal grounding, as the president’s civilian status typically places them under civilian jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The penalty for treason under civilian law (applicable to a president) includes death or imprisonment, with prosecution in federal courts, not military tribunals, unless civilian courts are non-functional. Always consult a qualified legal expert for specific cases, as this is a complex area.
PEADs enters the chat
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BGmFqcaG/enemy-combatants-to-be-a-success/c/
Yesterday he did.
Let's not forget those Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADs)
Military assets were used against an American citizen who was the incoming president during the transition period with the help of foreign governments for the benefit of foreign interests. That is treason and should be dealt with accordingly followed by an outlaw of the party for a 25 year period at the federal level given their inability to self govern.
Here we go!
We could only hope for this.............
Bondi has the referral, that means nothing will happen. This is to get everyone off epstein. If they had stuff they would just act on it, not announce it to everyone
If they are announcing it, it means the ball is already rolling and nothing can stop what is coming.