Has anyone ever listed what Russia supposedly did to interfere in the election? Did they create bots, or have actual people, praise Trump on social media? Or did they do the opposite regarding Hillary? All I hear is "Russian election interference", but I've never seen how they supposedly interfered. It seems like just another example of how Democrats will find someone/something else to accuse of doing what THEY ARE DOING.
The biggest concrete thing I ever heard is that they bought some facebook ads at some point. I don't even remember whether it was supposedly the russian government or some company based there, either way it's a total nothingburger
If I recall correctly, Facebook says it sold $100,000 in ads to fake Russian accounts during the presidential election. They are fake accounts supposedly Russian. But they could have easily been Obama and Hillary buying $100,000 in ads to fuel the fake much Russia, Russia, Russia.
But what did the ads say? I heard that if Russia actually had something from their hack of the DNC, they would have used it if they really wanted to improve Trump's chances of winning back in 2015.
Russia actually held back on their most damning information on Hillary because it was assumed she would win. They were going to release it after she won to weaken confidence in the system. They were not helping Trump, if they wanted to they would have released that information… hopefully the Hillary dump is forthcoming.
Russian memes do not equal election interference. They did not have the capability to steal and invent votes only the Democrats did that.
And yet the globalist toady Zuckerberg was giving hundreds of millions to stop Trump from being elected, and FB was deleting every Q related group as fast as they could at the time.
There was no way they would have left anything pro-Trump up on Fakebook unless they controlled it.
I guess for now, Zuck is not deleting posts or even putting a fact check on posts all although the2024 election cycle. I have been able to post freely anything I want. I have even intentionally posted fake news to check if I would get flagged, but I did not. I deleted the fake news after a week. IMO, this is how Facebook should work and any other public social media.
Why would Vladimir Putin and Russia want to damage the chances of their friend who pushed through the Uranium 1 deal for them? Knowing how critical HRC was in helping Russia purchase U1, the whole Russia, Russia, Russia narrative never made sense.
I cannot wait until this becomes common knowledge. My rural town has no idea about any of this. I keep asking questions that stir curiosity to awaken them, as I have done over the past 12 years. "Did you see this on the news?" "I noticed it's not on the news, but I have read that this happened. Did you see that too?" If sleepers are not told directly, but asked if they heard, then they search. When they search, they wake up slowly. Wakey! Wakey! Eggs-N-Bakey!
Yes, this is an excellent strategy. Get their interest piqued so that they want to look it up for themselves without actually telling them anything. But remember to be scant on details and a little cryptic. If you can allude that it may be related to Trump and Russia without saying how or why, they may get all excited and want to find it to "get Trump." ;)
I am doing this now with one of my friends re: Epstein. My friend was all excited that MAGA is mad at Trump over Epstein and she has been asking me more about it. I give her tiny bits to process at a time. It's been fun to see the lightbulb go on each time we talk. But I stop as soon as it does so she can process it because I know if I give her any more info before she's finished processing that bit of info, she'll shut down.
I ask in such a way that is innocent, and it is usually a question that I wonder if they know the answer to. Most of the time they had never heard the question before. I've tried both ways - asking and telling. When I tell someone, they immediately get on the defensive. I'm just asking questions and they want to help me find answers. I turned a huge percentage of libs into people who voted for Trump. They still haven't fully awakened, so I proceed. An example:I may hear someone say they are going to get their covid booster. Shortly after I walk around and ask... "It was so sad to hear that the coach from the nearby town died suddenly of a heart attack? He was so young." or "Do any of you know what is going on with Obama?" No - they say. "Hmmm. I must have misunderstood. I thought I heard the word treason." or "Have any of you heard about the low prices on iPads? I thought tariffs were going to raise prices, but I got one for $169, and I got a new apple watch for .99 cents per month."
I recall a pol post claiming Russia removed votes that were added to Clinton via the fractional voting/stealing algorithm they use. Aka they acted as an anti cheat to some extent.
But it's one of those things that'll likely never be confirmed even if true.
Has anyone ever listed what Russia supposedly did to interfere in the election? Did they create bots, or have actual people, praise Trump on social media? Or did they do the opposite regarding Hillary? All I hear is "Russian election interference", but I've never seen how they supposedly interfered. It seems like just another example of how Democrats will find someone/something else to accuse of doing what THEY ARE DOING.
I was taking a journalism class at the time. My professor smugly displayed examples of the Russian propaganda that "won Trump the election."
The example? Patriotic Facebook posts about supporting our troops, so vote for Trump. I shit you not, that was it.
Dumb-A "professor".
Pretty hilarious since it was pretty obvious Democrats are historically weak on foreign defense and military funding.
The biggest concrete thing I ever heard is that they bought some facebook ads at some point. I don't even remember whether it was supposedly the russian government or some company based there, either way it's a total nothingburger
I was going to post the same thing. I recall them claiming it was around 12 Russians buying Facebook ads. That was basically it.
Fakebook--isn't that what the clowns use to sort and go after people that dare say something?
TIL people still use "facebook" - what???
What's next - people still on geocities? MySpace?
If I recall correctly, Facebook says it sold $100,000 in ads to fake Russian accounts during the presidential election. They are fake accounts supposedly Russian. But they could have easily been Obama and Hillary buying $100,000 in ads to fuel the fake much Russia, Russia, Russia.
But what did the ads say? I heard that if Russia actually had something from their hack of the DNC, they would have used it if they really wanted to improve Trump's chances of winning back in 2015.
Russian interfered, Russian interfered, but you're right they never tell you how, much like Maxwell is convicted of sex trafficking, but to who?
Russia actually held back on their most damning information on Hillary because it was assumed she would win. They were going to release it after she won to weaken confidence in the system. They were not helping Trump, if they wanted to they would have released that information… hopefully the Hillary dump is forthcoming. Russian memes do not equal election interference. They did not have the capability to steal and invent votes only the Democrats did that.
And yet the globalist toady Zuckerberg was giving hundreds of millions to stop Trump from being elected, and FB was deleting every Q related group as fast as they could at the time.
There was no way they would have left anything pro-Trump up on Fakebook unless they controlled it.
I guess for now, Zuck is not deleting posts or even putting a fact check on posts all although the2024 election cycle. I have been able to post freely anything I want. I have even intentionally posted fake news to check if I would get flagged, but I did not. I deleted the fake news after a week. IMO, this is how Facebook should work and any other public social media.
I have seen the same, but the posts lack engagement so I figure they may still be shadow banning select posts.
Why would Vladimir Putin and Russia want to damage the chances of their friend who pushed through the Uranium 1 deal for them? Knowing how critical HRC was in helping Russia purchase U1, the whole Russia, Russia, Russia narrative never made sense.
I cannot wait until this becomes common knowledge. My rural town has no idea about any of this. I keep asking questions that stir curiosity to awaken them, as I have done over the past 12 years. "Did you see this on the news?" "I noticed it's not on the news, but I have read that this happened. Did you see that too?" If sleepers are not told directly, but asked if they heard, then they search. When they search, they wake up slowly. Wakey! Wakey! Eggs-N-Bakey!
Per the “too much info” comment before, u/christine_grab, is this the better method?
I can be pretty dense on this, and require samples.
Yes, this is an excellent strategy. Get their interest piqued so that they want to look it up for themselves without actually telling them anything. But remember to be scant on details and a little cryptic. If you can allude that it may be related to Trump and Russia without saying how or why, they may get all excited and want to find it to "get Trump." ;)
I am doing this now with one of my friends re: Epstein. My friend was all excited that MAGA is mad at Trump over Epstein and she has been asking me more about it. I give her tiny bits to process at a time. It's been fun to see the lightbulb go on each time we talk. But I stop as soon as it does so she can process it because I know if I give her any more info before she's finished processing that bit of info, she'll shut down.
I ask in such a way that is innocent, and it is usually a question that I wonder if they know the answer to. Most of the time they had never heard the question before. I've tried both ways - asking and telling. When I tell someone, they immediately get on the defensive. I'm just asking questions and they want to help me find answers. I turned a huge percentage of libs into people who voted for Trump. They still haven't fully awakened, so I proceed. An example:I may hear someone say they are going to get their covid booster. Shortly after I walk around and ask... "It was so sad to hear that the coach from the nearby town died suddenly of a heart attack? He was so young." or "Do any of you know what is going on with Obama?" No - they say. "Hmmm. I must have misunderstood. I thought I heard the word treason." or "Have any of you heard about the low prices on iPads? I thought tariffs were going to raise prices, but I got one for $169, and I got a new apple watch for .99 cents per month."
You are really good! :)
We all need to tag ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, etc w/ICYMI.
Awesome idea!
The elephant in the room is these people will never get convicted with a DC jury
I recall a pol post claiming Russia removed votes that were added to Clinton via the fractional voting/stealing algorithm they use. Aka they acted as an anti cheat to some extent. But it's one of those things that'll likely never be confirmed even if true.