If you have a disease where your expected survival is not more than say 2-5 years, experimental treatments should be allowed at the patient's discretion. Even if these "cancer vaccines" are as bad as the covid vaccines, you got nothing much to lose.
On the other hand, pushing these kind of shots on everyone - either as routine treatment or preventatives - thats the bigger risk we have to watch out for.
Luckily the mRNA name has been so badly soiled because of covid that people will think 10 times before taking them.
Also, the LNPs (Lipid Nano Particles) used in mRNA preparations are toxic in their own right. As are many other ingredients and contaminants found in the COVID vaccines; don't what what kind of shit is in THIS "vaccine" but I'll be surprised if there aren't serious problems with at least SOME of the ingredients.
For me, its more than all these other stuff. Its the artificial nucleotide that makes it not even an "mRNA" or anything organic. It should not be experimented on people who will have kids, because what happens if the synthetic nucleotide makes its way into a sperm or an egg and we have kids born with synthetic DNA?
But for old people and people with very limited lifee expectancy where the cancer would kill them faster than all this toxic stuff, sure, they can go to town.
CRISPR has nearly unlimited potential for good, but unfortunately it is just as dangerous. It could wipe out disease, or it could extinct the human race.
Boondock Saints is an all time fav around here in this house. 👍🏻🍻
A household of good taste!
"Protect your DNA" to me justifies avoiding any/every mRNA/gene therapy medical intervention. Everyone's DNA is unique, making these interventions all experimental on the recipients. No way to prove safety.
mRNA 'vaccines' are the worst medical product in human history, by so exponential a margin it makes centuries of quackery and experimentation and snake-oil frauds pale into comparison. And sure, maybe the death and cancer and blood-clot and sterilization rates were due to other poisons tagging along. There may not be an honest study on the clotshots and the mechanisms by which they murder for another 10 years, or another 20, or maybe not ever. And with that uncertainly maybe never ever going away (because what proportion of the medical industry will willingly sentence itself to die?), mRNA will remain non-viable.
People looking at the premature end of their life unless there is some immediate intervention will always have 'freedom to try', for sure. Like any experimental drug or serum or procedure. I wish them all the very best, but I think we will see kids shooting up thalidomide for social media clout before mRNA ever escapes the disaster it has bought about.
The russian vax offerings did not use any mRNA I believe. So in terms of trustworthiness of their local biotech industrial base, staffers and scientists, they are unmatched in the world at the moment. No record of killings or poisonings. Nowhere else in the world can make the same claim.
So if you feel this is the choice for you, approach this thing with scrutiny that it deserves - look for openness of disclosures, willingness for transparent contracts with no crazy indemnity clauses, openness of data and willingness to talk to prospective patients about it etc. Many of the organized-crime tells around the clotshots being malicious were in place before people started dying. So look for a similar thing happening in Russia.. or a lack.
The mRNA technology was created to fight cancer cells. Too bad the masses agreed to have a re-engineered version of it injected into their healthy bodies, causing their own DNA to produce spike proteins.
Clearly in siruations like this where you have nothing to lose its worth giving it a shot. Where mrna is bad is when they push it on an entire population and shame you for not taking it, take your livelyhood etc...
If you have a disease where your expected survival is not more than say 2-5 years, experimental treatments should be allowed at the patient's discretion. Even if these "cancer vaccines" are as bad as the covid vaccines, you got nothing much to lose.
On the other hand, pushing these kind of shots on everyone - either as routine treatment or preventatives - thats the bigger risk we have to watch out for.
Luckily the mRNA name has been so badly soiled because of covid that people will think 10 times before taking them.
If there's no Russians left after the release maybe we shouldn't take it. 🤔😮 This is not to be taken as medical advice, but I wouldn't ignore it. 😏
This
Also, the LNPs (Lipid Nano Particles) used in mRNA preparations are toxic in their own right. As are many other ingredients and contaminants found in the COVID vaccines; don't what what kind of shit is in THIS "vaccine" but I'll be surprised if there aren't serious problems with at least SOME of the ingredients.
For me, its more than all these other stuff. Its the artificial nucleotide that makes it not even an "mRNA" or anything organic. It should not be experimented on people who will have kids, because what happens if the synthetic nucleotide makes its way into a sperm or an egg and we have kids born with synthetic DNA?
But for old people and people with very limited lifee expectancy where the cancer would kill them faster than all this toxic stuff, sure, they can go to town.
As a general rule I do not trust anyone who calls a CRISPR gene therapy a "vaccine."
CRISPR has nearly unlimited potential for good, but unfortunately it is just as dangerous. It could wipe out disease, or it could extinct the human race.
Boondock Saints is an all time fav around here in this house. 👍🏻🍻 A household of good taste!
I don’t mind it for cancer: My dad died of cancer.
If something like this could have saved his life. I would have told him to take it!
Thanks for your kind words. Yeah in the case for cancer.
If the MRNA shots work. I say let people try them.
Cheers!
Ask anyone who's worked with AI generated code. Nope! Although I would assume the results would be checked by a competent human before being injected.
"Protect your DNA" to me justifies avoiding any/every mRNA/gene therapy medical intervention. Everyone's DNA is unique, making these interventions all experimental on the recipients. No way to prove safety.
mRNA 'vaccines' are the worst medical product in human history, by so exponential a margin it makes centuries of quackery and experimentation and snake-oil frauds pale into comparison. And sure, maybe the death and cancer and blood-clot and sterilization rates were due to other poisons tagging along. There may not be an honest study on the clotshots and the mechanisms by which they murder for another 10 years, or another 20, or maybe not ever. And with that uncertainly maybe never ever going away (because what proportion of the medical industry will willingly sentence itself to die?), mRNA will remain non-viable.
People looking at the premature end of their life unless there is some immediate intervention will always have 'freedom to try', for sure. Like any experimental drug or serum or procedure. I wish them all the very best, but I think we will see kids shooting up thalidomide for social media clout before mRNA ever escapes the disaster it has bought about.
The russian vax offerings did not use any mRNA I believe. So in terms of trustworthiness of their local biotech industrial base, staffers and scientists, they are unmatched in the world at the moment. No record of killings or poisonings. Nowhere else in the world can make the same claim.
So if you feel this is the choice for you, approach this thing with scrutiny that it deserves - look for openness of disclosures, willingness for transparent contracts with no crazy indemnity clauses, openness of data and willingness to talk to prospective patients about it etc. Many of the organized-crime tells around the clotshots being malicious were in place before people started dying. So look for a similar thing happening in Russia.. or a lack.
The mRNA technology was created to fight cancer cells. Too bad the masses agreed to have a re-engineered version of it injected into their healthy bodies, causing their own DNA to produce spike proteins.
No thanks. I do not consent to any vaccines at this time & maybe not ever again.
Clearly in siruations like this where you have nothing to lose its worth giving it a shot. Where mrna is bad is when they push it on an entire population and shame you for not taking it, take your livelyhood etc...
Nope. Not when tjere are much better eays.
No