100% agreed! Mom and day both have to work two full time jobs just to afford a roof over their heads. Toss in a kid or two and they have to farm out the kids to someone else to raise. Our kids come out of that meat grinder all messed up in the brain and the good doctors tell the parents to toss a few pills down the kids throats and all will be well. The parents need to understand that their first responsibility is to raising the children, not passing that off to someone who doesn't care about the kid.
Back in the day, sex and sex education was not anything a middle class kid even thought about, until puberty started to happen, we were allowed to be kids, we were not shipped to daycare, we had routines, parents were not spending thousands on kids sports, kids were not scheduled to within an inch of their time. It figures that children who are raised like this are undeveloped, so when they reach maturity, natural development, experience, parental guidance, leaves a huge hole. Add to that the over sexualization of the teen age years, the race to have sex with someone before legal age, the ridicule of kids who are not ready for that yet. We had boundaries when I was growing up, sex was something that parents did, grown ups did, and for many, when finding out about the facts of life, we went yuck, my parents dont do that. Telling yourself you are not a man, or not a woman,I think, is the avoidance of maturity, so many of these kids never experienced wholesome childhood, from the time they start walking, the "childhood development" is pushed toward adulthood, shaping the child the way they do in communist China. So, when western kids play house, and the girl wants to be the doctor, suddenly all these childhood games are pushed toward an adult outcome. It is overly analyzed to be much more important than it really is, but then liberal parents decide to direct the kid toward an identity. "OH! My child identifies as a boy! OH! My child identifies as a girl! Just stop the shit. Your child is playing, innocently, and you want to dump sexuality on it? Puberty is a big difficult time for some kids, you are stepping out of childhood, too early for our culture, we have no traditions anymore for coming of age, no guidance, no celebrations of what our grand roles as men and women will become. Instead of elevating the differences, they are trashed as being some sort of imprisonment, instead of taking a boys sense of adventure and physical nature, or a girls natural leaning toward nurturance and design, her intuition, we are expected to believe that those are constructs, instead of biological nature. I talk about animals a lot, I raise them and live with them and care for them. I can tell you that biological sex shows itself early, from birds to goats, dogs to cats, there is a difference. Some are breeders, some are not, but not one of them is confused. Passive men? Sure, they exist, don't pick on them and call them a girl, that is sexualizing a personality trait. Pushing a thoughtful contemplative or artistic boy into thinking those traits have anything to do with sex is wrong, we used to call those men great thinkers, scholars and gentlemen, not buy dresses for them!!!! I come from a long line of strong Irish women, they raised their kids and did back breaking chores, worked from dawn till bedtime, ruled the roost when the husband was away at work. That did not make them "manly" Both parents were the rock and the cradle for their children, but had different things to offer. Please leave the children alone and dont have them if you cannot enjoy their childhood with them, it is so fleeting and so magical, without any adult agenda on them. Let the children be, and teach them about a loving Christ, HE taught us that is where the Kingdom of Heaven is.
Oh thank you, I lived a pretty long time, turned 75 this year. I give a lot of thought to situations, I grew up in the 60's that is when I came of age. I had one foot in the past, and one foot in the imagined future, and then they started killing Kennedys, and our high school boyfriends went off to Viet Nam. Some never came back, the rebellion of youth was confusing for some. We loved the new music, we loved that young bands and musicians were on tv, growing tired of Dinah Shore and Andy Williams, but many of us did not love the sudden plummet into immorality, I guess I held to my guns, but failed sometime. I see so much social engineering going on that only makes sense in a diabolical sense, none of it advances communities or families. I guess its the inevitable fall of civilization that occurs when power and money become the golden calf, yet again, we cycle and cycle and cycle. The true rebellion is getting off that wheel, but be in the world, but not of the world. I was once a liberal, when it had to do with helping the poor in bad neighborhoods, when it had to do with wanting to give poorer people an equal standing to rise themselves up. My father was dirt poor growing up, but life was simple for men then, if they had intelligence, a moral compass and a good work ethic. It was simple. Then the system got involved and completely messed it up, then it took over education, medicine, almost everything, so we are forced to play within the system to survive. People lack the experience or the courage now, to get off the wheel and refuse to play.
I'll give someone props for finally posting the links to the actual studies. However, I'll do my usual bit of pointing out why this is bullcrap.
First and foremost, the states they asked the questions in. According to the link provided (https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/agency-information/omh/resource-center/hcps-and-researchers/data-tools/sgm-clearinghouse/brfss), the study was done over three years with 400K people being asked each year. The problem comes with the constituent states. They don't even GIVE you what states they supposedly did the study in for the last year, but for the two years they do ordain to reveal the states of operation, you'll notice a pattern.
In the first year, 20 states, 11 of which are blue or blue leaning, and they included GUAM which is a US territory, not a state, and thus is typically not considered for US population statistics. They also cherry picked larger blue states and smaller red states. A good portion of the red states picked have the smallest populations among all states.
In the second year is even worse. 21 states total, of which 13 are blue or blue leaning. You should also begin noticing another pattern at this point. If you look up transgender populations of all the states they're "testing" in, you'll come to find they're literally cherry picking the states known to have the highest percentages (percentage, since that's what's being measured, not absolute population in which case california, a state that's noticeably absent from both data sets, would win) of transgenders.
For example, Hawaii, and Minnesota both have the highest transgender populations in the entire US and are present in both data sets. Likewise, Georgia, a red state by most people's definition, is known to have the largest transgender population of any red state (thanks to atlanta) if you go by percentages instead of absolute population. Idaho (also in both data sets) is ALSO a solid red state known to have an unreasonably high population percentage of queers (unsure about the exact statistic of transgenders), because of boise and moscow and it's location in relation to washington and oregon (lots of poor lower class liberals from both states go to college in Idaho because it's cheaper and then move back to oregon and washington)
You'll also notice they only reveal state, not the exact areas. So using Georgia as an example, if 100% of the participants come from Atlanta (the queer capital of the south east), then the results are obviously gonna be skewed compared to a proper study where participants are weighted based on actual population distribution. This is even more evident in states like Idah, Montana, Wyoming, etc. where they have such absurdly small populations that if you targeted specific areas where you KNOW you're likely to find larger populations of queers thanks to it being a college town for example, then you're intentionally skewing the results heavily in one direction.
All in all, this study, like most that push this narrative of transgenderism and faggotry in general growing among younger people, is faulty by its very nature and dishonest to the core. The truth of the matter is that if you group up all the faggots into a single category, they've been pretty stable at 3%-ish since we've been counting that stuff. Trans specifically make up less than 1% of any given population. The only reason it SEEMS like there's more of them these days is because they're much more visible due to being given a platform on a silver platter and forcibly shoehorning their way into anything and everything they can.
There's not more of them, it's just that the one's that ARE there are much more vocal and insist on being part of everything to try and pervert it.
That’s all fair assessment but I think the thing to take from this study is that, even if the % shown isn’t indicative of the total population, the trend seems accurate. There’s definitely a lot more younger people identifying as trans than older people - my theory is that it’s a social contagion and the younger people are more affected. But I agree, the states picked definitely skew the observed % higher. As long as the states are consistent then I think the trend we are seeing can be relied on.
There's a VERY simple, but morbid, reason for that. Queers in general have MUCH higher suicide rates than any other demographic ( I think it's like double or triple compared to everyone else), but transgenders are in a whole other category even compared to other queers. I think it's something like, transgenders are 10-20X more likely to commit suicide by the age of 25-30, and the likelihood increases exponentially with every decade they grow older. VERY few trans people ever actually end up "old" because they usually end up killing themselves way before they could grow old.
Morbid, I know, but that's the main reason it's more prevalent among younger demographics than older. Most of them will kill themselves before they get the chance to get old.
Could the increase in the amount of "vaccines" these kids are required to take to be in the school system adding to this number?
It's interesting how this has increased along with an increase in the number of shots required. Then you add in more harmful environmental factors sprayed in the air and harmful ingredients in food, the constant use of social media and we have such a drastic increase being shown.
I am sure vaccines have had a role in turning people gay. This has been in play a long time with a granule build up and were seeing the effects now. Hopefully it was caught in time where the effects can be reversed.
Parenting has been left up to day care facilities and nutrition for a growing mind is filled with pop tarts and pizza.
100% agreed! Mom and day both have to work two full time jobs just to afford a roof over their heads. Toss in a kid or two and they have to farm out the kids to someone else to raise. Our kids come out of that meat grinder all messed up in the brain and the good doctors tell the parents to toss a few pills down the kids throats and all will be well. The parents need to understand that their first responsibility is to raising the children, not passing that off to someone who doesn't care about the kid.
Also many day care facilities have male and female perverts working for them. Where the children are, pedos will gather!
USAID-funded brainwashing is a bitch
Fuuuuck dude. If I had kids, especially a son, and I were in your shoes there, he wouldn’t have left that class alive.
If you want to know whether a Christian college really is Christian, look to who funds it and who the buildings are named after.
They want to belong to something..it’s very scary numbers
Back in the day, sex and sex education was not anything a middle class kid even thought about, until puberty started to happen, we were allowed to be kids, we were not shipped to daycare, we had routines, parents were not spending thousands on kids sports, kids were not scheduled to within an inch of their time. It figures that children who are raised like this are undeveloped, so when they reach maturity, natural development, experience, parental guidance, leaves a huge hole. Add to that the over sexualization of the teen age years, the race to have sex with someone before legal age, the ridicule of kids who are not ready for that yet. We had boundaries when I was growing up, sex was something that parents did, grown ups did, and for many, when finding out about the facts of life, we went yuck, my parents dont do that. Telling yourself you are not a man, or not a woman,I think, is the avoidance of maturity, so many of these kids never experienced wholesome childhood, from the time they start walking, the "childhood development" is pushed toward adulthood, shaping the child the way they do in communist China. So, when western kids play house, and the girl wants to be the doctor, suddenly all these childhood games are pushed toward an adult outcome. It is overly analyzed to be much more important than it really is, but then liberal parents decide to direct the kid toward an identity. "OH! My child identifies as a boy! OH! My child identifies as a girl! Just stop the shit. Your child is playing, innocently, and you want to dump sexuality on it? Puberty is a big difficult time for some kids, you are stepping out of childhood, too early for our culture, we have no traditions anymore for coming of age, no guidance, no celebrations of what our grand roles as men and women will become. Instead of elevating the differences, they are trashed as being some sort of imprisonment, instead of taking a boys sense of adventure and physical nature, or a girls natural leaning toward nurturance and design, her intuition, we are expected to believe that those are constructs, instead of biological nature. I talk about animals a lot, I raise them and live with them and care for them. I can tell you that biological sex shows itself early, from birds to goats, dogs to cats, there is a difference. Some are breeders, some are not, but not one of them is confused. Passive men? Sure, they exist, don't pick on them and call them a girl, that is sexualizing a personality trait. Pushing a thoughtful contemplative or artistic boy into thinking those traits have anything to do with sex is wrong, we used to call those men great thinkers, scholars and gentlemen, not buy dresses for them!!!! I come from a long line of strong Irish women, they raised their kids and did back breaking chores, worked from dawn till bedtime, ruled the roost when the husband was away at work. That did not make them "manly" Both parents were the rock and the cradle for their children, but had different things to offer. Please leave the children alone and dont have them if you cannot enjoy their childhood with them, it is so fleeting and so magical, without any adult agenda on them. Let the children be, and teach them about a loving Christ, HE taught us that is where the Kingdom of Heaven is.
Oh thank you, I lived a pretty long time, turned 75 this year. I give a lot of thought to situations, I grew up in the 60's that is when I came of age. I had one foot in the past, and one foot in the imagined future, and then they started killing Kennedys, and our high school boyfriends went off to Viet Nam. Some never came back, the rebellion of youth was confusing for some. We loved the new music, we loved that young bands and musicians were on tv, growing tired of Dinah Shore and Andy Williams, but many of us did not love the sudden plummet into immorality, I guess I held to my guns, but failed sometime. I see so much social engineering going on that only makes sense in a diabolical sense, none of it advances communities or families. I guess its the inevitable fall of civilization that occurs when power and money become the golden calf, yet again, we cycle and cycle and cycle. The true rebellion is getting off that wheel, but be in the world, but not of the world. I was once a liberal, when it had to do with helping the poor in bad neighborhoods, when it had to do with wanting to give poorer people an equal standing to rise themselves up. My father was dirt poor growing up, but life was simple for men then, if they had intelligence, a moral compass and a good work ethic. It was simple. Then the system got involved and completely messed it up, then it took over education, medicine, almost everything, so we are forced to play within the system to survive. People lack the experience or the courage now, to get off the wheel and refuse to play.
I'll give someone props for finally posting the links to the actual studies. However, I'll do my usual bit of pointing out why this is bullcrap.
First and foremost, the states they asked the questions in. According to the link provided (https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/agency-information/omh/resource-center/hcps-and-researchers/data-tools/sgm-clearinghouse/brfss), the study was done over three years with 400K people being asked each year. The problem comes with the constituent states. They don't even GIVE you what states they supposedly did the study in for the last year, but for the two years they do ordain to reveal the states of operation, you'll notice a pattern.
In the first year, 20 states, 11 of which are blue or blue leaning, and they included GUAM which is a US territory, not a state, and thus is typically not considered for US population statistics. They also cherry picked larger blue states and smaller red states. A good portion of the red states picked have the smallest populations among all states.
In the second year is even worse. 21 states total, of which 13 are blue or blue leaning. You should also begin noticing another pattern at this point. If you look up transgender populations of all the states they're "testing" in, you'll come to find they're literally cherry picking the states known to have the highest percentages (percentage, since that's what's being measured, not absolute population in which case california, a state that's noticeably absent from both data sets, would win) of transgenders.
For example, Hawaii, and Minnesota both have the highest transgender populations in the entire US and are present in both data sets. Likewise, Georgia, a red state by most people's definition, is known to have the largest transgender population of any red state (thanks to atlanta) if you go by percentages instead of absolute population. Idaho (also in both data sets) is ALSO a solid red state known to have an unreasonably high population percentage of queers (unsure about the exact statistic of transgenders), because of boise and moscow and it's location in relation to washington and oregon (lots of poor lower class liberals from both states go to college in Idaho because it's cheaper and then move back to oregon and washington)
You'll also notice they only reveal state, not the exact areas. So using Georgia as an example, if 100% of the participants come from Atlanta (the queer capital of the south east), then the results are obviously gonna be skewed compared to a proper study where participants are weighted based on actual population distribution. This is even more evident in states like Idah, Montana, Wyoming, etc. where they have such absurdly small populations that if you targeted specific areas where you KNOW you're likely to find larger populations of queers thanks to it being a college town for example, then you're intentionally skewing the results heavily in one direction.
All in all, this study, like most that push this narrative of transgenderism and faggotry in general growing among younger people, is faulty by its very nature and dishonest to the core. The truth of the matter is that if you group up all the faggots into a single category, they've been pretty stable at 3%-ish since we've been counting that stuff. Trans specifically make up less than 1% of any given population. The only reason it SEEMS like there's more of them these days is because they're much more visible due to being given a platform on a silver platter and forcibly shoehorning their way into anything and everything they can.
There's not more of them, it's just that the one's that ARE there are much more vocal and insist on being part of everything to try and pervert it.
That’s all fair assessment but I think the thing to take from this study is that, even if the % shown isn’t indicative of the total population, the trend seems accurate. There’s definitely a lot more younger people identifying as trans than older people - my theory is that it’s a social contagion and the younger people are more affected. But I agree, the states picked definitely skew the observed % higher. As long as the states are consistent then I think the trend we are seeing can be relied on.
There's a VERY simple, but morbid, reason for that. Queers in general have MUCH higher suicide rates than any other demographic ( I think it's like double or triple compared to everyone else), but transgenders are in a whole other category even compared to other queers. I think it's something like, transgenders are 10-20X more likely to commit suicide by the age of 25-30, and the likelihood increases exponentially with every decade they grow older. VERY few trans people ever actually end up "old" because they usually end up killing themselves way before they could grow old.
Morbid, I know, but that's the main reason it's more prevalent among younger demographics than older. Most of them will kill themselves before they get the chance to get old.
That’s horrifying to think about..
"They are turning the frogs gay!" - Alex Jones
Could the increase in the amount of "vaccines" these kids are required to take to be in the school system adding to this number?
It's interesting how this has increased along with an increase in the number of shots required. Then you add in more harmful environmental factors sprayed in the air and harmful ingredients in food, the constant use of social media and we have such a drastic increase being shown.
Thanks, TI. Always appreciate your input and contribution to this place.
I am sure vaccines have had a role in turning people gay. This has been in play a long time with a granule build up and were seeing the effects now. Hopefully it was caught in time where the effects can be reversed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXGxyWt2bIs