My standalone posts don't get any traction here. Only the "pinned" threads seem to get views. So i try to piggy-back within them when and where applicable.
Dr. Malone has REFUSED dozens of invitations to defend germ theory and the existence of boogeyman-viruses the past five years. His only comment in all that time on the subject was a "hand-wave" dismissal stating "we've known for over a hundred years that viruses exist...it's not even debatable".
Those are the words of someone profoundly brainwashed into the establishment cult of mainstream, institutional "experts and authorities".
We have NOT KNOWN boogeyman-viruses have existed for over a hundred years. We have been taught to BELIEVE they do, without a shred of actual, scientific proof. All true science has definitively shown there's no such thing as boogeyman-viruses, nor "contagious bacteria".
Those are images of nothing but a wide variety of cellular particulates, most skillfully "proven" via the [non]-expert POINT AND DECLARE technique.
How does the "expert" know those are images of boogeymen-viruses exactly? Do they collect, isolate and purify the "thing in the image" and then later use it, and it alone, to infect others? Sad to say, this has never been done in the history of establishment scientism.
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
How exactly do these "scientists of good repute" prove their CLAIM after pointing and declaring? Surely they can produce some "science" to back it up, wouldn't you think? Remarkably, they have yet to do so.
Robert Koch created his very rational, logical and common sense "postulates" over 130 years ago. Simply put, find the "thing" causing the dis-ease in the sick person. Remove it and isolate that "thing" from all other "things". Introduce that "thing" to a healthy person where that "thing" is not detected. Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease. Identify and isolate the new presence of that "thing" in that person.
Shockingly, such an experiment has never been successfully done. And to wit, they never even came close to isolating the "thing" they thought was causing the disease. They just transferred bodily fluids, mucous, blood, urine, saliva, etc. in any and every way imaginable. All attempts at such "scientific proof" failed spectacularly long ago. So much so, they gave up even trying in the early 1950s. It's been over 60 years since anybody has even tried such experiments.
They've been re-verified by scientists of good repute across decades and across the world.
I can count the number of "actual scientists of good repute" on one hand. All those licensed and endorsed by our cabal-operated mainstream institutions are profoundly brainwashed into the medical cult. And make no mistake, that's exactly what it is - a cult....of insanity no less.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your comment and question. I've spent thousands of hours researching and podcasting on this topic of germ theory, boogeyman-viruses, and the cause of dis-ease at large. I'm always ready to change my opinion with even a modicum of scientific evidence suggesting otherwise. Unfortunately, I have yet to find anything that even comes close.
Thanks for writing back. I'm actually on the fence about the existence of viruses myself. So I take no offense by your position or explanation.
Yet Logic demands that I ask:
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
Many have tried likely tens of thousands of times up until the late 1950s. Nobody has ever found any boogeyman-viruses in the living tissue, bodily fluids of dead tissue of a sick or healthy person. Pretty simple.
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
All our "experts and authorities" are the one's "claiming it is so". The establishment is comprised of brainwashed minions and liars. Most are the former obviously. It's this crowd of materialists that are making the POSITIVE CLAIM. Not me. We're calling them out on their fallacious claim. And "they" have yet to respond to our assertions.
If we were wrong, they would have clearly and carefully showed and explained how what errors we made in forming our conclusions.... a long time ago. Our position has been clearly articulated and presented for over five years now. And yet, not a peep from the "experts".
That should tell you all you need to know.
Look at the basic facts:
Nobody has ever found a boogeyman-virus in "reality". The establishment virologists reluctantly admit this too.
Nobody has ever scientifically demonstrated contagion
Nobody has ever performed an experiment showing how "germs" can be transferred from human to human, via normal transmission vectors like surface contact, air, water, food, etc.
Nobody has ever demonstrated "Koch's Postulates" (which are just basic common sense)
Nobody has ever produced a photograph of a "cell receptor", the very phake and ghey "mechanism" their boogeymen-viruses are said to "trick"
Nobody has ever photographed or video-taped "DNA transcription", the method by which "boogeymen-viruses" are supposed to "reproduce". They can't do this either because the ER, Golgi Apparatus and Ribosomes don't even exist, but are all "integral parts" of alleged "DNA transcription". They're "air bubbles" and "staining artifacts"
The claimed "boogeyman-virus" doesn't have a 'brain", therefore can't possibly have the "will" or "goal" to "reproduce" or "trick fantasy cell receptors"
Bacteria are produced by the body, not "caught" from "out there"
There's no such thing as the "immune system" because there is nothing to be immune to.
Boogeyman-viruses are INDISTINGUISHABLE from what scientists have named "exosomes" (outside the body), meaning not "inside a cell". Exosomes are basically just free-floating cellular particulates. The establishment virologists readily admit this too.
I'm hard pressed to come up with anything for their side. Every one of their "scientISM experiments over the past 50 years rely upon vivisection and animal torture, jabbing helpless creatures with wild brew "toxins", proving utterly nothing. I can whip up a brew of Coca-Cola, Cheeze-Whiz, Cheerios and maple syrup, throw it in a blender and I can quite easily guarantee if we injected it into 100 people, there would be many "negative reactions".
The establishment has only two things on their side. One, they're depdendent on continuing "blind trust in authority" brainwashing holding up. And second, people get sick around each other. These two facts prevent 99% of people from even considering, let alone researching this topic. It's a remarkable thing to witness. And I applaud you for being part of the 1%. You're a rare breed, even around these parts where everybody believes they're "bucking the system".
If you wish to deepen your research and understanding, I recommend reading Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology - expert edition", which you can download for free if you like, or if you want to support he and his lovely wife Sam's work, you can buy the paperback. Info here:
Sam Bailey has also been releasing at least two podcasts a month since mid-2020. She regularly uploads all of them to Odysee.com, whereas, due to YouTube's ongoing censorship, only a handful of her videos make it onto that platform.
And while I applaud all her efforts in carefully and clearly debunking all that she has, unfortunately she remains caught in the materialistic "terrain theory" club. As such, she's always pointing to "toxins", 5G, wifi, junk food, tap water, etc. as the potential causes of dis-ease instead of boogeyman-viruses. Sadly, neither she, nor any other "terrain theorist" has ever produced a single "Cause-to-Disease" relationship. Without such, it's just more unfalsifiable claims to add to the mix.
I'm not going to muddy-up this thread with discussion about "what causes dis-eases". This is, on one hand, a very simple topic to discuss, but because it's so vastly opposite of what we've all been brainwashed into believing all our lives, it's always perceved as UNBELIEVABLE for a time, until the planting ot the seen has time to germinate and grow.
So I'll leave it at that and wish you the best of luck! Happy to answer any questions you have if you want to DM me.
That’s another rabbit hole , the virus or germ theory, people are afraid to discuss. Perhaps public figures like Malone is really careful regarding such topics and tend to stick to singular subject so his message won’t get sidetracked.
It will bring down the entire pharma business and it means losing power and control over mankind through the elimination of fear.. like you said it’s all in the mind. The more humanity believe in the BS the denser and more real the lies (reality)become, like a self fulfilling prophecy. They’ll probably kill Malone if he opens his mouth, ha! Like they’ve done to so many.
Quite right, quite right you are. Which begs the question. At what point will one of our establishment "experts or authorities" dare to sacrifice their own life to save millions of others?
it's been five years now and no matryr has yet emerged.
Frankly, I don't think the cabal death cult can "kill off" opponents any longer. I think they've lost this "power". They've let Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and others go wayyy toooo far already in my estimation. They're openly saying things now I was telling everyone that would listen 10-15 years ago, much to their horror and disbelief. Now, it's literally becoming common knowledge amongst those that are tired of being lied to.
I hope I'm right and I hope one of these mainstream experts steps up soon as this endless discussion about jabs, germs and dis-ease is just unbearable once you know the simple truth.
Lots of evidence in the form of micrographs of the microbes and other organisms living within living beings. Cell cultures. Etc. Your claim of "without a shred of actual, scientific proof" simply omits all the proof that has been developed over the past centuries.
Malone does not debate germ theory for the same reasons astronomers and geographers do not debate Flat Earth theory.
Lots of evidence in the form of micrographs of the microbes and other organisms living within living beings. Cell cultures. Etc. Your claim of "without a shred of actual, scientific proof" simply omits all the proof that has been developed over the past centuries.
Which part or this paragraph constitutes "proof" of the existence of boogeyman-viruses or contagion? Do you consider it "proof" that nobody can find or ever had found boogeyman-viruses anywhere in the wild, in the fluids or tissues of a sick person?
Does not the fact that our establishment experts and authorities can only "manufacture" boogeyman-viruses through a highly toxic "cell culture" of chemicals and foreign DNA....or "genetically ASSEMBLE** strands of random DNA/RNA with no definitive provenance "proof"?
Are you as easily duped as our brainwashed experts and authorities or are you willing to stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to them and thinking for yourself?
A "micrograph of microorganisms" does not even APPROACH proving the existence of boogeyman-viruses and is many light years away from proving contagion.
You're going to have to do way better than that if you wish to intellectually DISMISS* the elephant in the room. Bring it!
You go right ahead and write your book, putting your case into documentary form, and let the outside world tear it to pieces. I'm not a medical expert or a cellular biologist, but I recognize blather by how loud it is. I've read of military (Air Force, I think) experiments to determine whether colds are the result of exposure, or of contagion, and contagion was the answer. Makes a big difference when dealing with troops in cold, wet trenches. Protection against contagion is useful. According to you, it is meaningless. Sorry, go peddle your papers to those whose eyes are not strained by bold caps. Write it down. Submit it to the world. See what happens. See if your extreme claims are refuted.
"Colds" are caused by annoyance/frustration "stink conflicts"...a.k.a. BELIEFS....as is the cause of all dis-eases.
The military ran the one and only wide scale contagion experiment that hasn't been fully scrubbed by our overlords in 1918 by attempting to transmit "Spanish Flu" between unwitting cadets. It was a spectacular failure. Not one case of "Spanish Flu" was transmitted to a healthy cadet using the saliva, mucous, coughing, sneezing and spitting efforts of the unhealthy onto the healthy. Over one thousand tries. Zero successes.
And so too have all the other --- very hard to find -- experiments in the ensuing 40 years. All of them complete failtures in all respects.
Whatever study you're referring to contains exactly ZERO SCIENCE, instead using speculation and assumption to arrive at their conclusions.
Really? You're going to use Wikipedia as a reliable source? I thought everyone on this board was fully aware that this is an establishment outlet?
Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur are the most GIGANTIC FRAUDS of all time. They were both entirely wrong about everything and what few minor and insignifcant things they seemingly "got right" they stole or plagiarized from their contemporaries. This is something you learn within the first hour of investigating this subject.
Why do you all keep turning to the ESTABLISHMENT to confirm your beliefs anyway? I just don't understand.
Would you like to learn the truth about "the history of virology" or are you okay continuing to hang out with the sheeple herd?
Those are the guys who started looking for the causes of the diseases. They filtered out bacteria and the stuff was still causing disease. They determined that it was particles, not fluid. They determined that it had proteins and nucleic acid. You start with that and research more. Do you just believe someone who says there is no such thing as viruses or bacteria? What kind of a source is that?
I haven't the slightest clue as to what you are referring to here. Whoever "they" are, "they" should have produced an experiment following the scientific method that has been repeated by others to PROVE THIS CLAIM.
Myself and thousands of other people spent the better part of the last half of 2020 looking for such a scientific paper. Nobody was able to find anything even approaching it.
"Proteins" and "Nucleic acids" are like literally the basis of life itself. How does finding these somehow lead you to conclude this proves the existence of boogeyman-viruses?
Shouldn't "Step One' be to find a boogeyman-virus anywhere in reality for starters?
Wouldn't you agree we're wasting our time discussing anything else but this most fundamental "step one" question?
I'm happy to go down the path of "what causes dis-eases" later. I can answer any and all questions you might have on the subject. But first, these "boogeyman-viruses" are going to need to graduate from the realm of unicorns and leprechauns for starters.
Believe it or not, there's a perfectly rational, logical and scientific explanation as to why we get dis-eases. An explanation that has nothing whatsoever to do with "germs", "genes" or "toxins" ta boot.
Nature and reality is simple and elegant. There's nothing complicated about any of it. What's complicated is the mountains of nonsensical mis-education we were all unwittingly subjected to our entire lives. It's in the uniwinding of all this where the tremendous difficult actually rests.
"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled" - Mark Twain.
Truer words have never been spoken. Nobody likes to find out, let alone admit they've been fooled. I didn't like it one bit as I unraveled this, and many other deceptions.
The "easy job" was the cabal's, blaming dozens of dis-eases on imaginary, unproven boogeymen. We all fell for it, yours truly included for the majority of my life.
The "hard job" is convincing everyone they done been duped! Just read through this thread and the many responses you see. How many times did you read "tell me more" or "interesting, but I'm not convinced". I think one person went off and on their own and watched a video. But everybody else is defending the cabal matrix.
It's a darn interesting phenomenon, is it not? I can think of only one explanation as to why people are so quick to defend it....I think Mark Twain gave us the undeniable answer. He was as keen to human nature as anybody in the past couple hundred years in my estimation.
My standalone posts don't get any traction here. Only the "pinned" threads seem to get views. So i try to piggy-back within them when and where applicable.
Dr. Malone has REFUSED dozens of invitations to defend germ theory and the existence of boogeyman-viruses the past five years. His only comment in all that time on the subject was a "hand-wave" dismissal stating "we've known for over a hundred years that viruses exist...it's not even debatable".
Those are the words of someone profoundly brainwashed into the establishment cult of mainstream, institutional "experts and authorities".
We have NOT KNOWN boogeyman-viruses have existed for over a hundred years. We have been taught to BELIEVE they do, without a shred of actual, scientific proof. All true science has definitively shown there's no such thing as boogeyman-viruses, nor "contagious bacteria".
Then what are these, pray tell?
https://www.utmb.edu/virusimages/the-virus-images
Because they were never able to pony up an electron microscope image of Covid-19, I contend that it doesn't really exist.
But these others? They've been re-verified by scientists of good repute across decades and across the world.
Those are images of nothing but a wide variety of cellular particulates, most skillfully "proven" via the [non]-expert POINT AND DECLARE technique.
How does the "expert" know those are images of boogeymen-viruses exactly? Do they collect, isolate and purify the "thing in the image" and then later use it, and it alone, to infect others? Sad to say, this has never been done in the history of establishment scientism.
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
How exactly do these "scientists of good repute" prove their CLAIM after pointing and declaring? Surely they can produce some "science" to back it up, wouldn't you think? Remarkably, they have yet to do so.
Robert Koch created his very rational, logical and common sense "postulates" over 130 years ago. Simply put, find the "thing" causing the dis-ease in the sick person. Remove it and isolate that "thing" from all other "things". Introduce that "thing" to a healthy person where that "thing" is not detected. Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease. Identify and isolate the new presence of that "thing" in that person.
Shockingly, such an experiment has never been successfully done. And to wit, they never even came close to isolating the "thing" they thought was causing the disease. They just transferred bodily fluids, mucous, blood, urine, saliva, etc. in any and every way imaginable. All attempts at such "scientific proof" failed spectacularly long ago. So much so, they gave up even trying in the early 1950s. It's been over 60 years since anybody has even tried such experiments.
I can count the number of "actual scientists of good repute" on one hand. All those licensed and endorsed by our cabal-operated mainstream institutions are profoundly brainwashed into the medical cult. And make no mistake, that's exactly what it is - a cult....of insanity no less.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your comment and question. I've spent thousands of hours researching and podcasting on this topic of germ theory, boogeyman-viruses, and the cause of dis-ease at large. I'm always ready to change my opinion with even a modicum of scientific evidence suggesting otherwise. Unfortunately, I have yet to find anything that even comes close.
You have a 33 post score and a 441 comment score and you joined 1 year ago.
Why are you here?
What's it to you? I'm here to spread the truth. That's what I do, everywhere I go.
Why are you here?
Thanks for writing back. I'm actually on the fence about the existence of viruses myself. So I take no offense by your position or explanation.
Yet Logic demands that I ask:
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
Many have tried likely tens of thousands of times up until the late 1950s. Nobody has ever found any boogeyman-viruses in the living tissue, bodily fluids of dead tissue of a sick or healthy person. Pretty simple.
All our "experts and authorities" are the one's "claiming it is so". The establishment is comprised of brainwashed minions and liars. Most are the former obviously. It's this crowd of materialists that are making the POSITIVE CLAIM. Not me. We're calling them out on their fallacious claim. And "they" have yet to respond to our assertions.
If we were wrong, they would have clearly and carefully showed and explained how what errors we made in forming our conclusions.... a long time ago. Our position has been clearly articulated and presented for over five years now. And yet, not a peep from the "experts".
That should tell you all you need to know.
Look at the basic facts:
I'm hard pressed to come up with anything for their side. Every one of their "scientISM experiments over the past 50 years rely upon vivisection and animal torture, jabbing helpless creatures with wild brew "toxins", proving utterly nothing. I can whip up a brew of Coca-Cola, Cheeze-Whiz, Cheerios and maple syrup, throw it in a blender and I can quite easily guarantee if we injected it into 100 people, there would be many "negative reactions".
The establishment has only two things on their side. One, they're depdendent on continuing "blind trust in authority" brainwashing holding up. And second, people get sick around each other. These two facts prevent 99% of people from even considering, let alone researching this topic. It's a remarkable thing to witness. And I applaud you for being part of the 1%. You're a rare breed, even around these parts where everybody believes they're "bucking the system".
If you wish to deepen your research and understanding, I recommend reading Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology - expert edition", which you can download for free if you like, or if you want to support he and his lovely wife Sam's work, you can buy the paperback. Info here:
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Sam Bailey has also been releasing at least two podcasts a month since mid-2020. She regularly uploads all of them to Odysee.com, whereas, due to YouTube's ongoing censorship, only a handful of her videos make it onto that platform.
And while I applaud all her efforts in carefully and clearly debunking all that she has, unfortunately she remains caught in the materialistic "terrain theory" club. As such, she's always pointing to "toxins", 5G, wifi, junk food, tap water, etc. as the potential causes of dis-ease instead of boogeyman-viruses. Sadly, neither she, nor any other "terrain theorist" has ever produced a single "Cause-to-Disease" relationship. Without such, it's just more unfalsifiable claims to add to the mix.
I'm not going to muddy-up this thread with discussion about "what causes dis-eases". This is, on one hand, a very simple topic to discuss, but because it's so vastly opposite of what we've all been brainwashed into believing all our lives, it's always perceved as UNBELIEVABLE for a time, until the planting ot the seen has time to germinate and grow.
So I'll leave it at that and wish you the best of luck! Happy to answer any questions you have if you want to DM me.
That’s another rabbit hole , the virus or germ theory, people are afraid to discuss. Perhaps public figures like Malone is really careful regarding such topics and tend to stick to singular subject so his message won’t get sidetracked.
Pasteur rejected germ theory at the end of his life
I 100% agree. But why do you suppose they're all afraid to discuss it?
It will bring down the entire pharma business and it means losing power and control over mankind through the elimination of fear.. like you said it’s all in the mind. The more humanity believe in the BS the denser and more real the lies (reality)become, like a self fulfilling prophecy. They’ll probably kill Malone if he opens his mouth, ha! Like they’ve done to so many.
Quite right, quite right you are. Which begs the question. At what point will one of our establishment "experts or authorities" dare to sacrifice their own life to save millions of others?
it's been five years now and no matryr has yet emerged.
Frankly, I don't think the cabal death cult can "kill off" opponents any longer. I think they've lost this "power". They've let Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and others go wayyy toooo far already in my estimation. They're openly saying things now I was telling everyone that would listen 10-15 years ago, much to their horror and disbelief. Now, it's literally becoming common knowledge amongst those that are tired of being lied to.
I hope I'm right and I hope one of these mainstream experts steps up soon as this endless discussion about jabs, germs and dis-ease is just unbearable once you know the simple truth.
Lots of evidence in the form of micrographs of the microbes and other organisms living within living beings. Cell cultures. Etc. Your claim of "without a shred of actual, scientific proof" simply omits all the proof that has been developed over the past centuries.
Malone does not debate germ theory for the same reasons astronomers and geographers do not debate Flat Earth theory.
Which part or this paragraph constitutes "proof" of the existence of boogeyman-viruses or contagion? Do you consider it "proof" that nobody can find or ever had found boogeyman-viruses anywhere in the wild, in the fluids or tissues of a sick person?
Does not the fact that our establishment experts and authorities can only "manufacture" boogeyman-viruses through a highly toxic "cell culture" of chemicals and foreign DNA....or "genetically ASSEMBLE** strands of random DNA/RNA with no definitive provenance "proof"?
Are you as easily duped as our brainwashed experts and authorities or are you willing to stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to them and thinking for yourself?
A "micrograph of microorganisms" does not even APPROACH proving the existence of boogeyman-viruses and is many light years away from proving contagion.
You're going to have to do way better than that if you wish to intellectually DISMISS* the elephant in the room. Bring it!
You go right ahead and write your book, putting your case into documentary form, and let the outside world tear it to pieces. I'm not a medical expert or a cellular biologist, but I recognize blather by how loud it is. I've read of military (Air Force, I think) experiments to determine whether colds are the result of exposure, or of contagion, and contagion was the answer. Makes a big difference when dealing with troops in cold, wet trenches. Protection against contagion is useful. According to you, it is meaningless. Sorry, go peddle your papers to those whose eyes are not strained by bold caps. Write it down. Submit it to the world. See what happens. See if your extreme claims are refuted.
Dozens of books have already been written. This is the latest that annihilates the fraud from every conceivable angle. It's an open and shut case.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
"Colds" are caused by annoyance/frustration "stink conflicts"...a.k.a. BELIEFS....as is the cause of all dis-eases.
The military ran the one and only wide scale contagion experiment that hasn't been fully scrubbed by our overlords in 1918 by attempting to transmit "Spanish Flu" between unwitting cadets. It was a spectacular failure. Not one case of "Spanish Flu" was transmitted to a healthy cadet using the saliva, mucous, coughing, sneezing and spitting efforts of the unhealthy onto the healthy. Over one thousand tries. Zero successes.
And so too have all the other --- very hard to find -- experiments in the ensuing 40 years. All of them complete failtures in all respects.
Whatever study you're referring to contains exactly ZERO SCIENCE, instead using speculation and assumption to arrive at their conclusions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_virology This will help to show what they know and how they found it.
Really? You're going to use Wikipedia as a reliable source? I thought everyone on this board was fully aware that this is an establishment outlet?
Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur are the most GIGANTIC FRAUDS of all time. They were both entirely wrong about everything and what few minor and insignifcant things they seemingly "got right" they stole or plagiarized from their contemporaries. This is something you learn within the first hour of investigating this subject.
Why do you all keep turning to the ESTABLISHMENT to confirm your beliefs anyway? I just don't understand.
Would you like to learn the truth about "the history of virology" or are you okay continuing to hang out with the sheeple herd?
Those are the guys who started looking for the causes of the diseases. They filtered out bacteria and the stuff was still causing disease. They determined that it was particles, not fluid. They determined that it had proteins and nucleic acid. You start with that and research more. Do you just believe someone who says there is no such thing as viruses or bacteria? What kind of a source is that?
I haven't the slightest clue as to what you are referring to here. Whoever "they" are, "they" should have produced an experiment following the scientific method that has been repeated by others to PROVE THIS CLAIM.
Myself and thousands of other people spent the better part of the last half of 2020 looking for such a scientific paper. Nobody was able to find anything even approaching it.
"Proteins" and "Nucleic acids" are like literally the basis of life itself. How does finding these somehow lead you to conclude this proves the existence of boogeyman-viruses?
Shouldn't "Step One' be to find a boogeyman-virus anywhere in reality for starters?
Wouldn't you agree we're wasting our time discussing anything else but this most fundamental "step one" question?
I'm happy to go down the path of "what causes dis-eases" later. I can answer any and all questions you might have on the subject. But first, these "boogeyman-viruses" are going to need to graduate from the realm of unicorns and leprechauns for starters.
Believe it or not, there's a perfectly rational, logical and scientific explanation as to why we get dis-eases. An explanation that has nothing whatsoever to do with "germs", "genes" or "toxins" ta boot.
Nature and reality is simple and elegant. There's nothing complicated about any of it. What's complicated is the mountains of nonsensical mis-education we were all unwittingly subjected to our entire lives. It's in the uniwinding of all this where the tremendous difficult actually rests.
"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled" - Mark Twain.
Truer words have never been spoken. Nobody likes to find out, let alone admit they've been fooled. I didn't like it one bit as I unraveled this, and many other deceptions.
The "easy job" was the cabal's, blaming dozens of dis-eases on imaginary, unproven boogeymen. We all fell for it, yours truly included for the majority of my life.
The "hard job" is convincing everyone they done been duped! Just read through this thread and the many responses you see. How many times did you read "tell me more" or "interesting, but I'm not convinced". I think one person went off and on their own and watched a video. But everybody else is defending the cabal matrix.
It's a darn interesting phenomenon, is it not? I can think of only one explanation as to why people are so quick to defend it....I think Mark Twain gave us the undeniable answer. He was as keen to human nature as anybody in the past couple hundred years in my estimation.