Prolog
Trump has made cryptic remarks multiple times about how "Israel no longer controls Congress like it used to" and has made it sound like this is the natural order of things that has been upset in recent years. This comment has greatly confused many a people, even Anons included.
Many were disappointed, believed he is a zionist puppet. Some were actually overjoyed because they believe in upholding the right of Israel. Common consensus amongst Anons was that Trump was exposing something in his own trolling way.
There is truth to it, but that answer never completely satisfied me and so I kept digging. After digging in many directions, I finally found my answer - and I was truly shocked. If I said I was shocked to the core, it would not be an understatement.
Not only did I understand why Trump says this (beyond the obvious trolling) but surprisingly it provided answer to a question I was yet to ask: "Why does Israel have such a deep hold on America?"
Before you read further, I strongly encourage everyone of you to ask this question to yourself: When did this (Israel's hold on America) even start ?
What is your answer Anon? When JFK forced American Zionist Council to be declared a foreign agent and got assassinated? When AZC was created in 1949? When Israel was created? When Balfour declaration was signed?
You will be wrong. Not only does it predate the creation of Israel itself, but it predates the creation of USA itself. Let that sink in for a second.
You can even make a good case that one of the goals for creation of USA. infact, was the creation of the state of Israel. But creation of Israel was not the end goal. It was simply considered an important milestone for the end goal.
The end goal is to bring about the end of the world because, it was believed, that it was possible to hasten the end times and make it possible for Jesus' second coming and to bring about the Kingdom of Heaven.
But we are getting ahead of ourselves. In this post I will focus on cold hard facts. I will outline how many of the founding fathers supported the idea of "Zionism". Going further, I will also show that it started even earlier. Even amongst the early settlers this was a driving factor.
Chapter 1:
Jewish support and even concepts of zionism in the founding fathers and even early settlers of America
John Adams
John Adams was a devout Christian. In his letters to his son he wrote:
“I have always endeavoured to read it with the same spirit and temper of mind, which I now recommend to you: that is, with the intention and desire that it may contribute to my advancement in wisdom and virtue,”
He maintained a close relationship with Mordecai M Noah, who was an early Zionist, even before Zionism was a movement. In his 1819 letter to Noah which is preserved in the archives, he wrote:
If I were to let my imagination loose I Should wish you had been a member of Napoleons Institute at Cairo nay farther I could find it in my heart to wish that you had been at the head of a hundred thousand Israelites indeed as well disciplin’d as a French army—& marching with them into Judea & making a conquest of that country & restoring your nation to the dominion of it—For I really wish the Jews again in Judea an independent nation
Alexander Hamilton
Known for his philo-Semitism, Hamilton defended Jewish clients against antisemitism and drew on Hebrew models in his writings. He once rebuked an antisemitic lawyer by invoking Jews' historical role under God's government as "witnesses of his miracles."
Hamilton's respect was bolstered by Jewish support during the Revolution, such as financier Haym Salomon's contributions of over $700,000 to the Continental Army.
John Quincy Adams:
Though not a core Founder, John Quincy Adams echoed his father's sentiments, reiterating his desire of "rebuilding of Judea as an independent nation." in his correspondence with Morecai Noah
Benjamin Franklin
Franklin proposed a Great Seal depicting Moses parting the Red Sea, with the motto "Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God," drawing directly from Exodus.
The Liberty Bell's inscription "Proclaim Liberty Throughout All the Land Unto All the Inhabitants thereof" is taken directly from the Leviticus.
John Winthrop (1588–1649)
As the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and a leader of the 1630 migration aboard the Arbella, Winthrop framed the Puritan venture in Zionist-like terms. In his famous 1630 sermon "A Model of Christian Charity," he invoked the colonists as a "city upon a hill," echoing biblical prophecies of Israel's role as a light to the nations. He later declared that "the ways of God towards this His people are in many respects like unto His dealings with Israel of old," positioning New England as a metaphysical successor to ancient Israel.
John Cotton (1584–1652)
A prominent minister who migrated to Boston in 1633, Cotton was influenced by English Puritan postmillennialism, particularly from Thomas Brightman. He advocated for the restoration of Jews to the Holy Land, viewing it as part of God's eschatological plan.
Increase Mather (1639–1723)
Born in England but migrating to the colonies as a child, Mather became a leading intellectual and Harvard president. In his 1669 work The Mystery of Israel's Salvation, he called for the "national restoration of Israel to her land," believing it would spark a global Christian reformation led by the Jewish people.
John Eliot (1604–1690)
Known as the "Apostle to the Indians," Eliot arrived in Boston in 1631 and translated the Bible into Algonquin. His millenarian views included support for Jewish restoration, aligning with broader Puritan eschatology.
Other notable figures
Ephraim Huit, a Cambridge-trained minister who settled in Windsor, Connecticut, predicted the regathering of Jews to Palestine by 1650.
John Davenport (1597–1670), founder of New Haven, and Samuel Sewall (1652–1730), a judge and diarist, shared restorationist beliefs.
For those surprised by this strong support for a Jewish state amongst devout protestant Christians who came to America to create a Christian Nation, stay tuned for the next part: Zionism can be traced all the way back to the Lutherian split from the Holy Roman Church and is embedded deeply within the many offshoots of the Protestantism.
But the more important aspect is the reason for this - which will be explored further down - but I want to dangle a tidbit. The true motivation is not out of love for the Jewish people, but rather due to a more self serving reason. But that has to wait.
PS: I fully expect to receive flames, even from my long term followers. All I ask is, I am build up to something, and keep an open mind as I present my case.
There is a reason why the saying is the western world is comprised of Judeo-Christian values and ethics.
George Orwell talked about this I believe.
Christio-Judaic lol
Israel for last, pedoland
No flames from me, only fuel for the cause. Discussing the topic of Zionism is a tire fire that not many are brave enough to endure the toxic fumes and high heat to put out. Thank you for your analysis.
Bear with me. You will need even more bravery than this by the end of this!
I'm one of the guys deep in the game, I know to choose neither if I'm presented with two choices, to look within to find the way forward
Good to hear fren. I look forward to presenting the next parts of the series, but its been hard to focus after Charlie's assassination.
Well, to be honest, the topics are related, so I've only dug deeper since. But I'm sure you are already aware
Yeah I noticed that he has been getting red pilled about Israel recently.
I like the thread, and look forward to the next parts.
But I do have a question: in what I'm reading above, is there a danger of mistaking "Jews" from "Hebrews" and/or "Israelites?" In other words, when John Cotton for example talks about restoring Jews to the Holy Land, is it possible he is speaking of Israelites, i.e. the Christian descendants from the people of Israel and Judea? Not sure how in depth you got in your digs. If that's in your next installment I'll be happy to wait.
FWIW, I remember an anecdote about Truman being surprised that the new country was named Israel when he presumably expected it to be Judea.
"Jews" specifically refers to those Israelites who had the covenant with God, but who did not accept Jesus as their Messiah, even though Jesus fulfilled more than a number of prophecies in the Old Testament.
That is kinda the crux of this story, but probably in a different way from what you expect. No spoilers yet.
You are correct sir. Sauce
Yep
Assuming the descendants of Jacob = current nation/gov/residents of Israel is folly in my opinion. There is much deeper nuance and meaning to who represents Israel. I’m not talking about or insinuating Replacement Theology either. That is folly as well.
Dasting read! I was going to mention a few of those points if you didn’t. Did you write this or is it from someone else?
This is getting way interesting. Keep going.
I started through the list, for whatever reason I started at the end (John Eliot).
He thought Native Americans were Jewish. Everything he discussed regarding restoring Israel was talking about Native Americans. I'm going to go out on a line here and say none of us believe Native Americans are Jewish.
Next John Davenport. He was a Calvinist. AI tells me he had nothing to do with Jews, Israel or Zionism. Furthermore it told me that
That's where I stopped.
The notion that 1600's ministers were supportive of a 1900s Zionism or that it has anything to do with Trump's remarks about clearing Israeli influence from congress is a miles-wide leap of logic not backed by the sauce provided.
It seems like a sentence created by an AI. While the fact that the modern movement for a Jewish State was indeed started by Theodor Herzl, the word Zionism and the idea of Zionism - as in getting the Jews to move to Plaestine as their homeland - has existed long before that and Herzl is nothing but one node of continuity in that flow. It is part of the case I make in this series, but not the main point.
The best way I like to argue with this kind of stuff is by simply presenting counter-examples:
Herzl did not coin the term Zionism
As for the concept of Jews marching to Judea and claiming their homeland - I have already presented the link to the archive of the letter in which John Adams is extremely excited about this idea - "marching with them into Judea & making a conquest of that country & restoring your nation to the dominion of it"
The earliest documented reference to the idea of sending Jews to their homeland that I can find, ironically, comes from Martin Luther in his Of
You are free to stop for whatever reason you want. Unless you are open to challenging the apparent conventional wisdom, in the same way we did with politics, medicine, science etc, this series will not be of any use.
I was about to make an argument of something like that “one point of contention does not overturn an entire argument, nor one false fact the whole set”, then noticed the original comment.
Israel gets billions every year form taxpayers and then Israel donates hundreds of millions to politicians. Same old scam. We fund the people like Soros, Gates, and nations that are hell bent on destroying the USA.
Before this cycle could be created - funding Israel from taxpayers, and then using those funds to bribe the politicians - there had to be a reason why it was Israel that this could happen with. Why not with any other country or any other cause ?
If it was as simple as this, they didnt even need to wage two world wars to create Israel in the first place, let alone use it to create this forever funding cycle.
Its an important question, with an answer that is not obvious at first sight.
"Israel" isn't really "who" has a hold on America...and all other countries around the world. "America" was being controlled long before there was even such a "place". "Israel" is just a red herring scapegoat.
The better, broader question is, who controls Israel? After all, it's just a piece of dirt, like any other. Who caused Israel to "come to be", and how did they make it happen? Didn't "they" propagandize Americans in 1916/1917 to "join the war" in exchange for the British imperialists promise to capture "Palestine" from their inhabitants? Same gang that started the Fed, FBI, DoJ, ushered in their "legal system", started and won the Civil War, the war of 1811, funded the Bolshevik revolution, the Jacobin French revolution, and on and on we could go, backward or forward in time.
"Destroying Israel", barring dual-citizenship, dissolving AIPAC and ADL, "ending the Fed", winning this war or that, etc. etc. won't change a thing in the grand scheme. These would all be minor obstacles, easily overcome as long as they keep everybody looking the wrong way and pointing fingers at the puppets on stage. Nothing will really change as long as "they" stay hidden.
"They" are those operating at the highest levels of all governments and institutions around the world. Far beyond the public names and faces. Presidents, Premiers, Prime Ministers, CEOs etc. all work for THEM. They are low-level operators. And herein lies the rub.
"They" don't identify as members of any country. And yet, "they" control all countries and have since time immemorial. They are our "rulers" (mis-leaders) that make the "rules" (legal mumbo-jumbo) which the masses still accept as "legitimate", even though they're unwittingly allowing their free will to be violated by "them".
Until a larger percentage of the population realizes this, nothing will really change. The public rulers and mis-leaders can be swapped in and out indefinitely. Only when a growing percentage of the population begins to realize we don't need any "rulers", and that they need us, will there be a significant shift in the present "world dis-order".
We are surely moving in this direction like never before, but until the fingers stop pointing at the "outer presentation layer", and not pointing toward the string pullers and puppet masters, it will continue to be slow going...
Said "puppet masters" are the ones constantly selling the masses the BELIEFS they need them to believe in order to maintain their apparent power as our "rulers". Find who's directing this part of the play, and you have identified "them". This applies to all our major institutions; government, media, academia, religious, legal, medical alike. "They" are directing and influencing them all with an unending stream of lies and deceptions which keep the masses feeling powerless and victimized, which is their "calling card". "They" require "us" to BELIEVE we need "them", through their licensed, endorsed and certified mainstream "experts and authorities".
One of the points I will be making in this series is that the "place" of Israel was only possible because the "concept" was in the minds of the people who build America.
Indeed. And built England, Rome, Greece, Babylon, and so on...
The "Balfour Agreement" between England and "them" was how they got America to unwittingly join WWI (Bernays 'ganda in newspapers was all it took) and get England to agree to steal the Palestinian lands, which weren't even their's to "pledge" in the first place, using military force as always of course.
It's the same "gang" that's been pulling the strings since time immemorial. "Israel" is a red-herring. It could be invaded and taken over tomorrow by whomever you care to name. Wouldn't even be a hiccup for this "gang" to manage. Because they're operatives are embedded all over the world in the highest places of the largest institutions and governments. This has been the case since time immemorial.
I call "them" the "Belief shapers". They've got the world's population believing in an endless list of lies and falsehoods. At the very top of that list is that "they" don't even exist, but rather are just figments of the imagination of "crazy conspiracy theorists".
"The devil's greatest trick was convincing the world [he] doesn't exist".
"They" are "the devil" as such. Not a creature with horns, pitchfork and spiked tail living underground. "They" call themselves "Luciferians". They are here to be disruptors and to play the role of the "bad guys". And boy have they done a number on humanity.
They're easy to see if you choose to look. They are in the business of selling lies, in the form of "beliefs", which they then convince the masses to accept as 'truths". And they're darned good at it too. It's their number one trick that's been working for thousands of years. The result of this one simple trick is that "we need them" and they are "more powerful" than us.
Nothing could be further from the truth. But if they've got 99% of the world's population BELIEVING this, they stay hidden, uncontested and free to continue doing what they've always done.
I hope you can manage to slip some of this into your ongoing series, shedding some light on the "hidden hand" that runs the worldwide show...
I will address all these things once the series is complete.
When I say America, I am talking about long before US was created. I am talking about the people who fleed from this control and found their way halfway across the world. Majority of those people and their generations going forward, we not controlled by the Satanists or their Banksters. But they were inflicted by a mind virus. A virus that looked pure and Christian, and yet it was a virus carefully crafted over 1000 years (at that time) that was used to afflict their minds, and with that, pull them back into their control. Indeed, this is the story of that virus. Bear with me.
Absolutely. Was just trying to give you some food-for-thought.
And I'll give you a little more. The "Mind-virus", as you describe it, is quite simply, BELIEFS MASQUERADING AS FACTS.
I often explain this to people with two examples. The first, that sugar causes weight gain. The second, that most people think they're "bad at math". First comes the BELIEF, which is always "first cause". Then comes the resulting EXPERIENCE. In other words, "believing is seeing". This is HOW "reality" works.
Sugar does not make people gain weight...unless...they say so. You are not "bad at math", unless....you say so.
Thus, these "mind-virus" BELIEFS become PERSONAL FACTS if you choose to entertain them.
Said mind-virus beliefs are running rampant through mainstream Christianity. They all got their start following the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. "Christianity" before 325 AD does not even remotely resemble today's version. Today's version is the result of the controlling cabal changing the meaning of words and interpreting scripture from a purely materialistic, literal, secular, historical perspective. The pre-Vatican Christians read scripture very differently, as metaphor, stories that can be applied to you personally, not about "what other people did". Scripture is a "psychological drama" depicting the lowest to highest levels of consciousness achievable. Obviously, culminating in the stories about Jesus and what the highest level looks like.
A level achievable by each and every one of us, as Jesus himself said -> "Some of you will do greater things than I". Plain and simple language. You've got to force yourself into some irrational mental gymnastics to try and make sense of this simple verse in the context of modern BELIEFS about Jesus.
The modern idea and BELIEFS about Jesus is a big part of this "mind virus" in terms of Christianity which you speak of. Jesus was the "pattern man". A "pattern" that everybody will one day achieve. In this lifetime, or in another. It's inevitable. Humans can only be dominated by the controlling cabal's endless "mind viruses" for so much longer. They're control is dwindling as the collective consciousness of humanity rises. And rising it is, as is plainly evident over the past 10-20 years.
Anyway, food for thought for you. Clearly identifying and describing the mechanism and operation of this "mind virus" will be of utmost importance in bringing it to light for all to see.
I wish you the best of luck!
Thanks for this. Overall, I agree with this take and yes, the end goal of this series is to explore this mind virus and the damage it has done and to reflect how many of us are still afflicted by it. But it will all unfold slowly over the next few posts, so I humbly request patience from the readers who are interested.
As for sugar - I grew up in a household where sweets were treated like its an equal of not greater part of the food pyramid and I would eat sweets regularly, almost every day because I lvoed them so much. I never thought muc about whether they were good or bad, all I knew was they were sweet and I loved sweet.
Only in my early 40s, when I was hit hard with gout and every remedy the doctors told me failed to make any difference, did I start taking nutrition seriously and watched a lot of videos by lot of doctors to understand what might be happening.
All I can say from experience is that, once I cut off sugars almost completely I noticed a few things:
Gout mellowed down finally and havent been hit by it again in the last 5 years. Even my doctor was "baffled"
I lost around 30 pounds
I started feeling healthier than in my 20s
My latest DL photo looks so much better than my original, that people joke that I am aging backwards.
Thats my observation as far as sugars are concerned. Your mileage might vary.
Spot on! It's not about metabolism, genetics, hormones, etc. All these things are the RESULT of what people BELIEVE, which is the first cause. In your case, you believed cutting sugars would help you with weight loss which resulted in you feeling better. Just as you believed it would work for you.
That's how 'reality' works. First we think, then we feel what we think, which results in our beliefs, which then generates what we call "reality". The "real reality", however, is inside us, or "the kingdom of God"...our feeling state.
I look forward to your ongoing series and the conclusions you draw.
Second coming, or first?
That is not even the tip for the iceberg of what we are dealing with. It is, quite literally, Biblical and thats what I intend to show in this series.