I think the train murder is a different thread for lack of a better word. I wonder if it may be the second event compared to the catholic school shooting, or if there is something else comming
The video presents a flowchart analyzing the potential outcomes of recent political violence, focusing on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It draws a historical parallel to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, suggesting that a state-sponsored funeral for Kirk could serve as a unifying measure.
The flowchart shows two paths following the "1st Event" (Kirk's assassination): one leading to "COOL" (unity and cessation of violence) and another to "HOT" (continued tension and potential unrest).
A "2nd event" is identified as a critical juncture that could either de-escalate or exacerbate the situation.
The analysis warns of the risk of ongoing volatility if measures to cool tensions fail, reflecting concerns about the fragility of political stability in the face of targeted violence.
They say, "Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it." If this saying holds water, and I believe it does, then it follows that prescribing possible future events based on like events of in history has some validity.
Her specialty is American History, so I think so is giving her read out with history as her guide.
Remember, September is National Preparedness Month.
Q2054 posted Sept 1, 2018:
"National Preparedness Month is a time to focus our attention on the importance of preparing our families, homes, businesses, and communities for disasters that threaten our lives, property, and homeland. During this time, we also honor the brave men and women who selflessly respond to crises and disasters, rendering aid to those in need. These first responders, who work tirelessly to safeguard our Nation and protect our citizens, deserve our utmost gratitude and appreciation."
I am going out on a limb to say that the flow chart is somewhat correct, but the first event was the assassination of President Lincoln. I look at the confederacy's surrender as a relief point given that the summer and fall of 1864 was especially brutal with General Sherman's march to the sea and the burning of Atlanta.
Abraham Lincoln presented a future of malice toward none in his second inaugural address. He wanted a quick and easy reconstruction period, and he had the Vice President in Andrew Johnson to make it happen. The only thing that happened is that President Lincoln was killed which was the first event with the attempt to unify through the execution of John Wilkes Booth and his co-conspirators and the funeral. But that attempt instead led to the second event which is the Andrew Johnson Presidency and the congressional response to that Presidency. Ultimately things cooled down with the installation of President Grant on March 4, 1869.
My only criticism is that I think the first event was the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, and Charlie Kirk’s murder is the 2nd. Otherwise spot on.
Indeed. This amazing young lady has awakened this old geezer (me) to the usefulness of process analysis describing/unpacking historic events. While casting events in rough flow-charts might be an oversimplification, such charts might get us initiated to being able to digest MUCH more detailed information. You learn something EVERY day! ;)
Any one who lives in the Gettysburg area who hasn’t visited the park would greatly understand the magnitude of the sacrifice. 50,000 died in a day! Pictures of our young and old piled up to be buried in a shallow grave temporarily until placed in a row at the cemetery in an “unknown”, marked grave. 1000’s unknown. 75,000 Americans standing against 50,000 Americans. Lincoln did his famous speech on that hill. “Four score”. What most don’t know is on that day in July the south under General Lee was winning. Battle after battle his troops push further and further north. Women and children displaced. Battlefield hospitals where nearly all died either from injuries or infections. Men lying outside on the ground by the thousands suffering. Thousands of children tagging along behind looking for scraps of food. All of YOUR PROPERTY now belongs to an enemy army made up of your own countrymen. We would have that AND foreign invaders!!
I din’t think she factors in the difference between the types of people involved.
WE ARE NOT ALIKE. They kill a leftist, and the world burns. They kill a Charlie Kirk, and there are prayer vigils.
And that is the right thing for us to do, UP TO A POINT.
Hopefully Trump will be able to take out the networks that feed these evil beast, and they will lose their motivation for action.
Then we need to start going after individuals that espouse views against our constitutional government. Advocating for overthrow of our constitutional system should not be allowed.
As horrific as the train murder was, I don't think it had nearly the level of national impact as Charlie Kirk's death.
I think the Train murder was pure crazy nig#er, not part of a larger scheme.
I think the train murder is a different thread for lack of a better word. I wonder if it may be the second event compared to the catholic school shooting, or if there is something else comming
The video presents a flowchart analyzing the potential outcomes of recent political violence, focusing on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It draws a historical parallel to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, suggesting that a state-sponsored funeral for Kirk could serve as a unifying measure.
The flowchart shows two paths following the "1st Event" (Kirk's assassination): one leading to "COOL" (unity and cessation of violence) and another to "HOT" (continued tension and potential unrest).
A "2nd event" is identified as a critical juncture that could either de-escalate or exacerbate the situation.
The analysis warns of the risk of ongoing volatility if measures to cool tensions fail, reflecting concerns about the fragility of political stability in the face of targeted violence.
It is insult for the name of the animals, they are monsters.
It's time for the storm.
I had the exact thought just this morning.
Good, in theory.
Is she accounting for the Cabal?
I didn't think so, either.
By the way, apparently this is the way to get close to the topic of... uh, can't say it.
They say, "Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it." If this saying holds water, and I believe it does, then it follows that prescribing possible future events based on like events of in history has some validity.
Her specialty is American History, so I think so is giving her read out with history as her guide.
Remember, September is National Preparedness Month.
Q2054 posted Sept 1, 2018:
"National Preparedness Month is a time to focus our attention on the importance of preparing our families, homes, businesses, and communities for disasters that threaten our lives, property, and homeland. During this time, we also honor the brave men and women who selflessly respond to crises and disasters, rendering aid to those in need. These first responders, who work tirelessly to safeguard our Nation and protect our citizens, deserve our utmost gratitude and appreciation."
I am going out on a limb to say that the flow chart is somewhat correct, but the first event was the assassination of President Lincoln. I look at the confederacy's surrender as a relief point given that the summer and fall of 1864 was especially brutal with General Sherman's march to the sea and the burning of Atlanta.
Abraham Lincoln presented a future of malice toward none in his second inaugural address. He wanted a quick and easy reconstruction period, and he had the Vice President in Andrew Johnson to make it happen. The only thing that happened is that President Lincoln was killed which was the first event with the attempt to unify through the execution of John Wilkes Booth and his co-conspirators and the funeral. But that attempt instead led to the second event which is the Andrew Johnson Presidency and the congressional response to that Presidency. Ultimately things cooled down with the installation of President Grant on March 4, 1869.
I suspect that Grant is lacking a LOT of good credit in the history books.
If you think Wilkes, and his co-conspirators killed Lincoln, you might want to read this 12 part story. You can also listen to audio.
Why Everything You Think You Know About the Lincoln Assassination is Wrong
My only criticism is that I think the first event was the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, and Charlie Kirk’s murder is the 2nd. Otherwise spot on.
Where does the second, failed attempt to assassinate POTUS fit in?
Good point. They happened so close the events kinda merged in my mind, but that may be throwing me off
In other words... THE PRECIPICE?!
That's the word.
There is another flashpoint event coming up and that is Halloween.
I would put money on the left dressing as Charlie Kirk on that day which will of course be inflammatory.
These people are sick.
Get the paintball guns loaded up.
Analysis from a citizen journalist who is using her God given gifts, including her brain.
Refreshing.
Indeed. This amazing young lady has awakened this old geezer (me) to the usefulness of process analysis describing/unpacking historic events. While casting events in rough flow-charts might be an oversimplification, such charts might get us initiated to being able to digest MUCH more detailed information. You learn something EVERY day! ;)
Thank you, Q20191776! Thank you, MuckyDuck! Thank you, thatthingido2!
I'm gonna give it about two weeks tbh
except we already had 2 "hot" events back to back with iryna and charlie so it may be a bit "warmer" than as presented in flow chart?
2nd Event=NG in place =ARRESTS' coming.
Any one who lives in the Gettysburg area who hasn’t visited the park would greatly understand the magnitude of the sacrifice. 50,000 died in a day! Pictures of our young and old piled up to be buried in a shallow grave temporarily until placed in a row at the cemetery in an “unknown”, marked grave. 1000’s unknown. 75,000 Americans standing against 50,000 Americans. Lincoln did his famous speech on that hill. “Four score”. What most don’t know is on that day in July the south under General Lee was winning. Battle after battle his troops push further and further north. Women and children displaced. Battlefield hospitals where nearly all died either from injuries or infections. Men lying outside on the ground by the thousands suffering. Thousands of children tagging along behind looking for scraps of food. All of YOUR PROPERTY now belongs to an enemy army made up of your own countrymen. We would have that AND foreign invaders!!
I din’t think she factors in the difference between the types of people involved. WE ARE NOT ALIKE. They kill a leftist, and the world burns. They kill a Charlie Kirk, and there are prayer vigils.
And that is the right thing for us to do, UP TO A POINT.
Hopefully Trump will be able to take out the networks that feed these evil beast, and they will lose their motivation for action.
Then we need to start going after individuals that espouse views against our constitutional government. Advocating for overthrow of our constitutional system should not be allowed.
I disagree with her. The leaders want civil war. We all know that.
She states multiple times that there are many many people who want maximum conflict. (my words not hers)
Thanks Mods