Snuff Propaganda and Emotionalism: The "Kirks" are not who you think they are.
(theamericanclassroom.substack.com)
🐴 LEFTY SHITPOST 💩
Comments (18)
sorted by:
I’m not going to remove this yet, so Anons can read and share the deep HORSESHIT type of articles they’ll begin to see from more lefty “educated” and “psychological” experts! 😠😤
So it is only horsehit when you disagree right?
Excuse this Mod for clarifying: perhaps you must have not read the entire article, and researched who wrote it, which is clearly not from a conservative or GAW and Q side patriot person. But it comes from a very left leaning expert spewing more psychologically covered hate. I kind of have mass expertise in this area and it’s very clear and well worded “hate propaganda” for Elites. I can easily just remove it, but felt it’s good once in awhile for Anons to see the deep seeded articles the left spews.
If you prefer these types of articles, you just may be in the wrong forum. It’s fine to disagree also Anon but please avoid dropping to griefing a Mod; as it is against the Rules.
Thank you for your concern.
Replying to a mod in disagreement is greifing a mod? I didnt know that....Forgive me, I will refrain replying to you when I disagree in the future.
I prefer to hear all sides of cases, even if one side is written by "the enemy" so if you think the article is bunk yet still leave it up then good.
I dont consider Miles Mathis to be left leaning or a patriot per se, he just researches and writes stuff ....some of it makes sense to me and other pieces dont.....
I don’t agree but that’s our difference of opinion about the writer. This happens.
Now beyond that; please reread what I said smartass! Because disagreeing and griefing are two different things. I hope you’re smart enough to understand, being an Anon on this forum.
And if we start going further back and forth on tit-for-tat, with you deciding to test/toe the taunt line, that is called griefing. And which will end in me handing a clear and fair ban. So let’s just end here as you’ve said your final piece and I’ve now said mine.
Good day Anon.
This comment is great. I like the deeper explanation.
Thank you!
🤣☝
Lefty? That's rich.
The guy gets how Charlie met Erkika wrong. I stopped reading after that.
We shouldn’t stop reading: That’s what the left does.
Erika "first saw him" in Israel by her own admission. She was there with her mom, and he was there with other people too. She herself has told that story on stage.
I saw Charlie at those universities. What he said. How he said it. I saw him give some patience and respect to his “enemies”, and yet receive barely any in return. That’s who I knew. I saw him profess his love of Jesus. How faith was and is the most important thing in his life. His Christian values. And his love of the family, through God’s word. I don’t need anyone to tell me his secrets. What he did in his private time. I don’t care. I saw him. I saw what God wanted me to see of Charlie. And I’m thankful. Thankful to have known him for a short time. The man loved Jesus. And I have no doubt he is basking in God’s glory right now. Right where I’m gonna be one day. That’s all I need to know.
This young lady has some valid questions 2minutes 59 seconds long. https://www.bitchute.com/video/nvqhSE7GdbXR
Valid questions indeed
All valid questions. The bigger question is do we buy that Charlie is actually dead? Is it possible this was fake and gay? As far as I can tell yes charlie is dead, but I only care at the moment that this Tyler Robinson character is actually the shooter. As long as we have the trigger man for this incident, I feel like we can question why this went down once we confirm. Because if this kid is not the trigger man then we are just dishing out the death penalty for a innocent and should our suspect of "that" country being involved be true, they will believe they can act with impunity to America and Americans. So i say let's confirm the perpetrator is the real one and make an example out of him.
Since when is Miles Mathis a lefty?
He obviously is read the whole article he refers to the other side us.
Miles is pretty much against ALL establishment.....left OR right
I have read dozens of his articles and he has disdain for BOTH sides as he believes BOTH sides are complicit in their own way.
Are you familiar with his work or just this piece?
His research and paper on the Manson psyop is tippy top...check it out if that kind of thing interests you.
Also and I dont know if this is clear to everyone, the author of the substack is Sean Brooks who I dont know anything about.....it is NOT Miles Mathis, whose work is the primary content being quoted by Sean in the substack.