There's a whole slew of crap going on out there. Everyone says they know how it happened. That's the new money maker online. Act like you know and watch the clicks roll in. It's all BS. Stick with the known facts and stop chasing some "expert".
Is that what you think? I believe what I can see and what I know about weapons. I shoot close to 10,000 rds a year. Have my own 25 to 500 yd range on my farm. And I shoot less now than several years ago. Owned my first gun when I was 8 years old, I'm 72 now. I also own several NFA weapons including select-fire. Shot competition and starting at the age 19 was trained in multiple weapons platforms by PACAF later AFSOC for serious shooting in SEA although I never had to go in country. All that to say, Charlie was shot at range from the front. Who shot him I have no idea. The little faggot kid may have done it. Hell any greenhorn with an hour on the range could make that shot. I practice hundred yard shots with a pistol, albeit a competition build.
I wish the FBI would just say if he was wearing body armor or not. If they would just share what they know it would stamp out a lot of crazier theories. There are just all these little lies, inconsistencies, and weirdness with what they have shared so far. But we can't expect that just having Kash and Bongino suddenly means the rest of the FBI is going to act with integrity, honor, and competency.
Do you have a source on that? All of the analysis I've seen suggested he was not wearing any known type of body armor. Unless, you mean, the full armor of God.
If i recall correctly, I believe when Megyn Kelly filled in on the charlie podcast she revealed that charlie was wearing bullet proof vest and she said she didnt know it had gotten that bad.
I watched the whole thing. They make a good case that he was wearing L4 armor. Others make a case that he wasn't wearing anything. If only the LE's involved would just release a statement on the matter (and other things)
I can't be slogging a 3.5 hour video, but skipping to 227, people STILL harping on white shirt audience guy? pff. He is not holding anything!
He may be signalling the shot yes, he might be a misdirection actor, yes, but he certainly would not be taking the shot, that would be way too risky. It would be seen/heard.
An automated "turret" disguised as a camera is much more likely - namely the rear high camera that was removed immediately after.
White shirt signals for the turret operator to activate the turret (someone is aiming it remotely, keeping it trained on target at all times) remotely. Turret trigger is watching white shirt guy.
At the same time, someone else triggers a "gunshot sound" near the patsy on the roof
The turret gun behind and above CK is a silent weapon, perhaps it uses "railgun" type acceleration of an actual round which was earlier fired from the patsy weapon into gel so it is balistically matching the rifle.
Our patsy is on the roof, in firing position, his presence triggers the entire sequence of signals from white shirt. But patsy has no gun, just a towel (covered in gunshot residue from the rifle firing to get the ballistics-matched round for the railgun)
Patsy takes "shot" (in hypnosis) when he sees the signal (he does this only in his imagination)
Gunshot sound is triggered near patsy, by the same trigger circuit that operates the turret railgun. Hence the round is delivered on the signal of white tee shirt guy from above and behind CK by silent railgun holding a real round from the rifle, the round emerges in the correct spot (approx) for an entry wound, the sound comes from the patsy location (some sort of noisemaker hidden somewhere). Patsy sees his charade of a shot actually cause noise and appear to hit CK. His hypnotic trance is deepened, and he is convinced he hold a rifle and just took the shot.
The actual rifle is hidden in the "woods"
pasty leaves the site carrying only a towel. Takes towel to the waiting rifle, leaving it there, contaminating the rifle with his DNA
confederates confess on site (zinn) while others remove the railgun turret and noisemaker.
Confused patsy wanders around in a daze, his phone comes alive due to hacking, and starts sending texts to his handler, I mean, "lover".
he eventually speaks to his dad, and "impies" he did it, but the hypnosis has worn off and he is not sure any more.
Hence, he jumped from the roof without a rifle. Hence there was no problem getting the rifle onto the site (it was never on the site)
Hence he could leave the site because he wasn’t carrying a three foot rifle
shot came from his direction due to noisemaker
exit wound taken for an entry wound, in direction of patsy.
IF there is an Autopsy (a genuine one) there should be an entry wound at the hairline on the back of CKs neck.
We need an autopsy report, and then we need another autopsy that is conducted in secret after the first one.
The angle at that short range has a negligible affect on point of impact. You can bet the neck wasn't the target. Even a trained sniper wouldn't try that shot. If the shooter knew or suspected Charlie was wearing a plate he would have taken a head shot. Also that wasn't Charlie's carotid artery. The wound was on the jugular vein. The carotid arteries are smaller, under the ears and under more pressure. Had it hit the carotid bright red (oxygenated) blood would have spewed out like a hose. The darker blood and the flow rate tell you instantly it was a jugular vein, blood returning to the lungs to get re-oxygenated.
A normal 150 grain hunting round would have done a lot of damage and I'm not seeing the blood spatter behind Charlie showing that. 30.06 ballistics show a lot of velocity and energy at an estimated 160 yards. Just sayin'.
Agreed. But not if it was deflected up into the neck and lodged in the cranium. Otherwise, yes there should have been a gaping exit wound. Even a soft-nosed 30 cal projectile would have been a pass thru on a human body, only very dense bone "may" stop it. A human neck is narrow and the muscles aren't dense so if there had been a pass thru there would have been blood and tissue splatter all over behind him. It also would have been visible in the slo-mo video. If we could see the autopsy results or hear from the mortician it would answer a lot of questions about projectile path and if the projectile was located in the body. But we know we'll never get that info. So, we are stuck with informed and wild speculation.
Do you want to know how many IFs your theory contains just so you can think you have it right?
The OPs video suggests the shooter was behind and to Charlies right. It enters just above the hairline, thus hard to see due to the small caliber.
The neck wound is the exit... thats why when slowed down you see particles coming OUT of the wound immediately.
When the bullet enters it produce a CAVITY of force through the body and NOTHING comes out the hole. You are seeing the exit wound in the neck 100% because of particles coming out immediately. Its standard ballistics. Any youtube video showing these tests will show you nothing comes OUT the entry point.
There's a whole slew of crap going on out there. Everyone says they know how it happened. That's the new money maker online. Act like you know and watch the clicks roll in. It's all BS. Stick with the known facts and stop chasing some "expert".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2F1BatlSBU
So you're believing the narrative? Incredible.
Is that what you think? I believe what I can see and what I know about weapons. I shoot close to 10,000 rds a year. Have my own 25 to 500 yd range on my farm. And I shoot less now than several years ago. Owned my first gun when I was 8 years old, I'm 72 now. I also own several NFA weapons including select-fire. Shot competition and starting at the age 19 was trained in multiple weapons platforms by PACAF later AFSOC for serious shooting in SEA although I never had to go in country. All that to say, Charlie was shot at range from the front. Who shot him I have no idea. The little faggot kid may have done it. Hell any greenhorn with an hour on the range could make that shot. I practice hundred yard shots with a pistol, albeit a competition build.
Agree.
Thank you.
Everyone knows he was shot in the front, side, back & faked his death & is in Valhalla with the Elves. PROVE ME WRONG! 🤔😮😂😎
Kek!!
I wish the FBI would just say if he was wearing body armor or not. If they would just share what they know it would stamp out a lot of crazier theories. There are just all these little lies, inconsistencies, and weirdness with what they have shared so far. But we can't expect that just having Kash and Bongino suddenly means the rest of the FBI is going to act with integrity, honor, and competency.
He always wore armor. Erika made sure of it.
Do you have a source on that? All of the analysis I've seen suggested he was not wearing any known type of body armor. Unless, you mean, the full armor of God.
If i recall correctly, I believe when Megyn Kelly filled in on the charlie podcast she revealed that charlie was wearing bullet proof vest and she said she didnt know it had gotten that bad.
Give this a watch: https://rumble.com/v6z1asg-defcon-zerq-ep.-009.html
This video claims that Kash fired the Utah FBI field office director the morning of the assassination (BEFORE the shooting). WUT?
It's 4+ hours long. Do you have a timestamp ?
Not at the moment - will try to reply later
In the meantime this presents much the same analysis: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0ZUYCnq/ballistic-wound-tech-on-the-char/c/
I watched the whole thing. They make a good case that he was wearing L4 armor. Others make a case that he wasn't wearing anything. If only the LE's involved would just release a statement on the matter (and other things)
I can't be slogging a 3.5 hour video, but skipping to 227, people STILL harping on white shirt audience guy? pff. He is not holding anything!
He may be signalling the shot yes, he might be a misdirection actor, yes, but he certainly would not be taking the shot, that would be way too risky. It would be seen/heard.
An automated "turret" disguised as a camera is much more likely - namely the rear high camera that was removed immediately after.
White shirt signals for the turret operator to activate the turret (someone is aiming it remotely, keeping it trained on target at all times) remotely. Turret trigger is watching white shirt guy.
At the same time, someone else triggers a "gunshot sound" near the patsy on the roof
The turret gun behind and above CK is a silent weapon, perhaps it uses "railgun" type acceleration of an actual round which was earlier fired from the patsy weapon into gel so it is balistically matching the rifle.
Our patsy is on the roof, in firing position, his presence triggers the entire sequence of signals from white shirt. But patsy has no gun, just a towel (covered in gunshot residue from the rifle firing to get the ballistics-matched round for the railgun)
Patsy takes "shot" (in hypnosis) when he sees the signal (he does this only in his imagination) Gunshot sound is triggered near patsy, by the same trigger circuit that operates the turret railgun. Hence the round is delivered on the signal of white tee shirt guy from above and behind CK by silent railgun holding a real round from the rifle, the round emerges in the correct spot (approx) for an entry wound, the sound comes from the patsy location (some sort of noisemaker hidden somewhere). Patsy sees his charade of a shot actually cause noise and appear to hit CK. His hypnotic trance is deepened, and he is convinced he hold a rifle and just took the shot.
The actual rifle is hidden in the "woods"
pasty leaves the site carrying only a towel. Takes towel to the waiting rifle, leaving it there, contaminating the rifle with his DNA
confederates confess on site (zinn) while others remove the railgun turret and noisemaker.
Confused patsy wanders around in a daze, his phone comes alive due to hacking, and starts sending texts to his handler, I mean, "lover".
he eventually speaks to his dad, and "impies" he did it, but the hypnosis has worn off and he is not sure any more.
Hence, he jumped from the roof without a rifle. Hence there was no problem getting the rifle onto the site (it was never on the site) Hence he could leave the site because he wasn’t carrying a three foot rifle shot came from his direction due to noisemaker exit wound taken for an entry wound, in direction of patsy.
IF there is an Autopsy (a genuine one) there should be an entry wound at the hairline on the back of CKs neck.
We need an autopsy report, and then we need another autopsy that is conducted in secret after the first one.
(apologies for haste on the move)
...and that's why he fell to his right? Physics would suggest otherwise.
Here's shorter version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltakvGyzfZs&rco=1
They're lying like they always do.
One thing is for sure. You cant believe much of what you read on the internet.
Wow.... thanks man. What an excellent contribution to the discussion.
And from a high angle, through his Carotid artery in the neck. Trained sniper shot. Not a .30-06. May God rest his soul.
The angle at that short range has a negligible affect on point of impact. You can bet the neck wasn't the target. Even a trained sniper wouldn't try that shot. If the shooter knew or suspected Charlie was wearing a plate he would have taken a head shot. Also that wasn't Charlie's carotid artery. The wound was on the jugular vein. The carotid arteries are smaller, under the ears and under more pressure. Had it hit the carotid bright red (oxygenated) blood would have spewed out like a hose. The darker blood and the flow rate tell you instantly it was a jugular vein, blood returning to the lungs to get re-oxygenated.
A normal 150 grain hunting round would have done a lot of damage and I'm not seeing the blood spatter behind Charlie showing that. 30.06 ballistics show a lot of velocity and energy at an estimated 160 yards. Just sayin'.
Agreed. But not if it was deflected up into the neck and lodged in the cranium. Otherwise, yes there should have been a gaping exit wound. Even a soft-nosed 30 cal projectile would have been a pass thru on a human body, only very dense bone "may" stop it. A human neck is narrow and the muscles aren't dense so if there had been a pass thru there would have been blood and tissue splatter all over behind him. It also would have been visible in the slo-mo video. If we could see the autopsy results or hear from the mortician it would answer a lot of questions about projectile path and if the projectile was located in the body. But we know we'll never get that info. So, we are stuck with informed and wild speculation.
perfectly stated. Thank you for your service DS2! Wish I would have.
Do you want to know how many IFs your theory contains just so you can think you have it right?
The OPs video suggests the shooter was behind and to Charlies right. It enters just above the hairline, thus hard to see due to the small caliber.
The neck wound is the exit... thats why when slowed down you see particles coming OUT of the wound immediately.
When the bullet enters it produce a CAVITY of force through the body and NOTHING comes out the hole. You are seeing the exit wound in the neck 100% because of particles coming out immediately. Its standard ballistics. Any youtube video showing these tests will show you nothing comes OUT the entry point.
Another brief analysis: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0ZUYCnq/ballistic-wound-tech-on-the-char/c/
Give this a watch - https://rumble.com/v6z1asg-defcon-zerq-ep.-009.html