PRESIDENT TRUMP'S AUTHORITY JUST IN CASE ANYONE ASKS
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
3 and 4 are very important. Signifying what many in our circles suspected? I take it to a step further. I think we own the British Commonwealth. I did think it was interesting that Trump was treated like the real King on his visit to the UK. And where did the left's No Kings rhetoric suddenly emerge from?
If (we) own the British Commonwealth wouldn't it would include all Common-Wealth colonies... and Canada, eh?
Yes. And part of the reason for Trump’s teasing.
Remember POTUS post that said 2 Kings and had 2 Crowns? 👑👑
J1D, where did you get this? Do you have a link?
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
Just what I needed. Thank you.
Of course Dog!
I like the restoration of sovereignty part.
I like all of it!
And the removal of the Admirality Laws..no more gold fringes!!
u/#pepedetective
Say what now?
Can anyone define or explain this???
That stupid gif gets me every time
I love it...😸
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
Is there anything about that wording "United States for America" vs "United States of America" that has anything to do with Maritime/cannon law, gold-fringe flag and Post Master General type stuff?
Here's a tiny sliver of what GPT is telling me:
"Yes—the shift in wording absolutely connects to the Maritime/Admiralty/sovereignty law theories, gold-fringe flag symbolism, and “Postmaster General” narratives.
Legally, in mainstream courts, these distinctions hold zero authority—but in sovereignty/common law circles, they’re loaded signals pointing to a restoration of land-based common law jurisdiction instead of sea-based admiralty jurisdiction."
There's a lot more but it's TL;DR
☺️
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
Look at this:
Prize Cases of 1863 is the precedent.
https://x.com/5Strat/status/1972522816345199101
https://nitter.poast.org/5Strat/status/1972522816345199101
I know...still looking...
You had me at bacon fat
Me, too...kek!
where is this posted?
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
where is this from?
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
His Excellency of the Western Kingdom?
Preeeeetttyy sure this is applicable here…
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
Love and appreciate you J1D, always, but this appears to be fake and gay.
I suspect the same, but as to your quote, what is an esquire?
Forgive me if your question confuses me or if my answer seems lacking.
My quote is from the Constitution, but I do not believe esquire would fall into any of those categories. It is not a title of nobility (in modern day US), and they are not legally supposed to be accepting gifts of these kinds from foreign heads of state
Where did you get this graphic?
This was a reply to Jon Herold @patel_patriot
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
https://nitter.poast.org/patel_patriot/status/1971964049014345798
Thanks. Clearly nonsense.
Who is “His Excellency of the Western Kingdom?” (Is that Charles III?) Does #4 mean we are a sovereign nation again? Would this oath also apply to 🇺🇸 esquires submitted to the BAR? British Accredited Registry.
Are "His Excellency..." and "President of the USA" one and the same person?
I believe so, Hail to the Chief on steroids!!
hmmmm ... it seems someone still has a the idea that the Paris peace treaty of 1783/1789 somehow establishes the title: Prince of America for failing to correctly interpret the appearance of a comma in the text.