It seems like John Brennan was part of a RICO Conspiracy... and should have all of his assets seized after he's convicted. House, bank account, cars, boats, jewelry, etc... everything. Let him see it all being auctioned off just before his hanging at Gitmo.
The claim that former CIA Director John Brennan lied to Congress centers on his statements about the Steele dossier—a collection of unverified reports alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia, funded by the Clinton campaign and DNC through Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie.
Critics, including the House Judiciary Committee, allege Brennan falsely denied the dossier's role in the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election interference, as well as the CIA's involvement in its inclusion. This ICA, co-authored by the CIA, FBI, and NSA, concluded Russia preferred Trump and sought to help him win—a finding later criticized as flawed and politically motivated.
The core evidence comes from a October 21, 2025, criminal referral by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) to Attorney General Pam Bondi, recommending prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for false statements to Congress.
The referral cites Brennan's May 11, 2023, transcribed interview before the House Judiciary Committee, his May 23, 2017, open testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), declassified documents from the Trump administration (July 2025), the 2020 HPSCI Majority Staff Report (declassified in 2025), and the 2023 Durham Report.
These sources allegedly show Brennan "knowingly and willfully" misrepresented facts to conceal the dossier's influence on the ICA.
Below, I outline the key alleged false statements, followed by supporting evidence from public testimonies and documents. All quotes are verbatim from the cited sources.
Alleged False Statements by Brennan
Brennan made these under oath or in official congressional proceedings:
Denial of CIA Involvement or Reliance on the Steele Dossier (2023 Interview):
"I was not involved in analyzing the dossier at all. I said the first time I actually saw it, it was after the election. And the CIA was not involved at all with the [Steele] dossier. You can direct that to the FBI and to others." (Response to Rep. Matt Gaetz on funding concerns.)
On inclusion in ICA: "There’s an annex in the ICA... that the Bureau asked to be included in there. It was their purview, their area, not ours at all."
Claim that CIA Opposed Including the Dossier in the ICA (2023 Interview):
"The CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment." (Response to Chairman Jim Jordan on when he first learned of the dossier.)
Denial of Dossier's Use as Basis for the ICA (2017 HPSCI Testimony):
To Rep. Trey Gowdy: "Did the CIA rely on it?" "No."
"Why not?" **"Because we… didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was—it was not."
These statements allegedly form a "pattern" of deception, per the referral, as Brennan portrayed the dossier as an FBI-only matter with no CIA role, despite evidence he championed its inclusion.
Evidence Supporting the Claim
The supporting evidence draws from official investigations and declassifications, showing Brennan's active role in incorporating the dossier despite internal CIA objections and knowledge of its flaws. Key documents contradict his denials by demonstrating CIA drafting, Brennan's overrides, and joint CIA-FBI decisions.
1. Role of the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA
The ICA's declassified version (Jan. 6, 2017) references the dossier in its main body and includes a two-page Annex A summarizing its claims as "additional reporting from an FBI Source on Russian influence efforts." This annex, only in the classified ICA, implied some corroboration despite minimal vetting.
The Durham Report (2023) details how the dossier—delivered to the FBI in 2016—contained "unverified and uncorroborated information" but was still used to support ICA conclusions on Russian preferences for Trump. It notes the ICA process rushed the assessment in under a week, sidelining tradecraft standards, and relied on "raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence" like the dossier.
HPSCI Majority Staff Report (2020, declassified 2025): Confirms Annex A was a "two-page summary of the Steele dossier along with some analysis that struggled to imply that some dossier findings might have been corroborated." A CIA officer drafted it "in coordination with [the] FBI," and inclusion was a "jointly made" decision by CIA and FBI directors (Brennan and Comey).
2. Brennan's Personal Involvement and Override of Objections
Declassified CIA Memorandum (June 26, 2025): When two senior CIA mission center leaders raised "specific flaws" in the dossier (e.g., its partisan origins and lack of corroboration), Brennan dismissed them, appearing "more swayed by the [d]ossier’s general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns." He formalized his stance in writing: "My bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report." The memo describes Brennan as overriding "veteran" CIA officers who warned the dossier was "substandard" and politically tainted.
HPSCI Report: Senior CIA officers demanded removal of dossier material due to "many flaws," but Brennan "refused to remove it," responding to concerns with, "Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?" He "had to order [the dossier] included over the objections of [CIA] professionals." A senior FBI analyst confirmed: After days of debate, "upper levels [at FBI and CIA] decided to put it in."
Durham Report: Highlights Brennan's knowledge of the dossier's weaknesses by late 2016 but notes he pushed its inclusion to align with preconceived narratives of Russian-Trump ties. It criticizes the ICA as a "guilt by association" exercise, with the dossier providing key (flawed) sourcing for the Trump-preference claim.
3. Knowledge of Dossier's Political Origins
Brennan claimed in 2023 he first saw the dossier "after the election" and had no prior analysis role. However, declassified ICA notes (July 2025) show he was briefed on its Clinton/DNC funding by September 2016 via FBI channels. The Durham Report (pp. 109-117) traces how Fusion GPS (hired by Clinton's campaign) commissioned Steele, a fact known to intelligence leaders including Brennan by fall 2016.
Declassified documents (July 2025) from the Trump administration, including ICA working papers, reveal Brennan was aware of "unreleased Russian material" further debunking dossier claims but proceeded anyway. These contradict his 2017 testimony of no "firsthand knowledge" of its testing or origins.
4. Broader Context from Investigations
Durham Report Overall Findings: While not recommending charges against Brennan, it faults CIA leadership (including him) for a "biased" ICA process that elevated unverified info like the dossier to drive narratives. It notes false premises in Crossfire Hurricane (FBI's Trump probe) stemmed from similar rushed judgments.
HPSCI Report: Describes the ICA as "marred by politicization," with Brennan's insistence on the dossier exemplifying how "senior leadership overruled analytic tradecraft concerns."
Recent Declassifications (July 2025): Trump-era releases, including the CIA memo, expose Brennan's role in "fabricating" ICA findings to undermine Trump, per the referral. These include timelines showing Brennan's pre-election awareness and post-ICA briefings where he hyped dossier elements to Obama.
Summary of Key Document Contradictions
2023 Judiciary Interview
Brennan's Alleged False Statement: "CIA was not involved at all with the dossier"
This evidence substantiates the claim with a chain of contradictions: Brennan's denials clash directly with declassified records showing his advocacy for the dossier despite known biases. The referral argues this was "willful" to protect the ICA's legacy and obscure political misuse of intelligence. No counter-evidence from Brennan or Democrats refuting these specifics appears in public records as of October 21, 2025; responses have focused on politicization of the referral itself. Prosecution remains pending DOJ review, but the documents provide prima facie support for the lying allegation.
I said this here (to a wave of down votes 😂) when Steve Bannon (AND again) when Peter Navarro went to prison: 'Relax, they're going to prison to set a precedent so the deep state scum can be held accountable in the future.'
My my do I love how the times (and opinions) do change.
There is something about Brennan I detest more than the others in the group of conspiratorial Orcs.
I want them all prosecuted and convicted for at least seditious conspiracy, all of their assets seized, and to at least rot in prison for the rest of their demonic lives. The damage they have done to our beloved country, as well as Western Culture, is incalculable.
I believe they've all committed treason, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to convict them of this. I'd be related if I'm wrong!
That miserable face is going to get more miserable. Out of all the sketchy people in government, he's one who puzzles me the most. Why does he speak Arabic? Why is he a communist? What's up with this guy?
It seems like John Brennan was part of a RICO Conspiracy... and should have all of his assets seized after he's convicted. House, bank account, cars, boats, jewelry, etc... everything. Let him see it all being auctioned off just before his hanging at Gitmo.
That's the price of treason.
Please please stop, it’s too much winning this early in the week.
No, please continue, it's already unzipped
Overview of the Claim
The claim that former CIA Director John Brennan lied to Congress centers on his statements about the Steele dossier—a collection of unverified reports alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia, funded by the Clinton campaign and DNC through Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie.
Critics, including the House Judiciary Committee, allege Brennan falsely denied the dossier's role in the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election interference, as well as the CIA's involvement in its inclusion. This ICA, co-authored by the CIA, FBI, and NSA, concluded Russia preferred Trump and sought to help him win—a finding later criticized as flawed and politically motivated.
The core evidence comes from a October 21, 2025, criminal referral by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) to Attorney General Pam Bondi, recommending prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for false statements to Congress.
The referral cites Brennan's May 11, 2023, transcribed interview before the House Judiciary Committee, his May 23, 2017, open testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), declassified documents from the Trump administration (July 2025), the 2020 HPSCI Majority Staff Report (declassified in 2025), and the 2023 Durham Report.
These sources allegedly show Brennan "knowingly and willfully" misrepresented facts to conceal the dossier's influence on the ICA.
Below, I outline the key alleged false statements, followed by supporting evidence from public testimonies and documents. All quotes are verbatim from the cited sources.
Alleged False Statements by Brennan
Brennan made these under oath or in official congressional proceedings:
Denial of CIA Involvement or Reliance on the Steele Dossier (2023 Interview):
Claim that CIA Opposed Including the Dossier in the ICA (2023 Interview):
Denial of Dossier's Use as Basis for the ICA (2017 HPSCI Testimony):
These statements allegedly form a "pattern" of deception, per the referral, as Brennan portrayed the dossier as an FBI-only matter with no CIA role, despite evidence he championed its inclusion.
Evidence Supporting the Claim
The supporting evidence draws from official investigations and declassifications, showing Brennan's active role in incorporating the dossier despite internal CIA objections and knowledge of its flaws. Key documents contradict his denials by demonstrating CIA drafting, Brennan's overrides, and joint CIA-FBI decisions.
1. Role of the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA
2. Brennan's Personal Involvement and Override of Objections
3. Knowledge of Dossier's Political Origins
4. Broader Context from Investigations
Summary of Key Document Contradictions
Assessment
This evidence substantiates the claim with a chain of contradictions: Brennan's denials clash directly with declassified records showing his advocacy for the dossier despite known biases. The referral argues this was "willful" to protect the ICA's legacy and obscure political misuse of intelligence. No counter-evidence from Brennan or Democrats refuting these specifics appears in public records as of October 21, 2025; responses have focused on politicization of the referral itself. Prosecution remains pending DOJ review, but the documents provide prima facie support for the lying allegation.
Excellent! Who is next? Clapper? Please please please, unless he’s the one cooperating.
I would not mind seeing Jordan replace P. Bondi as US AG……assuming he truly is a White Hat.
Lindsay Halligan is doing some good work. Make her AG. Or maybe Alina Hubba Hubba.
Yeah, agree. They might be a little more ‘inner circle’ too. At least Alina anyway.
OKAY, ILoveIvermectin...JUST PUT YOU'RE TONGUE BACK IN YOUR HEAD...ALSO, JUST MAKE SURE YOU WIPE THE DROOL OFF!!!!!!!
And I'm right along side you!!!!!!!😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘
It's the third Tuesday of the month. That's the day Jordan has balls.
I said this here (to a wave of down votes 😂) when Steve Bannon (AND again) when Peter Navarro went to prison: 'Relax, they're going to prison to set a precedent so the deep state scum can be held accountable in the future.'
My my do I love how the times (and opinions) do change.
There is something about Brennan I detest more than the others in the group of conspiratorial Orcs.
I want them all prosecuted and convicted for at least seditious conspiracy, all of their assets seized, and to at least rot in prison for the rest of their demonic lives. The damage they have done to our beloved country, as well as Western Culture, is incalculable.
I believe they've all committed treason, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to convict them of this. I'd be related if I'm wrong!
Brennan and all the rest are soon to learn that TREASON has a very steep price when caught!
They thought she would never lose…..
FAFO
So sweet that the people on my list of "most people I want to see go to jail" are being rounded up!
That miserable face is going to get more miserable. Out of all the sketchy people in government, he's one who puzzles me the most. Why does he speak Arabic? Why is he a communist? What's up with this guy?
In before Bondi completely ignores this referral and says "Nah, Brennan dindu nuffin"
He and Clapper s/b behind bars with Hillary.
Just wait until everyone finds out he is a muslim.....
https://t.co/NG45lgFWgM