Actually this looks like clickbait and otherwise pretty defensible, what don't you think can be defended?
The "saint" in question was a satanic priest who apparently publicly repented... so, not as the title suggests (unrepentant satanic priest)
The rest is common disagreement between Catholics and protestants (canonization, the papacy, the Rosary, etc.)
Historical Reality
I find this section of the article interesting as it focuses on the rosary developing in the middle ages, but "devotion to Mary" dates back to the 200s for Catholics and orthodox, while the author's protestant views seem to date from the 1500s. So personally I don't totally understand how protestantism continues as it seems like an "ahistorical" break away from Catholicism in the 1500s.
“You know what constantly jumps out to me about these Catholics? It’s the fact that they are constantly focused on almost anything other than Jesus Christ.”
What a retarded article.
Being a Saint is not really that special. The Bible considers all Christians to be Saints. The term "saint" comes from a Greek word meaning "holy one" or "sanctified," referring to anyone who is set apart for God through their faith in Jesus Christ. This is a not a title bestowed by a church after someone's death.
Have you noticed they focus on those who lived hedonist lives before being a Christian, more than those who were a Christian their whole lives?
Someone who is a former priest of satan, should just shut up if they become a christian. If they understand the full weight of their sin, then they would be wary of spreading their evil to others.
This crap happens in Protestant churches too. They are more interested in the voice of so called "reformed" Onlyfans hoes more than the devout christian women
"I say unto you that likewise more joy shall be in Heaven over one sinner that repenteth, than over ninety and nine just persons who need no repentance." - Jesus
I know about his story, how much of the New Testament he wrote, and what he did before his conversion.
He was also an accomplished Jewish scholar who knew the Old Testament well, which helped in his task of explaining the new covenant with the Christians of the world. I'm not denying conversions like these exist, I am calling into question the modern elevation of Christians with dubious pasts into positions of power claiming it was a "conversion." Paul even agrees in his teachings on selecting church elders and pastors. 1 Tim 3
The Vatican has been captured by the Illumi naughty
For centuries.
Lizzid peeple!
Canceling someone for something they did years and years ago after they have repented is anti-Christian and blue hair energy.
former
Jesus forgave sinners and said go and sin no more, and some of those did as he said and became holy.
At least he’s being open about it.
SMH.
The Catholics will defend this.
u/#q1002
Actually this looks like clickbait and otherwise pretty defensible, what don't you think can be defended?
The "saint" in question was a satanic priest who apparently publicly repented... so, not as the title suggests (unrepentant satanic priest)
The rest is common disagreement between Catholics and protestants (canonization, the papacy, the Rosary, etc.)
I find this section of the article interesting as it focuses on the rosary developing in the middle ages, but "devotion to Mary" dates back to the 200s for Catholics and orthodox, while the author's protestant views seem to date from the 1500s. So personally I don't totally understand how protestantism continues as it seems like an "ahistorical" break away from Catholicism in the 1500s.
I had a dialogue about this topic of Maryiology in c/Christianity recently: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/1ARJcyk5gb/why-do-people-in-2025-actually-b/c/4eWdyK3ku6a
The oldest pagan tradition is converting to Christianity.
The Jesuits would like a word with you, in private of course.
AND I'M CATOLIC!!!!! Ancient Greek spelling!!!!
“You know what constantly jumps out to me about these Catholics? It’s the fact that they are constantly focused on almost anything other than Jesus Christ.” What a retarded article.
Somehow I knew this guy was going to be a wack job.
From the headline, I thought Pope Francis was beeing canonized. I'm glad I was wrong.
Being a Saint is not really that special. The Bible considers all Christians to be Saints. The term "saint" comes from a Greek word meaning "holy one" or "sanctified," referring to anyone who is set apart for God through their faith in Jesus Christ. This is a not a title bestowed by a church after someone's death.
Have you noticed they focus on those who lived hedonist lives before being a Christian, more than those who were a Christian their whole lives?
Someone who is a former priest of satan, should just shut up if they become a christian. If they understand the full weight of their sin, then they would be wary of spreading their evil to others.
This crap happens in Protestant churches too. They are more interested in the voice of so called "reformed" Onlyfans hoes more than the devout christian women
"I say unto you that likewise more joy shall be in Heaven over one sinner that repenteth, than over ninety and nine just persons who need no repentance." - Jesus
The Apostle Paul wrote a quarter of the New Testament. Prior to his conversion on The Road to Damascus, he persecuted and murdered Christians.
I know about his story, how much of the New Testament he wrote, and what he did before his conversion.
He was also an accomplished Jewish scholar who knew the Old Testament well, which helped in his task of explaining the new covenant with the Christians of the world. I'm not denying conversions like these exist, I am calling into question the modern elevation of Christians with dubious pasts into positions of power claiming it was a "conversion." Paul even agrees in his teachings on selecting church elders and pastors. 1 Tim 3
The Vatican is MonkeyPox ground zero
🤡🌎