I've made a couple posts about nuclear weapons being fake, as another part of the fake WW2 history we've been force-fed. Here's a substack doing a review of a recent book that deconstructs it with all the nerdy details of how it was faked and why the weapons are impossible to begin with. The review has most of the salient points, although obviously the book has the details backing each point.
https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/death-object-exploding-the-nuclear
The book itself can be purchased here: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/death-object-akio-nakatani/1126300515 with a nicely spicy description anticipating the shills.
I believe this is slow, leading-edge disclosure, but you can be the judge. At any rate, I am reassured that while taking down the deep state may blow our minds in big and unexpected ways, there's no risk of it blowing up our cities with imaginary one-shot weapons.
Having worked for many years in the nuclear weapons field (mostly in nuclear remediation of sites that were part of the WWII Manhattan Project), I can tell you that the nukes are very real. They are also very expensive to maintain and keep ready. The very large Y-12 facility in Oak Ridge, TN, is responsible for maintaining America's nuclear weapons maintained, upgraded, and ready for use if they are ever needed. Pray to God that they are not ever used.
The guards standing outside of fort Knox think there's gold inside...Just saying.
I've said my piece and I stand by it. You are free to believe any dodgy conspiracy theories you want to.
They are "something dangerous", but likely NOT as described. It is very easy to exaggerate the capability of something so excessively compartmentalized and cloaked in multiple levels of secrecy.
A big part of the "nuclear psyop" that got defused by Eisenhower, JFK, and Nixon was that nuclear technology was so dangerous and supersecret that it MUST NOT BE USED for energy production. Globalists countered with "climate change", "environmental damage", and "nuclear meltdown" (via 3-mile island false flag, then Chernobyl, then Fukishima) once they were shown to demonstrably be RETARDS with the construction and safe operation of numerous nuclear power plants worldwide. The battle continues.
Agreed. I have maintained W188 nuclear depth charges for the Royal Navy in the early 70's, they are very real.
Ever hear of Galen Windsor
Nukes, not fake. This I know. But I believe that a significant portion of the Golden Dome is already operational. Thus making the big nuclear missile exchange moot. At the moment, we are the only country that can deliver a significant number of nukes.
Can I ask how you know?
I mean, if we're taking down the cabal and the cabal has even one that they can use, it would be very bad. I've read about suitcase nukes that wouldn't need a missile or even a bomber.
The US special forces in the 1970 had acess to an H912 parachutist delivery container nuke. It weighed 30 lbs but I don't know what its yield was.
A lot of those things floating around would be awfully dangerous. Just imagine if the Soviets had similar units in Uzbekistan or somewhere and the country fell...
There are breadcrumbs that a "missile shield" of some sort went active in 2013 in attempt to counter nefarious globalist activities expected in 2014 (i.e. Ukraine color revolution, etc.). Part of the reason for Obama's aggressive attacks on military leadership.
Presumed additional capability or expanded coverage came online 2017-2019 with partial handoff to Space Force. Exclusive USSF control in August 2022 along with transfer of all space/intel assets from Army, Navy, AF, CIA, etc. to USSF running Space Command. One example completed October 2023: https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3545006/armys-jtags-mission-transfers-to-ussf/
Most of Golden Dome is likely just public disclosure or upgrades of classified existing systems, imo. Space command-and-control part likely to be done by SpaceX as traditional mil-ind complex has bad actors that would likely sabotage (like they tried with SDI).
Ive had a suspicion that HAARP is reagans star wars. Electrifying the ionsphere that ballistic missles pass through fries them. How many NK missles dropped out of rhe sky duri g testing? There are 11 such sites. It takes a certain amount of moisture in the air to make harrp work well so maybe thats the point of the chemtrails. It may be the dome is activated to protect us. Because i cant figure out why desantis allows the contination of the practice.
Interesting thought. The Golden Dome needs a high and a low system. I believe that a significant portion of the high system is in place. I am not sure about the low system. Separately, I thought chemtrails was halted over Florida and some other states.
There is a free download for this book on "internet archive", not on the website directly.
Web search the title of the book, you'll see the retail sites like Amazon ect. Look for the internet achieve PDF free download. Enjoy!
It's always a good idea to keep an open mind on things like this subject of nuclear weapons.
With so many things to be concerned about, it’s nice to never have to waste a single second worrying about nuclear bomb annihilation. Then again, I never for one second worry about killer asteroids either. Breaking free from all the cabal’s “science” mind trauma is refreshing but you get looked down at by the smart people (meaning people whose entire identity is defined by specific areas of science).
Username checks out. Mental freedom is a wonderful thing.
Yes, we have some experts here too, who've never eaten killer asteroids for breakfast. https://share.google/images/jcmDPmbrDb8IndnrX
You might like this for a quick laugh. https://rumble.com/v70v82g-do-not-be-afraid-of-the-boogieman-a-comedy-golden-oldie.html
Keep posting on this topic, please. "Nuclear bombs" are not as described, just like space. There are very powerful (and destructive) weapons that can be used to make an explosion look like a "nuclear attack". The very reason for the "Republic military" watching over us is very likely keeping these weapons out of the hands of the blackhats and globalists.
The threat of "nuclear war" ginned up by the media and propaganda machine was used skillfully for numerous purposes since 1941. A short list:
The Germans will get "the bomb" first, we must stop them (1933-1945). Justification to destroy Germany after globalists were done using them to weaken Russia (since 1914), establish Israel (since 1917-8), and create the United Nations (since 1920).
The Soviets will nuke us, we must engage in unconstitutional worldwide proxy wars to stop them everywhere (1945-1989). Justification for the "Cold War", Operation Paperclip (and predecessors), Operation Gladio, and NATO.
"Rogue actors" will use a dirty bomb to destroy an American city (1989-2001). Justification to dismantle Soviet Union and steal resources.
"Terrorists" funded by our enemies (state actors with no Central Bank) are hellbent on nuking an American city (or using it as blackmail (2001-2014). Justification for destruction of Afganistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Eqypt, Lebanon, Iran, etc. (Weaken states for Greater Israel Project).
Russia is going to nuke Ukraine (and then Western Europe/NATO), so they must be pre-emptively attacked to stop them (2014-present). Justification for Round2 of "destroy Russia" by globalists, attempting to use the US (2014) rather than Germany (1914) this time.
Meanwhile, 2 "nukes" actually used since 1945 (80 years) in two Japanese cities completely rebuilt with normal radiation profiles despite the number of available nukes increasing 10-thousand fold from one nation to at least 10 during this time period. This indicates that any "nuclear attack" would be a false flag and really some other type of weapon (and the fearmongering doesn't work anymore), and is exactly why globalists pivoted to the "biowarfare narrative" and pandemic fearmongering since 1989.
Reagan defused their "nuclear narrative" with SDI and end of Cold War, and Trump will end it permanently with Golden Dome, world peace, and widespread civil nuclear usage for many applications, including small modular reactors (SMRs) and desalination plants.
That's a lot of good info; thank you.
I won't post too much on this topic because 1) there's a ton of pushback and 2) proving that something doesn't exist is nearly impossible, and more importantly 3) the direct impact on our lives is small nowadays compared to vaccinology and mask mandates. It's far more important and easier to wake people up to Covid scams and fake Biden than to the decades-old nuclear psyop.
But when I find another good resource on the topic, I'll definitely post it. Thanks again.
Nuclear weapons are fake! Propaganda & fear are a great way to control sheep! Dont take my word on it, Im not a Nuclear Physicist but the dude in this video is... https://www.bitchute.com/video/3atfynmAjOgN/ Oh yeah, Nuclear Power Plants are nothing but glorified steam plants. As told by Galen Windsor, probably the foremost expert (given his credentials) on Nuclear Power Plants...https://www.bitchute.com/video/qR78NdPMEQsv
There appears to have been some experimentation with nuclear plants (steam based similar to modern ones) done in 1830s-pre Civil War with Thorium (1828). Steam turbine technology (basis for modern jet engines and power turbines) may not have been advanced enough to make it work.
Modern Thorium reactors work similarly to how they were described in the 1830s from what I understand. I am searching for source material on this topic. There was a revisit of this topic in 1926 as the periodic table was being built out, and here we are another hundred years later still being blocked by globalists on low cost, decentralized, safe nuclear power.
I like taking on board narratives like this and thinking about them without finally evaluating their truth value.
It means that when more evidence comes along, I can evaluate it much more quickly because I know the terrain.
Therefore I recommend that other people entertain an idea such as fake nukes for the same reason without necessarily believing it.
Our anon reaction time is faster when we have consciously pre-processed the ideas and narrative nets.
Yes. The mind likes to taste, to sample. No need to chew it all up at once. Not every topic needs to be taken in at all, and many topics need the right moment to dig in.
I was part of the St. Louis baby tooth study in the 60’s to examine the effects of radiation in the Midwest from nuke testing. The study started up again with follow up cognitive and health studies out of Harvard. Thought it was cool that it was still around after all these years. Need to follow up and see what kind of results they have. I’m sure nukes are real.
Fair enough. I believe radiation is a true phenomenon, although less dangerous than what is represented. My main beef is with the idea of a nuclear bomb being as powerful as represented in the media.
Curious to background area of expertise to post such a claim of no nuclear weapons?
As a retired U.S. Navy Special Operations Diver: EOD and have been through the very intensive Nuclear weapons training program. While I applaud your efforts to minimalize the threat of nuclear weaponry, I along with every graduate of U.S. Naval EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL School along with the many military weapon technicians can rebuke the notion that nuclear weapons don’t exist. They do. I’ve been onboard one of our SSBN submarines that can carry 24 delivery engines whose full salvo can be launched in <10 minutes. Each missile with “X” re-entry vehicles whose guidance packages are constantly updated with yields that could potentially eradicate life on this planet. The Navy also developed a rocket assisted torpedo system to counter submarines for surface vessels. Add to the reality of this, the Naval weapon systems are guarded by The U.S. Marine Corps who will make one leak life sustaining fluids should one make a move or gesture that indicates a threat in any way shape or form. USAF have their own security elements who are parallel with the Marine mandate of protecting.
We also had a weapon system that was man carried (back pack) and could be delivered by a small platoon. Add these to the surface ICBM inventory and you get the idea of the deterrent potential. Briefcase sized weapon is very plausible and it would be more of a “dirty” bomb (area denial due to radiation levels) than a high yield device. Although I’m sure a certain middle eastern country who claims to be our “friend/aly” may have one or is feverishly developing one and are very willing to use it in order to keep their agenda continuing since 1905? Humanity prays these are never ordered launched.
There was also a recent incident where a B-52 bomber had flown from a base in North Dakota to a base in Louisiana that was carrying a live B84 bomb which was going to be a part of the load that was going to be scrapped. This base is not to far from the Mississippi River where merchant ships traverse? How convenient? If they don’t exist, why are they constantly being under threat of theft. Slick “boner Bill” Clinton even allowed the plans for said weapon to given to the Chinese??
Good luck with your book sales.
Thank you for your service.
Not my book. My "expertise," as it were, is only that of seeing through psyops and propaganda, common to many anons here. Nothing technical beyond college physics. I don't doubt that we have lots of highly dangerous and effective weapons, explosive devices and delivery systems. I geek out on the incredible engineering and capabilities of all the stuff you mention, but only from the armchair. I have a lot of respect for the people who work on and with those systems.
Even so, the story of one bomb decimating Nagasaki, and another single bomb destroying Hiroshima, has too many holes and better explanations than to be accepted at face value. Even passing the Olympic torch through Fukushima shortly after its being wiped out by a tidal wave highlights a major break from what we've been told about radiation. When you look, you find similar inconsistencies from 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl and other supposed nuclear disasters.
If they do exist as presented --- one bomb destroying 100's of sq miles --- we should expect one to go off before the cabal gives up the ghost. I don't expect that to happen, because I believe the official story of the potency of nuclear weapons is propaganda.
"Logical thinking is important, but insufficient. In a maze of deception, you also need to be able to unlearn, and recognise you have been fooled. This is an emotional skill, as it means dealing with a hurt ego and the loss of the “feeling of knowing”.
Thank you. That's very well said. The unlearning part can be very draining.
Read "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Richard Rhodes and get back to me. If you get through that then read "Dark Sun" also by Richard Rhodes that explains how the Soviets got their own bomb and the espionage that facilitated it 4years later. The first book explains the science and the physicists/engineers who made it work. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-making-of-the-atomic-bomb-richard-rhodes/1100181521?ean=9781451677614 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/dark-sun-richard-rhodes/1007988828?ean=9780684824147
The making of the atomic bomb is a good book to read. I recommend it, also.
There are many books to read. I haven't read those, but I have read Hersey's "Hiroshima" and other books about the final days of imperial Japan before the surrender, including much written about The Bomb. You might want to read this book or others with the counter arguments as well.