So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
I perceive this thread isn't about saving children. It's more about admonishing Trump and Q as liars.
Buck stops with Trump, no?
You would think, if Trump's own administration is putting out numbers of children saved, that Q would be aware of it, correct?
So essentially you're accusing Trump and Q of lying to you.
Ok then, well at least we have the specific instances of what you're talking about to verify your blackpills, right? Uh, no.
You wrote a wall of text telling us what you see when you research, without actually telling us what you see when you research.
Give the specific examples ... is that too inconvenient? You don't want people to delve into these extremely vague accusations and have an opportunity to save Trump and Q's reputation?
You've done this before, attempted to crowdsource the entire forum to help you verify your hunch that Q and the Trump administration is evil.
Top tier blackpilling this thread is. Even your thread title "We are being played again" ... you left off "by Trump and Q" because you're afraid of the backlash.
Show us just one child being reunited with their parents and speaking out? I don't care about "blackpilling" but shouldn't the kids matter the most? Like literally not one? If you have evidence post it right here.
The OP hasn't said anything about missing children outside the context of proving Q and Trump are lying.
His point is that the numbers are imaginary.
In that hypothetical being painted, there are no kids. Not, "there are kids but they're not being saved", but instead the claim is "there are no kids, the kids don't exist".
Somehow, you've jumped from "kids not existing" to "the kids exist and they're not being saved", as if Trump and Q somehow know where the kids are but refuse to save them.
Again, blackpilling at the highest degree. The wildest accusations imaginable, no proof -- and somehow a "lack of proof" is being offered as proof.
Completely 100% in all ways ridiculous.
Sorry but I believe there are kids, but there has to be a million now based on reports, so where are they?
Assume you have a child. The child was abducted, perhaps because the child had a social media account and a stalker found them.
The child is found.
Walk me through the thought process where a parent in that situation goes to the evil social media that got their child abducted in the first place, and blabs in non-private settings about their abducted child being saved.
Would you do that? Or would you avoid social media like the plague?
If you hadn't already deleted all social media accounts in that situation, you would be incredibly naive.
Attempting to crowdsource all of GAW to locate such people among trillions of social media accounts, and citing the lack of success in doing so as proof you're correct, is idiotic. Accusing Trump and Q of lying because you can't find any evidence to the contrary is a bad faith argument.
How is it possible you saw the caravan in 2018 and not believe there are children we have little knowledge of that have been saved?
I mean we all know it was mostly men mass migrating, but of the 30 million+ who have made their way into the Country surely there is at least a million children.
Hell you watch enough on the internet you'll find videos of women willingly selling their children into the trade. Who do we reunite that child with lmao?
We should not tolerate accusations against President Trump. He has proven himself over and over again. Asking questions is great, but if the question (can we trust President Trump) has already been answered (Yes), then continuing to ask to try and get a different answer is just trying to undermine the movement.
Just because you don’t like the implications of the evidence being presented (which in this case, is a lack of evidence that certain things are happening), doesn’t mean the person presenting that evidence is blackpilling. Just because you don’t know what to do with those facts and jump straight to “Trump and Q are lying to us” doesn’t mean the rest of us automatically go there with that info.
Maybe you’re just not as smart as you think.
“You are watching a movie.”
In a sense, yes, we’re accusing them of lying to us. But this isn’t a cult. We’re here because we actively try to make sense of everything.
“You are watching a movie” circa 1969
heres some bs about men walking on the moon!
“You are watching a movie” circa 2019
here’s some bs about bats in wuhan
But its not just one channel of bs
If you have 500 channels of cable TV, then you have 500 channels of bs
“You are watching a movie”
scroll thru every channel on your TV, and sort them into fiction and non-fiction
How many fiction channels are there?
They are ALL fiction, if truth be told
You can even watch Elon Musk send a car into orbit!
Even going back to Abe Lincoln
He was killed in the theater
He was killed by a famous actor,
John Wilkes Booth
Even the concept of government is a big illusion
What happened in law of 1871?
Did the original USA collapse, and was quietly replaced by the bankers?
Why do so many “actors” go into government?
Ronald Reagan was the president of the actors union
Ronald Reagan was NOT a great president, per se
Ronald Reagan was a GREAT ACTOR
AND WHAT MAKES GREAT MOVIES?
Ronald Reagan was an actor, who played the role of POTUS in this GREAT CHARADE