Ahh, see, NATO doesn't want us to own Greenland. NATO is part of the cabal's new world order plan, and for people to willingly accept a one world government, there has to be so much chaos in the world, that people will accept anything. And that means that the US will probably have to be attacked, with major cities utterly decimated. And they cant decimate us if we have our own iron dome.
Yeah, the true enemy is not Russia here, it is NATO. Since the special operation started in Ukraine, I've realized how hard the elites have pushed for Ukraine to win and demonize Russia. We need protection from the other NATO countries who are likely to turn on President Trump when it is convenient to do so.
President Putin has been clear that this is not a war, it is a special military operation. I got that straight from the source. Ironically, "war" is what the libs are calling it in all the headlines. You need to get your sources straight.
The way that NATO or more specificaly the UK empire thinks of US:
"I HATE YOU, DONT LEAVE ME"
They are as borderline personality disorder as they can be, when it comes to the USA.
They hate us. But they want to BE us and they want US to be part of them. They are like the obnoxious little psychopath child that "LOVES" their little puppy......to death (dead puppy in their arms)
The UK is a psychopath
Run away
NATO is just THEIR navy that WE pay for. It's a parasitic relationship
Considering we pay like 800B more than them for defense. We'll just go ahead and take. Screw them and their subversion on the world. Its our Greenland now.
AND that reply makes more sense than ANY I HAVE SEEN SO FAR OR HEARD!!!!!!
WE need Greenland due to how the routes go from Russia/China...that is the STRATEGIC purpose of acquiring Greenland...
These two countries may NOT always be friendly when NEW governments are put in!!!!! Both Putin & Xi are NOT getting any younger...(long in the tooth-if ya' know what I mean!!!)
I'm sick of this shit. Isolationism, close all of our military bases overseas, reduce the military to what is in the Constitution (no standing army), abolish immigration for 1000 years, forcefully deport all immigrants here, legally and illegally, and revoke visas. Colleges and jobs in America for Americans only.
About having a military base on our newly owned Greenland? You're asking how is it isolationist that if Trump buys Greenland, it becomes a territory, then how is putting a base, which one already exists there, the same as putting a new base overseas in a country not our territory?
Removing our military bases overseas isn't isolationism. It's stepping back from our self assumed role as the worlds' hall monitor.
We still trade with them. Still let people come and go (with surveillance). We still let immigrants be a part of the US (albeit at 1% of the current rate), if they REALLY want to be and REALLY support us and our culture. They don't bring in theirs. They come to be part of OURs. Big difference. And they have something to give
It is isolation, and we never should have decided to be the world's police. Closing our bases means drastically reducing the government's projection, I don't believe we should close embassies. Trade is entirely different, but we should abolish immigration, and not allow anyone from foreign countries to open businesses if they're only going to employ their fellow countrymen.
Few immigrants want to assimilate, they fly their home country's flag all the time.
The NATO Greenland treaty of 1951 (and its latest version of 20something) already gives the USA full militairy access to Greenland for defence purposes.
They can build bases, ports, airstrips and whatnot, they just need to -ask- Denmark (and nowadays Greenland) if they can do so, which is a formality.
So no, there is no need to “own” the land to defend against enemies.
Just because they allow us to be there now doesn't mean they will continue to allow it in the future. We are effectively just a guest staying there. Instead, we should own the house. Denmark has complained incessantly about some radioactive materials left over from "Camp Century" which was a secret US military base for nuclear missiles and experiments with controlling the weather. If we owned Greenland, leaving this stuff behind wouldn't be a problem and wouldn't create so much friction with our supposed allies.
Also, I think it is important to acknowledge that we have a right to Greenland. Per the Monroe doctrine, it is in our sphere of influence (like Canada). Denmark is an imperialist power and the Greenlanders are tired of their rule, they just might not know it yet. Once Greenland is freed and the population has been reeducated, they will understand that America is just doing what is best for them, and they will be overwhelmingly grateful to President Trump.
You think they do know and are intentionally rejecting the best offer of their lifetimes?
Reeducation is about helping them see that their liberal viewpoint is based on lies. Maybe you could call it a state sanctioned awaking. Some people (like those of us here) do this voluntarily, but others will need some "help" along the way.
Russia just threatened to annex Greenland if the USA doesn't do it.
The USA has never threatened Greenland, the USA has only informed that they want to protect Greenland and to do that Denmark should give up Greenland to the USA.
If any foreign leader is reading this, I want you to understand something.
If Trump doesn't get greenland, then he's going to put greenland in SPACE. Meaning that he will pursue putting the last bit needed for golden dome, IN SPACE. Meaning that this may have been what he wanted all along. To be denied the land, and therefore have no choice to to complete golden down in geosync orbit as far towards greenland as he can, for the over the horizon view; and that will necessistate putting much more infrastructure in space
If you force Trump to do this, it will cost the USA much more money. He's going to take it out on YOUR ASS if we have to pay much more. That means your tariffs will be higher, but more importantly, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT WE WILL HAVE IN SPACE and that should worry you. Because I can tell you as a non insider, that we have technologies far beyond your comprehension and your capability. I'm not talking about rods of god or any other conspiracy stuff. But the pinnacle of any electromagnetic weapon with a range and power beyond what you believe is possible by physics.
And you don't want Trump to put that up there. Becaue he will. There are 'international agreements' not to. You see what he thinks of those agreements.
lets just say they aren't SEPTIC SAFE
Give us greenland and be happy. He'll get it, and then NATO will be out of your hair too. You'll have to create a new military costco to protect you from yourselves and your ridiculous spectres of a bygone era
Ahh, see, NATO doesn't want us to own Greenland. NATO is part of the cabal's new world order plan, and for people to willingly accept a one world government, there has to be so much chaos in the world, that people will accept anything. And that means that the US will probably have to be attacked, with major cities utterly decimated. And they cant decimate us if we have our own iron dome.
Updooted to counter the GLOW-FAGs from Quantico.
You're welcome (and you're right).
Ha-ay glow fags! 👋
u/#glowie
Yeah, the true enemy is not Russia here, it is NATO. Since the special operation started in Ukraine, I've realized how hard the elites have pushed for Ukraine to win and demonize Russia. We need protection from the other NATO countries who are likely to turn on President Trump when it is convenient to do so.
Lol “special operation,” can we just say war? Double speak is what the libs do
President Putin has been clear that this is not a war, it is a special military operation. I got that straight from the source. Ironically, "war" is what the libs are calling it in all the headlines. You need to get your sources straight.
No matter what President Lincoln called it, nobody calls it the Civil Special Military Operation these days
The way that NATO or more specificaly the UK empire thinks of US:
"I HATE YOU, DONT LEAVE ME"
They are as borderline personality disorder as they can be, when it comes to the USA.
They hate us. But they want to BE us and they want US to be part of them. They are like the obnoxious little psychopath child that "LOVES" their little puppy......to death (dead puppy in their arms)
The UK is a psychopath
Run away
NATO is just THEIR navy that WE pay for. It's a parasitic relationship
It ends
NOW.
Owning Greenland would be so dope.
I was originally against the idea but I'm very for it now. I definitely see the strategic importance of it now and in the future.
Considering we pay like 800B more than them for defense. We'll just go ahead and take. Screw them and their subversion on the world. Its our Greenland now.
It's Redwhiteandblueland now
And despite what the GLOW-FAGS say (here on GAW or elsewhere).
IT WILL HAPPEN.
IMO it won't be an "iVaSiOn Or AnNeXaTiOn bY dRuMph... "
The smart anons will watch and see how this comes about, and we'll rejoice at yet another WIN by OUR POTUS and OUR country!
AND that reply makes more sense than ANY I HAVE SEEN SO FAR OR HEARD!!!!!!
WE need Greenland due to how the routes go from Russia/China...that is the STRATEGIC purpose of acquiring Greenland...
These two countries may NOT always be friendly when NEW governments are put in!!!!! Both Putin & Xi are NOT getting any younger...(long in the tooth-if ya' know what I mean!!!)
Whose "golden dome?"
I'm sick of this shit. Isolationism, close all of our military bases overseas, reduce the military to what is in the Constitution (no standing army), abolish immigration for 1000 years, forcefully deport all immigrants here, legally and illegally, and revoke visas. Colleges and jobs in America for Americans only.
Wouldn't a fully capable golden dome allow us to be isolationist?
Correct.
Then what's old boy dooming about
What's isolationist about having a military base overseas?
About having a military base on our newly owned Greenland? You're asking how is it isolationist that if Trump buys Greenland, it becomes a territory, then how is putting a base, which one already exists there, the same as putting a new base overseas in a country not our territory?
Removing our military bases overseas isn't isolationism. It's stepping back from our self assumed role as the worlds' hall monitor.
We still trade with them. Still let people come and go (with surveillance). We still let immigrants be a part of the US (albeit at 1% of the current rate), if they REALLY want to be and REALLY support us and our culture. They don't bring in theirs. They come to be part of OURs. Big difference. And they have something to give
It is isolation, and we never should have decided to be the world's police. Closing our bases means drastically reducing the government's projection, I don't believe we should close embassies. Trade is entirely different, but we should abolish immigration, and not allow anyone from foreign countries to open businesses if they're only going to employ their fellow countrymen.
Few immigrants want to assimilate, they fly their home country's flag all the time.
The NATO Greenland treaty of 1951 (and its latest version of 20something) already gives the USA full militairy access to Greenland for defence purposes.
They can build bases, ports, airstrips and whatnot, they just need to -ask- Denmark (and nowadays Greenland) if they can do so, which is a formality.
So no, there is no need to “own” the land to defend against enemies.
Speaking of enemies…
Russia never threatened to take Greenland
China never threatened to take Greenland
Only the USA did so multiple times…
Just because they allow us to be there now doesn't mean they will continue to allow it in the future. We are effectively just a guest staying there. Instead, we should own the house. Denmark has complained incessantly about some radioactive materials left over from "Camp Century" which was a secret US military base for nuclear missiles and experiments with controlling the weather. If we owned Greenland, leaving this stuff behind wouldn't be a problem and wouldn't create so much friction with our supposed allies.
Also, I think it is important to acknowledge that we have a right to Greenland. Per the Monroe doctrine, it is in our sphere of influence (like Canada). Denmark is an imperialist power and the Greenlanders are tired of their rule, they just might not know it yet. Once Greenland is freed and the population has been reeducated, they will understand that America is just doing what is best for them, and they will be overwhelmingly grateful to President Trump.
"They just don't know it yet", "reeducation"... Sounding awfully liberal there
You think they do know and are intentionally rejecting the best offer of their lifetimes?
Reeducation is about helping them see that their liberal viewpoint is based on lies. Maybe you could call it a state sanctioned awaking. Some people (like those of us here) do this voluntarily, but others will need some "help" along the way.
Russia just threatened to annex Greenland if the USA doesn't do it.
The USA has never threatened Greenland, the USA has only informed that they want to protect Greenland and to do that Denmark should give up Greenland to the USA.
Source? And also I think that's a ploy to get NATO to fracture.
The death of NATO would be welcomed with joy in the USA.
Here's source: https://www.reuters.com/world/senior-russian-official-says-greenland-could-vote-join-russia-if-trump-does-not-2026-01-13/
Can you link to where a Russian official said that?
https://www.reuters.com/world/senior-russian-official-says-greenland-could-vote-join-russia-if-trump-does-not-2026-01-13/
That's not the same thing at all.
If any foreign leader is reading this, I want you to understand something.
If Trump doesn't get greenland, then he's going to put greenland in SPACE. Meaning that he will pursue putting the last bit needed for golden dome, IN SPACE. Meaning that this may have been what he wanted all along. To be denied the land, and therefore have no choice to to complete golden down in geosync orbit as far towards greenland as he can, for the over the horizon view; and that will necessistate putting much more infrastructure in space
If you force Trump to do this, it will cost the USA much more money. He's going to take it out on YOUR ASS if we have to pay much more. That means your tariffs will be higher, but more importantly, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT WE WILL HAVE IN SPACE and that should worry you. Because I can tell you as a non insider, that we have technologies far beyond your comprehension and your capability. I'm not talking about rods of god or any other conspiracy stuff. But the pinnacle of any electromagnetic weapon with a range and power beyond what you believe is possible by physics.
And you don't want Trump to put that up there. Becaue he will. There are 'international agreements' not to. You see what he thinks of those agreements.
lets just say they aren't SEPTIC SAFE
Give us greenland and be happy. He'll get it, and then NATO will be out of your hair too. You'll have to create a new military costco to protect you from yourselves and your ridiculous spectres of a bygone era
Gold(en Dome) destroys FED
/shrug