But, what's not BS, Trump is sending Homan to help Noem, as they set aside their differences, to be Trump's 'Team Warriors'. President Trump wants someone to put the fear of God, into these demonic mentally deranged protesters, that Noem CANNOT do. ONLY the "Mighty Warrior" Homan WILL.
Indeed. Minnesota is quickly becoming an inflection point for the nation. All hands on deck sort of attention. The fraud. The "busted" Signal infrasturcture and all those top perps plus (and this may be killer) Ref: Tucker Carlson's last vid on human trafficking... bet that is happening in Minn too. All the same infrastructure.
These guys are not only totally caught and "fucked" but their models is visable in most major cities and states. This will wind up being massive. Talk about a lifeline for the panic'd whistblowers... the number of whistles will be deafening.
A whole new definition of "The military is the only way"... motif.
Might as well be reading the farggin FUNNY PAPERS.
The Daily Mail article (published January 26, 2026) mixes some verifiable elements with heavy reliance on anonymous sourcing, speculation, and dramatic framing typical of the outlet. Here's a breakdown:
Verified / Factual elements (supported by direct evidence or public statements):
Donald Trump posted on Truth Social announcing he was sending Tom Homan to Minnesota that night, describing Homan as "tough but fair" and saying he would report directly to Trump. This is directly quoted in the article and aligns with Trump's public posting style.
There has been long-standing reported tension between Kristi Noem (as DHS Secretary) and Tom Homan (Border Czar) over control of immigration/deportation policy since the start of Trump's second term. This friction appears in multiple sources beyond just Daily Mail.
Noem publicly stated she has worked closely with Homan and called him a "major asset" after the announcement (this is quoted in the article and seems to come from her own response).
Unsubstantiated, speculative, or thinly sourced elements (mostly fiction-like or exaggerated):
Claims that Trump directly "rebuked" Kristi Noem — this is not backed by any public statement or direct quote from Trump. The article relies on "multiple reports" of private disapproval about Noem's department "mishandling messaging" after shootings, but no named sources, documents, or on-record officials are provided.
The idea that Trump explicitly "ordered" Homan to take over/lead the "chaotic Minneapolis operation" to sideline Noem — this is interpretive spin. Trump's post mentions sending Homan to Minnesota because he "knows and likes many of the people there," but it doesn't frame it as a rebuke, takeover, or punishment of Noem. The rivalry and "clean up" narrative is amplified without strong evidence.
Description of a full-blown "shooting crisis" engulfing ICE in Minneapolis — there are references to specific incidents (e.g., fatal shootings involving ICE agents, including U.S. citizens like Alex Pretti and Renee Good, plus protests/riots). These events appear to have occurred based on the article's details and cross-references, but labeling it a widespread "crisis" engulfing the entire operation is sensationalized. Details like riots outside hotels or feuds between DHS officials and ICE officers are presented without independent sourcing beyond videos and unnamed insiders.
Broader claims of internal chaos, ultimatums, or Trump privately raging/vowing investigations (e.g., into Minnesota welfare fraud or Ilhan Omar) — some tie into Trump's known public rhetoric on these topics, but the private "wrath," "siding more with Homan," and dramatic ousting framing lack substantiation beyond anonymous "reports" or insiders.
In short: The core of the story (Trump sending Homan to Minnesota amid immigration enforcement tensions) has a factual kernel from Trump's own post and known administration dynamics. Much of the rest — especially the "rebuke," personal rivalry drama, and "chaotic/shooting crisis" framing — is unsubstantiated speculation or exaggeration, common in Daily Mail's style for clicks. No major outlets appear to have independently confirmed the rebuke or takeover angle as fact in the immediate coverage.
This article is, of course, is unfair and totally biased in its message.
Should be a 3 day vacation for posting such crap.
You expected different?
This article is from a left leaning news site. Complete BS. Never trust a liberal source.
But, what's not BS, Trump is sending Homan to help Noem, as they set aside their differences, to be Trump's 'Team Warriors'. President Trump wants someone to put the fear of God, into these demonic mentally deranged protesters, that Noem CANNOT do. ONLY the "Mighty Warrior" Homan WILL.
Indeed. Minnesota is quickly becoming an inflection point for the nation. All hands on deck sort of attention. The fraud. The "busted" Signal infrasturcture and all those top perps plus (and this may be killer) Ref: Tucker Carlson's last vid on human trafficking... bet that is happening in Minn too. All the same infrastructure.
These guys are not only totally caught and "fucked" but their models is visable in most major cities and states. This will wind up being massive. Talk about a lifeline for the panic'd whistblowers... the number of whistles will be deafening.
A whole new definition of "The military is the only way"... motif.
Might as well be reading the farggin FUNNY PAPERS.
The Daily Mail article (published January 26, 2026) mixes some verifiable elements with heavy reliance on anonymous sourcing, speculation, and dramatic framing typical of the outlet. Here's a breakdown:
Verified / Factual elements (supported by direct evidence or public statements):
Unsubstantiated, speculative, or thinly sourced elements (mostly fiction-like or exaggerated):
In short: The core of the story (Trump sending Homan to Minnesota amid immigration enforcement tensions) has a factual kernel from Trump's own post and known administration dynamics. Much of the rest — especially the "rebuke," personal rivalry drama, and "chaotic/shooting crisis" framing — is unsubstantiated speculation or exaggeration, common in Daily Mail's style for clicks. No major outlets appear to have independently confirmed the rebuke or takeover angle as fact in the immediate coverage.
u/#fakenews
what a retarded article
City of London division propaganda.
Why use the dailyfail as a source? You know, it doesn't get much more biased than that.
Just saying.
I just used them as a source in a post. To call out the blatant lie in the headline before someone reads it and gets their britches in a wad.
"Noem's department mishandled the public messaging"
find something else to do with your time, shill
Is the general rule of thumb that we can criticize Noem if she does get dumped but if we jump the gun then we get timeout?
City of London birdcage liner...
They hate you, your way of life AND your country - and they're desperately trying to wrestle it away from us.....
MiniSoda? Yep - It's them...They're behind it...
The daily mail, really? Cmon man
I'm immune to clickbait