there are change-logs somewhere, just as 'smart'sheets have this interesting feature called 'cell history'. This is where one can tell when and who did the change...
Not an easy task, as each entry has a separate history, and would have to be deleted separately, without completely deleting the cell.
Unless one wipes the whole database component (like deleting the whole column in a spreadsheet) and that would mean it was done in a hurry, and that is waay more detectable.
I had the same thought about dlls. Most people do not understand the layered nature of computer programs these days.
Even if people perform a complete walkthrough of the app's code they always omit the lower layers but those can be corrupted as well. That still leaves the device drivers unmonitored and the operating system itself.
I have written programs in the past that would remove a part of themselves after execution making investigations difficult. You could write a perfect program that opted to be more devious if, say, a USB drive with a specific volume name were inserted. The USB would effectively be a key to switch on the data corruption code. Or you might use data from disk sectors marked as bad.
The possibilities are endless and if someone can make a quick buck or billion out of it is it going to happen? You bet your life it is.
Why people trust computers for voting still defies belief.
Aside - For the non computer experts:
If we compare a computer program to a company, a dll is a bit like having a reprographics department that will do all your photocopying for you. While you might audit the company's finances you will probably never check whether that department is making exact copies or whether it is modifying the output. Imagine if you ordered a thousand copies of something but they had changed a QR code somewhere. Would you ever notice?
30 years ago a single byte of data had to go down through 7 layers of software and hardware before it hit the Ethernet cable as an electrical signal, and then back up through 7 layers on the other side. I doubt it's any less today. And the developers coming into industry today can't seem to write a basic program with a simple and elegant piece of code. Don't get me wrong, they are smart and know a lot more than me about manipulating threads, managing collections, etc. But they all seem to write the most incoherent and complex code that requires days of debug just to do something I would consider relatively simple.
I can't imagine how long it would take to scour the code produced by a team of developers with a few of them supporting the corruption.
The DLLs are the MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION of Programs to function correctly, especially offloading codes that can do tasks...IF there was an insertion of code that the dll executed, it will be there...BUT, it depends on HOW far the "code" is in the dll(s)!!!!!!...
OK, but, I have just looked at the dlls on my PC and I have 32 copies of one dll. How would we know which one ran at the time? Might the dll that did run have been replaced after it was used?
AND YOU HAVE DONE THE SAME THING I DID!!!! Duplicate DLLs in places you would not expect them... also, when I program, I put all the dlls in one spot and secure them...
NOTE: We don't know how many dlls are in the voting system, but I guarantee you, if they get the right programmers in there, they will find exactly how it was done. However, if those dlls were written in C++, then it is game over!!!! AND I am pretty sure they were due to the amount of chicannary that went on when these systems were being built!!!!
IMHO this is all calculated. When he says he's been given permission, I interpret it as him getting the 'action' cue to proceed with his lines. Or, more likely, the white hats fed him these crumbs knowing full well he'd blast them publicly; because it's designed to squeeze a big reaction out of the other side. It's all calculated. Relax and enjoy your popcorn. 🍿
Timing will be ok'd - that means someone is on the other end, doing the ok-ing.
Might as well be open about it if true. I mean, the military has structure that does that. order comes from above = YesSir. AS long as it is documented there are less thuggery - one would hope.
However, we still need to see everything for transparency, not just some narrative and no deets/receipts.
Trust but Verify.
If spangle's WhiteHat theory, there is no problem to get fed some juicy white crumbs, via a spin-merchant. JUST LET us see all of it.
He can soon spin a story, which is what he is trained to do - transmit a whole lotta information in a easy-to-understand package. That's a skill. Just as Larry Johnson does that so well. And Scott Ritter. Do you trust any of them? Why?
However, CIA, and also the more persuasive Hostage Negotiation types are extensively trained to do that.
So, listen with discretion, and also listen to what he does not say.
🚨 BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE: Patrick Byrne Reveals Secret 2020 Hard Drives After Fulton County Raid
Right after the
@FBI
seized Fulton County’s 2020 election records,
@PatrickByrne
dropped a massive bombshell on
@EmeraldRobinson
:
“We’ve secretly obtained 5 hard drive images from 2020.”
Byrne says forensic analysis of those drives found:
“In each one of them we have found an average of 500 changes to the DLLs after certification and as many as 1,000. Any one change violates the certification.”
He explains DLLs as the shared “toolbox” all election software relies on. Once the system is certified, any change to that toolbox voids the certification and opens the door to hidden scripts that can flip votes and wipe the traces.
Byrne then connected it directly to the
@FBI
’s Fulton County raid:
“My guess is there are government computer scientists opening the Fulton County hard drives this morning and they’re going to be finding records from 2020 that show hundreds of changes to that toolbox after certification… It’s so illegal, it’s hard to convey how bad that is.”
This isn’t just about “irregularities.”
It’s about post-certification code changes at the core of the voting system - now, finally, in federal hands.
However, there may well be a grain of truth to what he says. Or, he is meant to stir conversation, as we are diligently doing right here. Even eyeballs on the subject is worth something.
Has Patrick Byrne ever been roundly discredited, with hroof? I mean, not just made out to be a bad 'un, which no doubt exists, just because he supposedly was in Obama's CIA, or was it FBI. That 's the trouble with spooks.
So what happens to Rudy Giuliani’s law license, or the money he lost in the lawsuit, or Ruby Freeman and her fat daughter, or all the govt gangsters involved?
These guys need to learn the phrase "IMMUTABLE OS". Linux so far has a couple of them, including a gaming platform I'm using right now called Bazzite, and its excellent. It's based on fedora, which is itself loosely based on red hat; and its an immutable os, meaning that it's "DLLs" so called would not be able to be manipulated; and it its difficult to add software outside of the 'bazaar' which is a bazzite flatpak app which is quite amazing. Flatpak itself is a sandbox, where each app is pretty much self -contained and 'immutable' in a sense.
immutable OSes are born out of people wanting shit to "Just Work" and also it's a much higher security than other non immutables
are some others. The first thing we have to do is convince Congress that we ought not ever have electronic voting machines, but if we MUST have them, then they MUST USE OPEN SOURCE, and have NO closed source component.
That means open hardware and open firmware
Which is actually difficult, but they have to do it, if they want the system to be fully trusted. I also personally think it should be cryptocurrency based, that way there is no 'tally', it's done in realtime and it's a PERFECT tally. Such a system would rely much more on security for the registration aspect (receiving your one VOTECOIN)
This is the state that tried to arrest Trump 45~47 for questioning the election in Georgia.
ya, and dll's (dynamic link libraries) are a perfect way of inserting code manipulations.
Can those changes be found and determine what it was changing? Could this prove the coding was altered and what those alterations affected?
there are change-logs somewhere, just as 'smart'sheets have this interesting feature called 'cell history'. This is where one can tell when and who did the change...
So then its useful 😁
Unless those logs were deleted, and/or the staff making changes all share a generic login.
Not an easy task, as each entry has a separate history, and would have to be deleted separately, without completely deleting the cell.
Unless one wipes the whole database component (like deleting the whole column in a spreadsheet) and that would mean it was done in a hurry, and that is waay more detectable.
I had the same thought about dlls. Most people do not understand the layered nature of computer programs these days.
Even if people perform a complete walkthrough of the app's code they always omit the lower layers but those can be corrupted as well. That still leaves the device drivers unmonitored and the operating system itself.
I have written programs in the past that would remove a part of themselves after execution making investigations difficult. You could write a perfect program that opted to be more devious if, say, a USB drive with a specific volume name were inserted. The USB would effectively be a key to switch on the data corruption code. Or you might use data from disk sectors marked as bad.
The possibilities are endless and if someone can make a quick buck or billion out of it is it going to happen? You bet your life it is.
Why people trust computers for voting still defies belief.
Aside - For the non computer experts: If we compare a computer program to a company, a dll is a bit like having a reprographics department that will do all your photocopying for you. While you might audit the company's finances you will probably never check whether that department is making exact copies or whether it is modifying the output. Imagine if you ordered a thousand copies of something but they had changed a QR code somewhere. Would you ever notice?
30 years ago a single byte of data had to go down through 7 layers of software and hardware before it hit the Ethernet cable as an electrical signal, and then back up through 7 layers on the other side. I doubt it's any less today. And the developers coming into industry today can't seem to write a basic program with a simple and elegant piece of code. Don't get me wrong, they are smart and know a lot more than me about manipulating threads, managing collections, etc. But they all seem to write the most incoherent and complex code that requires days of debug just to do something I would consider relatively simple.
I can't imagine how long it would take to scour the code produced by a team of developers with a few of them supporting the corruption.
The DLLs are the MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION of Programs to function correctly, especially offloading codes that can do tasks...IF there was an insertion of code that the dll executed, it will be there...BUT, it depends on HOW far the "code" is in the dll(s)!!!!!!...
OK, but, I have just looked at the dlls on my PC and I have 32 copies of one dll. How would we know which one ran at the time? Might the dll that did run have been replaced after it was used?
AND YOU HAVE DONE THE SAME THING I DID!!!! Duplicate DLLs in places you would not expect them... also, when I program, I put all the dlls in one spot and secure them...
NOTE: We don't know how many dlls are in the voting system, but I guarantee you, if they get the right programmers in there, they will find exactly how it was done. However, if those dlls were written in C++, then it is game over!!!! AND I am pretty sure they were due to the amount of chicannary that went on when these systems were being built!!!!
I think Patrick Byrne needs to keep his mouth shut until people get arrested. don't let them see you coming. don't give them any amo
IMHO this is all calculated. When he says he's been given permission, I interpret it as him getting the 'action' cue to proceed with his lines. Or, more likely, the white hats fed him these crumbs knowing full well he'd blast them publicly; because it's designed to squeeze a big reaction out of the other side. It's all calculated. Relax and enjoy your popcorn. 🍿
Timing will be ok'd - that means someone is on the other end, doing the ok-ing.
Might as well be open about it if true. I mean, the military has structure that does that. order comes from above = YesSir. AS long as it is documented there are less thuggery - one would hope.
However, we still need to see everything for transparency, not just some narrative and no deets/receipts.
Trust but Verify.
If spangle's WhiteHat theory, there is no problem to get fed some juicy white crumbs, via a spin-merchant. JUST LET us see all of it.
He can soon spin a story, which is what he is trained to do - transmit a whole lotta information in a easy-to-understand package. That's a skill. Just as Larry Johnson does that so well. And Scott Ritter. Do you trust any of them? Why?
However, CIA, and also the more persuasive Hostage Negotiation types are extensively trained to do that.
So, listen with discretion, and also listen to what he does not say.
It's more likely he's just broadcasting plans and messing things up.
I don’t like him either, he feels too deep in the swamp and trying to portray himself as the opposite. He seems to try too hard in the past
Can’t wait for the calirado version of this…and poleass and griswold going to prison…and Tina Peters exonerated and made as whole as possible.
If she ever gets out alive she should get a ticker tape parade !
And pull the lever under griswold
Does anyone else think Tina Peters is already in Witness Protection? We need her testimony.
🚨 BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE: Patrick Byrne Reveals Secret 2020 Hard Drives After Fulton County Raid
Right after the @FBI seized Fulton County’s 2020 election records, @PatrickByrne dropped a massive bombshell on @EmeraldRobinson :
“We’ve secretly obtained 5 hard drive images from 2020.”
Byrne says forensic analysis of those drives found: “In each one of them we have found an average of 500 changes to the DLLs after certification and as many as 1,000. Any one change violates the certification.”
He explains DLLs as the shared “toolbox” all election software relies on. Once the system is certified, any change to that toolbox voids the certification and opens the door to hidden scripts that can flip votes and wipe the traces.
Byrne then connected it directly to the @FBI ’s Fulton County raid:
“My guess is there are government computer scientists opening the Fulton County hard drives this morning and they’re going to be finding records from 2020 that show hundreds of changes to that toolbox after certification… It’s so illegal, it’s hard to convey how bad that is.”
This isn’t just about “irregularities.” It’s about post-certification code changes at the core of the voting system - now, finally, in federal hands.
This is just one more thing telling me we're watching a movie...
In what scenario is a billionaire working for the clowns...getting cankles to agree to blackmail and now telling us about secret hard drives?
GTFOOH
I mean really? REALLY?
This ninja ain't buyin what you're sellin...
he has stated he is CIA.
He needs to stop saying things like "secretly obtained" and start saying "we have quietly and lawfully obtained"
he is awarded zero glowiepoints this round
agreed. Be transparent puhleeze.
However, there may well be a grain of truth to what he says. Or, he is meant to stir conversation, as we are diligently doing right here. Even eyeballs on the subject is worth something.
Has Patrick Byrne ever been roundly discredited, with hroof? I mean, not just made out to be a bad 'un, which no doubt exists, just because he supposedly was in Obama's CIA, or was it FBI. That 's the trouble with spooks.
Is this guy reliable?
Claims fbi, then cia. He's all over the place. I have a hard time believing he's honest. Is he more than a carnival barker after money?
Cocaine is a hell of a drug
This sounds like a CYA op
So what happens to Rudy Giuliani’s law license, or the money he lost in the lawsuit, or Ruby Freeman and her fat daughter, or all the govt gangsters involved?
patience.
If they find something, we will definitely hear about it.
I can guarantee it.
Patience? Bro, I’ve been patient since 2017
These guys need to learn the phrase "IMMUTABLE OS". Linux so far has a couple of them, including a gaming platform I'm using right now called Bazzite, and its excellent. It's based on fedora, which is itself loosely based on red hat; and its an immutable os, meaning that it's "DLLs" so called would not be able to be manipulated; and it its difficult to add software outside of the 'bazaar' which is a bazzite flatpak app which is quite amazing. Flatpak itself is a sandbox, where each app is pretty much self -contained and 'immutable' in a sense.
immutable OSes are born out of people wanting shit to "Just Work" and also it's a much higher security than other non immutables
are some others. The first thing we have to do is convince Congress that we ought not ever have electronic voting machines, but if we MUST have them, then they MUST USE OPEN SOURCE, and have NO closed source component.
That means open hardware and open firmware
Which is actually difficult, but they have to do it, if they want the system to be fully trusted. I also personally think it should be cryptocurrency based, that way there is no 'tally', it's done in realtime and it's a PERFECT tally. Such a system would rely much more on security for the registration aspect (receiving your one VOTECOIN)
Good info.
Patrick was part of the cover up...
please explain?
Burn. It. Down.
How did he get them? Would this nullify any findings the FBI found? Jus askin
Secret Sauce.
Don’t forget, they killed the governor’s future son-in-law as a warning. Georgia is bent top to bottom.
I have NEVER trusted this MF'er.
Glad to see this is coming back to life.