They know that the real danger isn’t all the corruption, it’s the stolen election in 2020.
That’s TREASON.
It will change everything.
It will lead to mass arrests and a complete transformation of our election system.
Morning Joe calls the stolen election a “stupid lie.”
But he’s too stupid to realize that not a single judge, back in 2020, allowed the evidence to be presented.
Every case was determined to be a “lack of standing.”
Remember that?
Why was that important at the time?
It prevented a civil war, which is what the enemy was trying to start on Jan 6.
It also LIMITED who can challenge elections, to prevent nonstop “frivolous” election challenges in the future.
It is important to make it a “high bar” to challenge elections.
I think that’s why the people around Trump at the time, who were bringing court challenges, weren’t laying out ALL the evidence they had.
It was just enough, to lay the groundwork for where we are today.
Plus, there is a Constitutional process for challenging elections.
We were in that process in 2020 when the very first state, “Arizona,” was challenged in Congress during the certification process.
That’s when the democrats coordinated plan, to storm the Capital kicked off, in order to disrupt the process.
Trump knew this would happen.
The enemy wanted a civil war and Trump prevented it, by walking away.
Biden then became the biggest red pill in history and a Judas Goat.
He was leveraged and used to destroy the democrat party.
My Substack article on that topic from years back:
The Prosecution Phase was ALWAYS going to happen in Trump’s second term.
And now, because of the Biden presidency and the stolen election, Trump has the ability to completely transform EVERYTHING.
But most importantly, the large majority of the American people, will now support these efforts.
As I have said for many years now, the stolen election in 2020, was ALWAYS going to be exposed in the court system.
Why?
Because Trump is doing EVERYTHING “legally” and by the book.
Court precedents, are SAFEGUARDS for our future.
But the other reason why it MUST be done in the courts, is because Trump knows, that when real evidence is FINALLY presented in a courtroom; that changes everything and the American people will no longer consider it a “political” issue. It will then be a “legal” issue and crimes.
Not just crimes.
Treason.
Treason is the “trigger” to unleash the military, working in the shadows, to step out into the light.
Morning Joe and the enemy are in real PANIC because they know that if Tulsi Gabbard is involved in this court case looking into the stolen 2020 election, that it involves national security and likely foreign involvement.
Not a coincidence that Maduro was just easily captured and giving two thumbs up pictures and his top intelligence chief defected.
What Morning Joe won’t tell his “stupid” audience, is “why” this raid on Fulton County election offices happened.
He ignored this big news.
“Fulton County admitted that around 315,000 votes from the 2020 election were illegally certified and included in the final election results.”
That was a case brought by a citizen, using the FOIA law to obtain “evidence” from the Fulton County election office.
But the FBI raid on Fulton County is a “criminal investigation.”
Guess who is conducting the investigation?
“The St. Louis-based US attorney overseeing the FBI search warrant executed on Fulton County’s election office Wednesday received a special appointment by Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate election integrity cases nationwide, said two people familiar with the matter.
Thomas Albus, the Trump-appointed chief prosecutor in the Eastern District of Missouri, appeared on the FBI’s court-approved warrant—rather than the US attorney for the Northern District of Georgia”
Those are NPCs. 1/4 are too far gone from their lifelong social engineering. 1/4 are reprogrammable. 1/4 are just following along with the clique, aka sheep following other sheep. And the last 1/4 is just retarded.
So, upwards of 75%+ of those "muh authoritainz" bunch is reprogrammable or not invested enough to little more than bitch about things on bluesky and reddit... their protected online safe spaces.
Besides old TDS tards no one even watches this guy anymore. What is his overall viewer count even now?........To me this is white hat comms move to tell us that they are making the main guy who is fully denying election fraud the same guy who said Biden was smarter than ever when he had full blown dementia.
SCOTUS ruled on three cases that they did not have standing and dismissed them, it was a unanimous vote by them - the biggest was Texas v. Pennsylvania at the Supreme Court, you should look it up! It's an interesting read and it seems like you don't really know much about it.
That's a great ruling, I've read a ton about it and it has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Go back and read what I wrote. Of the few that were tossed for no standing, only three were candidates, and two of those were tossed by Trump appointed judges.
This doesn't change anything I wrote, it's a completely different scenario, no matter what podcasters and twitter folk tell you.
Real question, did you read the scotusblog post you sent me?
It wasn't one judge who denied it all and set the lack of standing at all. While several high-profile cases (notably Texas v. Pennsylvania at the Supreme Court) were indeed dismissed for lack of standing, many other lawsuits were heard on their technical and evidentiary merits.
While "standing" is a common legal hurdle, it was not the sole reason for the failure of these cases. Many judges, even ones who had recently been appointed by Trump explicitly stated in their rulings that even if the plaintiffs had standing, the evidence presented failed to prove the claims of widespread fraud.
Out of more than 60 lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign and its allies, approximately 30 cases reached a stage where a judge considered the merits of the arguments or the evidence provided.
Evidence was examined in Ward v. Jackson (Arizona), the court allowed a forensic examination of a random sampling of ballots. The judge ultimately ruled that the evidence showed only "statistically negligible" errors and no fraud.
The 64 dismissals were issued by judges across the political spectrum, including those appointed by Donald Trump himself. For example, in Pennsylvania, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann (a registered Republican and Federalist Society member) dismissed a case citing a lack of "factual foundation" and "speculative accusations." Of the 30 that were put in front of judges, 22 of the judges were appointed either by Trump, Reagan, or Bush.
"There is real PANIC from the enemy.
They know that the real danger isn’t all the corruption, it’s the stolen election in 2020.
That’s TREASON.
It will change everything.
It will lead to mass arrests and a complete transformation of our election system.
Morning Joe calls the stolen election a “stupid lie.” But he’s too stupid to realize that not a single judge, back in 2020, allowed the evidence to be presented. Every case was determined to be a “lack of standing.”
Remember that?
Why was that important at the time?
It prevented a civil war, which is what the enemy was trying to start on Jan 6.
It also LIMITED who can challenge elections, to prevent nonstop “frivolous” election challenges in the future. It is important to make it a “high bar” to challenge elections.
I think that’s why the people around Trump at the time, who were bringing court challenges, weren’t laying out ALL the evidence they had. It was just enough, to lay the groundwork for where we are today.
Plus, there is a Constitutional process for challenging elections. We were in that process in 2020 when the very first state, “Arizona,” was challenged in Congress during the certification process. That’s when the democrats coordinated plan, to storm the Capital kicked off, in order to disrupt the process.
Trump knew this would happen. The enemy wanted a civil war and Trump prevented it, by walking away. Biden then became the biggest red pill in history and a Judas Goat.
He was leveraged and used to destroy the democrat party. My Substack article on that topic from years back:
https://open.substack.com/pub/badlands/p/the-chosen-one?r=q8lgy&utm_medium=ios
The Prosecution Phase was ALWAYS going to happen in Trump’s second term. And now, because of the Biden presidency and the stolen election, Trump has the ability to completely transform EVERYTHING. But most importantly, the large majority of the American people, will now support these efforts.
As I have said for many years now, the stolen election in 2020, was ALWAYS going to be exposed in the court system.
Why?
Because Trump is doing EVERYTHING “legally” and by the book. Court precedents, are SAFEGUARDS for our future. But the other reason why it MUST be done in the courts, is because Trump knows, that when real evidence is FINALLY presented in a courtroom; that changes everything and the American people will no longer consider it a “political” issue. It will then be a “legal” issue and crimes.
Not just crimes.
Treason.
Treason is the “trigger” to unleash the military, working in the shadows, to step out into the light.
Morning Joe and the enemy are in real PANIC because they know that if Tulsi Gabbard is involved in this court case looking into the stolen 2020 election, that it involves national security and likely foreign involvement.
Not a coincidence that Maduro was just easily captured and giving two thumbs up pictures and his top intelligence chief defected.
What Morning Joe won’t tell his “stupid” audience, is “why” this raid on Fulton County election offices happened. He ignored this big news.
“Fulton County admitted that around 315,000 votes from the 2020 election were illegally certified and included in the final election results.”
https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/17/fulton-county-we-dont-dispute-315000-votes-lacking-poll-workers-signatures-were-counted-in-2020/
That happened in December.
That was a case brought by a citizen, using the FOIA law to obtain “evidence” from the Fulton County election office.
But the FBI raid on Fulton County is a “criminal investigation.”
Guess who is conducting the investigation?
“The St. Louis-based US attorney overseeing the FBI search warrant executed on Fulton County’s election office Wednesday received a special appointment by Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate election integrity cases nationwide, said two people familiar with the matter. Thomas Albus, the Trump-appointed chief prosecutor in the Eastern District of Missouri, appeared on the FBI’s court-approved warrant—rather than the US attorney for the Northern District of Georgia”
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/bondi-hands-st-louis-prosecutor-nationwide-election-fraud-remit
Still think nothing is happening?"
I dunno. There's a lot of dumbasses out there. Ones that believe the "muh authoritarian" narrative. https://www.democracydocket.com/opinion/dojs-legal-machinery-to-subvert-the-2026-election-is-already-in-place/
https://archive.is/WhIZz
Those are NPCs. 1/4 are too far gone from their lifelong social engineering. 1/4 are reprogrammable. 1/4 are just following along with the clique, aka sheep following other sheep. And the last 1/4 is just retarded.
So, upwards of 75%+ of those "muh authoritainz" bunch is reprogrammable or not invested enough to little more than bitch about things on bluesky and reddit... their protected online safe spaces.
This is the guys who said "intellectually, this version of Biden is the best Biden" at the time when Biden was a full actual dementia tard.
https://youtu.be/0pb6xXuU5wM
Besides old TDS tards no one even watches this guy anymore. What is his overall viewer count even now?........To me this is white hat comms move to tell us that they are making the main guy who is fully denying election fraud the same guy who said Biden was smarter than ever when he had full blown dementia.
I was thinking the same thing. If they consider it "good ", I hate to think how they'd act if they thought it was straight up "bad"
The Supreme Court ruling that the candidates have standing was key. Step by step. Not only treason, but they also made themselves enemy combatants.
SCOTUS ruled on three cases that they did not have standing and dismissed them, it was a unanimous vote by them - the biggest was Texas v. Pennsylvania at the Supreme Court, you should look it up! It's an interesting read and it seems like you don't really know much about it.
Those were the 2020/2021 cases. There was one recently that flipped the script.
Link me to it please
What are your thoughts on this recent SCOTUS ruling? YOU seem to not know much about it, IMO..
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/court-holds-that-all-candidates-can-challenge-rules-governing-vote-counting-in-elections/
That's a great ruling, I've read a ton about it and it has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Go back and read what I wrote. Of the few that were tossed for no standing, only three were candidates, and two of those were tossed by Trump appointed judges.
This doesn't change anything I wrote, it's a completely different scenario, no matter what podcasters and twitter folk tell you.
Real question, did you read the scotusblog post you sent me?
Thank you, OP fren, for including the full text of the tweet thread!
It wasn't one judge who denied it all and set the lack of standing at all. While several high-profile cases (notably Texas v. Pennsylvania at the Supreme Court) were indeed dismissed for lack of standing, many other lawsuits were heard on their technical and evidentiary merits.
While "standing" is a common legal hurdle, it was not the sole reason for the failure of these cases. Many judges, even ones who had recently been appointed by Trump explicitly stated in their rulings that even if the plaintiffs had standing, the evidence presented failed to prove the claims of widespread fraud.
Out of more than 60 lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign and its allies, approximately 30 cases reached a stage where a judge considered the merits of the arguments or the evidence provided.
Evidence was examined in Ward v. Jackson (Arizona), the court allowed a forensic examination of a random sampling of ballots. The judge ultimately ruled that the evidence showed only "statistically negligible" errors and no fraud.
The 64 dismissals were issued by judges across the political spectrum, including those appointed by Donald Trump himself. For example, in Pennsylvania, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann (a registered Republican and Federalist Society member) dismissed a case citing a lack of "factual foundation" and "speculative accusations." Of the 30 that were put in front of judges, 22 of the judges were appointed either by Trump, Reagan, or Bush.
Joe Lang Sub-stack Yes!!! Comfy Reading on a cold night.