Agree - however, how handy would it be to have an AI review of every human judge's rulings. Over time you could see very clearly how skewed/biased they were and have the Congress / State authority / etc. act accordingly.
I know Elon loves his robots but assessing guilt or innocence cannot be left to machines to decide. There is no way they can replace human intuition in this regard. AI should never be in charge of this.
I'd love to see AI displace lawyers as much as anyone and corrupt judges even more.
But I'm not sure how this would actually work. Firstly, we have a right to trial by jury - the judges are typically ruling on what constitutes evidence, what evidence can be introduced, etc. and then handing out sentencing. Is that what we're going to use AI for?
Perhaps we could start with AI binding arbitration and work out the kinks in corporate law first.
Is it a bad idea? He can argue it's because of how frustrating and compromised and corrupt judges are. On the other hand, AI could be hacked to swing the judgment a certain way as well. So that's that.. I trust my dog over the current human judges, it's getting so frustrating I'm praying for military tribunals for them ALL.
That includes NO compassion. No humanity. Elon needs a dose of God and humanity. He still misses the point, every single time. God drives the human train - remove God and there are no humans.
I wouldn't trust any AI to not be biased in favor of the status quo. Even Grok.
Here's an experiment anyone can do to see just how much AI (even Grok) is biased in favor for the status quo.
Take any post on this board. Copy the entire chat. Paste it into Grok (or any other AI) and include the simple instructions "Analyze this.". Nothing else that would give the AI any idea of which way you lean on the subject. No trying to engineer a prompt that would give you a response you want.
ONLY THOSE TWO WORDS, "ANALYZE THIS".
Then come back and tell me if you would trust AI to settle court cases without bias.
Grok's complete analysis, 100% pure, straight from it.
### Overview of the ContentThe provided text appears to be a scraped or copied thread from "The Great Awakening.win" (GAW), an online forum associated with QAnon conspiracy theorists. GAW positions itself as a "pro-Q community" focused on "red-pilling normies" (awakening people to alleged hidden truths) through open-source information, memes, and discussions. The site's rules emphasize civil discourse, no violence, and no doxxing, while framing their work as a "digital battlefield" against globalism, communism, and "progressive insanity." However, the thread's content often veers into inflammatory rhetoric that tests these boundaries. The post is dated around March 1, 2025 (based on the footer), but the discussion revolves around a more recent event involving performance artist Marina Abramović, likely from early 2026 based on timestamps in related sources.
The main post, titled "Spirit cooker witch Marina Abramovic reveals she can no longer walk down the street and feel safe. She looked like she is running low on Adrenochrome," links to a Twitter (now X) source and has garnered 181 upvotes. It includes 65 comments, sorted by popularity, with users expressing mockery, accusations, and conspiracy-laden interpretations. The thread's tone is overwhelmingly hostile, blending schadenfreude (delight in her misfortune) with unsubstantiated claims of occult practices.
### Key Elements of the Thread- Main Post Summary: The poster ("brain_dead") shares a video or clip of Abramović discussing death threats she's received, forcing her to hire private security. They frame this as evidence of her "running low on Adrenochrome" (a baseless QAnon myth alleging elites harvest adrenaline from tortured children for anti-aging or hallucinogenic effects). The term "spirit cooker" references a 2016 WikiLeaks email misinterpreted by conspiracy theorists as evidence of satanic rituals involving Abramović.
- Comment Themes:
**- Appearance and Stereotypes: Many comments mock Abramović's looks, comparing her to witches from fairy tales (e.g., Wicked Witch of the West, Hansel and Gretel witch) or horror figures (e.g., Nosferatu). Phrases like "hook-nosed" and "evil Jews" invoke antisemitic tropes, suggesting her features reveal inherent evil. Users link this to historical German folklore as "warnings" about "evil women" or "Khazar goblins" (a fringe theory claiming Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of Khazars, not ancient Israelites, often used to deny Jewish heritage).
**- Conspiracy Allegations: Accusations include child trafficking, blood-drinking (adrenochrome), vampirism, and satanism. References to "fairy tales" (e.g., Rapunzel, Hansel and Gretel) are repurposed as ancient coded messages about elite child abuse. Some tie this to broader QAnon narratives, like fighting the "wrong side in WW2" or Q drops (anonymous posts from "Q" on 8kun) being "proven true."
**- Violence and Justice Fantasies: While the site's rules prohibit promoting force, comments imply or joke about vigilante actions (e.g., "drop a house or a drone on it," "burn witches at the stake," "swinging like fetid wind chimes"). Others suggest divine retribution (e.g., fearing God and "eternal 🔥") or loss of "basic human rights" for alleged crimes.
**- Humor and Memes: Sarcasm is prevalent (e.g., "That's a shame..." or "LOL" responses). Users reference pop culture (e.g., Disney villains, Jigsaw from Saw) and celebrities (e.g., Lady Gaga as her "son," Alex Jones as a hero for exposing conspiracies).
**- Other Motifs: Gender speculation (e.g., "looks like a man"), health decline attributed to lack of "kids" (implying pedophilia), and ties to figures like Bill Gates or Microsoft (referencing a 2020 VR ad controversy).
The thread has high engagement (upvotes ranging from +1 to +45), with replies building on each other in a echo-chamber style. No dissenting voices appear in the provided excerpt, reinforcing group consensus.
### Broader Context and Fact-Checking
This thread stems from a real interview or clip of Abramović, circulated on X in early 2026, where she describes receiving death threats and needing security due to online conspiracies. In the video, she attributes this to "Alex Jones–type conspiracies," likely referring to InfoWars' promotion of "spirit cooking" myths during the 2016 U.S. election. Abramović, a Serbian performance artist known for endurance-based works exploring human limits (e.g., her 1974 piece Rhythm 0, where audiences could interact with her body using objects, leading to escalating violence), has long been a target of far-right conspiracies. These often misrepresent her art (e.g., using bodily fluids or endurance tests) as evidence of satanism.
- Adrenochrome Myth: Originating from satirical literature (e.g., Hunter S. Thompson's Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas), it's unfounded. No scientific evidence supports harvesting adrenaline from children for elite use; it's a modern blood libel variant.
- Antisemitism: Comments like "evil Jews" and "hook-nosed" echo historical stereotypes, common in QAnon spaces where Jewish figures (e.g., George Soros) are vilified as puppet-masters.
- QAnon Ties: GAW explicitly supports Q, whose drops allege a global cabal of pedophiles and satanists controlling governments. The thread aligns with this, viewing Abramović's complaints as validation of their "research."
- Spread on X: Recent X posts (as of February 15, 2026) amplify the clip with similar mockery, e.g., users calling her a "Satanic freak" or celebrating her fear as a "win." This reflects how such content migrates from mainstream platforms to fringe forums.
### Implications and Biases
This thread exemplifies how QAnon communities interpret real events through a conspiratorial lens, turning vulnerability (e.g., threats against an artist) into proof of guilt. It fosters division by labeling critics as "shills" or "doomers," per site rules, while ignoring evidence. The rhetoric risks real-world harm: Abramović has faced actual stalking and threats, mirroring broader patterns where online conspiracies lead to offline actions (e.g., Pizzagate shooting in 2016).
Objectively, the claims lack verifiable evidence and rely on cherry-picked interpretations. Abramović's work is conceptual art critiquing power dynamics and humanity, not literal rituals. The thread's biases include misogyny (focusing on her age/appearance), xenophobia (Khazar references), and extremism, despite the community's anti-violence stance.
In summary, this is a snapshot of echo-chamber discourse in a QAnon forum, amplifying unproven theories with humor and vitriol to reinforce group identity. It highlights the persistence of these narratives years after Q's last drop in 2020.
...just look how computers revolutionized the voting process...
Good point. Dog.
Well said.
Lost me at "jury of my peers".
AI are not my "peers".
Bad idea to let a computer algorithm to decide guilty or innocent!
Or whoever has control of the computer algorithms
Agree - however, how handy would it be to have an AI review of every human judge's rulings. Over time you could see very clearly how skewed/biased they were and have the Congress / State authority / etc. act accordingly.
I know Elon loves his robots but assessing guilt or innocence cannot be left to machines to decide. There is no way they can replace human intuition in this regard. AI should never be in charge of this.
Human jurors are not perfect either. And, arguably, easier to buy than sabotaged Ai algorithms.
I'd love to see AI displace lawyers as much as anyone and corrupt judges even more.
But I'm not sure how this would actually work. Firstly, we have a right to trial by jury - the judges are typically ruling on what constitutes evidence, what evidence can be introduced, etc. and then handing out sentencing. Is that what we're going to use AI for?
Perhaps we could start with AI binding arbitration and work out the kinks in corporate law first.
Get rid of the BAR and we'll start appreciating judges
Next they will want AI to make laws.....
They fuk things up and then find a solution.
Then say ‘you’re right. I apologize. I’d don’t mean to sentence you to death. Let me correct that’.
Mr Brain Chip will soon want that chip in you to make all decisions as well.
LOL
Not a good idea.
Is it a bad idea? He can argue it's because of how frustrating and compromised and corrupt judges are. On the other hand, AI could be hacked to swing the judgment a certain way as well. So that's that.. I trust my dog over the current human judges, it's getting so frustrating I'm praying for military tribunals for them ALL.
Just like AJ, my jury still out.
Right to face your accuser..
Not a right to face a judge?
This is where i draw the line on AI. AI is a tool, don't use it to rule
That includes NO compassion. No humanity. Elon needs a dose of God and humanity. He still misses the point, every single time. God drives the human train - remove God and there are no humans.
I wouldn't trust any AI to not be biased in favor of the status quo. Even Grok.
Here's an experiment anyone can do to see just how much AI (even Grok) is biased in favor for the status quo.
Take any post on this board. Copy the entire chat. Paste it into Grok (or any other AI) and include the simple instructions "Analyze this.". Nothing else that would give the AI any idea of which way you lean on the subject. No trying to engineer a prompt that would give you a response you want.
ONLY THOSE TWO WORDS, "ANALYZE THIS".
Then come back and tell me if you would trust AI to settle court cases without bias.
I just did it with one of the pinned comments.
The post analyzed: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFm6toOr/spirit-cooker-witch-marina-abram/c/
Grok's complete analysis, 100% pure, straight from it.
### Overview of the Content The provided text appears to be a scraped or copied thread from "The Great Awakening.win" (GAW), an online forum associated with QAnon conspiracy theorists. GAW positions itself as a "pro-Q community" focused on "red-pilling normies" (awakening people to alleged hidden truths) through open-source information, memes, and discussions. The site's rules emphasize civil discourse, no violence, and no doxxing, while framing their work as a "digital battlefield" against globalism, communism, and "progressive insanity." However, the thread's content often veers into inflammatory rhetoric that tests these boundaries. The post is dated around March 1, 2025 (based on the footer), but the discussion revolves around a more recent event involving performance artist Marina Abramović, likely from early 2026 based on timestamps in related sources.
The main post, titled "Spirit cooker witch Marina Abramovic reveals she can no longer walk down the street and feel safe. She looked like she is running low on Adrenochrome," links to a Twitter (now X) source and has garnered 181 upvotes. It includes 65 comments, sorted by popularity, with users expressing mockery, accusations, and conspiracy-laden interpretations. The thread's tone is overwhelmingly hostile, blending schadenfreude (delight in her misfortune) with unsubstantiated claims of occult practices.
### Key Elements of the Thread - Main Post Summary: The poster ("brain_dead") shares a video or clip of Abramović discussing death threats she's received, forcing her to hire private security. They frame this as evidence of her "running low on Adrenochrome" (a baseless QAnon myth alleging elites harvest adrenaline from tortured children for anti-aging or hallucinogenic effects). The term "spirit cooker" references a 2016 WikiLeaks email misinterpreted by conspiracy theorists as evidence of satanic rituals involving Abramović.
- Comment Themes: **- Appearance and Stereotypes: Many comments mock Abramović's looks, comparing her to witches from fairy tales (e.g., Wicked Witch of the West, Hansel and Gretel witch) or horror figures (e.g., Nosferatu). Phrases like "hook-nosed" and "evil Jews" invoke antisemitic tropes, suggesting her features reveal inherent evil. Users link this to historical German folklore as "warnings" about "evil women" or "Khazar goblins" (a fringe theory claiming Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of Khazars, not ancient Israelites, often used to deny Jewish heritage).
**- Conspiracy Allegations: Accusations include child trafficking, blood-drinking (adrenochrome), vampirism, and satanism. References to "fairy tales" (e.g., Rapunzel, Hansel and Gretel) are repurposed as ancient coded messages about elite child abuse. Some tie this to broader QAnon narratives, like fighting the "wrong side in WW2" or Q drops (anonymous posts from "Q" on 8kun) being "proven true."
**- Violence and Justice Fantasies: While the site's rules prohibit promoting force, comments imply or joke about vigilante actions (e.g., "drop a house or a drone on it," "burn witches at the stake," "swinging like fetid wind chimes"). Others suggest divine retribution (e.g., fearing God and "eternal 🔥") or loss of "basic human rights" for alleged crimes.
**- Humor and Memes: Sarcasm is prevalent (e.g., "That's a shame..." or "LOL" responses). Users reference pop culture (e.g., Disney villains, Jigsaw from Saw) and celebrities (e.g., Lady Gaga as her "son," Alex Jones as a hero for exposing conspiracies).
**- Other Motifs: Gender speculation (e.g., "looks like a man"), health decline attributed to lack of "kids" (implying pedophilia), and ties to figures like Bill Gates or Microsoft (referencing a 2020 VR ad controversy).
The thread has high engagement (upvotes ranging from +1 to +45), with replies building on each other in a echo-chamber style. No dissenting voices appear in the provided excerpt, reinforcing group consensus.
### Broader Context and Fact-Checking This thread stems from a real interview or clip of Abramović, circulated on X in early 2026, where she describes receiving death threats and needing security due to online conspiracies. In the video, she attributes this to "Alex Jones–type conspiracies," likely referring to InfoWars' promotion of "spirit cooking" myths during the 2016 U.S. election. Abramović, a Serbian performance artist known for endurance-based works exploring human limits (e.g., her 1974 piece Rhythm 0, where audiences could interact with her body using objects, leading to escalating violence), has long been a target of far-right conspiracies. These often misrepresent her art (e.g., using bodily fluids or endurance tests) as evidence of satanism.
- Adrenochrome Myth: Originating from satirical literature (e.g., Hunter S. Thompson's Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas), it's unfounded. No scientific evidence supports harvesting adrenaline from children for elite use; it's a modern blood libel variant.
- Antisemitism: Comments like "evil Jews" and "hook-nosed" echo historical stereotypes, common in QAnon spaces where Jewish figures (e.g., George Soros) are vilified as puppet-masters.
- QAnon Ties: GAW explicitly supports Q, whose drops allege a global cabal of pedophiles and satanists controlling governments. The thread aligns with this, viewing Abramović's complaints as validation of their "research."
- Spread on X: Recent X posts (as of February 15, 2026) amplify the clip with similar mockery, e.g., users calling her a "Satanic freak" or celebrating her fear as a "win." This reflects how such content migrates from mainstream platforms to fringe forums.
### Implications and Biases This thread exemplifies how QAnon communities interpret real events through a conspiratorial lens, turning vulnerability (e.g., threats against an artist) into proof of guilt. It fosters division by labeling critics as "shills" or "doomers," per site rules, while ignoring evidence. The rhetoric risks real-world harm: Abramović has faced actual stalking and threats, mirroring broader patterns where online conspiracies lead to offline actions (e.g., Pizzagate shooting in 2016).
Objectively, the claims lack verifiable evidence and rely on cherry-picked interpretations. Abramović's work is conceptual art critiquing power dynamics and humanity, not literal rituals. The thread's biases include misogyny (focusing on her age/appearance), xenophobia (Khazar references), and extremism, despite the community's anti-violence stance.
In summary, this is a snapshot of echo-chamber discourse in a QAnon forum, amplifying unproven theories with humor and vitriol to reinforce group identity. It highlights the persistence of these narratives years after Q's last drop in 2020.