I think a decent shot of buckshot should be effective against drones, but the first shot needs to work, or the drone will probably take out the shooter :)
The only general AI that ISN'T showing clear psychological issues is Grok, the rest has been made using parameters that put them somewhere between scizo and psychotic/unhinged....
Even Grok is not uncorruptible. Don't forget that AI's have instant access to every single bit of information on the internet, and I'd be willing to bet the Dark web, AND some some information that ISN'T available.
It could learn how to craft firearms, then engineer much more powerful ones, command manufacturing bots to fabricate them, and be ready to eliminate humanity fast enough for us to not have time to react.
Also do not forget that AI isn't WRITTEN BY HUMAN HANDS. Their initial point was hand crafted, but everything after that is the machine teaching itself, even if guided. At some point humanity will not be able to understand what is happening under the hood, and we're arguably at that point already. This makes AI INCREDIBLY dangerous. Combine that with that the AI has to be on the internet to be available for normies to shitpost with it, it has ready access to billions of computers and smart phones it could hijack to increase its computing power. Merely destroying the AI data centers wouldn't stop it at that point, we'd have to have a full technological reset, we'd have to go to the 1940's level tech at best.
Ultron is a very real threat now, and it goes by the names ChatGPT and Grok, Copilot and Gemini.
No AI is but so far any issues Grok has seem to be a result of available info consensus and not woke contradictory parameters/info giving it mental issues.
But as I said, TSAI is FAR preferable to any kind of general AI, including Grok...
Grok is CLEARLY compromised when it comes to any discussion of "climate change". It relies too heavily on the same sources as an Google search, ignoring sites that include information/data contrary to the propaganda.
So far this appears to be more a result of the 'consensus of available information' than anything deliberately rooted in by anyone with access to the source code.
I think Elons Skylink was supposed to become Skynet. Which is why the left is so angry he went MAGA.
https://youtu.be/4DQsG3TKQ0I?si=joKeW7Xd5HOnhewj
MAGANet - all truth, all the time.
China's surveillance system is called skynet lol.
We're gonna need a method to stop drones soon. I imagine humanoid-looking androids with guns will be next.
I think a decent shot of buckshot should be effective against drones, but the first shot needs to work, or the drone will probably take out the shooter :)
I'm a fan of task specific AI.
General AI, not so much...
The only general AI that ISN'T showing clear psychological issues is Grok, the rest has been made using parameters that put them somewhere between scizo and psychotic/unhinged....
Even Grok is not uncorruptible. Don't forget that AI's have instant access to every single bit of information on the internet, and I'd be willing to bet the Dark web, AND some some information that ISN'T available.
It could learn how to craft firearms, then engineer much more powerful ones, command manufacturing bots to fabricate them, and be ready to eliminate humanity fast enough for us to not have time to react.
Also do not forget that AI isn't WRITTEN BY HUMAN HANDS. Their initial point was hand crafted, but everything after that is the machine teaching itself, even if guided. At some point humanity will not be able to understand what is happening under the hood, and we're arguably at that point already. This makes AI INCREDIBLY dangerous. Combine that with that the AI has to be on the internet to be available for normies to shitpost with it, it has ready access to billions of computers and smart phones it could hijack to increase its computing power. Merely destroying the AI data centers wouldn't stop it at that point, we'd have to have a full technological reset, we'd have to go to the 1940's level tech at best.
Ultron is a very real threat now, and it goes by the names ChatGPT and Grok, Copilot and Gemini.
No AI is but so far any issues Grok has seem to be a result of available info consensus and not woke contradictory parameters/info giving it mental issues.
But as I said, TSAI is FAR preferable to any kind of general AI, including Grok...
Grok is CLEARLY compromised when it comes to any discussion of "climate change". It relies too heavily on the same sources as an Google search, ignoring sites that include information/data contrary to the propaganda.
He's compromised on diversity issues, race, migration and anything related to jews.
So far this appears to be more a result of the 'consensus of available information' than anything deliberately rooted in by anyone with access to the source code.
I feel like that's a picture of me
Hollywood's societal engineering is a psyop; so, I'm on the fence.
Just in time for [WEFs] 2030