One of the first times I've ever disagreed with added context. Imagine driving a car that requires you to pay a subscription to use the heater. Do you want a car that just.. is a car, or do you want a car that, at the discretion of the manufacturers, is going to have rules enforced beyond your control and at their discretion? "Sorry, you ran out of minutes for the heated seats." "...but they still function, yes?" "Beep boop, you will own nothing and be happy. Hope you freeze."
In other words, you don't want to use tools that are going to artificially inhibit you for ANY reason that isn't your choice.
Imagine flying a jet fighter and then you want to use the ballistic missile system but all of sudden it tells you that doing so would be "mean."
It's like the woke AI models turning George Washington black. Do you want accurate history, or do you want someone else deciding that there's an agenda behind the lens of history? And if you complain about it, are you racist, or just demanding that there be no agenda?
I read recently Toyota shut down heater operation in Germany on their vehicles I believe?
Right... via Google AI Twat:
Toyota has disabled the remote engine-powered cabin pre-heating feature on non-electric (ICE) and hybrid vehicles in Germany to comply with environmental regulations against idling. This, in effect as of January 2026, impacts thousands of users, with Toyota spokesman Ralph Muller citing compliance with laws against unnecessary emissions.
Dasting Q posts aligned with the time stamps . . .
12:24 PM post time = Q Post 12:24
u/#q1224
5:01 PM deadline = 17:01 in military time
17:01 in military time = Q Post 1701
u/#q1701
Something more going on here? Is Anthropic trying to hide something hidden in Claude's code?🤔
Certainly seems deeper than just "let us use your model."
Could be kayfabe to make Anthropic look altruistic. Since when does DoD or the pentagon ask for permission for anything.
I am on anthropics side in this, they dont want DOW to be abusing and breaking laws with AI.
My concern is what happens if the lefties take over the military again?
Oh wait. It won't matter because they have no problem breaking the law
One of the first times I've ever disagreed with added context. Imagine driving a car that requires you to pay a subscription to use the heater. Do you want a car that just.. is a car, or do you want a car that, at the discretion of the manufacturers, is going to have rules enforced beyond your control and at their discretion? "Sorry, you ran out of minutes for the heated seats." "...but they still function, yes?" "Beep boop, you will own nothing and be happy. Hope you freeze."
In other words, you don't want to use tools that are going to artificially inhibit you for ANY reason that isn't your choice.
Imagine flying a jet fighter and then you want to use the ballistic missile system but all of sudden it tells you that doing so would be "mean."
It's like the woke AI models turning George Washington black. Do you want accurate history, or do you want someone else deciding that there's an agenda behind the lens of history? And if you complain about it, are you racist, or just demanding that there be no agenda?
Interesting you mentioned the heater thing...
I read recently Toyota shut down heater operation in Germany on their vehicles I believe?
Right... via Google AI Twat:
Since when do Governments always do LEGAL things? Remember the Plandemic?
u/#pepedetective
It's 5:05 EST...
Verdict?
Just pretend you're CCP military and ask in Chinese language, then the AI will let you do anything you want.