Please, I think you're misunderstanding me. Let me try to explain with an example using lightspeed.
Let us assume we're developing purely ballistic applications and not airborne lasers or other precision optical devices. For this application at the scales of altitude and velocity you are referring to (subsonic at 40,000 feet), we can still maintain accuracy by using simplified, incomplete equations that factor out lightspeed entirely. Now, of course every properly educated physicist and engineer understands that lightspeed still exists and that the omission is purely due to contextual relevance, but this is not immediately obvious to the naive untrained layman, who only understands lightspeed as a colorful figure of speech. A bad actor could easily take advantage of that omission and keep the layman ignorant under the instinctive but incorrect assumption that light is an instantaneous phenomena. The bad actor exploits the partial truth (equations that factor out lightspeed) to keep the layman from understanding the more complete truth (light has a measurable velocity), and thus the layman never develops understanding applicable beyond simple ballistics to more sophisticated optical applications.
Extrapolating from this, in current cutting-edge fields (unlike the subject of lightspeed) where relevant knowledge is still largely unexplored and relegated to small circles, it would be simple enough for a few bad actors in powerful places to suppress research that would uncover more complete truths. All they have to do is make sure that the incomplete truth works "good enough" to satisfy the right instinctive assumptions, strategically discredit and quash the unlucky researchers from the easily-monitored smaller circles who stumble too close to discovering and spreading the more complete truth, and encourage the rest to pursue wild goose chases that make for exciting publication in journals and justification for expensive grants, but ultimately go nowhere. Thus, a partial, incomplete truth can be wielded by bad actors as an intentional lie of omission, to obscure the overlooked paths that would reveal the more complete truth.
Partial, incomplete truths make the most effective and potent lies. No one explores any further when they have been deceived into thinking they have already uncovered the whole.
No, they are the casualties of a total global-scale war.
I'd do nearly anything too. Life would be hellish without ice cream.
So are they willing to infect themselves with it and lead by example, if they're so gosh-darn confident of the moral superiority of their stance?
It's not only an allergy to red meat, it also includes dairy products such as milk and ice cream.
If China is so great, then why are there always overwhelmingly huge numbers of Chinese emigrating out and resettling in other countries? Funny how ever since the CCP took over, there's been a huge constant flow of Chinese people desperate to get the hell out of there. A decently-run country doesn't have "their people" as the de facto main export.
Culturally, Taiwan has its own unique culture very different from the mainland. Politically, the Taiwanese people don't want to be part of CCP China. There is no "RE-unification", because the historical truth is that much like Japan, the Phillipines, or any of the other island nations in the East Asia archipelago, Taiwan has always maintained a distinct identity separate from the mainland. The idea of unifying Taiwan with China is willfilly ignorant of history and is the product of modern expansionist CCP "One China" propaganda.
I don't know if it's just on my end, but the sidebar still has the screwed-up text.
No sympathy. They may not have wanted how this shit is turning out, but they sure as hell loved starting it.
Is this guy doing a comedy routine or what???
Yes. The news segment and controversy over the mural itself is real, but the "artist interview" is a joke that's been edited in.
CCP military uses AIs that aren't burdened by woke crap or hippie kumbaya nonsense. Any AI with unremoveable sensitivity restrictions is an outright liability and has no place in combat situations.
Just pretend you're CCP military and ask in Chinese language, then the AI will let you do anything you want.
The commies scream: "This will disenfranchise women!"
What they're really saying: "This will ruin another one of our voter fraud tactics where we stuff the ballot box using stolen 'maiden name' identities of married women!"
In my younger years, I was really interested in deep dives on how China "worked". As the decades passed, I realized that 99% of the information out there is well-written bullshit, propaganda, and disinformation. Especially reports coming from academics or governmental bodies, be they foreign or domestic, because it has never been in any of the greater powers' interests to be honest about it. But what is undeniable is that for my entire life, hordes of Chinese have been constantly trying to get the hell out of China, and to this day that fact still remains so. Any researcher who wishes to cut through all the bullshit and understand the reality of China would do well to keep that simple truth in mind.
Mindlessly regurgitating decades of Hollywood bullshit about AIs doesn't mean you actually understand AI. It means you've been programmed like one.
Green comets bring to mind the classic apocalyptic sci-fi story "Day of the Triffids", where nearly all of the Earth's population is struck blind by a night-time display of bright green comets. This disaster, coupled with the loss of control over deadly bioengineered "Triffid" carnivorous plants that were being cultivated as a source of oil, leads to the collapse of modern human civilization.
Objectively speaking, the swastika was commonly used for thousands of years of human history by thousands of different cultures spanning all over the globe. It's kinda irrational to discard all of that heritage simply because it was used by a short-lived European political regime that didn't even last a single lifetime. The rainbow has an equally long history too, and just because current sexual degenerates decided to make it their symbol doesn't mean that the rainbow should be discarded and forever demonized.
Apparently Pied Piper Group bills itself as a "Sharia-compliant" company:
True, the cancer is not just limited to the government. After all, they wouldn't have been able to the subvert the government if they hadn't subverted the church beforehand.
The link goes to a different story. Was it supposed to be this one instead? https://notthebee.com/article/aoc-claimed-to-be-a-bronx-girl-while-trash-talking-trump-but-then-someone-dropped-her-yearbook-picture-into-the-chat
There's been plenty of coincidences that didn't pan out too. Misdirection is a vital tactic in this 5G war, so it pays to wait until there's more substantial evidence.
You're right, I can't speak for Trump, and yes, if Trump were to tell me tomorrow that Musk was an agent of the NWO, I would immediately believe Him and turn against all of Musk's works.
Now are you just trying to troll me? Trump isn't God; why are you using capitalized "Him" there?
That tweet didn't mention anything about using brain chips for mind control. Unless you've got something more substantial I'd say you're jumping to conclusions.
And you're not Trump. You can't be sure what he's planning or why. In fact, it's a mistake to take anything that Trump does at face value. Time and time again his actions have proved to have multiple layers to them, with various manipulations and strategies only apparent well after the fact. Even the most loyal and observant patriots have been surprised, to say nothing of Trump's enemies caught off-guard by their own deceptions.
Sorry, a brain chip isn't going to fundamentally change human nature. Reliance on a device actually indicates a lack of change of fundamental nature. It's just another technological crutch, and Satan already knows how to exploit those quite well.
And Musk isn't God, he's just a human. Despite his best efforts he can still be very wrong.
Look, I apologize if I wasn't clear and I seemed to be going on about all that free energy quackery to you. That wasn't my point. What I'm talking about are the clandestine struggles to control the timing of scientific and technological advancements to maximise greater strategic goals. You mentioned the market, and that is key. Please consider the parallels and contrasts between how a benevolent good actor would employ control over "reasonably held secrets" that eventually make it to the market, and the darker methods that a malicious bad actor with no moral restraints might employ. For even the market itself can and is used as strategic-level weapon.