I'm more or less speaking on the event organization, printing of banners, camera cranes/drones, just the whole setup in general. I work in film and event production and it takes a lot more time than people believe.
Believe me, people can do this sort of thing very quickly. That said, I would not be surprised if the liberate Iran folks haven't been increasingly active in recent times, with the bombing of the nuke facility being the indicator that finally, something might be ready to change.
I don't know how they will do it going forward, but I suspect that the Prince has the potential to be a rallying point, not for the restoration of the Monarchy (Shah), but as a potential leader for the people coming together to set up a democratically elected republic, creation of a constitution, etc.
My thoughts exactly. I don't get the impression from him that he wants anything more than helping Iran get back on its feet and moving towards a secular democratic form of governance.
I don’t believe that the Persian people or any of the other ethnic groups in modern day Iran would welcome any of the Shah’s family back into the country.
Yes, there are some anti-Pahlavi people in Iran, but they a very small minority. That opposition is outside Iran and are mostly from the MEK along with those politicians and leaders who have taken money from the MEK - Pence, Giuliani, Pompeo, and others. The MEK is well funded and lobbies support within the West. There is a popular influencer, I can't remember his name, that spreads a great deal of anti-Pahlavi talk. He is in reality affiliated with the MEK and is partially funded by them. Most Iranians, in and outside of Iran, want no part of the MEK since they were involved in the movement that ousted the Shah and that installed the Islamic regime. After the Islamists took control, they turned on the MEK killing many of them while the others fled to the West. They are straight up jihadi communists.
The Iranian people have consistently called for Pahlavi. He is the only one they trust and this includes all the ethnic groups in Iran - the Kurds, the Baloch, and all the others. The Iranian people need to choose their own way, not others deciding what's best for them. That is what started all this to begin with almost 50 years ago. It was a color revolution where foreign interests used Iran for whatever their own agendas were and there is plenty of blame to go around - including the US and Carter. Unfortunately for the Iranian people, and many others in the world, that plan backfired. One American president helped to cause this mess, and another American president now is trying to correct that wrong.
As I said, this is coming from the Iranians themselves inside and outside of Iran. I would think that they know what the hell is happening inside their own country. It is also available for anyone that takes the time to actually investigate the matter outside of mainstream sources.
Restoring a monarchy is not the only way going forward. I think there can be no doubt that Cabal forces influenced and controlled the Shah's family, until it no longer served them, and they installed the Radical Islamic republic.
But, perhaps without the Banking Cabal in the driver seat, the Iranian people can actually find their way forward. The Shah's family could serve the role of a natural focal point, but they do not necessarily have to have any role in government.
It's hard to know. There have been SO FEW genuine actual movements for national sovereignty in the last 50 (70?) years.
My understanding is the Iranian people by referendum will decide what form of governance they want. What there is consensus on at the moment is that there will be a clear separation of religion and state, equal access for all citizens, elected representation, and a system of checks and balances. What form it will take is up to the Iranian people.
It will be difficult going forward given the train wreck the regime has made of the country due to negligence, corruption, and mismanagement. I hope they are able to get back some of the stolen money taken out of the country to help them rebuild. They will have some major challenges that must be addressed immediately - like a collapsed currency and a severe water shortage.
I’m worried we’ll replace one dictator / tyrant for another?
“Some” of what I’ve read about the Palhavi’s paints the last one to rule in a not so good manner. That said,,, it’s a VERY complicated situation and I’m just a frog with a phone, so you should take whatever I say with a grain of salt..
The Ayatollah killed 40,000 people THIS YEAR but the SHAH was brutal? Lmao at least the shah wasn't a jihadi nutcase and was friendly to the United States
Well it also mentions the Adelsons as Rothchild assets. Sheldon Adelsons was Trump's biggest donor during the 2016 election. In turn Trump moved the Embassy, confirmed Syria's Golan Heights belonged to Israel and went after Assange.
You're a basic bitch "Trump is a puppet of Israel" concern troll handshake account that only pops your head out when your overlords command you to spread FUD about actions of Trump.
Don't believe the Islamic regime's propaganda. The shah did make some mistakes. But, it was not what has been portrayed of him. His overthrow was the result of a well coordinated color revolution with some of the same types of characters that are at work in any recent color revolution. Find out from Iranians themselves what really happened - and I don't mean the MEK who tries to portray themselves as the Iranian opposition. They are an Islamist jihadi communist cult that the Iranian people actually hate. The MEK have been making the rounds on several news shows in the West.
The school hit was an Iranian missile within Iran that didn't work right. At worst, the IRGC may have done it deliberately to blame the US and Israel. Take your pick - either scenario works. As far as the mourners, most of those people are connected to the regime and are hardliners or IRGC family members - the same group they always use in their propaganda videos that are then shared on Western mainstream news outlets. They are a small minority in the country and not representative of the majority of Iranians. They also often use AI to produce their videos and have been caught several times doing this.
Just look at the crowds outside of Iran. They are not mourning the loss of the Ayatoilet. Just the opposite. They are celebrating and dancing in the streets - just like inside of Iran. So be cautious of where you get your information. Iranians also love Trump. They call him uncle Trump.
How did they get all that shit together so quickly though
It's been years of preparation for this
I'm more or less speaking on the event organization, printing of banners, camera cranes/drones, just the whole setup in general. I work in film and event production and it takes a lot more time than people believe.
Believe me, people can do this sort of thing very quickly. That said, I would not be surprised if the liberate Iran folks haven't been increasingly active in recent times, with the bombing of the nuke facility being the indicator that finally, something might be ready to change.
I don't know how they will do it going forward, but I suspect that the Prince has the potential to be a rallying point, not for the restoration of the Monarchy (Shah), but as a potential leader for the people coming together to set up a democratically elected republic, creation of a constitution, etc.
My thoughts exactly. I don't get the impression from him that he wants anything more than helping Iran get back on its feet and moving towards a secular democratic form of governance.
I have been thinking the same thing -- all those new flags of the old Iran.
I don’t believe that the Persian people or any of the other ethnic groups in modern day Iran would welcome any of the Shah’s family back into the country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyRDD4-irRg
Yes, there are some anti-Pahlavi people in Iran, but they a very small minority. That opposition is outside Iran and are mostly from the MEK along with those politicians and leaders who have taken money from the MEK - Pence, Giuliani, Pompeo, and others. The MEK is well funded and lobbies support within the West. There is a popular influencer, I can't remember his name, that spreads a great deal of anti-Pahlavi talk. He is in reality affiliated with the MEK and is partially funded by them. Most Iranians, in and outside of Iran, want no part of the MEK since they were involved in the movement that ousted the Shah and that installed the Islamic regime. After the Islamists took control, they turned on the MEK killing many of them while the others fled to the West. They are straight up jihadi communists.
The Iranian people have consistently called for Pahlavi. He is the only one they trust and this includes all the ethnic groups in Iran - the Kurds, the Baloch, and all the others. The Iranian people need to choose their own way, not others deciding what's best for them. That is what started all this to begin with almost 50 years ago. It was a color revolution where foreign interests used Iran for whatever their own agendas were and there is plenty of blame to go around - including the US and Carter. Unfortunately for the Iranian people, and many others in the world, that plan backfired. One American president helped to cause this mess, and another American president now is trying to correct that wrong.
As I said, this is coming from the Iranians themselves inside and outside of Iran. I would think that they know what the hell is happening inside their own country. It is also available for anyone that takes the time to actually investigate the matter outside of mainstream sources.
Restoring a monarchy is not the only way going forward. I think there can be no doubt that Cabal forces influenced and controlled the Shah's family, until it no longer served them, and they installed the Radical Islamic republic.
But, perhaps without the Banking Cabal in the driver seat, the Iranian people can actually find their way forward. The Shah's family could serve the role of a natural focal point, but they do not necessarily have to have any role in government.
It's hard to know. There have been SO FEW genuine actual movements for national sovereignty in the last 50 (70?) years.
My understanding is the Iranian people by referendum will decide what form of governance they want. What there is consensus on at the moment is that there will be a clear separation of religion and state, equal access for all citizens, elected representation, and a system of checks and balances. What form it will take is up to the Iranian people.
It will be difficult going forward given the train wreck the regime has made of the country due to negligence, corruption, and mismanagement. I hope they are able to get back some of the stolen money taken out of the country to help them rebuild. They will have some major challenges that must be addressed immediately - like a collapsed currency and a severe water shortage.
They are as controlled as the Ayatollahs.
Does anyone know where this speech took place?
I’m worried we’ll replace one dictator / tyrant for another?
“Some” of what I’ve read about the Palhavi’s paints the last one to rule in a not so good manner. That said,,, it’s a VERY complicated situation and I’m just a frog with a phone, so you should take whatever I say with a grain of salt..
Iran bombed their own school
The Ayatollah killed 40,000 people THIS YEAR but the SHAH was brutal? Lmao at least the shah wasn't a jihadi nutcase and was friendly to the United States
This is you.
You're a basic bitch "Trump is a puppet of Israel" concern troll handshake account that only pops your head out when your overlords command you to spread FUD about actions of Trump.
GTFO.
Don't believe the Islamic regime's propaganda. The shah did make some mistakes. But, it was not what has been portrayed of him. His overthrow was the result of a well coordinated color revolution with some of the same types of characters that are at work in any recent color revolution. Find out from Iranians themselves what really happened - and I don't mean the MEK who tries to portray themselves as the Iranian opposition. They are an Islamist jihadi communist cult that the Iranian people actually hate. The MEK have been making the rounds on several news shows in the West.
The school hit was an Iranian missile within Iran that didn't work right. At worst, the IRGC may have done it deliberately to blame the US and Israel. Take your pick - either scenario works. As far as the mourners, most of those people are connected to the regime and are hardliners or IRGC family members - the same group they always use in their propaganda videos that are then shared on Western mainstream news outlets. They are a small minority in the country and not representative of the majority of Iranians. They also often use AI to produce their videos and have been caught several times doing this.
Just look at the crowds outside of Iran. They are not mourning the loss of the Ayatoilet. Just the opposite. They are celebrating and dancing in the streets - just like inside of Iran. So be cautious of where you get your information. Iranians also love Trump. They call him uncle Trump.