Personally I'm in hopes Mexico is next up on the list, they have killed more US citizens than all our wars, and have been sucking us dry forever. We don't need their cheap labor---
I want to be hopeful, but I can't help playing Devil's Advocate on this: without Columbia, Venezuela, or Mexico, what's the point? Is this merely symbolic? Or did they discuss putting economic pressure on those three (and other nations known for narco-trafficking) that might actually make a difference?
NAH, INCLUDING CANADA, THOSE ARE THE COUNTRIES IN BED WITH CHYNA. IT WONT BE LONG THOUGH AND THEY WILL EVENTUALLY CAVE. NOBODY WANTS TO BE THE SISSY AND NOBODY WANTS TO BE THE ONE IGNORED. THEY WANT WHAT WE CAN OFFER AND WHAT WE OFFER IS WAAAAYYYYY GREATER AND SAFER THAN CHINA.
I read that she's being moved to a different position. I can't remember the name of it now, but I believe she's heading the Shield of America's project, will be coordinating between the various countries. She's not being fired. She's being promoted.
Not me. I will always desire unity. Not a religious or spiritual type unity but a physical international type unity. I hate war, but when there is evil in the world there is going to be those that want to rule. Someone will always desire to rule the world reguardless of who it hurts. There will always be at least one who looks down on everybody else as a pesant. The Jews have always looked at the rest of the world that way. It was the Samaratians that were humble, they just didn't know what to worship just like the Babylonians. Its how we view whats within that determines how we see without ourselves.
Mexico making a big mistake.
Personally I'm in hopes Mexico is next up on the list, they have killed more US citizens than all our wars, and have been sucking us dry forever. We don't need their cheap labor---
Mexico wasn't invited. Neither were Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, and Columbia among others.
Cartels rule those countries and I think Trump don't want them in the know.
Yes. A Fatal Mistake.
I want to be hopeful, but I can't help playing Devil's Advocate on this: without Columbia, Venezuela, or Mexico, what's the point? Is this merely symbolic? Or did they discuss putting economic pressure on those three (and other nations known for narco-trafficking) that might actually make a difference?
Those are the countries the shield will fight...
Thanks, GBA58. I thought as much.
NAH, INCLUDING CANADA, THOSE ARE THE COUNTRIES IN BED WITH CHYNA. IT WONT BE LONG THOUGH AND THEY WILL EVENTUALLY CAVE. NOBODY WANTS TO BE THE SISSY AND NOBODY WANTS TO BE THE ONE IGNORED. THEY WANT WHAT WE CAN OFFER AND WHAT WE OFFER IS WAAAAYYYYY GREATER AND SAFER THAN CHINA.
They were purposely not invited. Neither were Cuba, and I think Peru.
Do you know that for certain? Or is that an educated guess?
Reported by Jeff Childers: Search for "Mexico."
👍👊
Those countries are all controlled by communists. Even Venezuela until the evil bitch proves otherwise.
👍🚀
What's the point? Apparently "missed."
The Dominican Republic, what a joke. They send all their citizens here to be permanent residents. They are lazy, decietful and drug traffickers.
Maybe PDJT is hoping to influence changes in the DR.
Not soon enough!
They'd better shape up or POTUS will set them straight...
Nope, there are too many of them that are "permanent residents: here, pumping out US Citizens to really give a damn.
We need to stop this! 🤬
Hahaha, they are a front for illegal activity. You cannot tell me that a town of 3000 needs 5 Dominican barbers.
Hahahaha, no.
"And now we'll turn the meeting over to Kristi Noem." Perhaps, reports of her being fired are over rated.
I read that she's being moved to a different position. I can't remember the name of it now, but I believe she's heading the Shield of America's project, will be coordinating between the various countries. She's not being fired. She's being promoted.
No Brazil... Interesting
YEP, another day of NOTHING HAPPENING!
MEXICO AND CANADA WILL BE 51 & 52 SINCE THEY WANT TO BE PUKES
I remember when pedes didn't want a north American union.
Not me. I will always desire unity. Not a religious or spiritual type unity but a physical international type unity. I hate war, but when there is evil in the world there is going to be those that want to rule. Someone will always desire to rule the world reguardless of who it hurts. There will always be at least one who looks down on everybody else as a pesant. The Jews have always looked at the rest of the world that way. It was the Samaratians that were humble, they just didn't know what to worship just like the Babylonians. Its how we view whats within that determines how we see without ourselves.