"Ian Carroll" is likely not a real person. He is an intelligence asset "cutout" using a fake name. Ian Fleming (spy) + Lewis Carroll (story author) = Ian Carroll spy telling stories, mostly true, but injected with key pieces of false information to steer the narrative away from sensitive topics (like Israel and Mossad, just like Candace [married to MI-6] and Tucker [son of CIA])
I am pretty disappointed that more anons simply don't see it.
What's the poison pill strategy? Embed 10% poison in a 90% glowing health pill.
The same strategy in an over-time framework is: lead with health/value for [x] (i.e. 30) days, then inject the poison once the crop (audience) are ready.
All of these figures have exhibited this behavior over and over again.
People's discernment muscles get placated with lots of content that fits into their biases very well (aka, for our crowd, it's 'red pills'), the discernment then atrophies, and then when the <asset> drops the anti-Trump message (or the narrative designed to influence the recipient away from what the controllers do not want), the targets then come up with X explanation to justify or validate the [poisonous] claims.
The methodology is unmistakable, and frankly it worries me that so many supposedly clear thinking individuals fall for it (or cannot see it).
The motive? Well, that's up for debate. Deployed DS assets? Personal gain? Ideological agenda? Personal agenda?
The motives are harder to discern, but the methodology and behavior are not. But people hear what they want to hear.
I think there is too much emotional investment. They seek validation too much and will follow anyone who gives it without questioning their motives. Red flags are ignored because they want to hold on to that feeling of validation. Sometimes we must stop - detach and take a step back - to see the bigger picture. Those who can't or won't do that will just keep swallowing the poison.
Ian listens to Candace too much. All these semi and full tards are going to have to live with the mistakes they make from their tunnel vision. I am totally out of patience with them. Maybe they are all receiving bibi money at a scale that they couldn't see refusing. Really never thought I'd see the day that Tucker's ability to see the grand scheme, would falter as it seems to be doing.
Ian carol is definitely an intelligence asset. I think anyone who gets a fast fallowing Like Ian Carrol did is suspect. unless I see what I would call organic growth I find a lot of personalities highly suspect when it comes to them being independent.
Ian… Candace… Tucker… who’s next?
"Ian Carroll" is likely not a real person. He is an intelligence asset "cutout" using a fake name. Ian Fleming (spy) + Lewis Carroll (story author) = Ian Carroll spy telling stories, mostly true, but injected with key pieces of false information to steer the narrative away from sensitive topics (like Israel and Mossad, just like Candace [married to MI-6] and Tucker [son of CIA])
I am pretty disappointed that more anons simply don't see it.
What's the poison pill strategy? Embed 10% poison in a 90% glowing health pill.
The same strategy in an over-time framework is: lead with health/value for [x] (i.e. 30) days, then inject the poison once the crop (audience) are ready.
All of these figures have exhibited this behavior over and over again.
People's discernment muscles get placated with lots of content that fits into their biases very well (aka, for our crowd, it's 'red pills'), the discernment then atrophies, and then when the <asset> drops the anti-Trump message (or the narrative designed to influence the recipient away from what the controllers do not want), the targets then come up with X explanation to justify or validate the [poisonous] claims.
The methodology is unmistakable, and frankly it worries me that so many supposedly clear thinking individuals fall for it (or cannot see it).
The motive? Well, that's up for debate. Deployed DS assets? Personal gain? Ideological agenda? Personal agenda?
The motives are harder to discern, but the methodology and behavior are not. But people hear what they want to hear.
So true
I think there is too much emotional investment. They seek validation too much and will follow anyone who gives it without questioning their motives. Red flags are ignored because they want to hold on to that feeling of validation. Sometimes we must stop - detach and take a step back - to see the bigger picture. Those who can't or won't do that will just keep swallowing the poison.
Dont forget the other axis of idocracy - Scott Ritter, Douglas McGregor etc
I guess the war is over doesn't pay his bills.
This iAN is not me, just for the record..
Oh well
Kek !!
Candace really went of the rails today
I believe you mean the past year.
Ian listens to Candace too much. All these semi and full tards are going to have to live with the mistakes they make from their tunnel vision. I am totally out of patience with them. Maybe they are all receiving bibi money at a scale that they couldn't see refusing. Really never thought I'd see the day that Tucker's ability to see the grand scheme, would falter as it seems to be doing.
"we are losing dramatically"... How?
That's why his post is so odd. Carroll has zero information backing up his claim.
the shill becomes shrill
They can't kill another one without suspicion, so now they'll threaten them.
Is anybody surprised?
No, he came on the scene fast and gained followers quickly, very suspicious. I watched part of 1 video and that was it, no more.
Ian carol is definitely an intelligence asset. I think anyone who gets a fast fallowing Like Ian Carrol did is suspect. unless I see what I would call organic growth I find a lot of personalities highly suspect when it comes to them being independent.
Exactly.
Always be suspicious of people who instantly gain a mass of followers.