35 year aircraft mechanic here (biz jet segment). This is the part that has always confused me about HOW they are pulling this off. I see contrails that don’t evaporate, so they are clearly chemtrails. I look up the aircraft on ADSB Exchange and they are commercial airliners, so I wonder, how can they pull this off, with all the A&Ps that know these fuel systems so well…how can this be happening without whistleblowers getting this out in the open? Do you have more info on the dedicated nozzle thing? That theory makes sense, but again, HOW!
Aluminum oxide (powder) is what industrial grinding wheels are made of. Aluminum powder and some rust and you got thermite. All you need is some heat from combusting diesel and you ain't going to be flying long.
So are you saying that the chemicals are sprayed into the exhaust rather than the chemicals going through the turbine section? If so, how are commercial airlines getting away with this? In my years of experience and aircraft maintenance training, I’ve never heard of a system like this on an aircraft - except for low altitude aircraft that are specifically designed or modified for this specific purpose.
Thanks for the video but I am going back to my question from several hours ago. When I see chemtrails being generated, I look on ADS-B and I see that it is commercial airlines leaving most of the chemtrails. How is this possible??
We know already they are spraying a separate fluid unrelated to the fuel, using nozzles.
On the internet there are thousands of pictures, and some videos of the inside of a chemtrail jet.
Regular Military and passenger jets are not doing this, they don't have nozzles, they avoid passenger routes so that they can continue this game they're playing.
The inside of chemtrail jets are gutted with a big tank and little tank, and usually a small crew of about 3-4. There is not seating, just hoses and the nozzles are either on the back of the wings closes to the body of the plane, or they are on the back of the body of the plane.
The video shows the nozzels in operation from the window / wing
The big tank holds liquid fluid they are spraying. The little tank is compressed air, an air compressor tank. Something like a 100 gal one. The larger tank is more like 1000 gal one or more. You don't need much compressed air, just enough to provide pressure to move the liquid to the nozzles, even 1 psi would do it, because the plane is flying thru the air, the air would do the rest and carry the mist away.
We have thousands of images and a couple of long videos of the inside of chemtrail jets.
I have seen them personally and would attest to having seen them in court. I saw them over a decade ago, well before all this AI bullshit so we can't claim that either. The videos were verified as unaltered.
I believe these planes were being operated by the US air force or the US Navy and conducting 'atmospheric research' on behalf of NOAA and National Science Academy
Why would you even need "compressed air"? liquid pumps exist.. and going hundreds of miles an hour seem more than enough for dispersing.
On the same video, I see a bunch of comments saying that is ballast and center of gravity testing equipment, which would totally make sense and would be the fastest and easiest way to distribute load into multiple configurations to see how the aircraft performed. What do you say to that? (personally I have no idea, not my area)
Practical and Engineering Problems
Mixing or burning these metals with jet fuel in a turbine engine would cause severe issues:
Abrasion and erosion — Hard oxide particles (especially Al₂O₃) would sandblast turbine blades, nozzles, and hot-section components, drastically shortening engine life.
Deposits and fouling — Oxides and residues would clog fuel nozzles, injectors, combustor liners, and cooling passages, leading to overheating, reduced efficiency, or failure.
Corrosion and chemical damage — Metals can catalyze unwanted reactions, form gums/sludges, or react with water/contaminants to plug filters (known issue even with trace metals). Barium/strontium compounds could exacerbate this.
Handling and stability — Powders don't dissolve; they settle, clog lines, require constant agitation, and pose explosion/fire risks. Nanoparticles improve suspension somewhat but still face long-term stability, agglomeration, and regulatory hurdles.
Performance penalties — Reduced thrust, higher maintenance, potential flame instability, and non-compliance with certification. Engines are optimized for clean hydrocarbon combustion.
Mixing Al, Ba and Sr into jet fuel will destroy a jet engine. It's done with dedicated nozzles and not mixed into the fuel.
35 year aircraft mechanic here (biz jet segment). This is the part that has always confused me about HOW they are pulling this off. I see contrails that don’t evaporate, so they are clearly chemtrails. I look up the aircraft on ADSB Exchange and they are commercial airliners, so I wonder, how can they pull this off, with all the A&Ps that know these fuel systems so well…how can this be happening without whistleblowers getting this out in the open? Do you have more info on the dedicated nozzle thing? That theory makes sense, but again, HOW!
Aluminum oxide (powder) is what industrial grinding wheels are made of. Aluminum powder and some rust and you got thermite. All you need is some heat from combusting diesel and you ain't going to be flying long.
So are you saying that the chemicals are sprayed into the exhaust rather than the chemicals going through the turbine section? If so, how are commercial airlines getting away with this? In my years of experience and aircraft maintenance training, I’ve never heard of a system like this on an aircraft - except for low altitude aircraft that are specifically designed or modified for this specific purpose.
Start @ 1:40 for how. https://youtu.be/mRjmzy9XcaY?si=WJl2sQCnpEfG-cSW
Thank you for your enlightened criticism. I fixed it. I am having trouble finding the STFU key on this keyboard BTW.
Aluminum oxide is corundum, which is just one below diamond on the Mohs hardness scale.
Of course it's used for industrial purposes. It's really hard.
Corundum is better known as rubies, sapphires, emeralds, topaz, etc.
I'm not an expert but I have a feeling you'll be better able to interpret and understand the images and other things shown in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e3dLMD7a58&list=PL6HUtpk-CBTsbasw-0VhRZch6haeaUhGg&index=1
Thanks for the video but I am going back to my question from several hours ago. When I see chemtrails being generated, I look on ADS-B and I see that it is commercial airlines leaving most of the chemtrails. How is this possible??
We know already they are spraying a separate fluid unrelated to the fuel, using nozzles.
On the internet there are thousands of pictures, and some videos of the inside of a chemtrail jet.
Regular Military and passenger jets are not doing this, they don't have nozzles, they avoid passenger routes so that they can continue this game they're playing.
The inside of chemtrail jets are gutted with a big tank and little tank, and usually a small crew of about 3-4. There is not seating, just hoses and the nozzles are either on the back of the wings closes to the body of the plane, or they are on the back of the body of the plane.
The video shows the nozzels in operation from the window / wing
The big tank holds liquid fluid they are spraying. The little tank is compressed air, an air compressor tank. Something like a 100 gal one. The larger tank is more like 1000 gal one or more. You don't need much compressed air, just enough to provide pressure to move the liquid to the nozzles, even 1 psi would do it, because the plane is flying thru the air, the air would do the rest and carry the mist away.
We have thousands of images and a couple of long videos of the inside of chemtrail jets.
I have seen them personally and would attest to having seen them in court. I saw them over a decade ago, well before all this AI bullshit so we can't claim that either. The videos were verified as unaltered.
I believe these planes were being operated by the US air force or the US Navy and conducting 'atmospheric research' on behalf of NOAA and National Science Academy
Why would you even need "compressed air"? liquid pumps exist.. and going hundreds of miles an hour seem more than enough for dispersing.
On the same video, I see a bunch of comments saying that is ballast and center of gravity testing equipment, which would totally make sense and would be the fastest and easiest way to distribute load into multiple configurations to see how the aircraft performed. What do you say to that? (personally I have no idea, not my area)
Practical and Engineering Problems Mixing or burning these metals with jet fuel in a turbine engine would cause severe issues:
Abrasion and erosion — Hard oxide particles (especially Al₂O₃) would sandblast turbine blades, nozzles, and hot-section components, drastically shortening engine life. Deposits and fouling — Oxides and residues would clog fuel nozzles, injectors, combustor liners, and cooling passages, leading to overheating, reduced efficiency, or failure. Corrosion and chemical damage — Metals can catalyze unwanted reactions, form gums/sludges, or react with water/contaminants to plug filters (known issue even with trace metals). Barium/strontium compounds could exacerbate this. Handling and stability — Powders don't dissolve; they settle, clog lines, require constant agitation, and pose explosion/fire risks. Nanoparticles improve suspension somewhat but still face long-term stability, agglomeration, and regulatory hurdles. Performance penalties — Reduced thrust, higher maintenance, potential flame instability, and non-compliance with certification. Engines are optimized for clean hydrocarbon combustion.
What is "it"
Spray deadly chemicals toxic to every living thing on Earth. That it?