I think the bigger story is what do we do about the traitors in the supreme court who continuously sell out the country's well being with nonsensical arguments?
5-4 is razor thin. I will look for who voted which way. Says everything.
Edit to fact check my own post.
This X post (from today, March 31, 2026) is recirculating old news.
The main claim — a “jaw-dropping 5-4 ruling” giving President Trump broad authority under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Tren de Aragua gang members (including sending them to El Salvador’s mega-prison) — refers to the Supreme Court’s April 7, 2025 emergency order in Trump v. J.G.G. (24A931).
That 5-4 per curiam decision (unsigned) vacated a D.C. district court’s temporary block on the deportations.
It said challenges must be filed as individual habeas petitions in the district where the detainees are held (mostly Texas), not as a class action in D.C.
All nine justices agreed some judicial review (habeas) is available, but the 5-justice majority cleared the way for the administration to proceed with removals under the Act (subject to notice and habeas opportunities).
There is no new SCOTUS ruling today (or in the last few days) on this issue. Follow-up emergency orders happened in April–May 2025 (some imposing temporary pauses for due-process reasons), and litigation has continued in lower courts since then, but nothing matches the “breaking” framing in this post.
The video in the post appears to be 2025 news footage being reused. Several replies in the thread are already pointing this out as old/misleading content.
In short: The post itself is brand new (posted earlier today), but the “news” it’s hyping is nearly a year old. Deportations under the Act have been happening since spring 2025, but today’s Supreme Court isn’t issuing any fresh decision on it.
A lot of sites could use special handling for handling recycled news. X especially.
Basically shouldn't be allowed to use alarm/red/boom/breaking/etc. if it didn't happen in the last day.
It's not necessarily bad to revisit stuff, and people often miss it the first time, but need a way to stop rewarding accounts that do it for views & create confusion.
I thought about deleting this post as soon as I realized it was old news. I chose to self report in the comments instead.
I almost always use the title of articles as the post title to help avoid duplicates. If users search words in an article title, the post will show up in search if it uses the same title.
In this case, I should have at least removed the siren, boom, and explosion.
Agree and hope you didn't receive any disrespect from my thoughts. I was actually referring to the X account as being rewarded, as there is no $$ in it for us here.
The fact that you owned it and provided context was great.
I think the bigger story is what do we do about the traitors in the supreme court who continuously sell out the country's well being with nonsensical arguments?
5-4 is razor thin. I will look for who voted which way. Says everything.
Edit to fact check my own post.
This X post (from today, March 31, 2026) is recirculating old news.
The main claim — a “jaw-dropping 5-4 ruling” giving President Trump broad authority under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Tren de Aragua gang members (including sending them to El Salvador’s mega-prison) — refers to the Supreme Court’s April 7, 2025 emergency order in Trump v. J.G.G. (24A931).
There is no new SCOTUS ruling today (or in the last few days) on this issue. Follow-up emergency orders happened in April–May 2025 (some imposing temporary pauses for due-process reasons), and litigation has continued in lower courts since then, but nothing matches the “breaking” framing in this post.
The video in the post appears to be 2025 news footage being reused. Several replies in the thread are already pointing this out as old/misleading content.
In short: The post itself is brand new (posted earlier today), but the “news” it’s hyping is nearly a year old. Deportations under the Act have been happening since spring 2025, but today’s Supreme Court isn’t issuing any fresh decision on it.
Time to indict 4 SCOTUS Justices for treason.
5-4 is literally the usual split.
A lot of sites could use special handling for handling recycled news. X especially.
Basically shouldn't be allowed to use alarm/red/boom/breaking/etc. if it didn't happen in the last day.
It's not necessarily bad to revisit stuff, and people often miss it the first time, but need a way to stop rewarding accounts that do it for views & create confusion.
I thought about deleting this post as soon as I realized it was old news. I chose to self report in the comments instead.
I almost always use the title of articles as the post title to help avoid duplicates. If users search words in an article title, the post will show up in search if it uses the same title.
In this case, I should have at least removed the siren, boom, and explosion.
Even I am still learning to do better.
Agree and hope you didn't receive any disrespect from my thoughts. I was actually referring to the X account as being rewarded, as there is no $$ in it for us here.
The fact that you owned it and provided context was great.
Thanks u/merf
u/#trumpflag
I agree. But Still good news though.
Sorry did this not already happen months ago? Why did I think this happened months ago?
See my fact check. Sorry about that i just copied the post title.
It's very generous of the Supreme Court to allow us to deport known illegals who are gang affiliated and an absolute cancer on our society.
Very good news
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LGF69mj4sRE
Let me guess who the four were, one dei hire, & the 3 commies?