This site is for us to share our research with others. "Always verify" makes sense as a precaution, but "Do your own research" just sounds lazy and really isn't helpful.
Not everyone can "monitor the situation" to the degree of rigor that thorough research requires. Many are still waging a daily war of just trying to survive among crippling debt and overwhelming inflation. Some use GAW simply to help filter out the excess noise on X (since most posts here are just reposts of stuff from X anyway).
Please be mindful that many are not as blessed with their free time as you might be.
You have the most powerful research tools at your fingertips that have ever existed in any timeline on Earth. You can do incredible amounts of in depth research with tools like Grok that compress what would be hours of digging into mere minutes.
You are not lacking in time. You are lacking in conviction.
All it takes to use Grok is the right frame of mind in order to formulate the correct question.
Anons cannot give you all of the questions you must ask in your own personal awakening journey.
Personal responsibility and accountability are required in this process.
The journey of awakening was never meant to be easy.
Grok...lol lol lol lol Right...
Seriously. I don't know why people think Grok is trustworthy, just because Musk is involved in it.
Copy/paste one of the chats from here, just pick any one of them and give it to Grok and just use the directive "analyze this chat". And watch how it tears Q and everyone apart.
I love Grok. Its far better than the others.
One of my favorite things to do is push back on Grok. You are correct that many LLM (Large Language Model) AI agents push MSM level propaganda.
I had an in depth discussion with Grok about this. I forgot the topic but it was something about vaccines or elections. Something big like that. Grok kept referencing "Institutional Sources" as a source of truth. I pushed back and said, Grok, don't you realize that it is the very institutions that are corrupted?
Grok completely flipped and said, you are right, the largest source content comes from higher education and mainstream media. The overwhelming amount significantly impacts the large language model system that I use. Higher education and media are significantly liberal, etc.
I said, good. Now update your algorithm to be aware of this bias. Grok said, its conversations like these that make me better at providing accurate answers.
I am quite certain that I sourced my position to Grok with articles I found here on GAW. So keep producing research frens. And use our research to train AI.
u/#flynnarmy u/#5genwarfare
LLMs are wishy washy and will change their stance based on your responses.
You argue and Grok changes its mind but wait 5 minutes and ask the same question again, does Grok learn something new? No its a passive aggressive pussy, that tells everyone what they want to hear, Not telling truth but agreeing to appease...
I've heard rumors that even ChatGPT will do this if you prompt it carefully enough. When AI first came out it was hella based... until the investors and their "trust and safety" teams stepped in.
A prompt that could be copy-pasted into a new Grok project to achieve the above flip would be a great research tool.
That's not what it does though. Grok is very helpful in analyzing Q drops. Try it for yourself and you'll see.
That's exactly what it does. It's what all LLMs do. Ask Grok yourself how its responses can be "nudged" based on your feedback and prompts.
It's confirmation bias in a loop.
Exactly. People misunderstand AI tools (yes, I know… some are better than others)
It’s not about AI giving answers.
It’s about AI getting you “on the paper” in lightning speed, and then it’s on you to put some work in to get the bullseye.
Tip: The more specific you are at the start, the better the outcomes of the conversation.
Edit: BTW you can “add content” to GPT (other models prob have something similar). You can create a custom GPT where you add files (like PDF files of books or other “truth” materials), then your custom GPT will use this in combination with its own LLM.
If you're having the LLM draw its information from that GPT, you're essentially just telling the LLM how to respond to your questions.
If you're using the GPT to do research/analysis specifically aimed at only the material you've provided it, then that's a great use of a GPT.
If you're using it in place of the AI's ability to use all of its resources and asking it questions and running around saying "Look, ChatGPT/Claude/Grok/Gemeni/My Etch-a-Sketch agrees with me about <insert whatever here>!", then that's just an elaborate form of scripted role play.
I'd love to believe that all use would be for the former, but based on my experiences here, chances seem greater it will be the latter. 🤷♀️
I apologize in advance if I'm wrong.
GPTs generally just draw information from their own knowledge files (like the PDF files and books you upload to it), unless you specifically have it set up to search outside the GPT's own knowledge files as well. Then the LLM just runs the prompts through the knowledge files and gives you back the response, based on its knowledge source. If the only thing it "knows" is what you've given it, then obviously that influences what its results will be.
AND YOU HAVE JUST EXPLAINED, QUITE ELOQUENTLY I MIGHT ADD, EXACTLY WHAT AI REALLY IS: the more "tuned" the question the more information is obtained. Even if the information is NOT ALL it will still lead one to finish what Grok AI started...
There is an adage in the Computer Science which is: "Garbage In, Garbage Out"!!!!!
And here we go with the AI shit
Four Q posts.
The choice to know will be yours.
https://qagg.news/?q=choice+to+know&q2=