Sovereign disentanglement: how the white hats bum-rushed a globalist color revolution in Iran just as in we did in Venezuela. This is a **long** foundational video on how to decode the plan's geopolitical strategy and how that is translated for the normies.
(rumble.com)
π¦π¦π1π¦πππ¦π¦ π
Please note that it's a near 3 hour video which you can listen to rather than watch as you do something else.
I recommend this video to anyone who thinks the Iran war is any more real than the Venezuelan operation to extract Maduro.
These are psyops to allow the white hats narrative cover to re-configure the world and end-run the cabal plans which were already in place for these countries. This is not not to say that there is no kinetic action, it is to say that it is entirely different to how it appears.
I recognized the expression "sovereign disentanglement" straight away. A Burning Bright coinage. A man after my own heart, burning bright is an author and therefore a linguist, and he understands the value and power of coining expressions to express and refine certain comments.
I look forward to tuning in to this episode of 'The Narrative'.
I'd love your feedback fren.
I think this episode is a really complete one.
For being 3(!) hours long I would certainly hope so.
I haven't tuned in to BB "the Narrative" for a while, but when I do, its usually by ripping the audio and listening while I drive in my car. Still three hours... whew. That's a big one.
About half way through it.
IMO so far, this is absolute top-grade analysis and anon-level thinking. It's long, but I highly recommend it. Already I'm planning to listen to it again.
Absolute high level content.
It also confirms to me why I like Badlands in general and BB et al so much: the thinking approach is second to none.
Example, the comparison between deductive reasoning with inductive reasoning. This is miles above anything that any influencers or run of the mill "Q types" are doing.
BB totally explodes the whole normie and half-normie thinking that still pervades so much of 'our community', i.e. Q folks, the 'truth community' etc.
Should really be non-optional listening for any serious frog or Qtard out in the wild.
Hope to be able to extract some of the ideas and present them back here at GAW.
But already I'm looking at the whole Iran thing with a much, much clearer (it seems to me) lens.
His mapping out the process of sovereign disentanglement with reference to Ukraine, Venezuela and Iran is high grade powerful stuff.
Er, not that I'm a fan boy or anything.... <shrugs>
You gotta watch defconq from last night!
https://rumble.com/v786yoy-defcon-zerq-ep-038.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl
You'll thank me.
Only so many hours in a day. But, ok.
<pencils in audio rip>
So.. patriots are in control. And doomers are eating shit.
I love Burning Bright, but he is too loquacious.
Unfortunately, I would agree and that's a particular shame with this video as there are precious few people that have an understanding of what Trump has been doing with Venezuela, Iran and very likely in the future, Cuba. And of course, even fewer that articulating that message.
DJT is reconfiguring the world to eliminate threats, create new allies through mutual economic benefit (the one thing that unites all cultures), and setting up the U.S. for a century of prosperity.
What greatly concerns me are the vehemently anti-war Republicans. I call them the George W. Bush Regret Republicans.
These are conservatives who learned from the terrible mistake of supporting George W. Bush, who now understand the folly of London and Military/Intelligence/Industrial complex-led forever wars, and who have now have a blanket reaction to any kinetic actions on the part of the U.S.
I am deeply concerned that those people are going to sit home on election day in the mid-terms. I deeply hope that the President and his allies have a plan for this because even with fake polls, the data does not look good right now.
I suppose burning a bunch of equipment to the point of NATO de-militarization, as well as abandoning a handful of a ME bases - with the aim of bringing all the troops home, hopefully - but how to do that and paint it as a victory?
Not sure if I'm following you, WITSD. Could you expand a bit for me?
Very nice analysis, thank you!
Thanks! Itβs been too long since I watched one of these.
If it takes three hours to lay out an argument, you either suck at editing or you're doing some olympic level gymnastics!
He's a longwinded guy.
This video is thoroughly sound IMO. It explains in detail exactly how you take control of the cabal colour revolutions and redirect them to white hat outcomes.
I think you would really benefit from this more than most anons.
It would really bring on your understanding.
Maybe it would help if you made some time-stamps?
Seconded.
I watched it, and it's a rambling mess.
Really?
So, you didn't watch it then?
Yes, it's just stream of consciousness gibberish.
I watched, I found it really useful in elucidating patterns in the plan.
Not really sure why you are here if you don't want to figure out what's happening.
That's the issue. I want to figure out what is happening, not watch someone who gets paid by the minute ramble on for 180 of them.
Nope. Not at all. Moreover, this particular outline comes on the foundation of hours and hours of foundational buildup at Badlands, in the form of Based Ghost of Patrick Henry, Chris Paul, Jon Harold, etc.
It's not 'laying out an argument'. It's essentially a lecture on an incredibly powerful framework for approach the info war and what has been happening with DJT in 2025/2026.
So not an attorney? Got it.
I am an attorney, and it's never taken me three hours to lay out an argument. It's called the opening statement. If you go on longer than about 30 minutes you've lost not only the jurors, but also the judge.
And I know you're going to say, "WHAT ABOUT THOSE TRIALS THAT TAKE SIX MONTHS!?!?!?!"
Well, you're clearly not an attorney. If you can't present and name all the evidence you have in under 30 minutes, you don't have enough evidence and you're scrambling. Also, anything that starts with movie quotes is suspect to me because the person is evoking emotion, not facts.
There's a reason why the defense always runs about 3X as long as the prosecution. The defense has to create a smokescreen of doubt to win over the jury. If you have the true facts on your side, all it takes is connecting the dots.
I've never gone over about 20 minutes in any case I've ever won and I probably could've cut that in half.
If you donβt care for videos, but want to read his articles on this subject, he has a website. https://burningbright.substack.com/
My preferred method is always: Rip audio to my phone, listen while driving and doing out of the house stuff during the day.
https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/badlands-media/the-narrative-ep-64-eSsfqZ12JGV/
u/propertyofUniverse/
Thanks fren!
The trouble is, one is a Muslim country, one is not.
I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that Iran isn't really a Muslim country, more like a country under brutal occupation by a fundamentalist minority following the '79 CIA coup.
Be interesting to see what it looks like when the dust settles.
Anyway, the video would argue that the results of this situation were worked out behind the scenes some time ago and a lot of the action now is performative narrative translation for the normies.
Yes, the 'regime change' has already happened.