On a recent podcast with Theo Von, Theo is coming out with all kinds of stuff including about things in the Epstein files, and Rogan calls him crazy and tells him he needs to get off the antidepressants.
In the same episode with Theo, Rogan lies about where he was during Charlie Kirk's assassination. When the assassination happened, Rogan was recording with Charlie Sheen and they broke in to react to it. Yet Rogan told Theo that he was actually hunting elk in Utah that day, and went so into detail about how he had to use Starlink to get internet in the mountains because everyone was wanting his input on it.
I don't think Rogan (or even Candace or Tucker etc) were ever with us. Candace smoothly slipped from extreme-TDS to Blexit, and from there she just snuck into MAGA without even blinking her eyes.
The difference between Rogan and Candace is that Rogan (and Tucker as well) are Intel operatives, and they actually believe that the Reset is going to happen and they think they are on the side of it that will benefit them greatly. Probably hope to get a position with lot of letters in in under CCP.
Candace, on the other hand, is purely in it for money. After Trump won, she realised she aint gonna make a ton of money on the left, and she saw Charlie getting all kinds of funding lined up, so she jumped in with him, used him to get funding for her Blexit and then discarded it when she realised hating Israel was far more lucrative at that point (as Elon stopped censorship) than anything else she had seen. Like floodgates opened up.
I’ve never had anything but side-eye for Candace, and with everything going on in the UK, their nobles aren’t to be trusted, but something I am keeping an eye out for is - when digging on her specific FiL (don’t hold me to this, a deeper dive would be needed), I seem to recall seeing indicators that he might be a sleeper pro-sovereignty sort. If so, it’s possible he is playing her for “control” exposure now, and will eventually have her flip our direction, or be removed from the playing board, or whatever works best.
Or maybe I was wrong on that and she’s just a crown shill. Regardless of what the situation is, she’s definitely controlled.
I don't know the answers, but haven't some of those you mentioned actually been more consistent to MAGA than Trump himself? "Epstein is a hoax," new wars Iran/Venezuala, etc..
If you are unsure what Trump said about Epstein Files before the 2024 elections, I highly recommend looking up the interview in 2024 where he was asked about it.
Did you know that until Trump started saying "Epstein is a hoax" no one cared about the Epstein Files? They have always been in play all this time, and would be publicly disclosed when its time and not a moment before.
As for "new war in Iran/Venezuela" take a look at what Trump said about Iran 39 years ago when he took out this full page ad in newspapers paying quite a bit of money.
Again, a reminder that just because we cannot see the chess board fully not understand all the rules nor know who all the players are, does not mean when things don't go according to our expectation, they are wrong moves.
The fascinating thing is that the board becomes clearer by the day for those who are paying attention. The rest will have a real hard time over the coming weeks and months. Either way, NCSWIC.
Q post 133
Nov 11 2017 23:29:35 (EST)
Q mentions Epstein.
People cared. The MSM had a blackout during Biden, then pivoted to attack Trump.
But our side has cared since the beginning.
take a look at what Trump said about Iran 39 years ago
the board becomes clearer by the day for those who are paying attention.
… really makes the movement patterns of different pieces make a lot more sense, metaphorically …
Move forward one space, then attacks by coming at you sideways. Always advance the objective. Can be promoted if successful. If the other team advances too quickly, can cut off their supply lines to remove them (en passant). Can be initially deployed at a bonus position.
Employ angles. Never direct. Can make attacks through visually small and protected spaces.
Direct action. Drop the hammer.
Can infiltrate enemy positions outright, but cannot move far nor leave a position quickly.
Highly powerful, highly visible, always targeted.
Can be used for support in offense, but highly risky to do so. Largely a defended piece. If captured, you lose. Can reinforce defensive position using blunt action and slow adnavcement, but only if those units have not yet been seen moving on the field.
I am deeply pissed when someone messes with Theo. He is a rare one and has a vulnerability that some assholes play off of. I don't like that. Not entertained by it.
Rogan used to LOVE talking about conspiracies and went DEEP in the rabbit holes.
But around 2018 or 2019 men in suits musta visited Rogan, as after that year he then shut down any and all conspiracies that are not approved/ safe.
He has to continually shut down Eddie bravo on his conspiracy talk, when earlier he would have joined Eddie.
Very sad to see Rogan change course and be a deep state stooge now. I have mostly stopped listening to JRE, and I used to listen to them back at episode 9 when it was only on YouTube!
I have Whitney Webb's book One Nation Under Blackmail, and watch some of her video discussions. And, I've been a paid subscriber to Catherine Austin Fitts. I have a number of her polished semi-annual reports in old-fashioned bound paper format.
I get what you mean. They are good in many respects, but in the end see Trump as bad news. As just a difference version of the UN/WEF/Davos crowd. This being despite the Establishment's obvious intense hatred of Trumps speeches at their venues, and despite 10 years of constant anti-Trump media barrage. Patrick Wood of Technocracy News, who is deeply Christian by the way, is another example.
Around this Board I think it is easy to forget how radicalizing the Q drops really are. I mean that in a good way. Radicalizing in terms of the clarity it brings to interpreting unfolding world events.
Try to imagine how you would react to what is going on without having first passed through the test of Q. For many, Trump's actions would seem chaotic, verging on incomprehensible.
So, taking Catherine Austin Fitts for example, when I integrate her non-support of Trump against her total body of work, being compromised from SES influence is not the conclusion I draw. I see a person who is operating without a critical piece of the puzzle. She believes the solution to the totalitarian control wishes of "Mr. Global" - as she terms it - is grassroots resistance. Homesteading. Local resilience networks, that sort of thing. This is a characteristic tell. The ongoing battle between two titanic forces is outside her field of vision, and those like her.
The same cannot be said of Tucker and Candice and similar loud voices.
If we step up to the 100,000 foot view, what is the Q Plan? Consider: the enemy had infiltrated and nearly conquered all the heights of social institutions. Government, military, industry, banking, academia, media, sports, art. Everything. Against those odds, what is your military strategy?
The Q solution was to lay low for a long while. Observing. Tracking. Tracing. Building a below-the-radar patriot network. Letting the enemy continue to construct their surveillance control grid. Then, at the opportune moment, grabbing control of the grid and turning it against them.
There is no historical precedence for what we are witnessing. No touchstone where people can go ah, this is like that. Andrew Jackson's struggle with the Rothchild bankers was a skirmish relative to today's match to the death.
He used to go DEEP with Eddie Bravo on all sorts of topics, nothing was off limits. But after that 2018ish visit, he now COMPLETELY shuts down any and all conspiracy talk about certain topics... It AKWARD now when Eddie tries to talk about some things, and Joe has to change the topic and stop Eddie from going on his once normal rants. Joe 100% changed, anyone who has watched JRE since 2008 knows what I am talking about, and it doesnt have to do with austin. it was when he lived in CA.
I'm out of the loop on Joe Rogan. But from video snippets I had formed the impression that with his relaxed style he is good at opening up topics to a widespread, more average audience. What was this 2018ish visit you mention? It sounds like a turning point, a result of behind-the-scenes leverage.
BooniesRedneck makes a good point. How does it reconcile?
And Joe Rogan is gone now, too.
On a recent podcast with Theo Von, Theo is coming out with all kinds of stuff including about things in the Epstein files, and Rogan calls him crazy and tells him he needs to get off the antidepressants.
In the same episode with Theo, Rogan lies about where he was during Charlie Kirk's assassination. When the assassination happened, Rogan was recording with Charlie Sheen and they broke in to react to it. Yet Rogan told Theo that he was actually hunting elk in Utah that day, and went so into detail about how he had to use Starlink to get internet in the mountains because everyone was wanting his input on it.
I don't think Rogan (or even Candace or Tucker etc) were ever with us. Candace smoothly slipped from extreme-TDS to Blexit, and from there she just snuck into MAGA without even blinking her eyes.
The difference between Rogan and Candace is that Rogan (and Tucker as well) are Intel operatives, and they actually believe that the Reset is going to happen and they think they are on the side of it that will benefit them greatly. Probably hope to get a position with lot of letters in in under CCP.
Candace, on the other hand, is purely in it for money. After Trump won, she realised she aint gonna make a ton of money on the left, and she saw Charlie getting all kinds of funding lined up, so she jumped in with him, used him to get funding for her Blexit and then discarded it when she realised hating Israel was far more lucrative at that point (as Elon stopped censorship) than anything else she had seen. Like floodgates opened up.
Who gives them their 4am talking points???
The same people who told the MSM networks to play along when they "shut down" the voting counts back in 2020.
Candy’s FIL is worth 1.6 BILLION. She does what she does because she’s part of the London group now.
I’ve never had anything but side-eye for Candace, and with everything going on in the UK, their nobles aren’t to be trusted, but something I am keeping an eye out for is - when digging on her specific FiL (don’t hold me to this, a deeper dive would be needed), I seem to recall seeing indicators that he might be a sleeper pro-sovereignty sort. If so, it’s possible he is playing her for “control” exposure now, and will eventually have her flip our direction, or be removed from the playing board, or whatever works best.
Or maybe I was wrong on that and she’s just a crown shill. Regardless of what the situation is, she’s definitely controlled.
Could be, FIL is called Mr. Copper, wasn’t part of the “nobility” was named a baron after making his money in metals.
I don't know the answers, but haven't some of those you mentioned actually been more consistent to MAGA than Trump himself? "Epstein is a hoax," new wars Iran/Venezuala, etc..
No one has been consistent to MAGA than Trump.
If you are unsure what Trump said about Epstein Files before the 2024 elections, I highly recommend looking up the interview in 2024 where he was asked about it.
Did you know that until Trump started saying "Epstein is a hoax" no one cared about the Epstein Files? They have always been in play all this time, and would be publicly disclosed when its time and not a moment before.
As for "new war in Iran/Venezuela" take a look at what Trump said about Iran 39 years ago when he took out this full page ad in newspapers paying quite a bit of money.
Again, a reminder that just because we cannot see the chess board fully not understand all the rules nor know who all the players are, does not mean when things don't go according to our expectation, they are wrong moves.
The fascinating thing is that the board becomes clearer by the day for those who are paying attention. The rest will have a real hard time over the coming weeks and months. Either way, NCSWIC.
Q post 133 Nov 11 2017 23:29:35 (EST) Q mentions Epstein. People cared. The MSM had a blackout during Biden, then pivoted to attack Trump. But our side has cared since the beginning.
… really makes the movement patterns of different pieces make a lot more sense, metaphorically …
So, Candace is independent of globalist cabal influence. I would agree. But I see her motives as better than just money.
Money of course comes into play. It influenced where I work, achieved education, live, and so on.
Money considerations affect us all.
Oh, who said she is independent of globalist influence? She married a nobility with deep connections
Her motive is money but the people manipulating her are the same ones manipulating Ticket etc. They just got hey for dirty cheap comparitively
I wonder why Rogan lied about that, I remember seeing video of where he and Charlie Sheen reacted to it live.
Me too. Absolutely retarded thing to lie about when you know the clips are all over the internet to prove you wrong.
I am deeply pissed when someone messes with Theo. He is a rare one and has a vulnerability that some assholes play off of. I don't like that. Not entertained by it.
Rogan used to LOVE talking about conspiracies and went DEEP in the rabbit holes.
But around 2018 or 2019 men in suits musta visited Rogan, as after that year he then shut down any and all conspiracies that are not approved/ safe.
He has to continually shut down Eddie bravo on his conspiracy talk, when earlier he would have joined Eddie.
Very sad to see Rogan change course and be a deep state stooge now. I have mostly stopped listening to JRE, and I used to listen to them back at episode 9 when it was only on YouTube!
I have Whitney Webb's book One Nation Under Blackmail, and watch some of her video discussions. And, I've been a paid subscriber to Catherine Austin Fitts. I have a number of her polished semi-annual reports in old-fashioned bound paper format.
I get what you mean. They are good in many respects, but in the end see Trump as bad news. As just a difference version of the UN/WEF/Davos crowd. This being despite the Establishment's obvious intense hatred of Trumps speeches at their venues, and despite 10 years of constant anti-Trump media barrage. Patrick Wood of Technocracy News, who is deeply Christian by the way, is another example.
Around this Board I think it is easy to forget how radicalizing the Q drops really are. I mean that in a good way. Radicalizing in terms of the clarity it brings to interpreting unfolding world events.
Try to imagine how you would react to what is going on without having first passed through the test of Q. For many, Trump's actions would seem chaotic, verging on incomprehensible.
So, taking Catherine Austin Fitts for example, when I integrate her non-support of Trump against her total body of work, being compromised from SES influence is not the conclusion I draw. I see a person who is operating without a critical piece of the puzzle. She believes the solution to the totalitarian control wishes of "Mr. Global" - as she terms it - is grassroots resistance. Homesteading. Local resilience networks, that sort of thing. This is a characteristic tell. The ongoing battle between two titanic forces is outside her field of vision, and those like her.
The same cannot be said of Tucker and Candice and similar loud voices.
If we step up to the 100,000 foot view, what is the Q Plan? Consider: the enemy had infiltrated and nearly conquered all the heights of social institutions. Government, military, industry, banking, academia, media, sports, art. Everything. Against those odds, what is your military strategy?
The Q solution was to lay low for a long while. Observing. Tracking. Tracing. Building a below-the-radar patriot network. Letting the enemy continue to construct their surveillance control grid. Then, at the opportune moment, grabbing control of the grid and turning it against them.
There is no historical precedence for what we are witnessing. No touchstone where people can go ah, this is like that. Andrew Jackson's struggle with the Rothchild bankers was a skirmish relative to today's match to the death.
He left California and moved to Austin, he hasn’t changed.
No, he literally changed.
He used to go DEEP with Eddie Bravo on all sorts of topics, nothing was off limits. But after that 2018ish visit, he now COMPLETELY shuts down any and all conspiracy talk about certain topics... It AKWARD now when Eddie tries to talk about some things, and Joe has to change the topic and stop Eddie from going on his once normal rants. Joe 100% changed, anyone who has watched JRE since 2008 knows what I am talking about, and it doesnt have to do with austin. it was when he lived in CA.
I wonder why. He did call out the Covid BS and ivermectin.
I'm out of the loop on Joe Rogan. But from video snippets I had formed the impression that with his relaxed style he is good at opening up topics to a widespread, more average audience. What was this 2018ish visit you mention? It sounds like a turning point, a result of behind-the-scenes leverage.
BooniesRedneck makes a good point. How does it reconcile?
💯 he is in it. All paid