b) the Frazzledrip thing was first brought up by long-time disinformation outlet, YourNewsWire (now ThePeople'sVoice), and only then went out into the Truth sphere.
c) Whatever was on Weiner's laptop, it's more than very likely it wasn't any sort of Frazzledrip. Definitely horrific stuff, but note d)
d) longtime strategy of poisoning the well and clouding the real information by dark actors is to drop over-the-top, fake and false narratives that play directly into certain truth-seeker biases so then it gets adopted, spread, and then becomes accepted, thereby obscuring the real information.
Personally, given the above, I'm more than skeptical that the frazzledrip narrative is real. This is not to downplay the evil these people get in to, but a variety of data points directly suggest it might well be disinformation.
There isn't such a drop. What was said is that the HRC video will be released when the time comes.
However, I think there was a video that could've been a dead man's switch going off, probably one of the NYPD investigators'. I know a guy who saw a torture video involving Hillary and Huma torturing a girl to death on Livegore. A friend of his tipped him off about it. The video was up only briefly but was then removed. He'd served in the military and had seen some bad stuff, but he said that this video made him sick. I've heard of that website. I think it features videos of people dying in terrible ways, like getting hit by a train or whatever.
If that video was genuine, then they could have yanked it off that site very quickly and decided that it wasn't time for that video to be seen.
It haunts him. I don't think he was able to watch the entire video, but what he said matches the description of what we know: they tortured a girl, cut her face off, and wore it like a mask to taunt her before they ultimately killed him. He said that he can sleep at night hoping that it was a deep fake.
And I'm telling you as someone who joined this board in its first week or so of existence, when there were only a handful of posts on here. I may not have a Pepe icon to my name and I don't contribute much that gets attention, but I'll give my word that I'm not having anyone on.
Frazzledrip has not actually been seen. The narrative that went around was that it was 'released on the darkweb' but at the time, the only thing actually on the dark web was a few anons going 'trust me bro I saw it and its bad'
You are correct. People need to remember the Chans AND Q Research (our Parent site to all things Q) exists with the most brilliant autists on the planet. IF the Frazzle vid or anything of the sort was released, even for a millisecond, those boards/anons would have it downloaded and be POSTING IT 100x a day for years and all over social media. It would have spread so far everyone who uses the internet would have seen and or heard of it existing. Anyone claiming they have seen it are falling for TikTok nonsense faked Ai or a repurposed older gore video.
Interpretation is always involved, and most of us simply try to formulate an understanding and, if it reaches our threshold, a determination of what is 'true'.
In the drop in question, to me, the question reads like this:
Anon: "What about the HRC vs 'dark web' video. Is that fake news???"
Q's reply was: "It's fake. We control (?)."
(The thread you linked below starts out with the comment that Q said: "Fake. We have it." but that's an interpretation, and not what Q themselves wrote)
What's most interesting for me is, as far as I understand it, this question was put to Q immediately in the days after the 'Frazzledrip' story was published by YourNewsWire (a known disinfo outlet).
That story apparently preceded any reference to 'frazzledrip' on Twitter. There was zero references to frazzledrip on Twitter prior to the date that YourNewsWire put out their story.
What's tricky is that somehow, the existence of the "frazzledrip" video has now become canon (established truth) for many in the truth community, but it is clearly 'anon' content, not Q.
"(The thread you linked below starts out with the comment that Q said: "Fake. We have it." but that's an interpretation, and not what Q themselves wrote)" u/#q1193
Unpopular comment:
a) Q said the frazzledrip thing was false (fake)
b) the Frazzledrip thing was first brought up by long-time disinformation outlet, YourNewsWire (now ThePeople'sVoice), and only then went out into the Truth sphere.
c) Whatever was on Weiner's laptop, it's more than very likely it wasn't any sort of Frazzledrip. Definitely horrific stuff, but note d)
d) longtime strategy of poisoning the well and clouding the real information by dark actors is to drop over-the-top, fake and false narratives that play directly into certain truth-seeker biases so then it gets adopted, spread, and then becomes accepted, thereby obscuring the real information.
Personally, given the above, I'm more than skeptical that the frazzledrip narrative is real. This is not to downplay the evil these people get in to, but a variety of data points directly suggest it might well be disinformation.
What drop say's frazzledrip is false? It's been a hard minute since I wen't down that hole.
There isn't such a drop. What was said is that the HRC video will be released when the time comes.
However, I think there was a video that could've been a dead man's switch going off, probably one of the NYPD investigators'. I know a guy who saw a torture video involving Hillary and Huma torturing a girl to death on Livegore. A friend of his tipped him off about it. The video was up only briefly but was then removed. He'd served in the military and had seen some bad stuff, but he said that this video made him sick. I've heard of that website. I think it features videos of people dying in terrible ways, like getting hit by a train or whatever.
If that video was genuine, then they could have yanked it off that site very quickly and decided that it wasn't time for that video to be seen.
u/Fractalizingiron
I know fren. I was wanting to point that out. edit.. I hope your friend doesn't still let those memories trouble him. ...another edit... found it I think. u/#q1193 And here's a good thread- on it.. https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbbX32s1/frazzledrip-fake/c/
It haunts him. I don't think he was able to watch the entire video, but what he said matches the description of what we know: they tortured a girl, cut her face off, and wore it like a mask to taunt her before they ultimately killed him. He said that he can sleep at night hoping that it was a deep fake.
And I'm telling you as someone who joined this board in its first week or so of existence, when there were only a handful of posts on here. I may not have a Pepe icon to my name and I don't contribute much that gets attention, but I'll give my word that I'm not having anyone on.
1197
Midterms are safe.
aka 2018.
Frazzledrip has not actually been seen. The narrative that went around was that it was 'released on the darkweb' but at the time, the only thing actually on the dark web was a few anons going 'trust me bro I saw it and its bad'
I disagree , but thx for the comment/feedback.
You are correct. People need to remember the Chans AND Q Research (our Parent site to all things Q) exists with the most brilliant autists on the planet. IF the Frazzle vid or anything of the sort was released, even for a millisecond, those boards/anons would have it downloaded and be POSTING IT 100x a day for years and all over social media. It would have spread so far everyone who uses the internet would have seen and or heard of it existing. Anyone claiming they have seen it are falling for TikTok nonsense faked Ai or a repurposed older gore video.
Interpretation is always involved, and most of us simply try to formulate an understanding and, if it reaches our threshold, a determination of what is 'true'.
In the drop in question, to me, the question reads like this:
Anon: "What about the HRC vs 'dark web' video. Is that fake news???"
Q's reply was: "It's fake. We control (?)."
(The thread you linked below starts out with the comment that Q said: "Fake. We have it." but that's an interpretation, and not what Q themselves wrote)
What's most interesting for me is, as far as I understand it, this question was put to Q immediately in the days after the 'Frazzledrip' story was published by YourNewsWire (a known disinfo outlet).
That story apparently preceded any reference to 'frazzledrip' on Twitter. There was zero references to frazzledrip on Twitter prior to the date that YourNewsWire put out their story.
What's tricky is that somehow, the existence of the "frazzledrip" video has now become canon (established truth) for many in the truth community, but it is clearly 'anon' content, not Q.
"(The thread you linked below starts out with the comment that Q said: "Fake. We have it." but that's an interpretation, and not what Q themselves wrote)" u/#q1193