2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks banjo.

As long as we engage in good faith, are willing to stand by our convictions but also be open to other perspectives, we'll move forward.

That said, no one is perfect, and although I have some biases towards Clandestine, that's not to say I think I can stand in judgment over him or even really know where he's at.

I do think his highlight of the U1 issue is a good one, too.

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there were a GAW Medal of Freedom, our mod team would all be recipients.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

We don't call him Q-a for naught!

3
FractalizingIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, I never thought you were datefagging, Fat.

I guess my subjectivity level has increased in recent weeks.... I meant no slur or disrespect to your comment, just that my own experience (observation) is a steadily increasing acceleration.

I do feel like we've begun to reach cruising altitude, tho.

Either way, head on swivel exhortations are never out of place, and never grow old, either.

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK. Either a lack of popcorn or insufficiency of caffeine is at work her for me, so could you perhaps rewrite that in English?

Or rewire my brain so that I can understand what you mean here?

<head-scratchingly yours>

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think its OK to offer your conclusions and thoughts in a condensed form to a public who might not have the time or inclination to do the same level of investigation, but I don't think its OK to simply set yourself up as THE authority to tell them what's what.

That said, I guess I can fall into that in my own area of specialty, so... hmmm...

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, Look, I'm mr pedantic these days. and I feel like, by far the more important aspect of engaging with Q is not WHAT you learn or find out, but HOW you learn to think, engage, approach, and self-analyse/reflect.

For that reason, I think Clandestine's comment here is misguided, bigly.

There are other ways he could have approached wanting to offer newbies or others insights into the drops without setting himself up as an authority giving the definitive answer. Infloooencers do this. Not bona fide anons.

And, reading some of Clandestine's posts today, I'm getting an impression that he's pretty big on his own identity, aka his 'importance'. Not sure that this is a good move.

But admittedly, I'm biased on Clandestine. From other sources that I have a long track-record with, its been indicated that, at the time of the Russian move into Ukraine in 2022, A bunch of folks were putting together their research on the whole Ukrainian biolabs thing, and Clandestine was a part of that group, and that he essentially decided to grab all the research, began posting it as his own rather than a collective work, and then blocked everyone else who was in that original group.

I'm not sure how accurate that is, but given the sources this comes from, I give it a high level of credence, and from that angle, I'm kinda biased about Clandestine.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

oh. Well, gravy is important.

Hey, surely you are familiar with qanon.pub. I thought it was kinda cute how someone there attempted to attach answers to many of the drops. Not sure how far they got.

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

One is free to adopt that perspective, but its an interpretation and not a fact.

You can say and believe or adopt the view that "this is Q", but the fact is, its nota Q drop placed on the chans, and is something entirely different. I mean, from this perspective over here....

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

I most certainly moved through a whole spectrum of commentators. I think that, by and large, when one digests and incorporates the unique angles and qualities that a particular commentator embodies, one then can or naturally does move on.

That's certainly true in my case. PM was one who I stayed with longer than most, only Dave at x22 topping him. During the Posting OP (2017 - 2020 ~) I probably listened to some 16 or 17 (!?) different commentators going through different phases. Some of those include

Redpill78 (?), BCP Black Conservative Patriot, In the Matrixxx (who I dumped after realizing that they are an anti-Flynn operation, Bards of War, Edge of Wonder, Man in America, SGT Report, just to name a few.

I would stick with one or three for a while, but then move on as the landscape of the operation etc, changed.

Eventually, however, the one's I have stuck with longer than anyone is Badlands. Firstly, it was Defected (3yrs), and during them I began listening to Devolution Power Hour, gradually both versions, and so on. Geopolitics with Ghost.

I feel like Badlands content, by and large, is the university level content for anons, in terms of cognitive observation, reasoning and critical evaluation of information. I bumped into Defected in 2022, and now a few Badlands shows are my full staple of updates.

Not that everyone will follow this path. Each of us has a unique angle and will resonate with different sources. But overall, I think, absorbing and upgrading is generally a sign of one's engagement steadily maturing.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think this sentiment is one of the over-arching proofs of the veracity of the Q operation; many people feel lead by God to find this path, and generally, that sense is not rooted in a doctrinal approach or overly 'religious' approach to faith, by rather, a more direct, personal and tangible experience.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, thinking of the original untouchable model, it surely took Ness some time to put together a team of uncomfortable officers and agents who could actually take on Capone, the Mob and the corrupt police force.

Then, for 2020s, think magnitude of 400 or several thousand.

12
FractalizingIron 12 points ago +12 / -0

Er, I disagree with the whole concept of:

"If you are too intimidated to read the Q drops, I read them all for you"

This equates to "Hey, Trust me. Don't worry. I did the work!"

Something along the lines of "This is my take away after reading all the Q drops" would do much, much better.

If people don't want to or are <ahem> intimidated by the Q drops, that's their choice. But to suggest that "er, you don't need to do that, because .....me" is simply reinforcing the problem behavior and habit of 'trusting (an) authority'.

Clandestine is either consciously or unconsciously setting himself up as 'an authority on Q'.

This attitude should never be encouraged. It's the core problem.

Q3906

Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion). Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions). Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs). Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts). Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs). Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements). ..... ..... "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, yeah, there's been heaps. Outside, there were of course Elons foray after he acquired Twitter, then we've got Kirill Dimitriev (?) on X.com, official Russian liaison to the USA.

But dept of War, dept of Energy, Dept of Labor.... Trust the Plan, patriots in Control, etc etc etc.

I think I said the other day that with the Iran MOU signing, we've started to hit cruising altitude. But yeah, acceleration.

why YouTube comments would be more based than PDW comments

What I think is really important at this juncture is that anons and frogs do not become insular. We need to keep participating an open mind, critical thinking, challenging our own preconceptions, and moving with the time. If we have wrong or insular thinking re: Q and Trump and the Plan, we're going to become antiquated, and we won't be keeping up.

I suspect that in the current era, Yutub is a more open platform, while the denizens of PDW are still stuck in 2018.

8
FractalizingIron 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ya reckon?

I'm yet to see anything slow down or not accelerate since Jan 20, 2025....

11
FractalizingIron 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yawn. Another day, another one thousand habbenings.

3
FractalizingIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the correct expression is "q-tarded". As in:

The White House is confirming that they are Q-tarded.

Qtards of the world, unite.

3
FractalizingIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yawn, Punx. It's been go time for a long time now! Upgrading from 73 habbenings to 77 habbenings ain't exactly a leap. Well, I mean, this could be a quantum leap, but jeepers, best to withhold expectations and reactions.

Sure, things are ramping up, but they've been ramping and ramping for 1.4 years now, if you've been watching.

3
FractalizingIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah, its not Q. Don't treat it as Q. What it is, is the White House team utilizing the Q framework, but half-trolling the normie world and half-acknowledging Q.

Give it 72 hours. It will become clear exactly the nature of this current move.

6
FractalizingIron 6 points ago +6 / -0

mods.

And a relatively sane, relatively informed and relatively critical thinking community.

5
FractalizingIron 5 points ago +5 / -0

it's the white house team totally trolling the heck out of the normies and presenting something 'as if it is a Q drop'. Not actually pretending to be Q, or representing Q, but using the whole Q thing to troll and move the current step: quantum.

47 is the President's number, and that's why they put the number there as if it were a drop.

4
FractalizingIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are trolling the system, obviously.

which is pretty darn cool, actually.

view more: Next ›