Yeah, I briefly took a look through her substack after my initial look, and saw that by and large, she's producing content that is decidedly anti-Trump agenda.
I don't know if Kent is a traitor or not, but this woman certainly presents the impression of being an Attack Trump Agenda asset.
This doesn't mean that all or some of her information here is wrong, but I think it calls into question her motives and therefor, product.
Leah certainly loves to hate Donald Trump. Personally, that's a red flag for me.
From her substack:
The Senate cannot confirm Todd Blanche on Wednesday, because Todd Blanche is actively covering up the Epstein files and has lied about a multitude of things all in an effort to protect one person, Donald Trump.
I'd be curious to see what the thrust of this "20 years in intelligence | Corporate intelligence CEO"'s narratives are, overall.
Definitely some rage baiting / clickbait with this.
Was worth looking into regardless.
Yep. ✔
and Yep. ✔
Not to be too obvious, but one of the reasons (objectives) of the rage baiting is to get people to react and therefore be less scrutinizing, with something like this that should be looked into. So that you either look and miss important details (and the truth of the thing) or you ignore it, because its all just "anti-Israel" nonsense...
Polarization.
PS. Was encouraged to see what I thought was a good number of discerning comments by the frog collective in this post. More than usual? Are we winning the battle?
hey, that's what I said!
see my comment above.
Analysis that I heard is that this is a massive exaggeration and not a real representation of what is actually being proposed. Notice how merge is put in quotes "merge" in the quoted tweet?
The factual information is under "Section 224 (sometimes renumbered, e.g., to 219) of the House Armed Services Committee’s draft FY 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.”
Its about sharing defense technology, NOT "merging" the militaries, which is a dumb idea, anyway.
I think this is being used as rage bait specifically at this time because of the entire Iran - Israel thing. The anti-Israel rhetoric is off the charts now, which is not necessarily a bad thing, but its perfect fodder for ragebaiting and narrative manipulation.
Here's what the proposal actually is (according to specific sources):
a) It directs the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent (EA) to coordinate and accelerate bilateral defense technology efforts.
military.com
b) Focus areas include research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation across a wide range of technologies (e.g., AI, quantum, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, missile defense, and more).
responsiblestatecraft.org
c) It builds on and expands existing cooperation (e.g., missile defense programs like Iron Dome, Arrow, David’s Sling) rather than creating an entirely new relationship.
quincyinst.org
It DOES seem to be promoting deepening connection b/t US and Israel militaries:
Defense-industrial integration: Co-production, joint ventures, licensing, and embedding Israeli-origin technology/components into US supply chains (and vice versa). (military.com)
R&D tech sharing
institutional changes: dedicated executive 'agent' within the DoD
Shift from aid model: Moves some support from visible Foreign Military Financing (aid) toward procurement, co-development, and industrial partnerships. This could make the relationship less transparent and harder to scale back. (military.com)
BUT
No integration of operational command
No automatic mutual defense pact or treaty-level obligations
No blanket sharing of all military capabilities or full fusion of forces
Existing US sovereignty, export controls, and oversight mechanisms remain (though critics argue they could be weakened in practice).
So, its not really a "merger" even though it does appear to enhance industrial and technological integration/cooperation.
My take? I think this is the pro-Israel lobby attempting to move this forward, ata time when DJT is making it clearer every day that his priorities are NOT Israel or making Netanyahu happy, but rather in creating real peace and cooperation in the middle east, which of course runs opposite to the real controllers of the Israel Proxy state.
DJT would be fully aware of this. The rhetoric exploitation by the anti-Israel crowd blows the situation out of proportion, exacerbating the whole Pro-Israel Vs Anti-Israel Divide and Conquer operation.
We don't need anti-Israel as much as we don't need pro-Israel. We need to dismantle the influence over the Middle East that the Bankers, Communists etc have via the Israel proxy state through their continuous war.
Conclusion: yes, expose, but remember that there are bigger things in motion (Potus and the whole Iran situation) and don't get distracted. Do you think that Congress listens to the people anyway?
BREAKING! BREAKING! BREAKING!
See what I did there?
No, this post by RR isn't 'breaking news', although that's clearly the impression he is more than happy to leave the reader with, by directly omitting the source, context, and relevance of the information he presents.
You'll notice that Real (?) Robert doesn't provide us with any link to the source, the information. I'm not saying the information is wrong or inaccurate (although I am most affirmatively a non-fan of this X account), but this is what infloooencers do: they'll throw information at you, NOT to empower you to follow it up or check it, or give you references and sources, but to exploit you.
Why/How? Because they want you to come back to their account operation for 'information'. Inflooencers love the model the Mockingbird Media operated on, aka "you (User) come to us (Source) for the information you get. And that should be good enough for you." And they have simply begun to fill the vacuum that the death of the legacy MSM has left.
Really honest info sources (researchers, analysts, commentators who want to advance the awakening) in social media will provide sources, give you direct references, and empower you to think for yourself, instead of just accepting, swallowing and consuming the information they give you.
Exhibit #1: RR here posts a clip of Powell from Dec 11, 2020 on Lou Dobbs Tonight. It's a sound bite. Its MSM level presentation, wrapped in the disguise of an Alt-media social media patriot awakening source.
The clip is NOT related to the information presented in the post. but its offered instead of posting a link to the decision or directly referencing the actual source.
Want to know why?
This decision was delivered on April 17, 2024.
https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2024/05-23-00497-cv.html
Sure, the information RR presents is roughly accurate. I emphasize ROUGHLY, because RR is NOT interested in informing you. He is only interested in you coming to suckle at the teat of his 'information', just as the MSM had people doing a few years back.
Want to see HOW shoddy this operation is?
(Operation, because this, like so many other accounts, do NOT work or make effort to empower and assist their targets. Rather, they are an operation to get clicks, exploit people's reactivity in a time of great upheaval and information chaos, at worst to mislead and deceive, at best, to grift inflooence and $$$.)
RR's 6th point:
F: “You have to be a damn fool, and abjectly stupid not to see what happened here,” the opinion added.
Do you think for a minute that a decision by a fifth court panel would use this language "damn fool"? No, right.
So where did this come from? Why, its right there, what Sidney Powell says to Lou Dobbs at TIME STAMP 32 seconds into the clip.
It wasn't added by the opinion of the court. It was a statement by Sidney Powell.
That's how serious RR is about you, the reader, and the information he 'presents'.
Conclusion: RR has a seriously bad case of the Inflooencer Virus. And, friends, the only vaccine effective against this virus is a conscience (for the infected) or discernment and skeptical clear thinking, for the potential target.
If you haven't already, you should add RealRobert @Real_RobN to your list of dodgy inflooencer accounts whose primary purpose is NOT to inform and empower you, but to exploit you, the times, the situation in the country. Edit: Read the information, if you think it helps, but recognize a) his tangible lack of interest in empowering his audience, and b) that his motives in sharing the information are very probably not the same as yours.
Addendum #1: I hope this post is left up, because this sort of account and the methods they use should be highlighted NOT ignored (even though 1000 frogs will simply upvote the post because all they are interested in is the sound bite, the dopamine feed, that the 'information' provides them).
The Inflooencer Virus has become an epidemic, and it is NOT helping our cause, or the Great Awakening.
Addendum #2: Read this (currently stickied) post: How to Analyze “Breaking News” Intelligently
It falls short of what even basic anons should do - its a very normie level of approach to the information aspect of the psywar - but its a good starting point if you want to get on the path to becoming a source of discernment rather than an exploited carrier of the virus. Especially read the comments under the post by OUR frogs.
The virus and its carriers: Excuses are given left and right by people in our own community regarding sort of account. "Oh, its just to keep the narrative alive!" "It's to keep the public focus on this" "It's a secret operative working for the White Hats!"
But the operations explicitly use manipulative methods that directly undermine clear thinking, objective questioning, and self-empowerment and which instead herd the readers - the targets - into a specific corral, one that serves their purpose, not ours.
Can the Republic survive if it is populated by meat-heads who just consume information instead of actually thinking for themselves? (rhetorical question)
This Inflooencer Virus is simply the matrix outside the MSM matrix, the next effort by the (corrupt) Powers That Be to waylay any people on the road to free thinking. Whether those powers are earthly (The Cabal and its tendrils) or spiritual (spiritual entities that use and exploit selfishly motivated irresponsible behavior), the effect is the same.
It's a spiritual AND physical war folks. And the Inflooencer Virus is just another Covid19 released into the public sphere. This one, however, is more insidious and more disguised. However, it still targets the same sort of thinking, or rather non-thinking.
Accountability is an integral and critical part of the restoration. That accountability may not always come in the exact format we would like, but it must be effective. There is no responsibility without accountability.
before reposting
Important tip.
Always dig a little before reacting, before buying. Digging a little (it may be as small as reading a few comments on an X post, as per PB) aerates the soil, and lets in light.
In the psywar, the most widely utilized tactic is the REACTION protocol. Get the target to react rather than dig a little.
lol, T.
I'm surprised a bit; do US citizens actually believe that SC justices can NOT be impeached? Such that this post actually says "Const. expert says...." It's not exactly breaking news. It's right there in the constitution.
For me, the real takeway and impact of this testimony is the assertion that the SC is NOT the final arbiter of what the constitution says and means. That's the really important point.
Because putting forward the notion that the SC is the final arbiter usurps the power of the people, and as she very clearly and importantly points out, it creates a tyrannical rule by the SC.
Speaking of Candyland, did you see this post by Data Republican?
FWIW, my encounters with DR leave me with the view that she's a formidable research/analyst, not given much to the inflooencer virus.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2075384791080280453
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
My comment on May 2, 2024.
Current stardate: July 12 2026.
That was my perception at the time. As evidenced by the post itself. I mean, read the post..... jeepers. Talk about utterly selective focus.
Joe may have evolved. I certainly hope so.
Sorry 'bout that.
Thanks for the lengthy response.
Such men, if found, were shipped off to prison as prisoners of war,
and subject to prisoner of war treatment
If they were lucky. More likely, they would simply be shot. A partisan (combatant) not in uniformed clothing is not protected under the Geneva convention, neither are they "subject to prisoner of war treatment".
the German people were starving, too
So this is the moral justification for starving another country's entire population?
All the other points worth discussing, I'll omit. I can see that you believe what you believe, and I'm not going to try to argue you off it (what would be the point, right?)
I do not buy into the idea that Britain (or British rulers) was blameless or innocent in all this, but neither do I accept the nation that Hitler and the Nazi regime were innocent, were victims, and otherwise wonderful people forced to do bad things because other, more evil people, forced them into it.
As for the examples you cite, Patton (one general), victims, incidents, and more, I think this simply illustrates how any person can take a particular data set and then reach conclusions or make interpretations based on the chosen overriding framework or perspective. By which I mean, one case: M looks at A, C, E, G, and concludes "this means X", when N looks at B, D, F, H and concludes "this means Y". And O looks at ABCDE and concludes "this means Z".
What each person (chooses) to look at, and what conclusions they draw from them, obviously says something about the person and their chosen framework (worldview) as much as it does about the actual available data.
I do not find your argument (aka as laid out here) convincing or persuasive. There is already a plethora of counter-arguments in my mind, but I'm not keen to discuss further a very complex subject with extremely broad ramifications and nuances, as to what we see in the world.
We've both stated our perspective, and position, and made an exchange based on that. As it is, I'd call that a win.
I will mention, however, I think your constant reference to and emphasis on "(communist) jews" (10 times) is a strong indicator. Of what? Well, you decide for yourself.
Although I am not persuaded, I appreciate the effort you made to lay out your perspective. Cheers
Well, there is source, unless you are referring to me.
You could look at the information, see the sources cited, and then apply discernment from there. But choosing NOT to look at the information or the source(s), well, that's a free choice, but a choice nonetheless.
What I find fascinating is your dismissing out of hand even while admitting "I haven't watched any of the video, but..."
I personally applaud you being suspicious, and most assuredly working to apply discernment, but the way your describe your approach comes across more (to me) like a rationalization of why "I'm not going to even look at the content".
Which is something I have no problem with, only with the reasoning you offer as justification for your conclusion.
I mean, hey, if you don't wish to even expose yourself to the information, just say it, and own it. But your reasoning just sounds like justification for avoidance from over here.
But, we've discuses it enough. I don't resonate with or agree with your justifications or the rationale you (seem to be) presenting. But, I don't need to.
Thanks for the replies, anyway. (Not being sarcastic!)
Let's move on, shall we? Cheers.
I like it.
One of the many dimensions of our (percieved) reality.
Well said.
There is a whole realm of gobbledygook nonsense politico talk and politico jargon out there, where politicians, bureaucrats and activists talk theoretical nonsense, just spinning narratives like spells, with a lot of the media and public simply getting entranced believing in that talk.
Then, someone like Miller comes along who just cuts right through the nonsense narrative spin, and tells it in plain, direct words. He's cutting through the spell-talk, and breaking spells.
We need more people like him, everywhere.
One. Check ✓
Three. Check ✓
Two. Um.....
So true.
I'm listening to the podcasts again. It's curious stuff, and although I haven't really reached any conclusions, the first hand information is..... at best, eye opening, and at worst, concerning.
Some times researchers can get into a myopic view where they interpret the information in a specific way, because of a framework they developed over time.
Case in point. The Corbett Report, by James Corbett. His documentary "How Big Oil Conquered the World" was one of my first, big red pills in 2015. His 4-part documentary on "Who is Bill Gates?" is excellent viewing. Both of these are very solid redpill content for normies...
"How Big Oil Conquered the World"
But because of his view of Trump, you might say his TDS, he cannot see Trump as anything but part of the Cabal and a big problem.
FI quote of the day: "It's easier to force open a closed door than it is a closed mind"
not a single iota of the information brought forward has ever been heard of until this moment
You missed the most important part. "By me".
"not a single iota of the information brought forward has ever been heard of BY ME until this moment...."
Sources are all there. Its well documented. Empirical evidence? Heaps.
Ignoring information is a choice we all have, but the presumption that "I have never heard this therefor it cannot be true" is pretty much the antithesis of The Great Awakening...
hth
My dad was Dutch. Born and raised near The Hague (southern part of the netherlands). Long-time Catholic family.
He was 8 years old when the Nazi's rolled in and occupied the Netherlands. In a larger Catholic family, his older brothers had to live/sleep under the floorboards in the later years to avoid being taken (kidnapped, literally, tho not kids) by the Germans and enlisted or put to work in camps, etc, in Germany.
To keep warm/cook, the elder brothers had to go out and cut down tree wood at night, because if they were spotted, the German soldiers would have shot them. (weren't allowed to cut down any trees)
In the latter years of the occupation, Germany took ALL the food from the Netherlands, so that the entire population was starving. My dad made forays into nearby market garden areas that had been ravaged, guarded by German soldiers, to try to scramble up potatoes. For several years, his family basically lived primarily on bread with sugar as the only nourishment, (triggering a life-long addiction to sugar).
His stories of, at the ripe old age of 11, finding dead corpses on the banks of the canals were pretty harrowing. And of feeling so guilty because he ran to grab a piece of food and stick it in his mouth when his baby brother dropped it on the floor, because he was a starving kid.
Perhaps some Americans simply think that WW2 was ALL about the Jews, and the (reported) slaughter of Jews. (Putting aside how much of that information is real or not, we know that the Jewish thing in WW2 was orchestrated and used as a pretext to set up the Cabal proxy state of Israel, among other things)
But it was about a LOT more than the Jews. The Jewish thing has been highlighted for obvious reasons (see previous statement). Which doesn't mean it wasn't real, but either way, millions of innocent and non-Jewish people suffered under the Nazi regime during WW2, in all countries, including Germany.
The methods of torture, brutality, etc, used by the Nazi regime are well recorded. Which is not to say all German soldiers were brutes, or evil bastards. Or that other govts didn't employ such methods ever. But the Regime, headed by Old Adolf, was the brutal driving force that destroyed so many lives, including German (non-Jewish) ones.
Like some, I am of the view that the whole Jewish thing has been utilized to create a smokescreen for what has really been going on behind the scenes. By which I mean, the anti-semetic vs. pro-jews dichotomy is simply another case of divide and conquer. But that's another story.
hth
I would suggest that, as much as possible, "freeing a mind" always be undertaken with a heavy dose of prayer or meditation, with strong reflection and consideration, so that it can proceed IF right. I say 'as much as possible' because its not always that easy.
The reality is, I believe, that the freeing of the mind - the awakening process - is fundamentally a spiritual process, more than it is an intellectual one. Most certainly, there is a knowledge component, and facts, data and information (red pills) tend to primarily be processed first by the intellect (if not rejected or dismissed by the emotional barriers).
But, how that information is processed, how knowledge and wisdom are accomplished, that requires the internal compass that each and every human being is born with. Born with, but not necessarily developed or nurtured.
Whether you are Christian, Buddhist, Confucianist, agnostic, or atheist, the internal connection (re: relationship) with [the Creator / the Transcendent, / the Great Ultimate, God, or just "It"] is the fundamental anchor that guides any person on the path towards Truth.
That's not always recognized explicitly, but I am confident it is true.
This is why I frequently try to emphasize that the Great Awakening is a dual process: comprised of an external Great Awakening, which is the coming into and becoming aware of information, facts, and data about the world that was previously hidden from you, plus an internal Great Awakening, which takes place through encountering, digesting and processing information about yourself, about your internal world, your behavior, emotions, thinking, patterns and motives, that was previously hidden to you.
Neither can properly proceed without the other. Just as a human being has both spirit and flesh, the Awakening requires both the internal aspect and the external aspect. You have to GROW as a person in order to digest the external information, and to continue to proceed on the path.
Sadly, when one is captured by the intellectual aspect, reveling in knowledge, as you so poignantly describe your friend to be experiencing, TaQo, that the misdirection can and often does occur. Because the necessary internal rudder and compass can very easily be derailed in that immature awakening time.
That internal compass is the guardrail that allows one to begin to apply discernment, and discernment is simply an expression of internal discipline, aka the capacity to put off the instantaneous gratification that comes from 'being right' or 'now knowing' - that dopamine rush - and the capacity to question and/or reflect on one's internal processes - the emotions, the thinking patterns, the desires, while engaging with the information that enters the mind.
There is a reason we recognize that ultimately this is a spiritual war, albeit fought over the material world. Not because religion or theology are important. They are important, but they are tools, instruments. And as instruments, they can as easily be misused as they can be used properly. But as instruments, they are not the purpose, the goal.
Rather, the goal of these tools is to support an ongoing internal awakening to internal reality, so that one can start, rebuild, reinforce and/or develop the internal relationship with [the Creator / the Transcendent, / the Great Ultimate, God, or just "It"].
There are two components: the internal awakening and the external awakening. And they both go hand in hand.