Two guys fagging off have had all restraints (women) to their perverted selves removed. As one perversion becomes old hat they move to more and more depraved diversions.
I've become convinced that the progression towards more disgusting perversions is a matter of the parasite toxins (see my Parasite Pill link above) increasing their influence on the gut & brain.
Parasites hide in their host to avoid detection. Once they are firmly established, it is then safe to spread to other hosts.
See page #51 to see what a "Bug Chaser" is. Just avoid eating anytime soon.🤢
No, I don’t, but not all homosexuals are cut from the same cloth, just like all heterosexuals don’t make good parents.
FYI: Scott Bessent's family includes his husband, John Freeman, and their two children, Cole and Caroline.
From a civil and legal standpoint — what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home is their business. Has MAGA suddenly become the theological gestapo? I seem to recall that in the early days of MAGA, we had no problem with the likes of Scott Bessent and Scott Pressler and Ric Grenell. Now all of the sudden, we’re pushing a religious ideology on people.
It is a rejection of nature, and therefore against natural law. Two men can't create life together, thus they shouldn't be able to buy it. You are supporting the denial of a child of their natural right to a mother.
I get it, you aren't a Christian and don't care for my dogma. But you are denying the rights of a child by allowing homosexual men to buy a child.
So, change the law. I’m pointing out that just because they’re gay doesn’t mean that they are pedophiles; to suggest that they are is idiotic. Do I think it’s the best situation for the child, no, but I’ve seen far worse in households that you would deem just fine on the surface because it was a heterosexual couple.
Btw, I was one of your upvotes here, and agree with every point in this comment. (I was reviewing a comment of mine)
We have a lot of work to do on identifying and managing what happens to children in bad situations.
The Choctaws have wonderful family courts who strive for the best interests of everyone involved. Imitating them instead of putting a bunch of angry racist/lesbian childless feminists in charge of unaccountable administrative courts charged with placing children in homes would be a good start.
I also agree with showing love and respect to those trapped in the sin of sodomy. My insistence on using language centered around identifying it by its verb is just part of an effort to establish boundaries that allow for mutual understanding and respect, reflect a different concept of what it fundamentally is. There is no room for plain biblical understanding in the word “homosexuality”, but the underlying proclivities are very real, so here we are.
Under normal circumstances a man and woman can create life, it is natural. They can bring the natural and rightful balance to a child that isn't of them. A homosexual couple can never do that, to force it by taking a child from a mother is against natural law.
I agree legally (as the current laws are written) two adults can do what they want. I appreciate what Rick, and the two Scott's have done for MAGA. I do NOT think any children should be raised in that environment. There's simply too much risk.
When you look at the bigger picture; SOOO much information and history has been purposely obscured & kept from us for centuries. Do you think the LGBTQPEDO+ communities REALLY want to continue that lifestyle if they were informed that a healthier alternative which was more comfortable and longer lasting life was within reach? Once the group-think mentality fractures, would they maybe turn away from that lifestyle and help others to seek treatment?
The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital.
Is 99% of the population intentionally infected with some type of bug? Why was Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and HCQ aggressively rejected by the media and the "medical industry"?
What does the Bible tell us about serpents & worms?
You know, this sounds a lot like when the older generation would scream about whites marrying blacks or Hispanics and if they did marry, then they should certainly not have kids.
We don’t need to consider them all pedophiles (because that consideration simply is neither true nor fair) to assert that their having children is unnatural (which is true) and then move to a discussion of whether what is unnatural should be legal. Two men raising a baby is two men pretending to be a natural family, which is not true. It may be that there are acceptable exceptions, but generally speaking, to legalize/normalize untruth is to empower a lie. Whose kingdom does that support?
Even on exceptions, “abortion” (or “infanticide”) was supposed to be an “exception”, and 65,000,000 dead babies later… it turned out the “slippery slope” is a real thing. So…. where any lines should be is probably farther than we are ready, socially, to have an earnest and open discussion at present (nor do I claim to have an answer or even strong opinion, presently). I recently posted that “homosexuality” is not an innate characteristic, and even that got some pushback, here.
This issue does still regard fellow humanity and fellow Americans, who will be respected if they are respectable, AND genuine respect involves reciprocation or it’s simply dominance. Christianity has been run roughshod on this issue since 2010. 1627 may not be an acceptable option, but neither is the current status quo. To get to a mutually acceptable position from the current hellish one is probably going to require some uncomfortable discussions, for all interested parties.
I don’t like any of this, and would prefer to still have opinions similar to yours.
I can’t because nude men with artificial breasts are dressing children up in BDSM costumes for public parades while reading to them in demonic attire at public libraries and filling the childrens’ section with books like “heather has two mommies”.
It’s not religious zealotry. Red lines have been crossed.
I agree with the idea of this being a social contagion, it most definitely is. I do think we should call out the awfulness and abuse of children by those seeking attention and garnering it through the use of children. I’m just not willing to vilify a subset of the population based on the horrible actions of some.
Note that while I’m against the behavior, and don’t accept it as a natural identity, I do try very hard not to vilify them as a whole. From what I’m aware of, many of them have had very hard lives.
However, just because we shouldn’t crap on them, it doesn’t mean them crapping in the opposite direction needs to be acceptable.
That's like taking any case of pedophilia, child sex abuse, incest, whatever you can find in a "normal" family and using that to say that all "normal" families do the same.
I’m not here to talk about politicians. I’m here to find out why you are so comfortable minimizing child abuse. What is your obsession with defending them?
I have a neighbor who is a divorced mom with a young son that my son would play with on occasion. That's basically all I knew about her until a couple of years ago, when, while the two boys were playing in front of my house, the mom approached and, out of the blue, said that her son is confused. I asked how so. She said he doesn't understand why he has two moms (she was divorced from the other mom). Regardless of ones views on the correctness of their arrangement, I don't see how anyone could miss the irony. Edit: More recently, there was an occasion where her son knocked on the door wanting to play with my son. He ( her son) was wearing a pink lacey dress. I said, "why are you wearing a dress? You're a boy." At least he no longer wears dresses.
What’s your obsession with attacking them? The politician I pointed out, is Scott Bessent, who is a homosexual, married with a man with two adopted children.
"Lord Jesus, deliver this child from slavery. We pray your Divine protection. We call out to you for the ones who have no voice." Even the video carries a demonic tone...chilling. May we keep praying.
According to God's plan every child should have a mom and a dad. They learn from both sexes.
When my daughter was in HS she was working as a lifeguard and taught swim lessons at a community pool. She couldn't be there one day and referred her swim lesson kids to another guard who happened to be male. There was a lesbian who would not allow any male to be near or touch her female child. She begged t my daughter to find another female to teach her daughter's swim lesson that day. I can only imagine now what that child who is now an adult thinks about men. Either she rebelled against her mother as a teenager and sought them out or she grew up hating men.
And he keeps bouncing him and asking that stupid question. I, as a mother, would've hugged and kissed on that baby when he starting showing signs of distress. Poor thing.
Nice, bouncing the kid off his crotch. I bet he's got a roaring hard on. And the way he's squeezing that babies chest...I have no words. That's not a toy ya freak! Disgusting.
Damn even the baby knows better than these two faggot retards. I feel sorry for the baby cause these two fags are probably going to molest it in the years to come.
Jesus, this fills me with indescribable rage. Primal.
I know it’s probably against ToS to use words like “kill” and “torture” etc, but that’s what it makes me want to do.
That poor child will have his little soul corrupted (and his body molested) from day 1.
It’s not enough just to reject the left anymore. I actually WANT our side to start becoming everything they already accuse us of being anyway. No more tolerance. I’m not tolerating a fuckin thing anymore
CRUELTY! The baby wants his mama!!
meanwhile.... https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2045110457954922959 HHS Sec. RFK Jr. reveals the Biden administration was BLOCKING Christian families from adopting foster children
They were pushing to get state laws against Christian families adopting.
Now this is truly evil.
Two guys fagging off have had all restraints (women) to their perverted selves removed. As one perversion becomes old hat they move to more and more depraved diversions.
Two fags should never be allowed a child.
Agreed.
I've become convinced that the progression towards more disgusting perversions is a matter of the parasite toxins (see my Parasite Pill link above) increasing their influence on the gut & brain.
Parasites hide in their host to avoid detection. Once they are firmly established, it is then safe to spread to other hosts.
See page #51 to see what a "Bug Chaser" is. Just avoid eating anytime soon.🤢
Baby appears to be in good health and is happy. Baby’s mama isn’t in the picture because she chose not to be.
You think this newborn boy was happy and healthy as well? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/10/queensland-paedophile-peter-truong-sentenced-for-30-years-jail
No, I don’t, but not all homosexuals are cut from the same cloth, just like all heterosexuals don’t make good parents. FYI: Scott Bessent's family includes his husband, John Freeman, and their two children, Cole and Caroline.
How do homosexuals reproduce?
See page 53 below: 👇
Parasite Pill 2.0
From a civil and legal standpoint — what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home is their business. Has MAGA suddenly become the theological gestapo? I seem to recall that in the early days of MAGA, we had no problem with the likes of Scott Bessent and Scott Pressler and Ric Grenell. Now all of the sudden, we’re pushing a religious ideology on people.
It is a rejection of nature, and therefore against natural law. Two men can't create life together, thus they shouldn't be able to buy it. You are supporting the denial of a child of their natural right to a mother.
I get it, you aren't a Christian and don't care for my dogma. But you are denying the rights of a child by allowing homosexual men to buy a child.
So, change the law. I’m pointing out that just because they’re gay doesn’t mean that they are pedophiles; to suggest that they are is idiotic. Do I think it’s the best situation for the child, no, but I’ve seen far worse in households that you would deem just fine on the surface because it was a heterosexual couple.
Btw, I was one of your upvotes here, and agree with every point in this comment. (I was reviewing a comment of mine)
We have a lot of work to do on identifying and managing what happens to children in bad situations.
The Choctaws have wonderful family courts who strive for the best interests of everyone involved. Imitating them instead of putting a bunch of angry racist/lesbian childless feminists in charge of unaccountable administrative courts charged with placing children in homes would be a good start.
I also agree with showing love and respect to those trapped in the sin of sodomy. My insistence on using language centered around identifying it by its verb is just part of an effort to establish boundaries that allow for mutual understanding and respect, reflect a different concept of what it fundamentally is. There is no room for plain biblical understanding in the word “homosexuality”, but the underlying proclivities are very real, so here we are.
So if an infertile couple can't create life together, they shouldn't be able to adopt either?
Under normal circumstances a man and woman can create life, it is natural. They can bring the natural and rightful balance to a child that isn't of them. A homosexual couple can never do that, to force it by taking a child from a mother is against natural law.
So you hate homosexuals because Christianity tells you to hate them?
I have a natural revulsion when I see gay men akin to that of seeing maggots. They are an afront to what is good, orderly, and natural.
I agree legally (as the current laws are written) two adults can do what they want. I appreciate what Rick, and the two Scott's have done for MAGA. I do NOT think any children should be raised in that environment. There's simply too much risk.
When you look at the bigger picture; SOOO much information and history has been purposely obscured & kept from us for centuries. Do you think the LGBTQPEDO+ communities REALLY want to continue that lifestyle if they were informed that a healthier alternative which was more comfortable and longer lasting life was within reach? Once the group-think mentality fractures, would they maybe turn away from that lifestyle and help others to seek treatment?
As Q said in Post 142:
Is 99% of the population intentionally infected with some type of bug? Why was Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and HCQ aggressively rejected by the media and the "medical industry"?
What does the Bible tell us about serpents & worms?
You know, this sounds a lot like when the older generation would scream about whites marrying blacks or Hispanics and if they did marry, then they should certainly not have kids.
I didn't go there; you made that implication.
Interracial marriage poses no risk to children.
It's not just the older generation saying that, and I've seen pretty much exactly that said here a few times.
EXACTLY THIS.
And it's equally as reprehensible, I don't care how they vote.
We don’t need to consider them all pedophiles (because that consideration simply is neither true nor fair) to assert that their having children is unnatural (which is true) and then move to a discussion of whether what is unnatural should be legal. Two men raising a baby is two men pretending to be a natural family, which is not true. It may be that there are acceptable exceptions, but generally speaking, to legalize/normalize untruth is to empower a lie. Whose kingdom does that support?
Even on exceptions, “abortion” (or “infanticide”) was supposed to be an “exception”, and 65,000,000 dead babies later… it turned out the “slippery slope” is a real thing. So…. where any lines should be is probably farther than we are ready, socially, to have an earnest and open discussion at present (nor do I claim to have an answer or even strong opinion, presently). I recently posted that “homosexuality” is not an innate characteristic, and even that got some pushback, here.
This issue does still regard fellow humanity and fellow Americans, who will be respected if they are respectable, AND genuine respect involves reciprocation or it’s simply dominance. Christianity has been run roughshod on this issue since 2010. 1627 may not be an acceptable option, but neither is the current status quo. To get to a mutually acceptable position from the current hellish one is probably going to require some uncomfortable discussions, for all interested parties.
You should consider revisiting Parasite Pill. The population didn’t go from <1%-2% to 9.3% in 15 years naturally. The terms “social contagion” and this article (https://greatawakening.win/p/17txodTNLv/the-nature-of-exponents-in-a-lim/ ) are worth being aware of.
I don’t like any of this, and would prefer to still have opinions similar to yours.
I can’t because nude men with artificial breasts are dressing children up in BDSM costumes for public parades while reading to them in demonic attire at public libraries and filling the childrens’ section with books like “heather has two mommies”.
It’s not religious zealotry. Red lines have been crossed.
I agree with the idea of this being a social contagion, it most definitely is. I do think we should call out the awfulness and abuse of children by those seeking attention and garnering it through the use of children. I’m just not willing to vilify a subset of the population based on the horrible actions of some.
Note that while I’m against the behavior, and don’t accept it as a natural identity, I do try very hard not to vilify them as a whole. From what I’m aware of, many of them have had very hard lives.
However, just because we shouldn’t crap on them, it doesn’t mean them crapping in the opposite direction needs to be acceptable.
That's like taking any case of pedophilia, child sex abuse, incest, whatever you can find in a "normal" family and using that to say that all "normal" families do the same.
He does not appear to be happy. Quite the opposite to anyone with eyes.
This turns my stomach Disgusting 🤢🤢 and evil 🤮
Why does he keep bouncing the baby on his nuts? Gross. Dear God, protect this child.
I’m not here to talk about politicians. I’m here to find out why you are so comfortable minimizing child abuse. What is your obsession with defending them?
I have a neighbor who is a divorced mom with a young son that my son would play with on occasion. That's basically all I knew about her until a couple of years ago, when, while the two boys were playing in front of my house, the mom approached and, out of the blue, said that her son is confused. I asked how so. She said he doesn't understand why he has two moms (she was divorced from the other mom). Regardless of ones views on the correctness of their arrangement, I don't see how anyone could miss the irony. Edit: More recently, there was an occasion where her son knocked on the door wanting to play with my son. He ( her son) was wearing a pink lacey dress. I said, "why are you wearing a dress? You're a boy." At least he no longer wears dresses.
What’s your obsession with attacking them? The politician I pointed out, is Scott Bessent, who is a homosexual, married with a man with two adopted children.
"Lord Jesus, deliver this child from slavery. We pray your Divine protection. We call out to you for the ones who have no voice." Even the video carries a demonic tone...chilling. May we keep praying.
According to God's plan every child should have a mom and a dad. They learn from both sexes.
When my daughter was in HS she was working as a lifeguard and taught swim lessons at a community pool. She couldn't be there one day and referred her swim lesson kids to another guard who happened to be male. There was a lesbian who would not allow any male to be near or touch her female child. She begged t my daughter to find another female to teach her daughter's swim lesson that day. I can only imagine now what that child who is now an adult thinks about men. Either she rebelled against her mother as a teenager and sought them out or she grew up hating men.
This is so f****ing sad. It literally made my mom heart hurt.
Calirado dual citizen governor poleass and his ‘partner’ bought two kids.
Now, now, let’s get it right. Women SELL their babies to faggots.
The woman chose to sell her child. As always zero accountability for women.
Watch from 0:34: since the baby isn't saying "mama," the faggot presses his two thumbs against the baby's chest, which is why the baby is crying.
Horrifying
And he keeps bouncing him and asking that stupid question. I, as a mother, would've hugged and kissed on that baby when he starting showing signs of distress. Poor thing.
"Not until you say the right word, bigot!"
Nice, bouncing the kid off his crotch. I bet he's got a roaring hard on. And the way he's squeezing that babies chest...I have no words. That's not a toy ya freak! Disgusting.
Damn even the baby knows better than these two faggot retards. I feel sorry for the baby cause these two fags are probably going to molest it in the years to come.
Jesus, this fills me with indescribable rage. Primal.
I know it’s probably against ToS to use words like “kill” and “torture” etc, but that’s what it makes me want to do.
That poor child will have his little soul corrupted (and his body molested) from day 1.
It’s not enough just to reject the left anymore. I actually WANT our side to start becoming everything they already accuse us of being anyway. No more tolerance. I’m not tolerating a fuckin thing anymore
Hate that this happens, but love your post title!