I mean at this point. Both sides of the political spectrum are liable to immediately jump to everything being a conspiracy or false flag against their preferred political, economic, and philosophic points and positions.
The left tends to believe official statements on events when it makes the right, or a largely ideological right-wing point look bad. The right tends to believe official statements on events when it makes the left, or a largely ideologically left-wing point look bad. Otherwise the assumption is conspiracy. Hell weāre advancing into the realm where both sides are coming up with conspiracyās about their opposite numbers conspiracy accusations.
Weāre already well into everything economic being a āNo True Scotsman fallacy.ā Where glaring flaws and oversights of one side or the otherās preferred economic systems arenāt really reflective of oversights inherent to that system and are instead the fault of something or someone else.
Even if we got the 100% unvarnished Truth on everything. I doubt at this point that significant portions of the population will believe it. If it doesnāt affirm their sides preferred political, philosophic, and economic positions.
I'm zooming out past simple left/right red/blue and focusing more on City of London...
For example, here's a Lyndon Larouch document titled: Why the British Kill
American Presidents - that spells it all out. Susan Kokinda has referenced this several times...
Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, JFK....
With CoL's geopolitical position getting tossed around like a ragdoll lately, I've got them pegged for being responsible in some way for this situation.
In addition to that, with coincidence never actually being coincidental...it just so happens that King sausage fingers and his harlot are in town...
So yanno... nothing to see here...They tossed a proverbial grenade and slipped out the back, to create SOME form of chaos and desired effect. That I can be sure of...
I'm wondering about a possible false flag double bluff.
They set it up not necessarily expecting it to succeed. And then claim it was a false flag setup done by Trump for him to further his agenda. Hmm..? š¤
It was set up to look like...They set it up not necessarily expecting it to succeed. And then claim it was a false flag setup done by Trump for him to further his agenda. Hmm..? *Triple backflip?*š¤
If it was a FF then Trump's admin should be gaining something from this. That's the point of a FF, you use it as a way to get what you want, so what was gained?
We, as a community have been trained for years to question everything. As we should. BUT, sometimes, an assassination attempt really is an assassination attempt.
He did send a manifesto
Exclusive | WHCD gunman Cole Allen sent anti-Trump manifesto, said he wanted to take out Trump officials: āThe Friendly Federal ...
Gunman Cole Allen sent an anti-President Trump manifesto to his family members about 10 minutes before opening fire at Saturday nightās White House Correspondentsā Dinner.
nypost.com
10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments
tbh I think it could be one as well. If, as people seem to be saying, Q knew about this exact guy doing this beforehand, that would mean it was staged. Right?
But of course, because it's coming out leftists were the ones who did this.
I mean at this point. Both sides of the political spectrum are liable to immediately jump to everything being a conspiracy or false flag against their preferred political, economic, and philosophic points and positions.
The left tends to believe official statements on events when it makes the right, or a largely ideological right-wing point look bad. The right tends to believe official statements on events when it makes the left, or a largely ideologically left-wing point look bad. Otherwise the assumption is conspiracy. Hell weāre advancing into the realm where both sides are coming up with conspiracyās about their opposite numbers conspiracy accusations.
Weāre already well into everything economic being a āNo True Scotsman fallacy.ā Where glaring flaws and oversights of one side or the otherās preferred economic systems arenāt really reflective of oversights inherent to that system and are instead the fault of something or someone else.
Even if we got the 100% unvarnished Truth on everything. I doubt at this point that significant portions of the population will believe it. If it doesnāt affirm their sides preferred political, philosophic, and economic positions.
This
confirmation bias knows no bounds.
I'm zooming out past simple left/right red/blue and focusing more on City of London...
For example, here's a Lyndon Larouch document titled: Why the British Kill American Presidents - that spells it all out. Susan Kokinda has referenced this several times...
Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, JFK....
With CoL's geopolitical position getting tossed around like a ragdoll lately, I've got them pegged for being responsible in some way for this situation.
In addition to that, with coincidence never actually being coincidental...it just so happens that King sausage fingers and his harlot are in town...
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2026/04/president-donald-j-trump-and-first-lady-melania-trump-to-welcome-his-majesty-king-charles-the-iii-of-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-and-her-majesty-queen-camilla-for-a-state/
So yanno... nothing to see here...They tossed a proverbial grenade and slipped out the back, to create SOME form of chaos and desired effect. That I can be sure of...
u/#catdance
Just because both sides are capable, doesnāt mean that both sides are doing it. That is the difference.
I'm wondering about a possible false flag double bluff.
They set it up not necessarily expecting it to succeed. And then claim it was a false flag setup done by Trump for him to further his agenda. Hmm..? š¤
Actually, I was wondering whether there was an element of sting to this too.
I've been a bit downhearted that we're all laughing at the leftists for what is a reasonable take on their part. It does look suspicious to me.
But won't it be interesting if it's a lefty psyop that the white hats knew of.
"Moves and counter moves, Katniss "
If it was a FF wouldn't the shooter be dead?
I think that was the shooters plan but he got shot in the leg and tackled like a little ho
That's old School.
The DEAD shooter on the roof at Butler was Maxwell Yearick.
If it was a FF then Trump's admin should be gaining something from this. That's the point of a FF, you use it as a way to get what you want, so what was gained?
That seems to be the established narrative on the left.
Itās more plausible if they said Allen came to whack the āmediaā instead of the administration
Brain challenged
What a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
Of course they think that. And, so were the other 10,001 violent leftist attacks. All Leftwing violence is all just a rightwing conspiracy theory!
The truth of lib/Dem violence was getting out there, so they had to pivot to "fake".
We, as a community have been trained for years to question everything. As we should. BUT, sometimes, an assassination attempt really is an assassination attempt.
Not hardly.
Of course because it FAILED. If it had been successful it would be e totally different narrative.
Oh, the irony. What about January 6 being a false flag?
He did send a manifesto Exclusive | WHCD gunman Cole Allen sent anti-Trump manifesto, said he wanted to take out Trump officials: āThe Friendly Federal ... Gunman Cole Allen sent an anti-President Trump manifesto to his family members about 10 minutes before opening fire at Saturday nightās White House Correspondentsā Dinner. nypost.com 10 comments share save hide report block hide replies Comments
tbh I think it could be one as well. If, as people seem to be saying, Q knew about this exact guy doing this beforehand, that would mean it was staged. Right?