"The byproduct is that the Republicans will receive more than 20 House Seats in the upcoming Midterms!" 🔥
YES! Fight, fight, fight, GOP!
"We cannot allow there to be an Election that is conducted unconstitutionally simply for the “convenience” of State Legislatures. If they have to vote twice, so be it. We should demand that State Legislatures do what the Supreme Court says must be done. That is more important than administrative convenience."
This is the horse shit we deal with around these parts...
“If Trump is going to try to attack fair voting across the country, then New Jersey is going to stand up so that we can create, you know, a counterbalance to whatever he’s doing,” said Sherrill, a Democrat.
Even if democrat controlled states redistrict, they won't do so to benefit anyone but themselves.
Only red states can do this and states like Indiana cucked out. I highly doubt they will reconvene.
Don't get me wrong, I am glad the red states that are redistricting are doing so, but it is so obvious the uniparty is against this. Led by Thune, the RINOs still have too much control.
Also, let's not forget 3 SCOTUS judges delayed their dissent for 7 months to purposely interfere in the 2026 midterms.
During the next elections, if a Congressman is 'elected' from a state with gerrymandered racial districts, in defiance of the Supreme Court ruling... there is a good response.
A majority vote from members of the House can block an "elected" member from being seated. It requires a formal vote of the entire House... and simple majority to prevent seating an unfairly elected member.
Same with the Senate. A simple majority of U.S. Senate can vote to block a member unfairly "elected" from being seated.
Exclusion requires a chamber vote: Under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, each chamber is the "judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members." This means a majority vote in the House or Senate is required to refuse seating a member-elect.
There are limited grounds for exclusion: The Supreme Court ruled in Powell v. McCormack (1969) that Congress cannot exclude a member-elect who meets the Constitution’s qualifications (age, citizenship, residency). Past misconduct or political views are not valid grounds. However, election cheating due to use of gerrymandered districts IS valid reason to refuse to seat members. Use it.
California has 52 representatives in the United States House of Representatives all by itself. Imagine if the House votes to exclude ALL California representatives unless the voting district gerrymandering is fixed before the election. Either they fix the problem, or NONE can seat.
"The byproduct is that the Republicans will receive more than 20 House Seats in the upcoming Midterms!" 🔥
YES! Fight, fight, fight, GOP!
"We cannot allow there to be an Election that is conducted unconstitutionally simply for the “convenience” of State Legislatures. If they have to vote twice, so be it. We should demand that State Legislatures do what the Supreme Court says must be done. That is more important than administrative convenience."
He nailed it.
The south needs to get this done!"
https://nitter.net/i/status/2051078848616223130
All the dems are gonna do is shrug their shoulders and scratch their heads. How is POTUS going to enforce this decree? Probably the military. Hehehehe
We got redistricting and now have to drive 10 minutes further in the opposite direction of our old polling place. Shenanigans
...have to drive 10 minutes more.... once every two years.
The point was they aren't sending people to their closest places anymore.. not even the top 2. I drive 30 mins one way to work .. 😂🙄
This is the horse shit we deal with around these parts...
Keep it up democrats. Not much patience left on some of us to dwell peaceably with you.
Even if democrat controlled states redistrict, they won't do so to benefit anyone but themselves.
Only red states can do this and states like Indiana cucked out. I highly doubt they will reconvene.
Don't get me wrong, I am glad the red states that are redistricting are doing so, but it is so obvious the uniparty is against this. Led by Thune, the RINOs still have too much control.
Also, let's not forget 3 SCOTUS judges delayed their dissent for 7 months to purposely interfere in the 2026 midterms.
He’s going to have to use arrest-force I Hope 😁 to get NewScum to follow through!
😁
Tell Commie Shapiro.
He has poor districts in PA put in with the Conservative areas to nullify the votes.
That is how Bkack AOC Summer Lee won a very Conservative area.
What happens when they choose to ignore federal law/orders as usual?
During the next elections, if a Congressman is 'elected' from a state with gerrymandered racial districts, in defiance of the Supreme Court ruling... there is a good response.
A majority vote from members of the House can block an "elected" member from being seated. It requires a formal vote of the entire House... and simple majority to prevent seating an unfairly elected member.
Same with the Senate. A simple majority of U.S. Senate can vote to block a member unfairly "elected" from being seated.
Exclusion requires a chamber vote: Under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, each chamber is the "judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members." This means a majority vote in the House or Senate is required to refuse seating a member-elect.
There are limited grounds for exclusion: The Supreme Court ruled in Powell v. McCormack (1969) that Congress cannot exclude a member-elect who meets the Constitution’s qualifications (age, citizenship, residency). Past misconduct or political views are not valid grounds. However, election cheating due to use of gerrymandered districts IS valid reason to refuse to seat members. Use it.
California has 52 representatives in the United States House of Representatives all by itself. Imagine if the House votes to exclude ALL California representatives unless the voting district gerrymandering is fixed before the election. Either they fix the problem, or NONE can seat.