It's posts like this that really make me dislike Q. Right there in our faces Q states that this war is wrapped up. Grrrrrrr....either I'm stupid or Q really didn't explain how to decode his posts all that well.
Now, who knows when Barry and HRC are gonna meet the hangman's noose?
Literally what are you talking about?Q and explain us how to decode his post. Autists researched. Like....what are you in about?
And Q was not posting in a linear fashion.
...sooooooooo...what are you in about?
The main part of 'getting the uranium' is about discovering where it came from originally. Innit? Maybe one could negotiate upon some samples, for analysis. If the smoking gun is what we are all looking for, that is.
They should have the right to have, and make, some uranium for civilian uses only, that is normal for countries internationally, if they choose to have nuclear energy, and the higher medical grade stuff. I think that is the place where Iran would be comfortable.
900 lbs of enriched uranium? No, the main part of "getting the uranium" is GETTING THE URANIUM out of Iranian hands. Tagging its identity is the frosting on the cake. (Have you noticed that we never facilitated the ability for our World War II enemies to develop nuclear weapons?)
No worldwide sponsor of terrorism, culpable for the deaths of thousands of innocent people, has the "right" to fiddle with nuclear power on their own. That's the life sentence for all their murders. If they want their own nuclear powerplants, they can arrange to have CANDU reactors, which can be fueled with natural uranium. And no reprocessing. There is no "civilian use" necessity for enriched uranium or any bred plutonium.
Who exactly in Iran is this deal supposedly being made with? The Republic of Iran's leadership is extremely fractured and all groups are all jockeying for power and control. They are not on the same page. There are no reasonable "moderates" within Iran's leadership. They are all on the radical Shia revolutionary durka scale with some having more power than others. The only difference is that a few are more pragmatic for pure corruption interests, but they are still bad. But they are mostly powerless in the country. These are the ones that have been taking part in negotiations. I also don't trust the Pakistanis. They are playing many sides in this game - Iran, the US, and China.
I could see Trump doing something like this to further drive a wedge among the battling factions. The IRGC extreme hardliners for one who have the guns. Another group is the Paydari Front extreme Islamic hardliners who don't have guns, but they have people support of the minority of Iranian radical Islamists. Something like this kind of an agreement, which is basically a surrender deal, would send the few pro-regime supporters, less than 5% of Iranians, completely ballistic and they have already threatened the leadership that they would turn on them if they surrendered to the Americans. They see it as surrendering Islam to the infidels. If the support of these people is lost there is no way the regime will be able to survive. The guns would have to be turned on the entirety of the Iranian public. Those radical Islamists have no problems dying for what they see as an affront to Islam. Is this part of Trump's overall strategy to get them to turn on each other and ultimately bring the regime down? It will be interesting to see what happens in Iran if this turns out to be what Trump actually said.
Three biggest lies, oral sex, helping the sheep over the fence, I won this belt buckle and now there’s a Fourth one , barred from producing it but they can purchase it WTF
Partially true, but overstated and unconfirmed as a done deal.Trump has publicly stated in recent days (early May 2026) that Iran has agreed not to develop nuclear weapons and that the US would obtain Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium (which he calls "nuclear dust").
reuters.com
Key Facts from ReportsTrump's statements: He has claimed progress in talks, saying Iran "agreed to that very powerfully" regarding no nuclear weapons and handing over enriched uranium as part of efforts to end recent Gulf conflict/hostilities.
dailysabah.com
Negotiations context: The US and Iran are in active talks (mediated in part by Pakistan and others) on a possible one-page memorandum of understanding (MOU) to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, lift some sanctions/blockades, and set a framework for further nuclear talks (including a potential multi-year moratorium on enrichment). A cash-for-uranium idea (e.g., releasing frozen funds) has been discussed.
axios.com
Uranium stockpile: Removing or transferring Iran's highly enriched uranium (hundreds of kg, per estimates) is a major US demand. Trump has pushed this hard, but it's a sticking point.
axios.com
Important CaveatsIran has not fully confirmed: Iranian officials have pushed back on transferring uranium to the US specifically, emphasizing they won't give up enrichment rights entirely. Some reports note denials or that key demands remain unresolved.
reuters.com
No final agreement yet: Talks are ongoing and described as "closing in" on a framework/MOU, with a possible 30-day window for deeper negotiations. Details like the exact fate of the stockpile, enrichment limits, sanctions relief, and proxies/missiles are still being worked out. Past rounds have faltered.
reuters.com
Broader picture: This follows US/Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and a period of conflict/blockades affecting oil flows. The X22Report post adds interpretive layers (e.g., "smoking gun" against Obama/Clinton, decentralizing oil) that go beyond verified facts.
Bottom line: Trump's claims reflect his optimistic view of the negotiations and align with reported US goals and some progress. However, it's not a finalized confirmation from both sides—more like strong assertions amid fluid diplomacy. Watch for official joint announcements or IAEA involvement for confirmation. The situation remains dynamic as of May 8, 2026.
Q never misses.
u/#q1320
It's posts like this that really make me dislike Q. Right there in our faces Q states that this war is wrapped up. Grrrrrrr....either I'm stupid or Q really didn't explain how to decode his posts all that well.
Now, who knows when Barry and HRC are gonna meet the hangman's noose?
Literally what are you talking about?Q and explain us how to decode his post. Autists researched. Like....what are you in about? And Q was not posting in a linear fashion. ...sooooooooo...what are you in about?
HOT DAMN!!!
Just don't put Israel in charge of cleanup!!!
u/#hopium
It would appear. I'm just trying to find info/sauce on it. To make sure it's correct u/#seriouspopcorn
What a great delta.
Anybody know where Hillary is?
Trump just confirmed: Iran has agreed to being barred from producing nuclear weapons AND the US will be taking possession of Iran's uranium.
Oil decentralized. No nuclear weapon. No control of the Strait.
AND Trump gets the uranium — the smoking gun against Obama and Hillary Clinton. You think they're panicking? Absolutely.
The main part of 'getting the uranium' is about discovering where it came from originally. Innit? Maybe one could negotiate upon some samples, for analysis. If the smoking gun is what we are all looking for, that is.
They should have the right to have, and make, some uranium for civilian uses only, that is normal for countries internationally, if they choose to have nuclear energy, and the higher medical grade stuff. I think that is the place where Iran would be comfortable.
Hillary Billie Bob, Obama DNA is all over it
900 lbs of enriched uranium? No, the main part of "getting the uranium" is GETTING THE URANIUM out of Iranian hands. Tagging its identity is the frosting on the cake. (Have you noticed that we never facilitated the ability for our World War II enemies to develop nuclear weapons?)
No worldwide sponsor of terrorism, culpable for the deaths of thousands of innocent people, has the "right" to fiddle with nuclear power on their own. That's the life sentence for all their murders. If they want their own nuclear powerplants, they can arrange to have CANDU reactors, which can be fueled with natural uranium. And no reprocessing. There is no "civilian use" necessity for enriched uranium or any bred plutonium.
Need more confirmation on this.
Who exactly in Iran is this deal supposedly being made with? The Republic of Iran's leadership is extremely fractured and all groups are all jockeying for power and control. They are not on the same page. There are no reasonable "moderates" within Iran's leadership. They are all on the radical Shia revolutionary durka scale with some having more power than others. The only difference is that a few are more pragmatic for pure corruption interests, but they are still bad. But they are mostly powerless in the country. These are the ones that have been taking part in negotiations. I also don't trust the Pakistanis. They are playing many sides in this game - Iran, the US, and China.
I could see Trump doing something like this to further drive a wedge among the battling factions. The IRGC extreme hardliners for one who have the guns. Another group is the Paydari Front extreme Islamic hardliners who don't have guns, but they have people support of the minority of Iranian radical Islamists. Something like this kind of an agreement, which is basically a surrender deal, would send the few pro-regime supporters, less than 5% of Iranians, completely ballistic and they have already threatened the leadership that they would turn on them if they surrendered to the Americans. They see it as surrendering Islam to the infidels. If the support of these people is lost there is no way the regime will be able to survive. The guns would have to be turned on the entirety of the Iranian public. Those radical Islamists have no problems dying for what they see as an affront to Islam. Is this part of Trump's overall strategy to get them to turn on each other and ultimately bring the regime down? It will be interesting to see what happens in Iran if this turns out to be what Trump actually said.
U think Trump is playing with five or six Ace’s in a deck of cards😱
Confirmed where?
I’m watching Rob Schmitt on Newsmax and he hasn’t said anything about this 😳
thx
Three biggest lies, oral sex, helping the sheep over the fence, I won this belt buckle and now there’s a Fourth one , barred from producing it but they can purchase it WTF
Crazy
I think once Iran and USA start sharing intel, there will be a whole lot of weeping and wringing of hands.
Agree
is it true
Grok=
Partially true, but overstated and unconfirmed as a done deal.Trump has publicly stated in recent days (early May 2026) that Iran has agreed not to develop nuclear weapons and that the US would obtain Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium (which he calls "nuclear dust").
reuters.com
Key Facts from ReportsTrump's statements: He has claimed progress in talks, saying Iran "agreed to that very powerfully" regarding no nuclear weapons and handing over enriched uranium as part of efforts to end recent Gulf conflict/hostilities.
dailysabah.com
Negotiations context: The US and Iran are in active talks (mediated in part by Pakistan and others) on a possible one-page memorandum of understanding (MOU) to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, lift some sanctions/blockades, and set a framework for further nuclear talks (including a potential multi-year moratorium on enrichment). A cash-for-uranium idea (e.g., releasing frozen funds) has been discussed.
axios.com
Uranium stockpile: Removing or transferring Iran's highly enriched uranium (hundreds of kg, per estimates) is a major US demand. Trump has pushed this hard, but it's a sticking point.
axios.com
Important CaveatsIran has not fully confirmed: Iranian officials have pushed back on transferring uranium to the US specifically, emphasizing they won't give up enrichment rights entirely. Some reports note denials or that key demands remain unresolved.
reuters.com
No final agreement yet: Talks are ongoing and described as "closing in" on a framework/MOU, with a possible 30-day window for deeper negotiations. Details like the exact fate of the stockpile, enrichment limits, sanctions relief, and proxies/missiles are still being worked out. Past rounds have faltered.
reuters.com
Broader picture: This follows US/Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and a period of conflict/blockades affecting oil flows. The X22Report post adds interpretive layers (e.g., "smoking gun" against Obama/Clinton, decentralizing oil) that go beyond verified facts.
Bottom line: Trump's claims reflect his optimistic view of the negotiations and align with reported US goals and some progress. However, it's not a finalized confirmation from both sides—more like strong assertions amid fluid diplomacy. Watch for official joint announcements or IAEA involvement for confirmation. The situation remains dynamic as of May 8, 2026.
Thanks for grokking it.