But rhetoric on the net is one thing, reality another. And there's a reason why simply venting that desire or passion for revenge, suffering, lets call it vengeance, is unproductive. It's toxic. It simply leads down the same path.
They work their asses off to dehumanize. We should be working our asses off in the opposite direction, not the same one.
Heed the lessons of the French Revolution.
Victor Hanson on how the Democratic Party of the past, of JFK, even of Clinton, no longer exists. It has been infiltrated and taken over by Jacobins.
Summary: At the time of the french revolution, the Jacobins infiltrated and took over control, leading to the hysteria of the Reign of Terror.
Starmer himself is not the problem, any more than Joe Biden is for the decline of America and the rise of the swamp over the past 70 years.
But the way to build something great is not to chop people's heads off, or do the equivalent, or destroy their lives. It's to focus on creation, not destruction.
Meanwhile, events of yesterday in the UK are a cause for real, tangible hope and vision. To UK patriots: take a word out of DJT's mouth: "Fight! Fight! Fight!"
But the way to build something great is not to chop people's heads off, or do the equivalent, or destroy their lives. It's to focus on creation, not destruction.
The problem with that philosophy is that it is much easier to destroy than it is to create. A single match can destroy a lifetime of creation.
People who threaten destruction must be taken out. Our enemies understand this very well.
The people who led us to this point need to be permanently removed from society. No, prison doesn't work. They can be pardoned if something goes wrong and we get another apparatchik in office.
The guillotine is quick and humane. Unlike hanging it doesn't fail allowing the condemned their freedom or a death by strangulation.
Although, I’ve read somewhere that the head maintains a few seconds of consciousness once it’s separated…and may still see and hear as it’s falling and rolling…
Wait. It is easier to destroy than to create.... so this is a problem with "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy"?
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
I'm guessing you mean "the challenge" rather than "the problem".
But perhaps you think that "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy" implies no accountability? But that's not inherent at all. 'Taking out' people who pursue destruction is valid, BUT the problem is, as we can see historically, this mentality can easily slip into vengeance or righteous terror.
There is a big difference between overcoming those who seek your destruction and pursuing destruction yourself.
Motive is the key here, and there also lies the difference between actual accountability and justice on one hand, and destructive pursuit of vengeance and death on the other.
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
That isn't what I am implying. There is an old adage "bad money drives out good." (Gresham's Law) That is how they are replacing us, with undesirables.
Banksters can tell you that it took them centuries to almost destroy us and that failed. Destruction takes a lot of effort, generational planning and control of money supply, because most humans left to their own devices simply go about their own lives
You mean the machine that's spending the dollars propping the candidate up, media, etc? If so, yeah, I agree that if that machine wasn't there the candidate would have a much harder time. But the useful idiots still need to think for themselves, though the fact that they're useful idiots I guess guarantees that they can't think for themselves. For instance, I knew Pocahontas (aka Elizabeth Warren) was a phony in about 5 seconds, not sure why it wasn't obvious to everyone.
Also, my guess is that you can't get rid of those systems behind these phony politicians but it would be great if we could get the useful idiots to start thinking for themselves.
Rhetoric on the Net is Cheap.
But rhetoric on the net is one thing, reality another. And there's a reason why simply venting that desire or passion for revenge, suffering, lets call it vengeance, is unproductive. It's toxic. It simply leads down the same path.
They work their asses off to dehumanize. We should be working our asses off in the opposite direction, not the same one.
Heed the lessons of the French Revolution.
Victor Hanson on how the Democratic Party of the past, of JFK, even of Clinton, no longer exists. It has been infiltrated and taken over by Jacobins.
Victor Davis Hanson: The Democrat Party is 'Gone Forever'
Summary: At the time of the french revolution, the Jacobins infiltrated and took over control, leading to the hysteria of the Reign of Terror.
Starmer himself is not the problem, any more than Joe Biden is for the decline of America and the rise of the swamp over the past 70 years.
But the way to build something great is not to chop people's heads off, or do the equivalent, or destroy their lives. It's to focus on creation, not destruction.
Meanwhile, events of yesterday in the UK are a cause for real, tangible hope and vision. To UK patriots: take a word out of DJT's mouth: "Fight! Fight! Fight!"
The problem with that philosophy is that it is much easier to destroy than it is to create. A single match can destroy a lifetime of creation.
People who threaten destruction must be taken out. Our enemies understand this very well.
Yes, creation is much better than destruction
The people who led us to this point need to be permanently removed from society. No, prison doesn't work. They can be pardoned if something goes wrong and we get another apparatchik in office.
The guillotine is quick and humane. Unlike hanging it doesn't fail allowing the condemned their freedom or a death by strangulation.
Cable ties are a lot cheaper.
Although, I’ve read somewhere that the head maintains a few seconds of consciousness once it’s separated…and may still see and hear as it’s falling and rolling…
Interesting concept…
I've read that as well, but it's still got to be better than being strangled to death because your neck didn't break.
Wait. It is easier to destroy than to create.... so this is a problem with "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy"?
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
I'm guessing you mean "the challenge" rather than "the problem".
But perhaps you think that "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy" implies no accountability? But that's not inherent at all. 'Taking out' people who pursue destruction is valid, BUT the problem is, as we can see historically, this mentality can easily slip into vengeance or righteous terror.
There is a big difference between overcoming those who seek your destruction and pursuing destruction yourself.
Motive is the key here, and there also lies the difference between actual accountability and justice on one hand, and destructive pursuit of vengeance and death on the other.
That isn't what I am implying. There is an old adage "bad money drives out good." (Gresham's Law) That is how they are replacing us, with undesirables.
Creating is all well and good if you can keep it.
Banksters can tell you that it took them centuries to almost destroy us and that failed. Destruction takes a lot of effort, generational planning and control of money supply, because most humans left to their own devices simply go about their own lives
I was listening to VDH Jacobin explanation of the Democrat party last night, it was fantastic
Obama wasn't the problem either, it was all the useful idiots that voted for him.
The real problem is the system behind any of them, and the people who operate or drive that system.
You mean the machine that's spending the dollars propping the candidate up, media, etc? If so, yeah, I agree that if that machine wasn't there the candidate would have a much harder time. But the useful idiots still need to think for themselves, though the fact that they're useful idiots I guess guarantees that they can't think for themselves. For instance, I knew Pocahontas (aka Elizabeth Warren) was a phony in about 5 seconds, not sure why it wasn't obvious to everyone.
Also, my guess is that you can't get rid of those systems behind these phony politicians but it would be great if we could get the useful idiots to start thinking for themselves.