My personal opinion is that I have seen President Trump's entire cabinet prepared to fight the media and the opposition at every moment. POTUS has shown everyone how to fight and given them the courage to follow the leader.
I guess surviving multiple assassination attempts provides additional cred.
We are at war and the vast majority of the war is information warfare. It's a very real thing with more death than bullets. Think of how many loved ones were lost in the covid war. The NARRATIVE created covid hospital death protocols, and the NARRATIVE pushed the [NSFW] clot shot.
Personally, I love the push back on narratives that all cabinet officials are prepared to take. As example, Lee Zeldin CRUSHED Purple DeLauro.
The Lobby bar is EXPENSIVE, I've been there a few times for work. Entrees are $30-$40, drinks are $10-$30 each, appetizers are $20 per person.
$7,000 is around $150 per person, and they had dinner and appetizers on top of drinks. With 50 people they'd be renting the place out which I just made a phone call to ask about because I was curious. The dude who answered told me he was the manager and said it's a $6500 minimum to rent the place out for a happy hour, add extra drinks not on the menu during an open bar, and easy peasy to hit $7k.
Hell, I rented out a cheaper place nearby that had craft beers and appetizers only, just crappy stuff like pizza bites and mini burgers and stuff and for 35 people it cost me $5500 and that was six months after what's his name booked that place, so not surprising.
People hear $7k for a bar tab! But hell, be realistic, that was a bullshit response to a kind of valid question. Kash has been handing out hundreds of bottles of $250 whiskey as his calling card and chugging beers on live TV. We've run dems through the ringer for half that shit.
Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab - that makes you guys look fucking retarded
If we are going to engage in an info war, you have to battle in truth and you have to choose those battles carefully
All things aside sure even for 50 people its bad - but its IMPOSSiBLE to actually argue that point when people are fixating on an INCORRECT portion of the facts
Its "Van Allen and his campaign spent 7k for an event where they were day drinking" - thats a TRUTHFUL and accurate condemnation. Everyone can be like "ok thats kinda problematic. Shouldnt be day drinking"
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face. You cant condemn behavior that didnt happen. People can simply counter with "thats a lie, there were 50 people there" which is a TRUTHFUL counter. Why give people a good and truthful counter to your criticisms, when you can avoid exaggerating and criticize accurately, leaving no real room for anyone to excuse the behavior?
Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab
Literally no one on this thread is saying that.
Something happened that day, that Kash walked in with the receipts for that specific day. We are just spitballing what it could be and in the process are having insightful discussions here that has become very rare these days.
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face
And I dont say this to disrespect you, but for others following along, this is exactly what "strawman argument" is. Its where condense the entire discussion into one simple point that no one actually made, and then argue against it.
One question, is not canceled by another question. This was not a good look for the FBI. IMO.
Whats not good look? That someone made baseless accusations against Kash?
I am sure Kash is toying with them, just like he got people to believe he has a freaking Israeli gf because he knew they were hacking his email.
He is making himself a target so rest of FBI can do their job. He can do that only if he is really clean.
Exactly... he's toying with them.😸
Kashyap Patel - name to remember. Q
u/#q1481
Oh you sneaky Anon, always finding the Q-Connection! 🙌🏼😁
😉
Thanks for showing me the error of my ways.
You are far too self-deprecating, fren!
It is perfectly okay to question and discern.
My personal opinion is that I have seen President Trump's entire cabinet prepared to fight the media and the opposition at every moment. POTUS has shown everyone how to fight and given them the courage to follow the leader.
I guess surviving multiple assassination attempts provides additional cred.
We are at war and the vast majority of the war is information warfare. It's a very real thing with more death than bullets. Think of how many loved ones were lost in the covid war. The NARRATIVE created covid hospital death protocols, and the NARRATIVE pushed the [NSFW] clot shot.
Personally, I love the push back on narratives that all cabinet officials are prepared to take. As example, Lee Zeldin CRUSHED Purple DeLauro.
u/#kashpatel
You have an eloquent way with words. That's for your kind support.
u/#trumpflag
Well said MAGA!
Thanks fren! I hope you are well!
u/#Merica
You are right to question everything SirBud...
Answers you get after you question everything only with the goal of discovering the truth, is far more powerful than any brainwashing.
He is also inerupting their re-election fund raising videos when he talks over them.
Good point, I love war strategy...and this is a GREAT War...TY good perspective
Especially when its actually not a 7k bar tab - we are better than this
It was an event with 50 people - his campaign paid for the space, food, and drinks for 50 people
Some single malts can easily tally up 7Gs....
The Lobby bar is EXPENSIVE, I've been there a few times for work. Entrees are $30-$40, drinks are $10-$30 each, appetizers are $20 per person.
$7,000 is around $150 per person, and they had dinner and appetizers on top of drinks. With 50 people they'd be renting the place out which I just made a phone call to ask about because I was curious. The dude who answered told me he was the manager and said it's a $6500 minimum to rent the place out for a happy hour, add extra drinks not on the menu during an open bar, and easy peasy to hit $7k.
Hell, I rented out a cheaper place nearby that had craft beers and appetizers only, just crappy stuff like pizza bites and mini burgers and stuff and for 35 people it cost me $5500 and that was six months after what's his name booked that place, so not surprising.
People hear $7k for a bar tab! But hell, be realistic, that was a bullshit response to a kind of valid question. Kash has been handing out hundreds of bottles of $250 whiskey as his calling card and chugging beers on live TV. We've run dems through the ringer for half that shit.
People in glass houses…
Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab - that makes you guys look fucking retarded
If we are going to engage in an info war, you have to battle in truth and you have to choose those battles carefully
All things aside sure even for 50 people its bad - but its IMPOSSiBLE to actually argue that point when people are fixating on an INCORRECT portion of the facts
Its "Van Allen and his campaign spent 7k for an event where they were day drinking" - thats a TRUTHFUL and accurate condemnation. Everyone can be like "ok thats kinda problematic. Shouldnt be day drinking"
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face. You cant condemn behavior that didnt happen. People can simply counter with "thats a lie, there were 50 people there" which is a TRUTHFUL counter. Why give people a good and truthful counter to your criticisms, when you can avoid exaggerating and criticize accurately, leaving no real room for anyone to excuse the behavior?
I expect more out of this board
Literally no one on this thread is saying that.
Something happened that day, that Kash walked in with the receipts for that specific day. We are just spitballing what it could be and in the process are having insightful discussions here that has become very rare these days.
And I dont say this to disrespect you, but for others following along, this is exactly what "strawman argument" is. Its where condense the entire discussion into one simple point that no one actually made, and then argue against it.
What are the odds that "Van Allen" aligns with "Radiation Belt?" Is there more here than meets the eye? I'm thinking comms here.
Van Allen is "radioactive??"
And according to comms, radioactive = pedo blackmail
Am I getting warmer?
u/#nancypox
I support Kash 100%.