yeah just shows how little power our side has. dems are move fast to bust people that do them wrong, but evidently the good guys always have their hands tied.
I don't know if I still believe that "The good guys have their hands tied." This is a choice.
This reminds me of the Viet Nam war. They're fighting with one hand tied behind their backs because they are always worried about being "honorable" and the other side isn't. Well... that's why the Viet Nam war lasted as long as it did with such poor results.
No one can ever say that we have learned from our mistakes.
Precisely...I came here to use that "shocking!" descriptor myself. They still roam free...not blackpilling, but sorry...THEY STILL ROAM FREE, with no punishment.
Yes, the core claims in the post are substantially true, with some important clarifications on details.
aol.com
The X post shares a Fox News clip (from around September 2024) discussing an undercover recording of Nicholas Biase, then-chief spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office (SDNY, part of the DOJ), criticizing Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s hush money case against Donald Trump.
cnn.com
Key Verified ElementsBiase’s statements: In secretly recorded conversations (July/August 2024) with an undercover operative from Steven Crowder’s Mug Club, Biase said Bragg was “stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case,” called the case “nonsense,” a “perversion of justice,” and noted that “every real estate person in New York does what [Trump] did—nobody’s ever been charged with this.” He described it as politically motivated “lawfare” tied to Bragg’s ambitions (they had known each other ~15 years from prior work).
cbsaustin.com
The recording’s origin: It was an undercover operation, not a direct leak from Bragg’s office. The New York Post and Crowder released/featured it. Fox News covered it as shown in the post’s video.
nypost.com
Context and impact: Biase’s comments aligned with widespread conservative criticism that the case (elevating misdemeanor falsified business records to felonies via an uncharged federal election law violation) was novel and politically timed before the 2024 election. Trump was convicted on 34 counts in May 2024.
cnn.com
Important CaveatsNot from “DA Alvin Bragg’s office”: Biase worked for the federal SDNY U.S. Attorney’s Office, not Bragg’s local Manhattan DA office. He was a colleague/critic, not an insider leaking from Bragg’s team. The post’s phrasing is slightly misleading here.
cnn.com
Biase walked it back: After the video surfaced, he issued a statement regretting the comments, saying they were made in a private/social setting and did not reflect his official views on the prosecutions.
cnn.com
Opinion, not new evidence: This is one prosecutor’s candid (private) opinion, not formal proof of wrongdoing or new court-admissible evidence. The case’s legal merits remain heavily debated—defended by Bragg’s team as valid enforcement, criticized by many legal experts as stretched.
nypost.com
In short, the Fox News segment and Biase’s recorded criticisms are real and accurately represented. The post frames it as strong evidence of election interference via “lawfare,” which matches Biase’s words and a common view on one side of the aisle, though it’s partisan commentary rather than undisputed fact. The underlying recording and coverage check out from multiple outlets (NY Post, CNN, Breitbart, etc.).
Anybody that was even half ass paying attention knew that. If we had a non corrupted media they would have been all over a juicy story like that. Instead they all got their TDS memo and ran forward in lockstep gaslighting anyone daring to say anything
There's no audio of Bragg, the audio is from a guy who worked in the same office giving his opinion on the case. This came out about 18 months ago - that is when that news clip is from.
I have no idea why this is stickied and being made into a big deal right now.
How is it unreal? This is old news, very old news and has been around for a while.
But to cut to the quick, this would be like if CNN aired audio of Trump's secretary giving his opinion on the Iran war. No one gives a shit what that person thinks.
We have it all. But we can't do anything with it
You have to admit, the timing is interesting
Almost 2 years now and yet they roam free.
Shocking....
yeah just shows how little power our side has. dems are move fast to bust people that do them wrong, but evidently the good guys always have their hands tied.
I don't know if I still believe that "The good guys have their hands tied." This is a choice.
This reminds me of the Viet Nam war. They're fighting with one hand tied behind their backs because they are always worried about being "honorable" and the other side isn't. Well... that's why the Viet Nam war lasted as long as it did with such poor results.
No one can ever say that we have learned from our mistakes.
Precisely...I came here to use that "shocking!" descriptor myself. They still roam free...not blackpilling, but sorry...THEY STILL ROAM FREE, with no punishment.
FWIW, reality isn't black-pilling.
At least not in my book....
I appreciate that observation. :)
https://nitter.net/i/status/2063607242260115758
Yes, the core claims in the post are substantially true, with some important clarifications on details. aol.com
The X post shares a Fox News clip (from around September 2024) discussing an undercover recording of Nicholas Biase, then-chief spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office (SDNY, part of the DOJ), criticizing Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s hush money case against Donald Trump. cnn.com
Key Verified ElementsBiase’s statements: In secretly recorded conversations (July/August 2024) with an undercover operative from Steven Crowder’s Mug Club, Biase said Bragg was “stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case,” called the case “nonsense,” a “perversion of justice,” and noted that “every real estate person in New York does what [Trump] did—nobody’s ever been charged with this.” He described it as politically motivated “lawfare” tied to Bragg’s ambitions (they had known each other ~15 years from prior work). cbsaustin.com
The recording’s origin: It was an undercover operation, not a direct leak from Bragg’s office. The New York Post and Crowder released/featured it. Fox News covered it as shown in the post’s video. nypost.com Context and impact: Biase’s comments aligned with widespread conservative criticism that the case (elevating misdemeanor falsified business records to felonies via an uncharged federal election law violation) was novel and politically timed before the 2024 election. Trump was convicted on 34 counts in May 2024. cnn.com
Important CaveatsNot from “DA Alvin Bragg’s office”: Biase worked for the federal SDNY U.S. Attorney’s Office, not Bragg’s local Manhattan DA office. He was a colleague/critic, not an insider leaking from Bragg’s team. The post’s phrasing is slightly misleading here. cnn.com
Biase walked it back: After the video surfaced, he issued a statement regretting the comments, saying they were made in a private/social setting and did not reflect his official views on the prosecutions. cnn.com
Opinion, not new evidence: This is one prosecutor’s candid (private) opinion, not formal proof of wrongdoing or new court-admissible evidence. The case’s legal merits remain heavily debated—defended by Bragg’s team as valid enforcement, criticized by many legal experts as stretched. nypost.com
In short, the Fox News segment and Biase’s recorded criticisms are real and accurately represented. The post frames it as strong evidence of election interference via “lawfare,” which matches Biase’s words and a common view on one side of the aisle, though it’s partisan commentary rather than undisputed fact. The underlying recording and coverage check out from multiple outlets (NY Post, CNN, Breitbart, etc.).
Anybody that was even half ass paying attention knew that. If we had a non corrupted media they would have been all over a juicy story like that. Instead they all got their TDS memo and ran forward in lockstep gaslighting anyone daring to say anything
Scumbags, get it pretty tired of this crap
Yeah, and in other news, bears shit in the woods
BREAKING
UNREAL
So… why didn’t they play the audio of Bragg then? Did I miss something? Right now this is nothing more than a he said, she said post of hopium….
There's no audio of Bragg, the audio is from a guy who worked in the same office giving his opinion on the case. This came out about 18 months ago - that is when that news clip is from.
I have no idea why this is stickied and being made into a big deal right now.
because it is UNREAL
How is it unreal? This is old news, very old news and has been around for a while.
But to cut to the quick, this would be like if CNN aired audio of Trump's secretary giving his opinion on the Iran war. No one gives a shit what that person thinks.
Thread title clearly states..
Concur. I often wonder why old news keep popping up…
Everything old is new again.
Fat rigger
Fire him and revoke his law license!
ALVIN!!!