The post argues that the United Kingdom and Ireland face a catastrophic breach of the social contract by insulated political elites who favor globalist immigration policies over the security of native citizens. It cites Magna Carta article 61 from 1215 as codifying the inherent right of the community to resist and reclaim sovereignty whenever government violates its oath to the realm. The text describes the resulting anarcho-tyranny in which working-class areas suffer housing and service strain from mass migration while two-tier policing suppresses domestic patriots and shields the architects of disruption. Mainstream media pathologizes normal national survival instincts yet economic and demographic data reveal the unsustainable pressure on public resources and social cohesion. The post frames the rising populist backlash across Europe from Dublin to London not as insurrection but as a legitimate defense of national survival and self-determination when elites abdicate constitutional duties.
It’s a very good idea. The Magna Carta being, I believe the first citizens charter, outlining basic rights of the people and also restricting the power of the king (ruler).
We certainly need to have a modern version of this. Get rid of their admiralty “legal” system, legalese, barristers, lawyers and judges.
Return to common, understandable law, written in plain English, overseen by juries, appointed citizens.
Most of their law revolves around restrictions to justify wealth extraction (theft and extortion) through the creation of licenses and government approved monopolies.
Hundreds of thousands of public servants in the Western World are guilty of treason and the ongoing genocide of various cultures.
Some may be puppets, others simply indifferent or stupid, but most know exactly what damage they are causing. They must face the consequences of their actions.
Excellent post C5. This is what the long suffering men and women of the UK need to trigger. They have a legal cause to overthrow the Corrupted Governments.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages
(FI: the 'We' here is the king, the sovereign of the nation)
(61) SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security:
The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.
If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us – or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice – to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.
Any man who so desires may take an oath to obey the commands of the twenty-five barons for the achievement of these ends, and to join with them in assailing us to the utmost of his power. We give public and free permission to take this oath to any man who so desires, and at no time will we prohibit any man from taking it. Indeed, we will compel any of our subjects who are unwilling to take it to swear it at our command.
If one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is prevented in any other way from discharging his duties, the rest of them shall choose another baron in his place, at their discretion, who shall be duly sworn in as they were.
In the event of disagreement among the twenty-five barons on any matter referred to them for decision, the verdict of the majority present shall have the same validity as a unanimous verdict of the whole twenty-five, whether these were all present or some of those summoned were unwilling or unable to appear.
The twenty-five barons shall swear to obey all the above articles faithfully, and shall cause them to be obeyed by others to the best of their power.
We will not seek to procure from anyone, either by our own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and we will at no time make use of it, either ourselves or through a third party.
Ueah, well people who reject Gods Word arent likely to care if they violate the magna carta.
The people need to throw off the illigitimate and fake king.
Look. I wish I wasn't a pedant and such a stickler for the English language, but to me words should mean what they mean. That's what words are for. Once words mean more than one thing it isn't a language anymore, it's a lottery. Ambiguity is a dangerous foe and one which makes productive discourse and good information flow take an eternity to achieve.
Now, that said I need to make it clear that no one who isn't trying to sound like some kind of Che wannabe or a teenager with sociopolitical angst should ever say the termAnarcho-tyrrany. Seriously, ugh. Just seeing it makes my mind want to vomit. There is no excuse for it conceptually. The term anarcho tyrrany is an oxymoron at its worst, and whenever I see it it makes me go "this opinion is just word salad now", regardless of whether or not it is correct. Hate to be a pedant but it really is one of my biggest bugbears.
If something is anarcho anything, it is "without rulers" . If there is one ruler it's a tyranny. if there is a small group ruling it's an oligarchy. Anarcho-tyrrany makes no sense logically as a term - a society without rulers but it has tyrant (which is in fact a group of globalist)? Yeah, that dog don't hunt. That dog is a paradox concept. It is slightly worse than these to my view:
"Civil servant" (who neither are civil nor do they actually serve anyone but themselves) ,
"fair democracy" (two wolves and a sheep decide what to have for dinner),
"honest Democrat" (excuse me, I can't breathe, I'm laughing to hard at the thought of that one even existing).
However, the concept that is being pushed as the "enemy" does have a term that is far more accurate. We should call the broken system what it actually is: a tyrranical oligarchy.
Tyrranical - unjust, oppressive, cruel.
Oligarchy - rule by a small group of elites in a society.
Calling it something else just takes away from the point to my mind.
The "anarcho" part comes from them not enforcing laws when their useful idiots commit crimes, leading to vigalantism that they use as an excuse for their tyranny.
I can't think of any better words describing the rioting, mayhem, and random murders of their imported brownshirts.
An (without) archo (rule, government). The leftist thugs are permitted by the government to be lawless. This causes an outcry from the people demanding strict control from the government (tyranny) so they can be safe. This is a tactic employed by governments that want to overthrow the liberty of the people.
The post argues that the United Kingdom and Ireland face a catastrophic breach of the social contract by insulated political elites who favor globalist immigration policies over the security of native citizens. It cites Magna Carta article 61 from 1215 as codifying the inherent right of the community to resist and reclaim sovereignty whenever government violates its oath to the realm. The text describes the resulting anarcho-tyranny in which working-class areas suffer housing and service strain from mass migration while two-tier policing suppresses domestic patriots and shields the architects of disruption. Mainstream media pathologizes normal national survival instincts yet economic and demographic data reveal the unsustainable pressure on public resources and social cohesion. The post frames the rising populist backlash across Europe from Dublin to London not as insurrection but as a legitimate defense of national survival and self-determination when elites abdicate constitutional duties.
SOURCE: https://x.com/FinalTelegraph/status/2065414092643258731 SOURCE (mirror): https://xcancel.com/FinalTelegraph/status/2065414092643258731
It’s a very good idea. The Magna Carta being, I believe the first citizens charter, outlining basic rights of the people and also restricting the power of the king (ruler).
We certainly need to have a modern version of this. Get rid of their admiralty “legal” system, legalese, barristers, lawyers and judges.
Return to common, understandable law, written in plain English, overseen by juries, appointed citizens.
Most of their law revolves around restrictions to justify wealth extraction (theft and extortion) through the creation of licenses and government approved monopolies.
Hundreds of thousands of public servants in the Western World are guilty of treason and the ongoing genocide of various cultures.
Some may be puppets, others simply indifferent or stupid, but most know exactly what damage they are causing. They must face the consequences of their actions.
This is the way forward to Salvation. Along with a new financial system floated..
Excellent post C5. This is what the long suffering men and women of the UK need to trigger. They have a legal cause to overthrow the Corrupted Governments.
Nothing new. From the declaration...
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages
No one shall be arrested or imprisoned on the appeal of a woman, for the death of anyone except her husband.
“I wonder what prompted that clause.”
Possibly the oldest profession
wrong use of the word: anarcho.
an - archo means: no hierarchy. Clearly, there is one. But, it sounds good, does it not? Spooky! Sinister ( left: for sure).
Article 61 of the Magna Carta
(FI: the 'We' here is the king, the sovereign of the nation)
(61) SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security:
The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.
If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us – or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice – to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.
Any man who so desires may take an oath to obey the commands of the twenty-five barons for the achievement of these ends, and to join with them in assailing us to the utmost of his power. We give public and free permission to take this oath to any man who so desires, and at no time will we prohibit any man from taking it. Indeed, we will compel any of our subjects who are unwilling to take it to swear it at our command.
If one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is prevented in any other way from discharging his duties, the rest of them shall choose another baron in his place, at their discretion, who shall be duly sworn in as they were.
In the event of disagreement among the twenty-five barons on any matter referred to them for decision, the verdict of the majority present shall have the same validity as a unanimous verdict of the whole twenty-five, whether these were all present or some of those summoned were unwilling or unable to appear.
The twenty-five barons shall swear to obey all the above articles faithfully, and shall cause them to be obeyed by others to the best of their power.
We will not seek to procure from anyone, either by our own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and we will at no time make use of it, either ourselves or through a third party.
Ueah, well people who reject Gods Word arent likely to care if they violate the magna carta. The people need to throw off the illigitimate and fake king.
Look. I wish I wasn't a pedant and such a stickler for the English language, but to me words should mean what they mean. That's what words are for. Once words mean more than one thing it isn't a language anymore, it's a lottery. Ambiguity is a dangerous foe and one which makes productive discourse and good information flow take an eternity to achieve.
Now, that said I need to make it clear that no one who isn't trying to sound like some kind of Che wannabe or a teenager with sociopolitical angst should ever say the term Anarcho-tyrrany. Seriously, ugh. Just seeing it makes my mind want to vomit. There is no excuse for it conceptually. The term anarcho tyrrany is an oxymoron at its worst, and whenever I see it it makes me go "this opinion is just word salad now", regardless of whether or not it is correct. Hate to be a pedant but it really is one of my biggest bugbears.
If something is anarcho anything, it is "without rulers" . If there is one ruler it's a tyranny. if there is a small group ruling it's an oligarchy. Anarcho-tyrrany makes no sense logically as a term - a society without rulers but it has tyrant (which is in fact a group of globalist)? Yeah, that dog don't hunt. That dog is a paradox concept. It is slightly worse than these to my view:
However, the concept that is being pushed as the "enemy" does have a term that is far more accurate. We should call the broken system what it actually is: a tyrranical oligarchy.
Tyrranical - unjust, oppressive, cruel.
Oligarchy - rule by a small group of elites in a society.
Calling it something else just takes away from the point to my mind.
The "anarcho" part comes from them not enforcing laws when their useful idiots commit crimes, leading to vigalantism that they use as an excuse for their tyranny.
I can't think of any better words describing the rioting, mayhem, and random murders of their imported brownshirts.
Yeah!!!! If violates that shit!!!!!!!!
Okay, now what.
An (without) archo (rule, government). The leftist thugs are permitted by the government to be lawless. This causes an outcry from the people demanding strict control from the government (tyranny) so they can be safe. This is a tactic employed by governments that want to overthrow the liberty of the people.